Daniel Webster & Jay Bell

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
“Strategic Plan ( ) and Agency Accreditation”
Advertisements

From QA to QI: The Kentucky Journey. In the beginning, we were alone and compliance reigned.
Using Data to Plan Waiver Strategies and Drive Improvements: Key Indicators and Trends April 11, 2012.
Local Control and Accountability Plan: Performance Based Budgeting California Association of School Business Officials.
Understanding Katie A and the Core Practice Model
Permanency Roundtables -Texas Style! October 2012 Jenny Hinson, Division Administrator for Permanency Carol Self, Lead Permanency Program Specialist.
1 Child and Family Services Review Program Improvement Plan Kick-Off Division/Staff Name Date (7/30/07)
1 Strengthening Child Welfare Supervision as a Key Practice Change Strategy Unit I: Helping Child Welfare Leaders Re-conceptualize Supervision.
1 Statewide Parent Collaboration Group and Local Parent Support Group May 23, 2012 Presented by: Kathryn Sibley, Family Based Safety Services Program Specialist.
Data Driven Practice for Program Managers: Riverside County Melissa Correia Adam Darnell Casey Family Programs Daniel Webster, MSW PhD Center for Social.
May 18, MiTEAM Is Michigan’s guide to how staff, children, families, stakeholders and community partners work together to achieve outcomes that.
Common Core 3.0 Content Overview Stakeholder Feedback Seeking Your Input to Improve Child Welfare Training! For audio: call enter access.
Virginia Learning Collaboratives Reducing Family Homelessness in Virginia: A Rapid Re-Housing Approach.
Strategic Planning Module Preview This PowerPoint provides a sample of the Strategic Planning Module PowerPoint. The actual Strategic Planning PowerPoint.
Prepared by American Humane Association and the California Administrative Office of the Courts.
Maine DHHS: Putting Children First
Julie R. Morales Butler Institute for Families University of Denver.
Presentation originally created by William C Dawson & Amy C Nuñez The Performance Indicators Project & the Administrative Office of the Courts: Toward.
Program Evaluation for Nonprofit Professionals Unit 1 Part 2: Evaluation and The Logic Model.
Strictly adhere to the FTC model and all of ACS’s requirements for General Preventive services Maintain caseload of 45 families Conduct 2 face-to-face.
Trends in Child Welfare Outcomes CA Blue Ribbon Commission May1, 2013 The Performance Indicators Project is a collaboration of the California Department.
Child and Family Service Review CFSR 101. Child and Family Service Review CFSR stands for the Child and Family Service Review. It is the federal government’s.
Children grow up in a safe and supportive environment Families are stronger and healthier, leading to greater success and personal development for children.
1 A QTS Web Training Writing Consumer Education & Referral Outcomes.
Educating Youth in Foster Care Shanna McBride and Angela Griffin, M.Ed.
LOGIC MODEL ACTIVITY: EXAMPLES to be distributed as paper handouts (one for each group of 5 to 8 people) for the logic model activity.
Overview of the Collaborative Capacity Instrument Integration of Services Leadership Meeting October 21, 2010.
1 Department of Human Services (DHS)/Child Welfare Services (CWS) Branch Child & Family Services Review (CFSR) & Program Improvement Plan (PIP)
Schools as Organisations
2015 Annual Report February 9, 2016 Presenters:
Completing the circle: concurrent planning and the use of Family Finding, Blended perspective meetings, and family group decision making processes.
Promoting Education Stability For Foster Youth Through Legislation in
Resolving Foster Parent Concerns
Getting Results through Systemic Approaches
OACCA Residential Transformation Conference
No Place Like HOME Texas Kick Off Meeting
Homeless Education Network Assessment & Community Feedback
Quality Case Practice Improvement
Grant Champions Workshop Logic Model Development
Using Logic Models in Program Planning and Grant Proposals
Society for Social Work & Research New Orleans 1/14/2017
Educators & Parents Special Education
Bringing Continuous Quality Improvement to Operations
Concrete support in times of need
Child Welfare & Homelessness: Housing Ensures a Solid Foundation
Tuolumne County Adult Child and Family Services
Equity from the Start Disproportionality and Disparity Among Young Children in the CW System: What the Data Tell Us Wendy Wiegmann CCWIP May 10, 2017.
Wendy Wiegmann ~ CCWIP ~ October 25, 2016
Equity from the Start Disproportionality and Disparity Among Young Children in the CW System: What the Data Tell Us Wendy Wiegmann CCWIP May 10, 2017.
Outcomes and Evidence Based Programming
Everything you always wanted to know about S. - urvival Curves (
Youth Leadership Advisory Team (Maine)
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services January 23, 2015
SUCCESSFUL MEASURING JAMES HARDIN, DIRECTOR, HEALTH IMPACT
COLLABORATIVE LEARNING TEAMS
Adult Perspective Shift
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services December 19, 2014
Troubleshooting Logic Models
Improved Outcomes For All Children
Bringing comprehensive suicide prevention, intervention, and postvention planning to schools: addressing the whole school environment. Keith Kline, Ph.D.
BARBARA NEEDELL, MSW, PhD
Using the CCWIP Data Portal
Permanency Planning Modified Manual
Creative Approaches to Providing Inclusive Services
A Simple and Powerful Strategy for Building School-Family Parnerships
Re-Framing Agendas: From the Personal to the Policy Level
Introduction to the Question Formulation Technique (QFT) Strengthening Parents’ Skills to Ask the Right Questions.
Marion County Re-Entry Coalition Presentation to CWF coaches
Using Logic Models in Project Proposals
BOOTCAMP SOCIAL INNOVATION ACCELERATOR TO CREATE LASTING CHANGE
Presentation transcript:

Daniel Webster & Jay Bell On the Road to Success: How Will We Know We’ve Arrived? An Orientation to Logic Models Daniel Webster & Jay Bell Quality, Outcomes and System Improvement Circle Long Beach, CA April 24, 2017 Special thanks to colleagues at Casey Family Programs for development of many of these slides.

