Long-term Synthesis of ARM Millimeter Cloud Radar and

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Proposed new uses for the Ceilometer Network
Advertisements

Anthony Illingworth, + Robin Hogan, Ewan OConnor, U of Reading, UK and the CloudNET team (F, D, NL, S, Su). Reading: 19 Feb 08 – Meeting with Met office.
Radar/lidar observations of boundary layer clouds
Robin Hogan Ewan OConnor Damian Wilson Malcolm Brooks Evaluation statistics of cloud fraction and water content.
Integrated Profiling at the AMF
Allison Parker Remote Sensing of the Oceans and Atmosphere.
3D Radiative Transfer in Cloudy Atmospheres: Diffusion Approximation and Monte Carlo Simulation for Thermal Emission K. N. Liou, Y. Chen, and Y. Gu Department.
Lecture 12 Content LIDAR 4/15/2017 GEM 3366.
Microphysical and radiative properties of ice clouds Evaluation of the representation of clouds in models J. Delanoë and A. Protat IPSL / CETP Assessment.
Radiative Atmospheric Divergence using ARM Mobile Facility, GERB data and AMMA stations A proposal led by Tony Slingo to deploy the new ARM Mobile Facility.
Satellites and Radar – A primer ATMO 203. Satellites Two main types of satellite orbits – Geostationary Earth Orbiting Satellite is 35,786 km (22,236.
Observed Updraft & Mass Flux in Shallow Cumulus at ARM Southern Great Plains site Preliminary results Yunyan Zhang, Steve Klein & Pavlos Kollias CFMIP/GCSS.
Cirrus Production by a Mesoscale Convective System Sampled During TWP-ICE: Analysis via Water Budget Equations Jasmine Cetrone and Robert Houze University.
Remote sensing of Stratocumulus using radar/lidar synergy Ewan O’Connor, Anthony Illingworth & Robin Hogan University of Reading.
The Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Program: An Overview Robert G. Ellingson Department of Meteorology Florida State University Tallahassee, FL.
Combining satellite and surface observations to determine the radiative divergence across the atmosphere Tony Slingo Environmental Systems Science Centre.
Figure 2.10 IPCC Working Group I (2007) Clouds and Radiation Through a Soda Straw.
Balloon-Borne Sounding System (BBSS) Used for atmospheric profiling Measures P, T, RH, wind speed and direction Uncertainties arise from incorrect surface.
ARM Water Vapor Measurements for Validation and Analysis Jim Mather Technical Director for the ARM Climate Research Facility.
Possibility of stratospheric hydration by overshooting analyzed with space-borne sensors Suginori Iwasaki (National Defense Academy, Japan) T. Shibata.
The Arctic Climate Paquita Zuidema, RSMAS/MPO, MSC 118, Feb, 29, 2008.
© Crown copyright Met Office Future Upper-Air Network Development (FUND)-Integration TECO 2008 St Petersburg Russia Catherine Gaffard, John Nash, Alec.
Ship-based measurements of cloud microphysics and PBL properties in precipitating trade cumulus clouds during RICO Allen White and Jeff Hare, University.
Gerd-Jan van Zadelhoff & Dave Donovan Comparing ice-cloud microphysical properties using Cloudnet & ARM data.
The Arctic Climate Paquita Zuidema, RSMAS/MPO, MSC 118, March
NARVAL South Lutz Hirsch, Friedhelm Jansen Sensor Synergy While Radars and Lidars provide excellent spatial resolution but only ambiguous information on.
The RADAGAST project Tony Slingo Environmental Systems Science Centre University of Reading Background and motivation Aims Methodology GIST 23, Deutscher.
Profilers & Surface Gauges NE Corner of Stuart Hwy & McMillans 2835-MHz Precip. Profiler: km 920-MHz Wind Profiler: km 50-MHz Wind Profiler:
MAGIC Cloud Radars Karen Johnson First MAGIC Science Workshop 5/2014.
DOE’s Flagship Global Climate Change Program ARM Climate Research Facilities in Alaska The North Slope of Alaska Team at Sandia Labs/NM: Bernie Zak, Jeff.
© TAFE MECAT 2008 Chapter 6(b) Where & how we take measurements.
Cabauw Experimental Site for Atmospheric Research - CESAR - Henk Klein Baltink Atmospheric Research Section.
