Norwegian practice - new research

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Flood handling and emergency action planning for dams Dr.ing.thesisby Grethe Holm Midttømme GHM SEPT 2002.
Advertisements

Stability and Failure Mechanisms of Dams A dam safety research project Kjetil Arne Vaskinn.
Frequencies Estimation Ricki M Mulia, ST. MSc. Unsafe Act Unsafe Condition HAZARD EXPOSURE Penyakit Akibat kerja RISK Kecelakaan kerja Higiene Industri.
Sharif University of Technology Civil Engineering Department Tehran-Iran Dam Safety An Approach to Prevent Dam Incidents.
Tailing Dams – A Consultants Perspective
John Hunyadi, P.E. Dam Safety Engineer General Orientation on Dams Classification, Terminology, Types of Construction, etc.
1 Risk evaluation Risk treatment. 2 Risk Management Process Risk Management Process.
Title slide PIPELINE QRA SEMINAR. PIPELINE RISK ASSESSMENT INTRODUCTION TO RISK IDENTIFICATION 2.
Tony Gould Quality Risk Management. 2 | PQ Workshop, Abu Dhabi | October 2010 Introduction Risk management is not new – we do it informally all the time.
Annex I: Methods & Tools prepared by some members of the ICH Q9 EWG for example only; not an official policy/guidance July 2006, slide 1 ICH Q9 QUALITY.
ICH Q9: Quality Risk Management
Quality Risk Management ICH Q9 Annex I: Methods & Tools
1. Session structure Overview Example definition Actions Example output Challenges Exercises Module 3 Identify hazards and assess risks 2.
OHS Risk Management - Overview Risk management is a system that allows workplaces to identify OHS issues and to methodically control them by the best means.
“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions Risk modeling.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration San Bruno – Lessons Learned Alan K. Mayberry, P.E. Deputy Associate.
Dam Hazard Consequences Assessment
Engineering Risk Assessments and Risk Communication Sarah Arulanandam, Hazard and Risk Group RWDI West Inc. DISCLOSURE OF MATERIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURES:
“ Building Strong “ Delivering Integrated, Sustainable, Water Resources Solutions 1 What is Engineering Risk and Reliability? Why We Use It? Robert C.
Industry & Research: Issues, needs and conclusions from the US IMPACT Investigation of Extreme Flood Processes & Uncertainty Workshop at HR Wallingford,
2013 NWHA CONFERENCE FERC’S RISK-INFORMED DECISION MAKING Doug Johnson – Regional Engineer - Portland From PFMA to Risk Assessment.
9 th Workshop on European Collaboration for Higher Education and Research in Nuclear Engineering & Radiological Protection Salamanca, Spain 5-7 June 2013.
Reducing the Risk of Embankment Failure Under Extreme Conditions Mark Morris HR Wallingford IMPACT Project Workshop Wallingford, 17 May 2002.
Water Resource Management Company (WRM) Ministry of Energy Iranian Approach to Dam Safety - Practice - Achievements - Future plans.
Centre for Climate Science and Policy Research Centrum för klimatpolitisk forskning Vulnerability Assessments A Vulnerability Assessment is the process.
IMPACT 3-5th November 20044th IMPACT Project Workshop Zaragoza 1 Investigation of extreme flood Processes and uncertainty IMPACT Investigation of Extreme.
IMPACT 3-5th November 20044th IMPACT Project Workshop Zaragoza 1 Investigation of extreme flood Processes and uncertainty IMPACT Investigation of Extreme.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Overview of Risk Approach to Manage USACE Dam and Levee Safety Program The Reality of Risk: Dam Safety in.
RISK MANAGEMENT YULVI. Introduction Time Quality Cost Project Constraints Success Introduction.
RLV Reliability Analysis Guidelines Terry Hardy AST-300/Systems Engineering and Training Division October 26, 2004.
Embankment Dam and Spillway Relative Risk Procedures (for Asset Management/Maintenance) Luc Chouinard – McGill University.
Mountain Risks: A Marie Curie Research & Training Network J. Corominas and the ‘Mountain-Risks’ research team Department of Geotechnical Engineering.
ON “SOFTWARE ENGINEERING” SUBJECT TOPIC “RISK ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT” MASTER OF COMPUTER APPLICATION (5th Semester) Presented by: ANOOP GANGWAR SRMSCET,
Towards a robust transportation infrastructure to respond extreme weather events in Norway Project manager Bjørn Kristoffer Dolva, 2016 International Partnership.
Module 3 Identify hazards and assess risks
Assessment of hydropower system safety using a systems approach and dynamic resilience June 27, 2017 Civil and Environmental Engineering.
NASA OSMA SAS '02 Software Fault Tree Analysis Dolores R. Wallace SRS Information Services Software Assurance Technology Center
BSR Risk Management Capability Assessment Methodology
EM&V Framework Refresh Needs Assessment
PRA: Validation versus Participation in Risk Analysis PRA as a Risk Informed Decision Making Tool Richard T. Banke– SAIC
Update on WHO and TFH activities
2) Methodology Research instrument:
Implementation of Connection Codes in Norway
Kick-off Conference “Risk Management for
Quality Risk Management
Flood damage survey after major flood in Norway cooperation between the insurance business and a government agency Hallvard Berg, Norwegian Water.
Risk Ranking and Filtering and Its Role in Risk Management
Implementation of Connection Codes in Norway
Seminar on Land Use Planning 24 September – Nicosia Summary
Hazard and Vulnerability Assessment
Quantitative Risk Assessment
Risk-informed Decision Making under Incomplete Information
Finnish Case Study: Bayesian Network Modelling
Joint Research Centre The European Commission’s in-house science service.
Regulatory Oversight of HOF in Finland
ICH Q9: Quality Risk Management
ICH Q9: Quality Risk Management
Pathway Risk Analysis: NAPPO RSPM 31 (2012)
CIS progress June-November 2011: main highlights
Critically reviewing the literature
2nd IMPACT Workshop Mo i Rana, Norway 12/13th Septemper 2002
Anja S. Ibrekk Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate
BHOPAL Industrial Disaster Management Cycle: OECD 2004.
Main recommendations & conclusions (1)
Implementation of Connection Codes in Norway
Project Risk Management Jiwei Ma
Review and comparison of the modeling approaches and risk analysis methods for complex ship system. Author: Sunil Basnet.
And now the Framework WP4.
ONAP Risk Assessment – Preparation Material - Overview of the Process - Terminology - Assumptions
Critically reviewing the literature
Presentation transcript:

