Asian Dust Episode (4/26/2001)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NESCAUM-MA Mapping Project: Example Maps. Translation Operations Gridding – Point-to-grind extrapolation –Standard 1/r2; declustering; Krieging (independent.
Advertisements

1 Dust Impacts on the 20% Worst Visibility Days Vic Etyemezian, David Dubois, Mark Green, and Jin Xu.
Kari Murray.  This article is extending on a 10-year climatological study done by Rose et al.  Rose et al. found that tornadoes most commonly occur.
1 The Asian Aerosol Contribution to North American PM Pollution: Recognizing Asian Transport Composition and Concentration Modeling Regional Aerosol Burdens.
BRAVO - Results Big Bend Regional Aerosol & Visibility Observational Study Bret Schichtel National Park Service,
Radiative Effects of Atmospheric Aerosols and Regional Haze Jin Xu DAS Science Talk February 17, 2004.
IMPROVE Report 2006 L. Debell, K. Gebhart, B. Schichtel and W. Malm.
BACKGROUND AEROSOL CONCENTRATIONS AND VISIBILITY DEGRADATION IN THE UNITED STATES Rokjin Park Motivated by EPA Regional Haze Rule Quantifying uncontrollable.
The August 2001 Western US Wildfire Episode 44 sites in the WRAP region experienced the worst 20% day on August 17. Most of August experienced heavy OC.
Springtime Airmass Transport Pathways to the US Prepared by: Rudolf B. Husar and Bret Schichtel CAPITACAPITA,Washington University, Saint Louis, Missouri.
Chapter 10 – Midlatitude Cyclones. The Origin of the Theory of Midlatitude Cyclones The polar front theory (Norwegian cyclone model) – description of.
MSC 118, 2/12/14. Prof. Sharan Majumdar.
Wind Blown Dust Monitoring and Modeling at Owens Lake, CA Duane Ono Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District July 2004 WRAP Dust Emissions Joint.
April 22, 2001 Dust Episode 20% worst for three sites in West Texas and Mid South Region Worst day for Bext at GUMO 20% best day for several sites in UT,
CAPITA CAPITA PM and Ozone Analysis A. PM2.5 National Maps B. Visibility (PM2.5) trends C. Natural (out of EPA jurisdiction) Events D. US-Canada Ozone.
The Perfect Dust Storm From Gobi to the Atlantic and on to … An evolving presentation by a virtual community. Would you like add to this presentation?
Colorado Plateau Sulfate Episode Worst 20% at 5 sites: INGA, BRCA, MEVE, WEMI & SAPE Best 20% at GICL, SACR, CHIR, SIAN, GUMO, TONT, and most California.
Sources and Processes Affecting the Chemical and Physical Properties of Denver Aerosol during DISCOVER-AQ FRAPPÉ/DISCOVER-AQ Science Team Meeting 4 May.
Causes of Haze Assessment Mark Green, Dave DuBois, Jin Xiu, and Dan Freeman Desert Research Institute Marc Pitchford, NOAA and WRAP Monitoring Forum Chair.
Aerosol Extinction Assessment and Impact on Regional Haze Rule Implementation Douglas Lowenthal Desert Research Institute Pat Ryan Sonoma Technology, Inc.
The Asian Dust Events of April 1998 Prepared by: R. B. Husar, D. Tratt, B. A. Schichtel, S. R. Falke, F. Li D. Jaffe, S. Gassó, T. Gill, N. S. Laulainen,
Update on IMPROVE Light Extinction Equation and Natural Conditions Estimates Tom Moore, WRAP Technical Coordinator May 23, 2006.
Causes of Haze Update Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the 5/24/05 AoH conference call.
Guided Notes for Weather Systems
Regional Haze Rule Reasonable Progress Goals I.Overview II.Complications III.Simplifying Approaches Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the WRAP Reasonable.
MANE-VU states, Virginia and West Virginia Regional Haze Trend Analyses Latest available (December 2011) IMPROVE DATA (for TSC 5/22/2012) Tom.
Global Distribution and Transport of Air Pollution Presented at The Haagen-Smit Symposium: From Los Angeles to Global Air Pollution Lake Arrowhead, April.
Causes of Haze Assessment (COHA) Update. Current and near-future Major Tasks Visibility trends analysis Assess meteorological representativeness of 2002.
Influence of the Asian Dust to the Air Quality in US During the spring season, the desert regions in Mongolia and China, especially Gobi desert in Northwest.
Draft, 2 June NATURAL HAZE LEVELS SENSITIVITY ASSESSMENT 1. Project Overview Ivar Tombach Regional Haze Data Analysis Workshop 8 June 2005.
AoH Conference Call October 8, 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
June 4, 2004 – Tucson Dust Community Analysis PPT Please add your content by downloading this PPT, and returning to
The Asian Dust Events of April 1998 Prepared by: R. B. Husar, D. Tratt, B. A. Schichtel, S. R. Falke, F. Li D. Jaffe, S. Gassó, T. Gill, N. S. Laulainen,
OVERVIEW OF ATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES: Daniel J. Jacob Ozone and particulate matter (PM) with a global change perspective.
Global and Local Dust over North America Initial Assessment by a Virtual Community on Dust Coordinated by R.
Support by Inter-RPO WG - NESCAUM Performed by CAPITA & Sonoma Technology, Inc F ast A erosol S ensing T ools for N atural E vent T racking FASTNET Project.
Update on Assessment of the Major Causes of Dust-Resultant Haze in the WRAP Vic Etyemezian, Jin Xu, Dave Dubois, and Mark Green.
WORKSHOP ON CLIMATE CHANGE AND AIR QUALITY : part I: Intercontinental transport and climatic effects of pollutants OBJECTIVE: Define a near-term (-2003)
Ambient Monitoring & Reporting Forum Plans for 2005 Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the WRAP Planning Team Meeting (3/9 – 3/10/05)
WRAP RMC Phase II Wind Blown Dust Project Results & Status ENVIRON International Corporation and University of California, Riverside Dust Emission Joint.
Transpacific transport of anthropogenic aerosols and implications for North American air quality EGU, Vienna April 27, 2005 Colette Heald, Daniel Jacob,
Observations Complex mixture of contributors to 20% worst Many 20% worst extinction days at many sites Sulfate episodes in Midwest, SE and SW Soil.
Ambient Monitoring Data Summary: Dust WRAP Workshop on Fire, Carbon, and Dust May 24, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Accelerator Based Techniques for Air Pollution Studies Across Asia David Cohen, ANSTO, Sydney, Australia
Chapter 14: Cold Waves Formation of Cold Airmasses Cold Air Outbreak.
Global Winds, Jet Stream, Gulf Stream, and El Nino
Local Winds, Global Winds and The Jet Streams
Weather Patterns and Climate Bates
Local Winds, Global Winds and The Jet Streams
Reasonable Progress Demonstrations
Water and the Atmosphere – Chapter 4 Lesson 4
ATMOSPHERIC AEROSOL: suspension of condensed-phase particles in air
The average PM2.5 mass concentration based on IMPROVE data available from September 2000 to December 2002 is 3.3 mg/m3 The highest occurrence of the 20%
Climate Factors.
Reasonable Progress: Chiricahua NM & Wilderness Area
Contribution of Dust to Regional Haze Based on Available IMPROVE Data From (Provided by Marc Pitchford (NOAA) and Jin Xu (DRI), 01/14/04) Mean.
Asian Dust Episode (4/16/2001)
Chapter 12-Meteorology.
2006 Prentice Hall Science Explorer-Earth Science
PM2.5 Annual primary standard currently 15 ug/m3
TAF Regional Haze Plan Update
WRAP Regional Modeling Center (RMC)
New CoHA Product Access Page & Representativeness Analysis
Arizona Local (Regional) Dust Episode ?
Paved and Unpaved Road Dust
Contribution of Dust to Regional Haze Based on Available IMPROVE Data From (Provided by Marc Pitchford (NOAA) and Jin Xu (DRI), 01/14/04) Mean.
Sulfate Contributions to Regional Haze in the WRAP Region
Attribution of Haze Project Update
Extratropical Cyclones Forming East of the Rocky Mountains
Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Presentation transcript:

Asian Dust Episode (4/26/2001)

Origin of the Asian Dust Strong low pressure system sitting in northeast Mongolia caused surface wind speeds to be as high as ~30 m/s

Transport of the Asian dust to the United States The common weather conditions are usually associated with the upper low pressure trough / cut-ff low and surface low pressure system (low formed by a strong cyclonic vortex) over northeast China and north Korea [Kim et al., 2002]. Under this weather conditions, Asian dust can move fast along the zonal wind distribution due to the jet streak [Kim et al., 2002].

Large Area Regional Haze on April 16, 2001 45 of the 68 WRAP IMPROVE monitoring sites were in 20% worst case days of the year 2001. For the sites that were 20% worst case days, the average contribution of fine soil to PM2.5 is ~60% (with a standard deviation of 13%), and dusts (fine soil and coarse mass) contributed in average ~ 46% (S.D. 13%) to the aerosol light extinction. The average contribution of fine soil to PM2.5 is ~54%, and to aerosol light extinction is ~41% for all WRAP sites on April 16, 2001.

GOES View of the Dust Streak Across N. America, April 17 GOES10 (West) view of dust streak on the morning of April 17 GOES8 (East) view of dust streak on the evening of April 17

Arizona Regional Dust Episode

Annual Percentile of Bext, OC, FS and CM on 10/16/2001

Weather Condition Before the Sampling Day

Transport of the Dusts