National Lab for Remote Sensing and Nowcasting Dual Polarization Radar and Rainfall Nowcasting by Mark Alliksaar.
ARM Data Overview Chuck Long Jim Mather Tom Ackerman.
Southern Surveyor. Instruments on the Southern Surveyor Radiosondes PNNL Atmospheric Remote Sensing Laboratory (PARSL) Surface Fluxes Sea Surface Temperature.
RAdio Detection And Ranging. Was originally for military use 1.Sent out electromagnetic radiation (Active) 2.Bounced off an object and returned to a listening.
Status of the ARM Aerial Vehicle Program at DOE/PNNL Interagency Coordinating Committee for Airborne Geosciences Research and Applications (ICCAGRA) Washington,
Observations and Parameterization of Boundary Layer Structures and Clouds at the ARM TWP Nauru Site Bruce Albrecht, Virendra Ghate, and Dan Voss 1 Pavlos.
Ship-Based Measurements of Cloud Microphysics and PBL Properties in Precipitating Trade Cumuli During RICO Institutions: University of Miami; University.
Matthew Miller and Sandra Yuter Department of Marine, Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences North Carolina State University Raleigh, NC USA Phantom Precipitation.
Dual-Polarization and Dual-Wavelength Radar Measurements Vivek National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, Colorado I.Polarization and dual- wavelength.
Robin Hogan Ewan O’Connor The Instrument Synergy/ Target Categorization product.
Matthew Shupe Ola Persson Paul Johnston Duane Hazen Clouds during ASCOS U. of Colorado and NOAA.
1 Atmospheric profiling to better understand fog and low level cloud life cycle ARM/EU workshop on algorithms, May 2013 J. Delanoe (LATMOS), JC.
Yuying Zhang, Jim Boyle, and Steve Klein Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Jay Mace University.
Cloud Mask: Results, Frequency, Bit Mapping, and Validation UW Cloud Mask Working Group.
KNMI 35 GHz Cloud Radar & Cloud Classification* Henk Klein Baltink * Robin Hogan (Univ. of Reading, UK)
Atmospheric Visualization Collections. Atmospheric Visualization-A Collection at the NSDL Near real time remote sensing of the atmosphere to provide high.
Image structures: rain shafts, cold pools, gusts Separate rain fall velocity from air velocity – turbulence retrieval– microphysical retrieval Diurnal.
Shaocheng Xie, Renata McCoy, and Stephen Klein Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Statistical Characteristics of Clouds Observed at the ARM SGP, NSA,
BBHRP Assessment Part 2: Cirrus Radiative Flux Study Using Radar/Lidar/AERI Derived Cloud Properties David Tobin, Lori Borg, David Turner, Robert Holz,
Towards a Characterization of Arctic Mixed-Phase Clouds Matthew D. Shupe a, Pavlos Kollias b, Ed Luke b a Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental.
DEPARTMENT OF GEOMATIC ENGINEERING Validation of MODIS Cloud products through an inter- comparison with MISR, GOES and ground-based radar/lidar Jan-Peter.
Ship-board Flux Measurements made during CalNex 2010 C.W. Fairall, D.E. Wolfe, S. Pezoa, L. Bariteau, B. Blomquist, C. Sweeney Air-Sea flux measurements.
Instrument location ceilo pyro radar 10m Ground-based remote sensing instruments of clouds and precip at Princess Elisabeth.
Ieng Jo, Bruce A. Albrecht and Pavlos Kollias Division of Meteorology and Physical Oceanography Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science (RSMAS),
Satellites Storm “Since the early 1960s, virtually all areas of the atmospheric sciences have been revolutionized by the development and application of.
Comparison between aircraft and A-Train observations of midlevel, mixed-phase clouds from CLEX-10/C3VP Curtis Seaman, Yoo-Jeong Noh, Thomas Vonder Haar.
The EPIC 2001 SE Pacific Stratocumulus Cruise: Implications for Cloudsat as a stratocumulus drizzle meter Rob Wood, Chris Bretherton and Sandra Yuter (University.
W. Smith, D. Spangenberg, S. Sun-Mack, P.Minnis
Summer 2014 Group Meeting August 14, 2014 Scott Sieron
PACS/EPIC Enhanced Monitoring
Using A-train observations to evaluate clouds in CAM
Microwave Remote Sensing
Mesoscale Convective Systems Observed by CloudSat
Henk Klein Baltink Atmospheric Research Section
716 Investigating the Role of Aerosols and Clouds on the Radiation Budget in Niamey, Niger Allison Marquardt Collow and Mark Miller Department of Environmental.
