The Pew Charitable Trusts

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DC Responses Received WA OR ID MT WY CA NV UT CO AZ NM AK HI TX ND SD NE KS OK MN IA MO AR LA WI IL MI IN OH KY TN MS AL GA FL SC NC VA WV PA NY VT NH.
Advertisements

Background Information on the Newspoets Total Number: 78 active newspoets. 26 (of the original 36) newspoets from returned this year.
2014 NASACT ANNUAL CONFERENCE Stan Czerwinski State Fiscal Pressures 1.
IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE PEW CHARITABLE TRUSTS CHILDREN’S DENTAL CAMPAIGN Dental Access Project Moving forward for those in need of dental care Amy Zaagman.
MD VT MA NH DC CT NJ RI DE WA
Medicaid Enrollment of New Eligibles in Expansion States, by Party Affiliation of Governor New Eligibles as a Percent of Total Medicaid Enrollment, FY.
Josh Goodman Research Officer The Pew Charitable Trusts 5/12/2017
House Price
WA OR ID MT ND WY NV 23% CA UT AZ NM 28% KS NE MN MO WI TX 31% IA IL
Medicaid Enrollment of New Eligibles in Expansion States, by Party Affiliation of Governor New Eligibles as a Percent of Total Medicaid Enrollment, as.
Medicaid Enrollment of New Eligibles in Expansion States, by Party Affiliation of Governor New Eligibles as a Percent of Total Medicaid Enrollment, as.
House price index for AK
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
The State of the States Cindy Mann Center for Children and Families
Medicaid Costs are Shared by the States and the Federal Government
Expansion states with Republican governors outnumber expansion states with Democratic governors, May 2018 WY WI WV◊ WA VA^ VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK.
Expansion states with Republican governors outnumber expansion states with Democratic governors, January WY WI WV◊ WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA.
Share of Births Covered by Medicaid, 2006
Non-Citizen Population, by State, 2011
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Share of Women Ages 18 – 64 Who Are Uninsured, by State,
Executive Activity on the Medicaid Expansion Decision, May 9, 2013
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA1 OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH2
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA OR OK OH1 ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
WY WI WV WA VA* VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Mobility Update and Discussion as of March 25, 2008
Current Status of the Medicaid Expansion Decision, as of May 30, 2013
IAH CONVERSION: ELIGIBLE BENEFICIARIES BY STATE
WAHBE Brokers / QHPs across the country as of
619 Involvement in State SSIPs
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2015
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2018
HHGM CASE WEIGHTS Early/Late Mix (Weighted Average)
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Status of State Participation in Medicaid Expansion, as of March 2014
States including governance in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including governance in their SSIP improvement.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
10% of nonelderly uninsured 26% of nonelderly uninsured
22% of nonelderly uninsured 10% of nonelderly uninsured
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2017
(map is coded by CAE-CD region)
S Co-Sponsors by State – May 23, 2014
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Seventeen States Had Higher Uninsured Rates Than the National Average in 2013; Of Those, 11 Have Yet to Expand Eligibility for Medicaid AK NH WA VT ME.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Average annual growth rate
Percent of Children Ages 0–17 Uninsured by State
Executive Activity on the Medicaid Expansion Decision, May 9, 2013
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
How State Policies Limiting Abortion Coverage Changed Over Time
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Percent of Adults Ages 18–64 Uninsured by State
States including quality standards in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including quality standards in their SSIP.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
10% of nonelderly uninsured 26% of nonelderly uninsured
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Ashleigh Holand, Manager-State Policy
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
States including their fiscal systems in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including their fiscal systems in their.
Current Status of State Individual Marketplace and Medicaid Expansion Decisions, as of September 30, 2013 WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
22% of nonelderly uninsured 10% of nonelderly uninsured
Presentation transcript:

cpearson@pewtrusts.org The Pew Charitable Trusts How States Are Improving Tax Incentives for Jobs and Growth Georgia Special Tax Exemption Study Committee Chaaron Pearson cpearson@pewtrusts.org The Pew Charitable Trusts 7/18/2017

www.pewtrusts.org/taxincentives

Why evaluate tax incentives Tax incentives are one of states’ primary economic development tools Tax incentives collectively cost states billions of dollars per year Evaluation is a proven way to improve the effectiveness of incentives Evaluations can lead to a more constructive conversation about incentives

Year evaluation laws were adopted in states that are “leading” or “making progress” WA ME ND MN OR WI IA HI NE OH IN NH RI CT MD DC UT VA CO MO TN OK MS AL Pre-2014 2014 2015 2016 TX LA FL

Three steps to effective evaluation Step 1: Make a plan Step 2: Measure the impact Step 3: Inform policy choices

State tax incentive evaluation ratings

Make a plan: Who evaluates in states that are “leading” or “making progress” WA ME ND MN OR WI IA HI NE OH IN NH RI CT MD DC CO UT VA MO TN OK MS AL Executive branch agency TX LA Independent agency FL Legislative staff Legislators themselves Outside experts

Make a plan: Developing a strategic schedule Include all major incentives Use a rotating multi-year cycle Study incentives with similar goals in the same year Coordinate evaluations with sunset dates

Measure the impact: High-quality evaluations include… A description of the incentive, its history, and goals An assessment of the incentive’s design and administration An estimate of the incentive’s economic and fiscal impact Policy recommendations

Evaluation example: Indiana

Evaluation example: Alabama

Evaluation example: Minnesota

Options to inform policy choices Create new legislative committees Utilize existing committee structure Require the governor to make recommendations after evaluations Establish expiration dates on incentives to encourage review

With evaluations, states can… Make subtle changes to incentives to increase their return on investment Identify programs that are working well, so that the state can invest in them with confidence Repeal or replace ineffective or obsolete incentives

Chaaron Pearson Senior Manager, The Pew Charitable Trusts cpearson@pewtrusts.org