Orlando Cabrera-Rivera JPAC Meeting El Paso, Texas November 7, 2011

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chemicals Management Forum San Antonio, Texas May 15-16, 2012 Comparing Chemicals Information across National Inventories SMOC Chemical Inventory Team.
Advertisements

Best Practices for Selecting a World Class Environmental Management System Lessons Learned from OEMS in the US & Canada Presented by Bob Ernest Toyota.
Update on Activities in the U.S. EPA’s Toxics Release Inventory Program November, 2014 Mexico City, Mexico Stephen C. DeVito, Ph.D., RPh.
Household Batteries Varun Ravishanker. Laws and Regulations Mercury-Containing and Rechargeable Battery Management Act passed by Congress in 1996 Mercury-Containing.
Regulatory Framework for Spent Lead-Acid Batteries (SLABs) and SLAB Recycling in Canada NA CEC Workshop on Spent Lead Acid Batteries & Electronics 4-6.
Technical Guidelines for Environmentally Sound Management (ESM) of End-of-life Batteries in North America.
Taking Stock, Vol. 14: Exploring Changes in PRTR Reporting, With a focus on releases to air and water from pulp, paper and paperboard mills KEY.
Modeling with CAMEO Les Benedict St. Regis Mohawk Tribe.
Introduction The purpose of the following presentation is to provide you with important information on how to respond to a “Vale hazardous material release.
TRP Chapter Chapter 4.2 Waste minimisation.
Workshop -- Launch of the First Report of the Chilean PRTR Alain Chung, Environment Canada Santiago, Chile – November 28, 2007.
1 The Challenge of Collecting and Maintaining Quality Data – Overview of U.S. Toxics Release Inventory Data Quality Activities U.S. PRTR – Toxics Release.
PRTR Trends in the Automotive Industry Using PRTR data to measure & assess progress November 11, 2014.
Update on Canada’s National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) CEC – Public Meeting of the NAPRTR Project November 11, 2014 Karen Mailhiot Environment.
February 13, 2008 Scott Slesinger Environmental Technology Council 1 Suggested Improvements To EPA’s Implementation Of The Pollution Prevention Act.
Toxics Release Inventory Data and Tools Envirofacts Database and Query US EPA Office of Environmental Information Tribal Lands Forum August 2013.
PRTR-online survey. Questions – Items Question 3 – Item 2.
Commission for Environmental Cooperation Keith Chanon, Program Manager Pollutants and Health Characterizing Chemicals in Commerce: Using Data on HPV Chemicals.
1 What do we do with all the waste? Dealing with waste disposal issues that have implications for all of these different components of the environment…
Commission for Environmental Cooperation SMOC Meeting March 4-5, 2008 Tucson, Arizona Orlando Cabrera Rivera, Program Manager - Air Quality/PRTR North.
North American Commission For Environmental Cooperation Chemicals Management in Mexico Chemicals Management in Mexico M AURICIO LIMÓN AGUIRRE Under Secretary.
The 2012 Governor’s Awards for Environmental Excellence Completing the Nomination Cover Page and Providing Supporting Information.
Pollutants in Europe: what, where and how much European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register Data 11 th May 2010.
Commission for Environmental Cooperation Toxics Release Inventory Conference February 12-13, 2008 Orlando Cabrera Rivera, Program Manager - Air Quality/PRTR.
Influencing State Government Hazardous Waste Management Policy and Product Procurement Using LCA Bob Boughton California Department of Toxic Substances.
1 Improving International Collaboration TRI National Training Conference February 2008.
Pilot Projects on Strengthening Inventory Development and Risk Management-Decision Making for Mercury: A Contribution to the Global Mercury Partnership.
International Collaboration on PRTRs: Canadian experiences TRI National Meeting February 12-13, 2008 Jody Rosenberger Environment Canada.
1 Pollutant Release & Transfer Registers The Canadian Government Experience National Workshop on PRTRs Santiago, Chilé - May 29, 2002.