The EPIC 2001 SE Pacific Stratocumulus Cruise: Implications for Cloudsat as a stratocumulus drizzle meter Rob Wood, Chris Bretherton and Sandra Yuter.
Graeme Stephens • Colorado State University
Meteorological Instrumentation and Observations
Presentation transcript:

Long-term Synthesis of ARM Millimeter Cloud Radar and Micropulse Lidar Observations Karen Johnson1, Michael Jensen1, Pavlos Kollias2, Jennifer Comstock3, Eugene Clothiaux4, Mark Miller5 1Brookhaven National Laboratory 2Pennsylvania State University 3McGill University 4Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 5Rutgers University 1) Multi-Year Radar and Lidar Observations 2) ARM’s Best-Estimate Radar-Lidar Synthesis: ARSCL The Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) program has ongoing multi-year records of Cloud Boundaries Hydrometeor Reflectivity Vertical Velocity, more… based on synthesized measurements from vertically pointing Millimeter Cloud Radar (35 GHz, 95 GHz) Micropulse Lidar Ceilometer Black Forest, Germany (2007) North Slope of Alaska (since 1998) Southern Great Plains (since 1996) ARM routinely processes radar, lidar, ceilometer and surface measurements from each site to produce a value-added product, ARSCL (Active Remote Sensing of CLouds), which provides cloud boundaries, best-estimate hydrometeor reflectivities, vertical velocities and spectrum widths. China (2008) Manus, PNG (since 1996) Nauru Island (since 1998) Darwin (since 2002) ARSCL Examples Niamey, Niger (2006) ARM has 5 fixed global sites and two ARM Mobile Facility deployments (to-date). 2006.05.31 Southern Great Plains Niamey, Niger 2006.08.18 Height (km) Time (hours) 16 24 95 GHz Radar Reflectivity Height (km) Time (hours) 24 14 dBZ 35 GHz Radar Reflectivity Radar modes are merged and artifacts removed. Data are freely available! www.arm.gov 14 16 18 12 10 8 Radar + Lidar 3) Cirrus Clouds as Detected by Radar and/or Lidar Cloud Top Heights Radar-only Lidar-only + + Heights (km) Micropulse Lidar Height (km) Time (hours) 24 16 Log10(power) Micropulse Lidar Height (km) Time (hours) 16 24 Log10(power) Fewer Lidar mid-level clouds due to attenuation The ARSCL product allows us to compare radar vs. lidar cloud detection. Right is a typical monthly histogram of radar-only vs. lidar-only vs. radar-plus-lidar cirrus clouds detections (above 6km). Below, heating rates were computed using SBDART to assess the radiative impact of cirrus missed due to radar-only or lidar-only detections. Radar misses high cloud Lidar backscatter is converted into a lidar cloud mask. 6 14 16 18 12 10 8 6 Radar-only Radar + Lidar Lidar-only Cloud Base Heights Heights (km) Best-Estimate Reflectivity plus Cloud Boundaries Height (km) Time (hours) 24 16 Height (km) Time (hours) 24 14 dBZ x 104 Sample Cloud Masks for Niamey, Niger Number of Occurrences Radar, lidar and ceilometer are combined to distinguish cloud and precipitation, 14 12 10 Time (9 hours) Lidar-only detection Radar-only detection Radar + Lidar Detection Radar only, Lidar missing Clear Height (km) eliminate radar clutter, add cloud seen by only lidar, and extend lidar cloud tops as detected by radar. Time (9 hours) Time (9 hours) Cloud Mask showing Instrument Source IR Lidar Solar Lidar Lidar-only detections Upper cloud seen by radar only IR Radar Solar Radar Time (hours) 12 24 Height (km) 16 8 Lidar-Detected Cirrus Heating In Section 3) at left, we examine the value of radar vs. lidar vs. both in detecting cirrus. Additional Radar-Detected Cirrus Heating Additional Lidar-Detected Cirrus Heating Clutter Lidar only, Radar missing Radar only, Lidar missing Lidar-only detection Radar-only detection Radar + Lidar Detection Clear Missing Radar and Lidar Significant Heating Rates associated with Undetected Cirrus