Norwegian practice - new research 2nd IMPACT WORKSHOP, Mo i Rana, Sept. 2002 Risk analysis Norwegian practice - new research by Grethe Holm Midttømme The Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate (NVE) Photo: NVE

The Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate (NVE)

Development of RA for dams in Norway - brief overview Norwegian practice Development of RA for dams in Norway - brief overview 1987: First project initiated by NVE and EBL (RA for 2 dams) 1987-1995: A few projects on RA for dams, spillway gates and penstocks, among others a project on estimation and comparison of the probability of failure in large rockfill dams using event trees (Johansen et al. 1997, Hydropower’97) 1995 - 2002: Several risk analyses performed, mostly probabilistic event tree analyses, e.g. RA of the rockfill dam Valldalen (Funnemark et al. 2000, Q.76, ICOLD congress Beijing) Very few analyses include consequence analyses, i.e. assessment of probability of failure is emphasized G.H.Midttømme - 2nd IMPACT WORKSHOP, Mo i Rana, Sept. 2002

Development of RA for dams in Norway - brief overview (continued) Norwegian practice Development of RA for dams in Norway - brief overview (continued) In general: Dam owners seem to use PRA’s mainly as a systematic way of identifying deficiencies and ranking safety improvements, e.g. as part of a dam safety reassessment PRA methodology usually include: site inspections, hazard identification, construction of event trees, probability assessment (statistics and engineering judgment) and evaluation of results A method for consequence analysis adapted to Norwegian conditions has been developed (Funnemark et al. 1998, ICOLD European Symposium on Dam Safety in Barcelona 1998) G.H.Midttømme - 2nd IMPACT WORKSHOP, Mo i Rana, Sept. 2002

Regulations and guidelines Norwegian practice Regulations and guidelines Revision of the first dam safety guidelines (1981) included a working group on risk analysis and emergency action planning 1997: Guidelines on application of RA for dams (NVE) 1999: Guidelines on the use of PHA for emergency planning (EBL) 2001: New regulations on dam safety (§2.8 - NVE may demand risk analyses conducted by the responsible dam owner) 2001: Practical guidelines describing how to perform event tree and fault tree analyses (EBL) NVE-guidelines issued in 1997 describes only what kind of RA-methods are available and when RA are relevant to use. G.H.Midttømme - 2nd IMPACT WORKSHOP, Mo i Rana, Sept. 2002

Regulations and guidelines (continued) Norwegian practice Regulations and guidelines (continued) There are plans for developing new guidelines on application of RA (NVE) -> focus will probably be on qualitative methods and analyses for EAP Planned ICOLD-bulletin on Risk Assessment in Dam Safety Management and ongoing projects related to risk analysis will be looked at NVE-guidelines issued in 1997 describes only what kind of RA-methods are available and when RA are relevant to use. G.H.Midttømme - 2nd IMPACT WORKSHOP, Mo i Rana, Sept. 2002

New research Recent dr.ing. studies at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim Hilde Marie Kjellesvig: Dam Safety - The Passage of Floods that Exceed the Design Flood, Thesis published July 2002 Parts of the research work has been done in close cooperation with the project ”Stability and Breaching of Embankment Dams” Grethe Holm Midttømme: Flood Handling and Emergency Action Planning for Dams, June 2002 G.H.Midttømme - 2nd IMPACT WORKSHOP, Mo i Rana, Sept. 2002