South Dakota School of Mines and Technology

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
3 rd Generation SunSaver. SunSaver Generation 3 Legacy Design: Same Size Controller Same Amp and Voltage Ratings Same Mounting Plates Same Easy Battery.
Advertisements

Www. otis.com. An Innovation for the New Millennium.
Malte Marko Daniel MacDonald Stephen Thomas Matthew Gleddie
E Light UTV Safety Training
University of Buffalo, SUNY 2005 SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge.
Getting to Know Your Vehicle
Snowmobile Rear Drive Neil Miller Chris Hill Jeremy Nichols.
Michigan Tech’s E-Rush Presented by: Terry Gregoricka Adrienne Piron.
Wendigo 2014 – An Arctic and Antarctic Snowmobile Presented by Cyrille Goldstein Dante Filice March 6, 2014 McGill Electric Snowmobile Team.
SAE CLEAN SNOWMOBILE CHALLENGE (CSC) 2015 Team IUPUI
UAF Bristol Bay Campus Design of a meaningful Snuukuuq Frank Nicholson, Ryan Giordano, Tiarna Bartman, University Alaska Fairbanks - Bristol Bay Campus.
University of New Hampshire Clean Snowmobile Challenge 2006.
Direct Solution Design review Stake Holders  Sponsor: NIATT  Client: Karen DenBraven  Customer: UI CSC Team, Competition judges,
Direct Solution Design review Stake Holders  Sponsor: NIATT  Client: Karen DenBraven  Customer: UI CSC Team, Competition judges,
Motor Coupling Design Review The 2004 Idaho Future Truck needs a system to couple the AC induction motor to the power train. + = Motor Future Truck Happy.
Design of Electric Snowmobile
South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Electric Snowmobile Team 2015.
1 Presenters: Ozzie Goodman Zak Parker. Design Objectives  Create Efficient Snowmobile Fueled by 16%-32% Isobutanol  Emissions Reductions  Noise 
North Dakota State University Ross Larson Justin Omdalen.
Wobel Paper Company Delivery Car Possibilities. The Environmentally Efficient Choice.
University of Wisconsin - Platteville 2014 Clean Snowmobile Team
Powertrain for RIT EV Team TT- Zero Race Bike R12900 Sean Harriman 5/20/2012.
Page 1 May 2010 © Siemens AG 2010 Industry / Drive Technologies Innovative Hybrid Drive Systems for Commercial Vehicles Industry – Drive Technologies Innovative.
Presented by: Ashley Kelly Nathan Hansen Utah State University Electric Snowmobile Team.
By Heather Sykes and Don Fox. The product Custom print shirts. Selling for about 15 to 20 dollars a shirt.
Senior Design Spring 2015 Lindsay Sullivan Emily Simonelli Taniya Singh United Illuminating in Orange, CT 1/21/2015 1/22/2014 Copyright © 2014 – Advanced.
Basic Utility Vehicle (BUV) ME 462 Capstone Design Presentation Department of Mechanical Engineering, IUPUI December 14, 2005 Presented by: Tom Peters.
Minnesota State University, Mankato X treme  AET Program  1989  TAC-ABET Accredited  140 Majors  The Team  Seven Seniors  Ten Undergraduates 
Proposed Dewbot V Chassis Clem McKown Team 1640 December 21, 2008.
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge  Design Goals  Specifications  Snowmobile Modifications  Drive System  Battery choice  Maintenance  Conclusion.
Suspension D.J. Conroy.
2005 Michigan Tech Clean Snowmobile Greg Davis David Meyer Advisor: Dr. Bernhard Bettig Incorporation of a High Performance, Four-Cylinder, Four-Stroke.
Ability to operate on US Highway Rating = 3 More than likely will not be transported on a US highway (will be carried in another vehicle) More off road.
Electric Motorcycle Proposal John J. Romano Carleton B. Simpson Advisor: Dr. Allen Drake 28 September 2011.
SDSMT Zero Emissions Snowmobile Bennett Prosser, Kyle Roe.
● Wendigo Project ● Fully Electric Sled. Our Goals Eliminate emmisions Data Acquisition Improve Efficiency Reduce Environmental Impact.
Designing Robots How to make a stable robot! Much of the information in this power point is from Winning Design! By James J. Trobaugh.
Michigan Technological University Clean Snowmobile Enterprise Adrienne PironEthan Hill Zero Emissions Team.
North Dakota State Clean Snowmobile Challenge Presented by: Steve Miller Danika Gieske Advisor: Dr. Robert Pieri.
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge  Design Goals  Specifications  Ergonomics and Emissions  Drive System  Motor/Motor Controller  Battery choice.
Hybrid Electric Vehicles
E Bike & E Cruising Published By:
University of Wisconsin-Platteville
Innovations in Zero Emissions Snowmobile Technology
SAE CLEAN SNOWMOBILE CHALLENGE (CSC) 2016 Team IUPUI
University of Wisconsin Platteville 2017 CSC Diesel Team
ELECTRONIC THROTTLE CONTROL SYSTEM
Dallas Streetcar & TOD - Bishop Arts
Part The smallest removable item on a car Not normally disassembled
University of Wisconsin - Platteville 2017 Clean Snowmobile Team
Clarkson University Electric Knights E54
Spring Water Awareness Program 2013
SAE Baja Senior Design Project
Mohammed Allahyani, Khalid Alghamdi, Yu Sun, James Sigler
4.0 Markets and Applications
South Dakota School of Mines and Technology
Studio 5. Need Analysis Summer 2017 GE105
Chapter 14 Cooling System.
Who We Are Samuel Wick – President Blake Thurnbeck – Engine Packaging
SAE Baja Senior Design Project
University of Wisconsin-Platteville Clean Snowmobile
2017 University of Waterloo E62 Clean Snowmobile
ECE 477 Final Presentation Team 10  Spring 2008
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge Presentation
University of Wisconsin-Platteville CSC CI Team
University of Wisconsin – Platteville 2019 SI Snowmobile Team
SAE Clean Snowmobile Challenge
Motor Cart with Dolly Hoist
Dash Warning Lights and Driver Information Systems
CLASS® Compressible Liquid Adaptive Suspension System
Presentation transcript:

South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Electric Snowmobile Team 2016

Overview Who we are System Overview Usability, Functionality, and Performance Dealer Benefits and Maintenance Environmental Impacts

Who we are Student Organization on campus, open to all students Main focus is to design and build electric snowmobile Comprised of ME and EE undergrad students 2015 SDSMT Electric Snowmobile Team

System Overview 2014 Polaris Switchback Assault 6 Brammo BPM 15/90 Li-ion battery modules 88.8 VDC, 90 Ah, 7.99 kWh Internal heaters keep at optimum temperature in cold conditions Sevcon Gen4 motor controller Parker-Brammo GVM1425 liquid cooled motor 54 hp, 60lb*ft Direct Drive Modular component design Talk about the general specs of the snowmobile and what we had to change from the original snowmobile. Don’t be afraid to spend some time talking over the SolidWorks Image on this page to point out the components we made. SolidWorks Concept of modular assembly

Usability and Functionality Functions like a traditional snowmobile Controls all carried over from stock Easy to read GPS speedometer/location/mapping Bright LED status lights on dash Crossover chassis – versatility Hard-packed snow and deep snow capability Storage space on tunnel Comfortable seating and standing positions Mention that all controls are where they would normally be on a conventional snowmobile. Talk about the display and what was used to make it (R-Pi w/ open source Navit software, Arduino LCD) A crossover snowmobile has characteristics that make it good in a varying terrains, it can handle groomed trails just as well as deep snow. In my experience, this snowmobile is way more comfortable to sit on than my own 2004 Polaris RMK, just my opinion. LCD display on Dashboard

Performance Top Speed – 40 mph Range – Testing indicates 20-25 miles Weight ~ 620lb Charge time ~ 8 hours from 0% to 100% Rear suspension optimization for improved handling and bump/jump capability Maybe mention gearing here and how it was selected to optimize efficiency during the range test at comp while still giving us a reasonable top speed. Mention that I put around 200 miles worth of testing on it during December and January, plus whatever else you guys did. Maybe mention your towing the old heavy sled uphill with a rider on it? If asked, the rear suspension was designed by a Senior Design team that all graduated in December. The purpose was to use geometry to alter the roll center so the skis would not lift under acceleration. We also increased spring rates to improve load handling and impact handling abilities. IT ACTUALLY WORKED! If anyone comments or notices that the orange arm isn’t in there anymore, tell them it was removed to because it was a reliability concern for competition. (It was a first draft prototype after all) Suspension testing

Dealer Benefits and Maintenance Aluminum containers provide strong structures to protect sensitive electronics Modular battery container and motor compartment Easy to remove/replace as needed Easy access to perform repairs inside compartments if needed Minimal routine maintenance Diagnostic software – plug and play with PC to view system data Cost – initially high due to use of high-end components Improved performance, range, reliability Emphasize how easy it would be for dealers to service The containers are easy to access for trained personnel and can be removed easily too if need-be. The only annual maintenance would be to change the chain case oil and check coolant levels. If you read the design paper, remember my comments about the Ford Focus Electric in terms of cost. Emphasize that we are pushing performance and quality over cost. This is a one-off prototype, so they need to keep that in mind. Modular motor and motor controller mount

Environmental Impacts Light weight and long track help prevent treading on potentially delicate ground Quiet operation – only noise from drive-belt <80 dB at top speed No noise while ‘idling’ Zero source emissions Fairly self explanatory. Maybe mention Yellowstone and the delicate-ness of the polar ice caps. It should be much quieter with the new belt, maybe use a phone app to get a better dB #, but mention how much more comfortable it is to a rider having an almost silent machine to enjoy the wilderness with. I personally loved having the silent sled versus my obnoxiously loud one. Frozen landscape of the Black Hills in South Dakota Photo: Bennett Prosser

Summary Who we are System overview Usability and functionality Dealer benefits and maintenance Environmental impacts

Questions?