IMPROVE THIS !!! Step 1 : Activity taken from: Miller, B.C. (2004). Quick teambuilding activities for busy managers: 50 exercises that get results in just 15 minutes. New York: American Management Association. Abruptly announce: “you have exactly sixty seconds to improve your seating arrangement!” After giving the instructions, do not ask if there are any questions--look at the clock to discourage questions. Often those wanting clarification will back off if the source appears elusive. Usually, the pressure of the group will discourage anyone from not moving quickly If they directly ask for clarification, say, "You determine for yourselves what "improve" means. You’re adults. It seems pretty obvious." During the debrief, point out how similar this is to responses they can encounter if goals are not clear After 60 sixty seconds—stop activity and ask participants if they were successful (e.g., “I’m not sure,” or “no, because I was not sure what the objective was,” or “yes, because I am closer to the window,” etc.) Purpose is to show them how, without clear goals, or if individuals make assumptions or do not ask for clarification—a effort can be sabotaged/undermined. Point out that their work environment can set them up like this, and how they might typically respond. We often try to accomplish things when we are not clear on the real goal or the specific criteria for success; We often don't ask for clarification, and if we do, we don't press until we get what we truly need to succeed

And we believe it is because: Observe We’ve noted that: Children are not exiting to permanency in a timely way Explain And we believe it is because: Families are not successfully engaged with CWS in case planning Strategy So we plan to: Increase child and family team meetings with parent participation Outcome Which will result in ENVISIONED OUTCOME: An increase in children exiting to permanency within 12 months of entry Developed by NY OCFS

We believe it is because: We have noted that: We believe it is because: So we plan to: Which will result in: Observe Explain Prescribe Strategy Outcome Hypothesis Statement: A High Level Cause And Effect Statement Resources & Inputs Activities Short-Term Outcomes Observe and Explain Strategies Outcome Logic Model: Digging Deeper – More Detail Outputs Long-Term Outcomes & Impact Logic Model Internal factors: policy, staffing, workload, workflow, tools, processes External factors: demographic changes, service array, courts, law enforcement and other partners…

We believe it is because: Where are we now? Define assets, strengths & areas needing improvement Observe performance on key measures: review trends and patterns Establish priorities by considering: mandates, greatest areas of need/opportunity for impact etc… Explain/Explore key underlying factors: both internal and external Consider subpopulations: is performance different by age? Race? Maltreatment type? Placement type?   We have noted that: We believe it is because: So we plan to: Which will result in: Observe Explain Prescribe Outcome Hypothesis Statement: A High Level Cause And Effect Statement Resources & Inputs Activities Short-Term Outcomes Observe and Explain Strategies Outcome Logic Model: Digging Deeper – More Detail Outputs Long-Term Outcomes & Impact Logic Model

We believe it is because: What will we do to address the issue? Strategies should align with the strengths and needs. What activities are supporting good performance? What are the barriers? When planning, consider: What do you control? Where do you need to partner or advocate? Should change focus on process, quality, capacity? Training Programs/Services Policies/practices We have noted that: We believe it is because: So we plan to: Which will result in: Observe Explain Prescribe Outcome Hypothesis Statement: A High Level Cause And Effect Statement Resources & Inputs Activities Short term outcomes Observe and Explain Strategies Outcome Logic Model Outputs Long Term Outcomes & Impact

We believe it is because: How do we know that the strategy was implemented as planned? What are our timeframes? Examples of outputs: Often a count (and percent) # of people trained # of clients served # of referrals # of meetings held We have noted that: We believe it is because: So we plan to: Which will result in: Observe Explain Prescribe Outcome Hypothesis Statement: A High Level Cause And Effect Statement Resources & Inputs Activities Short Term Outcomes Observe and Explain Strategies Outcome Logic Model Outputs Long Term Outcomes & Impact

We believe it is because: How will we know we are heading in the right direction? Short Term outcomes can be expected to change relatively quickly. Examples of measurable improvements: Improve diligent search and engagement Improved family engagement in case planning Greater staff satisfaction and retention Reduce time to adjudication and disposition, and permanency hearings We have noted that: We believe it is because: So we plan to: Which will result in: Observe Explain Prescribe Outcome Hypothesis Statement: A High Level Cause And Effect Statement Resources & Inputs Activities Short Term Outcomes Observe and Explain Strategies Outcome Logic Model: Digging Deeper – More Detail Outputs Long Term Outcomes & Impact Logic Model

Where do we ultimately want to be? What are the eventual outcomes, and system impact that we hope to achieve? Reduce entries into care Improve likelihood and timeliness of a permanent exit Reduce re-entry Improve health, mental health and education indicators Improved safety, permanency & well-being of children, youth, and families! We have noted that: We believe it is because: So we plan to: Which will result in: Observe Explain Prescribe Outcome Hypothesis Statement: A High Level Cause And Effect Statement Resources & Inputs Activities Short Term Outcomes Observe and Explain Strategies Outcome Logic Model Outputs Long Term Outcomes & Impact

dwebster@berkeley.edu 510.290.6779 Questions? dwebster@berkeley.edu 510.290.6779 CCWIP is a collaboration of the California Department of Social Services and the School of Social Welfare, University of California at Berkeley, and is supported by the California Department of Social Services, the Conrad N. Hilton Foundation, Casey Family Programs, and the Stuart Foundation