Face-to-Face Meeting Semantic Web for Healthcare and Life Sciences Interest Group http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/hcls/ W3C HCLS chairs, Eric Neumann - Clinical.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Using Ontologies in Clinical Decision Support Applications Samson W. Tu Stanford Medical Informatics Stanford University.
Advertisements

1 Intermountain Healthcare Clinical Genetics Institute Marc S. Williams, M.D. Director Grant M. Wood Senior IT Strategist Introduction to HL7 Clinical.
Joint TC Meeting: EHR – RCRIM RCRIM Overview HL7 Working Group Meeting January, 2007 Presented by: Ed Tripp Program Director, eSubmissions Abbott (RCRIM.
COI Architecture? Web Enabling Standard Patient-Model Searches in Disparate EMR Systems By Dan CorwinDan Corwin November 2007.
Convergence Workshop, March 2013 The goals and expected outputs of the convergence initiative Dipak Kalra EuroRec.
RDB2RDF: Incorporating Domain Semantics in Structured Data Satya S. Sahoo Kno.e.sis CenterKno.e.sis Center, Computer Science and Engineering Department,
“Service Framework” workgroup
The Open Innovation Center Susie Stephens, Principal Research Scientist, Eli Lilly.
EDUCATIONAL CURRICULUM IN TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH Panel Session Goals:  To discuss how CTSA training programs currently prepare clinical and translational.
Coordinating data interoperability – a W3C perspective M. Scott Marshall, Ph.D. W3C HCLS IG co-chair Leiden University Medical Center University of Amsterdam.
Open Library Environment Designing technology for the way libraries really work November 19, 2008 ~ ASERL, Atlanta Lynne O’Brien Director, Academic Technology.
Thee-Framework for Education & Research The e-Framework for Education & Research an Overview TEN Competence, Jan 2007 Bill Olivier,
Query Health Business Working Group Kick-Off September 8, 2011.
1 Open Library Environment Designing technology for the way libraries really work December 8, 2008 ~ CNI, Washington DC Lynne O’Brien Director, Academic.
EHR Integration – Project Charter slide 1 Goals  Support specification of the already started service specification within HL7 RCRIM –going to ballot.
revised CmpE 583 Fall 2006Discussion: OWL- 1 CmpE 583- Web Semantics: Theory and Practice DISCUSSION: OWL Atilla ELÇİ Computer Engineering.
Introduction to Pharmacoinformatics
Advancing translational research with the Semantic Web Ruttenberg, Clark, Bug, Samwald, Bodenreider, Chen, Doherty, Forsberg, Gao, Kashyap, Kinoshita,
Business Value of SW in Drug Discovery Eric Neumann, W3C HCLSIG co-chair Teranode Corporation F2F Cambridge MA.
© CDISC 2011 Joint Initiative Council 18 October 2011 Bron Kisler, VP, Strategic Initiatives, Current JIC Leader Rebecca D. Kush, PhD, President and CEO,
Integrated Biomedical Information for Better Health Workprogramme Call 4 IST Conference- Networking Session.
From Bench to Bedside: Applications to Drug Discovery and Development Eric Neumann W3C HCLSIG co-chair Teranode Corporation HCLSIG F2F Cambridge MA.
©Ferenc Vajda 1 Semantic Grid Ferenc Vajda Computer and Automation Research Institute Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
ADVANCED DB SYSTEMS BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING. Index INTRODUCTION  BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING  B.E. DATASETS APPLICATIONS  DATA MINING ON FDA DATABASE  ONTOLOGY-BASED.