North American Sound Management of Chemicals Initiative Commission for Environmental Cooperation Ned Brooks, Chemicals Program Manager Commission for Environmental.
UNECE PRTR Protocol EPER/E-PRTR module ECENA training workshop Szentendre,15/16 October 2007 Michel Amand Belgian Head of delegation PRTR Chair of the.
Measurement and Targeting – Design and Implement Programs to Track Results and Accountability National Environmental Partnership Summit 2006 Wednesday,
Industry environmental self- monitoring and reporting UK experience with reference to the Pollution Inventory Dr Ian Whitwell The Environment Agency of.
Cement Kilns Canadian Experience Prepared for the CEC North American Strategy for Catalyzing Cooperation on Dioxins, Furans and HCB Source Control Workshop.
Canada’s National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) and Data Visualization PRTR Global Round-Table Session on Next Generation PRTRs Spain, November 24.
OECD ACTIVITIES ON PRTRS Inception Workshop for the GEF Medium-sized project November 2015 / Madrid, Spain UNITAR/GEF/PRTR2/SCM1 Pre 9.
North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation Sound Management of Chemicals (SMOC) and Environmental Monitoring & Assessment (EM&A) Presented.
Air Pollution Research Group Analysis of 1999 TRI Data to Identify High Environmental Risk Areas of Ohio by Amit Joshi.
Commission for Environmental Cooperation JPAC Meeting June 24, 2009 Denver, Colorado Orlando Cabrera-Rivera Air Quality and Pollutant Releases Program.
OECD ACTIVITIES ON PRTRS 4 th PRTRs Protocol Working Group of the Parties 26 November 2015 / Madrid, Spain.
CEC Operational Plan Development process Irasema Coronado Executive Director JPAC Meeting, April 2013, Calgary US NAC-GAC Meeting, 25 April.
Report on Accomplishments Overview: CEC Operational Plan Evan Lloyd CEC Executive Director 22 June 2011 Commission for Environmental Cooperation.
Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers (PRTR) as tools to access environmental information May 2013.
Finding Information on Environment and Health Presented by the JSI Center for Environmental Health Studies with support from the National Network of Libraries.
Commission for Environmental Cooperation Adrián Vázquez – Executive Director Measuring Results The CEC’s Strategic Plan: An Interim Report on.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF HEALTH CARE TPJ4M. HEALTH CARE WASTE Waste generated by health care activities includes a broad range of materials: used needles.
Islamic Republic of IRAN’s Training Course: Waste Management Auditing Based on INTOSAI Working Group on Environmental Auditing Handbook: Towards Auditing.
Transboundary Requirements -Environment Canada & Ontario
Potential Environmental Impact of Vapours
Clean Air Act Glossary.
RETAP Retired Engineer Technical Assistance Program
Protocol on Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers
Microwave Water Purification Process
Workshop -- Launch of the First Report of the Chilean PRTR
E-PRTR Regulation PRTR Protocol
Reducing emissions from goods movement via maritime transportation in North America Joint Public Advisory Committee (JPAC) Regular Session
Environmental Protection Agency
Orlando Cabrera-Rivera JPAC Meeting Montreal, Quebec June 22, 2011
Van Wert, OH Water and Wastewater Element Training
Actions to Reduce Mercury
Mining and quarrying activities and waste generation
Microwave Water Purification Process
Report on Accomplishments Overview: CEC Operational Plan
Quality aspects of EPER
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Orlando Cabrera-Rivera Commission for Environmental Cooperation
Current status of PRTRs Activities
I would like to explain on the revision of OECD Council Act on PRTRs.
Emissions to surface waters
THE COMMISSION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL COOPERATION OF NORTH AMERICA       The CEC on Disaster Resilient Communities JPAC Regular Session Mexico City,
Presentation transcript:

Orlando Cabrera-Rivera JPAC Meeting El Paso, Texas November 7, 2011 Cross Border Transfers of Toxic Contaminants in North America Analysis of PRTR Data Orlando Cabrera-Rivera JPAC Meeting El Paso, Texas November 7, 2011 This presentation gives a brief overview of the results of a preliminary analysis on the types and amounts of toxic substances transferred across North American borders. The information presented is from data reported by industrial facilities in Canada, the US, and Mexico to their respective Pollutants Releases and Transfer Registers, or PRTR.

This picture illustrates the types of information that is reported to a PRTR system. In North America we have three national PRTR programs: the US’ Toxic Release Inventory (TRI), the Canadian National Pollutant Releases Inventory (NPRI), and in Mexico, the Registro de Emisiones y Transferencia de Contaminantes (RETC). Each of these PRTR systems has different pollutant coverage and reporting requirements. So, we do not have information on all toxic substances that are transferred across borders; just for those subject to PRTR reporting. In terms of transfers off-site, we also have information on the final destination of that transfer, including both inside and outside the country.

The CEC’s North American PRTR project brings together the information from the NA PRTR systems; and adds value to it by providing analyses and access through the TS report and TS online website.

Taking Stock Online Cross-Border Transfers One of the tools in TS Online allows the users explore information on cross-border transfers of toxic substances. This tool was developed last year under NAPRTR project, partly to assist in some of the work conducted by the CEC’s Hazardous Waste Task Force. You can view the amounts and types of transfers from one country to another (recycling, disposal, treatment); the substances being transferred; and information on both the sending and receiving facilities. This information can be exported in a variety of formats, including Excel, or for visualization using Google Maps.

This map illustrates the transfer of toxic substances across North American borders. As you can see we have transfers from Canada to the US, from Mexico to the US, and from the US to both Canada and Mexico. These reported transfers are for the most part to disposal or recycling.

Summary of Cross-Border Transfers, 2009 Over 181 million kg transferred across NA borders (just over 10% of all off-site disposal or other transfers) 119 pollutants transferred (mainly to recycling) by 24 industrial sectors Top 10 pollutants (by amount) = 170,508,844 kg (94% of total)

Top 10 Substances - Cross-Border Transfers Pollutants * Reported Amount (Kg) Sulfuric Acid 107,759,113 Zinc (and/or its compounds) 30,145,574 Copper (and/or its compounds) 8,562,357 Lead (and/or its compounds) 7,323,606 1,2-Dichloroethane 5,297,093 Manganese (and/or its compounds) 4,278,961 Nickel (and/or its compounds) 2,012,778 Sodium Nitrite 1,953,476 Hydrochloric Acid 1,644,340 Aluminum Oxide (Fibrous Forms) 1,531,546 Now, when we look at the top substances by amount, we need to take into account the differences in reporting requirements of the PRTR systems. For example, Sulfuric acid is the substance that was reported in the highest amounts. Most of this comes from Canada. Transfers of sulfuric acid are reportable under the Canadian PRTR, but not in the US and Mexico. In the US, the PRTR only requires reporting on atmospheric emissions of sulfuric acid. Zinc is another example: releases and transfers of this substance are subject to reporting in the US and Canada, but not in Mexico. In these cases, we know that a toxic substance was sent to recycling, but we do not know how it was managed once it crossed the border. How much of it was recycled, and how much ended as a release to the environment. Another important consideration is the toxicity of each of these substances. The substance transferred in the highest amounts is not always the most toxic. Mercury for example, was also transferred for recycling and disposal, but in lesser amounts. * May be subject to different PRTR reporting requirements

North American Cross-border Transfers, 2009 This slide presents the top substances transferred, their source sector, destination, and waste management method. Please keep in mind that reporting requirements vary from country to country (sector coverage, reporting thresholds, substances, etc.). One substance the is covered under the three PRTR systems in North America is 1,2-Dichloroethane, a known carcinogen. This toxic chemical accounts for the bulk of the transfers from Mexico to the US. Some of its uses includes the production of PVC, and as a lead removal agent in gasoline production.

Transfers to Disposal (1,2-DCE) Mexico-US These maps, developed using the TS online cross-border transfer tool track the transfer of 12DCE sent from a Pemex Petrochemical facility in Veracruz, Mexico (Complejo Petroquímico Morelos en Coatzacoalcos, Veracruz) to a hazardous waste handling facility in Deerpark, Texas (Clean Harbors). These maps allow you see the potential transfer route from Mexico to the US, and the surroundings of both the source and receiving facilities (residential areas). With these maps, you can link to the information that the facility reported to their PRTR program.

Considerations Use of PRTR data for assisting in tracking cross-border transfers Reporting requirements Information gaps Waste Management Methods Recycling, Disposal, Treatment Effect on Receiving Communities Health and Environmental Effects Reporting and regulatory standards 1- PRTR data can be a valuable tool in tracking the movement of hazardous substances across borders. However, we see that the differences in reporting requirements create information gaps. 2- We have a degree of uncertainty as to the final environmental or health impacts of these transfers. How much was recycled, and how much ended as a release to the environment. 3- Do we have the appropriate environmental and health protections standards to deal with the potential effects of these toxic substances?

CEC North American PRTR Project For more information Orlando Cabrera Rivera Program Manager, Air Quality/PRTR Telephone: (514) 350-4300 Fax: (514) 350-4314 Email: ocabrera@cec.org www.cec.org/takingstock Three countries. One environment.