ST-09-01: Catalyzing Research and Development (R&D) Funding for GEOSS Florence Béroud, EC Jérome Bequignon, ESA Kathy Fontaine, US ST Kick-off Meeting.
Knowledge Management Issues in a Global Pharmaceutical R&D Environment Ted Slater Proteomics Center of Emphasis Proteomics Center of Emphasis Pfizer Global.
PHS / Department of General Practice Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Coláiste Ríoga na Máinleá in Éirinn Knowledge representation in TRANSFoRm AMIA.
BBN Technologies Copyright 2009 Slide 1 The S*QL Plugin for Cytoscape Visual Analytics on the Web of Linked Data Rusty (Robert J.) Bobrow Jeff Berliner,
Sara Lovell, CPCS Education Coordinator Providence Alaska Medical Center.
Topic 3A SEMANTIC INTEROPERABILITY: REUSE OF EHR DATA Mats Sundgren.
BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN CLINICAL RESEARCH AND CARE Philips Research Europe Brussels, February 2012 EHR4CR WP4-Semantic Interoperability: Convergence Meeting.
Semantic Web COMS 6135 Class Presentation Jian Pan Department of Computer Science Columbia University Web Enhanced Information Management.
Rule Engine for executing and deploying the SAGE-based Guidelines Jeong Ah Kim', Sun Tae Kim 2 ' Computer Education Department, Kwandong University, KOREA.
Data Infrastructure Building Blocks (DIBBS) NSF Solicitation Webinar -- March 3, 2016 Amy Walton, Program Director Advanced Cyberinfrastructure.
C3PR: An Introduction for Users A Tool Demonstration from caBIG™ Vijaya Chadaram Duke Cancer Center April 29, 2008.
Semantic Graph Mining for Biomedical Network Analysis: A Case Study in Traditional Chinese Medicine Tong Yu HCLS
TITIN ANDRI WIHASTUTI SCHOOL OF NURSING FACULTY OF MEDICINE
Semantic Web - caBIG Abstract: 21st century biomedical research is driven by massive amounts of data: automated technologies generate hundreds of.
Jim Bland Executive Director, CRIX International
W3C Semantic Web for Health Care and Life Sciences Interest Group
CDISC and related initativies
Harnessing the Semantic Web to Answer Scientific Questions:
W3C Semantic Web for Health Care and Life Sciences Interest Group
Data challenges in the pharmaceutical industry
Federal Health IT Ontology Project (HITOP) Group
Medical Record as a Semantic Graph
What is a Learning Collaborative?
Sponsored by the University of Southampton
Lessons Learned Through HBD: The Regulator’s View - US FDA
COI: Brainstorming Document
PCORTF Common Data Model Harmonization Project and the Oncology Use case January 30, 2018.
Electronic Health Information Systems
Semantic Web for HealthCare and Life Sciences Interest Group F2F Jan 25-26, 2006, Cambridge Tonya Hongsermeier, Eric Neumann, co-chairs Brian Gilman,
Face-to-Face Meeting Semantic Web for Healthcare and Life Sciences Interest Group W3C HCLS chairs, Eric Neumann - Clinical.
HCLS Tutorial: The W3C Health Care and Life Sciences Interest Group
CRUE – The Way Forward Vicki Jackson
Introduction to TransCelerate
RECARE set-up Rudi Hessel on behalf of coordination team
Semantic Interoperability
The International Consortium for Personalised Medicine
LOD reference architecture
The Linked Data Cloud Source: Chris Bizer. Linking Open Drug Data Susie Stephens, Principal Research Scientist, Eli Lilly.
W3C HCLS Task Force on Drug Safety and Efficacy
FDA Sentinel Initiative
2nd HCLS F2F Amsterdam 3-4 October, 2006
DICOM – A Preclinical Perspective
Bird of Feather Session
BioRDF Task Force.
Harnessing the Semantic Web to Answer Scientific Questions:
Tom Savel, MD Lead – Grid Technologies Medical Officer NCPHI, CDC
Presentation transcript:

Face-to-Face Meeting Semantic Web for Healthcare and Life Sciences Interest Group http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/hcls/ W3C HCLS chairs, Eric Neumann - Clinical Semantics Group Tonya Hongsermeier - Partners Healthcare

F2F Agenda Thursday November 8, 2007 1.30pm - 2.00pm - F2F Kickoff, Welcome and Introductions (EricN & Tonya) 2.00pm - 2.30pm - Clinical Observations Interoperability: How can Semantic Technologies Help? (Vipul) 2.30pm - 3.00pm - Clincal Observations Interoperability (COI) Use Case (Rachel) 3.00pm - 3.30pm - Tea/Coffee 3.30pm - 4.00pm - Detailed Clinical Models and the COI Use Case (Tom) 4.00pm - 4.15pm - Demo: Semantic DB System at Cleveland Clinic (Chimezie) 4.15pm - 4.30pm - Demo: SHER System by IBM and Columbia University (Chintan) 4.30pm - 5.30pm - Round Table and Feedback on Next Steps for COI (Moderator: Vipul) 5.30pm - 6.00pm - Wrap Up (EricN & Tonya) 6.30pm - Dinner with COI participants to work on functional requirements spreadsheet, etc.

F2F Agenda Friday November 9, 2007 8:30am - 9:00am - Welcome and Introductions (EricN & Tonya) 9.00am - 10.30am - Group Reviews: BioRDF, ACPP, DSE, & BIONT/Clinical Trials + EMR 10.30am - 11.00am - Break 11.00am - 12.00pm - HCLS questionnaire results and charter discussion (EricP et al) 12.00pm - 1.00pm - Lunch 1.00pm - 2.30pm - BioRDF: Understanding and enhancing the knowledgebase (Alan, et al.) 2.30pm - 3.00pm - Break 3.00pm - 4.00pm - BioRDF: URI note discussion (Jonathan) 4.00pm - 5.00pm - Next Steps / Wrap up

What is HCLS? “The Semantic Web Health Care and Life Sciences Interest Group is chartered to develop and support the use of Semantic Web technologies and practices to improve collaboration, research and development, and innovation adoption in the health care and life science domains. Success in these domains will ultimately depend on a foundation of semantically rich systems, processes and information interoperability.” The scope of HCLSIG includes: Core vocabularies and ontologies to support cross-community data integration and collaborative efforts Guidelines and Best Practices for Resource Identification to support integrity and version control Better integration of Scientific Publication with people, data, software, publications, and clinical trials

HCLS Themes Principle activities have centered around: Building a broad and strong community Exploring and documenting Use Cases Converting resources to RDF-OWL Learning to work with semantic web query/inference technology such as SPARQL, OWL, and rule engines.

Organization Chairs: Eric Neumann, Tonya Hongsermeier Group divided in to task forces (coordinator) BioRDF. Established initially to convert biomedical data to RDF (Susie Stephens) BIONT. Established initially to be resource for ontology needs for other groups (Vipul Kashyap) DSE (Drug Safety and Efficacy). Established initially to work on SW technology to support monitoring drug safety, pharmacovigilance (Eric Neumann) ACPP (Adaptable Clinical Protocols and Pathways) Established initially to work on method of representing and computing applicability of protocols to dynamically changing patient status (Helen Chen) COI (Clinical Observations Interoperability). Established recently with two goals 1) Establish new collaboration with health care industry players 2) Work on issues at the intersection of electronic medical records and health care organization needs. (Vipul Kashyap)

Membership 64 participants from 38 organizations 3 Invited Experts Many more non-member participants on-line

Meetings to-date Formal F2F, January 2006, Cambridge Formal F2F, October 2006, Amsterdam Workshop, ISWC November 2006, Banff Informal F2F (Demo) 3 x March/April, 2007, Cambridge Workshop, WWW 2007, May 2007, Banff Informal F2F (URI), July 2007, Cambridge Formal F2F, November 2007, Cambridge

Demonstrations and Examples HCLS NeuroScience Demo - WWW2007 Banff http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/Banff2007Demo Clinical Trials Data Management and Viewing http://eneumann.org/exhibit/clinicaldemo/ Taverna, AIDA http://taverna.sourceforge.net, http://myexperiment.org/ Mining Disease Relations from Semantically Integrated Genome - Phenome Maps http://www2007.org/workshops/paper_146.pdf

Presentations WWW2007 Demo ISMB 2007 Demo ISMB BioOntology SIG Poster 2007 Society for Neuroscience Poster Nov 2007 Selection of presentation venues of members showing HCLS work Bridging Pharma and IT Drug Discovery Technology of Innovative Therapeutics 1st European Semantic Web Conference Bio-IT World Norwegian Semantic Web Day InfoTech Pharma Modern Drug Discovery and Development Summit Massachusetts Biotechnology Panel eScience Institute; RDF, Ontologies and Meta-Data Workshop Virginia Biotechnology Summit Systems Biology Semantic Web Gathering Allen Institute for Brain Sciences Informatics and Interactomes in Huntington’s Disease Ontology for Biomedical Informatics Workshop Clinical Trial Ontology Workshop Jackson Laboratories Pubmed Plus NIH Blueprint NIF Workshop

Publications and Public Databases HCLS Ecosystem HCP Choices Insurers Grants HMO,PPO Biomed Research Publications and Public Databases BioKB Gov/Funding Large Studies Risks & Benefits Disease Areas Drug R&D Mol Path Res EHR Clin Res Chem Manuf Drug Programs Clin POC Surveillance BiomarkerTox HCP Public Preclin CDC VA System R&D Gov/Regulatory Marketing Clin Safety CROs JANUS Safety Commons

Distributed Nature of R&D Information Registry Silos of Data… Tox Biomarkers Targets Libraries Assays HCS Diseases Genotypes Mol Models

Data Integration Forcing data to fit a specific application App 1 ?

Data Aggregation Think: Smart Mash-up Data aggregated for any application ins semantically consistent way. ? App ? App ?

The Current Web What the computer sees: “Dumb” links Resources What the computer sees: “Dumb” links No semantics - <a href> treated just like <bold> Minimal machine-processable information Resources Resources Resources Resources Resources Resources Resources

The Semantic Web RDF- Resource Description Framework Clinical Study RDF- Resource Description Framework Machine-processable semantic information Semantic context published – making the data more informative to both humans and machines hasSubject using Subject Design hasFindings hasAE treatment Finding Intervention Adverse Event hasExpression derived Gene Expression Biomarker Sample

The Layer Cake

Facts as triples has_associated_disease PARK1 Parkinson disease subject predicate object

has_associated_disease From triples to a graph MAPT Parkinson disease PARK1 Parkinson disease MAPT Pick disease TBP Spinocerebellar ataxia MAPT Pick disease PARK1 Parkinson disease TBP Parkinson disease TBP Spinocerebellar ataxia has_associated_disease PARK1 Parkinson disease MAPT Pick disease TBP Spinocerebellar ataxia

Neurodegenerative diseases Connecting graphs Integrate graphs from multiple resources Query across resources Alzheimer disease Parkinson disease Neurodegenerative diseases isa APP Alzheimer disease PARK1 Parkinson disease has_associated_disease

Graphs can be filtered and pivoted, without losing meaning Recombinant Data Graphs can be filtered and pivoted, without losing meaning

Where does Semantic Web Fit In? Connecting Legacy Data to SW: D2R, MagLev

Semantic Web Applied to Disease Mechanism and Pharmacology

Drug Safety and Efficacy Group focuses on: Draft an approach for clinical trial data that is in line with the Clinical Data Interchange Standards(CDISC) Study Data Tabulation Model (SDTM) Can SW standards help with EDC? Work on aggregating patient data with pharmacogenomic information. Use Case around Pharmacovigilance Emphasis on display/visualization of clinical trial data, rather than query They have a demo that uses the Simile project’s Exhibit tools to display information merging three points of view Demographics Treatments Adverse Events SNP

Clinical Observations Interoperability Recently formed http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/OntologyTaskForce/BIONTDSEDCM Focusing on problem of identifying clinical trial candidates based on constraints of participation and information in medical records. Clinical trial recruitment is an everybody-wins situation Patients want new cures and development of them is dependent on trials Pharma want new drugs to bring huge profits Running clinical trials is profitable for CROs Doctors and hospitals get money for identifying, treating, and recording information about patients. Technical problems (evaluation of constraints) are very similar to those identified and somewhat addressed in ACPP. Driver of rule and OWL technology. Has brought in new industry and academic participants. DSE, ACPP, and BioONT participants are joining this effort.

BioRDF Demo: Neurocommons Triple Store Challenge: Go beyond toy size examples of Semantic Web Strategy: 1) Work on translating a dozen existing databases using OBO methodology and OWL, focused on neuroscience research questions Pubmed/Mesh mappings OBO ontologies, including Gene functions, molecular processes, cellular components Neuroscience ontologies: Senselab, BAMS, Allen Brain Atlas Strategy: 2) Develop capability to run interesting SPARQL queries at scale 300 Million triples Open source, reproducible Queries that could only be done previously with a lot of effort Demonstrate “Practice” a useful prelude to developing “Best Practice” Enthusiastic response from community. We often hear “ This is the first time I’ve seen semantic web technology do anything useful” WWW2007: “Thank you from the semantic web” Some problems solved, many remain, ongoing work.

Adaptable Clinical Protocols and Pathways This group was active mostly in the first year Worked on Guideline Reference Ontology Prototyped three instances of guidelines based on the ontology Worked on reasoning with inclusion/exclusion criteria Developed clear use cases that need temporal concepts reasoning Two rule engines used. Helen Chen: Euler, Chimezie Ogbuji: Fuxi (his own work!) This work is great arena for exploring the difference between using OWL versus rules Although research is finished, need more manpower to write up results AGFA benefited significantly from the work and it has influenced their internal models. SW is a strong focus in AGFA health care for evidence based patient care, and they expect to invest in it for years to come. Helen, Chimezie are now bringing their experiences to the new Clinical Observations Interoperability group.

URI recommendations project Jonathan Rees leading work in BioRDF on upcoming note Problem is stable identifiers for knowledge resources of import, and for entities in the world Proteins, Organs, Symptoms etc. Motivated by complaints about inadequate instruction From providers not knowing good practices for minting URIs From users not knowing how to name or make statements about resources that can be effectively integrated Community finds current AWWW and TAG documentation and recommendations inadequate Problem is not easily separable from issues of providing good practices for making use of the URIs, such as having mechanisms for figuring out what they mean

New charter process Goal is to design one or two charters for working group and/or interest group. Initial step was drafting of questionnaire circulated to wide swath of life sciences and health care community. We listed possible activities and asked which would be of interest for participation. Currently almost 50 responses http://www.w3.org/2007/06/HCLSForm Next step: analyze and draft a charter that is responsive to the feedback gained from the questionnaire. Target is for new charter to circulate early November.

Looking Forward Work with TAG over architectural needs for Semantic Web for science. Important to get time with them at Tech Plenary meeting in November. Find and recruit more members like AGFA, who feel they got value from group participation. Current membership has no shortage of other organizations with some tie to health care/life sciences, either as vendors (e.g. IBM) or primary, such as pharma (Merck, Pfizer) Targeting pharma, health care, vendors, not currently SW-ready standards groups (e.g. CDISC), FDA, NIH sponsored projects, and academic research leaders. Further recruitment should be based on listening to needs, addressing them with focused projects within the next HCLS. Focus on increasing credibility. Acceptance of SW technology’s role in pharma/ health care is growing, hopefully to soon match enthusiasm from life sciences community. They are looking for guidance, and we need to provide it.

Upcoming Event: C-SHALS Conference on Semantics in Health and Life Sciences March 5-7 2008, Cambridge, MA Industry Presentations on the State of the Art for intelligent semantic applications in Drug R&D Sponsors: Pfizer, Merck, …