Catherine Pape, Specialist SLT and lay member of SENTW

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Common Legal Mistakes Districts Make
Advertisements

1 FIFTH ANNUAL COAT CONFERENCE NSW CHAPTER DEALING WITH DIFFICULTIES IN THE ABSENCE OF LEGAL REPRESENTATION The Hearing Process In the Absence of Legal.
Hampshire Children’s Services Personalisation and Personal Budgets Pilot A Parent and Carer Guide.
The New SEN Law THE CHILDREN & FAMILIES ACT 2014 EXPLAINED.
Participating in Your Child’s IEP Meeting
Introduction to the Children and Families Act 2014 Laxmi Patel 12 June 2014.
ENFORCING PROVISION and legal aid Elaine Maxwell Solicitor Lancaster
Last Topic - Administrative Tribunals
How to submit evidence to the SEN Panel in support of Statutory Assessments C. Marks
TAKING CONTROL OF YOUR PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT/APPRAISAL 1 NASUWT Member Seminar July 2014.
Education, Health and Care Plans Conversions. Background  We currently have over 800 pupils with Statements in West Berkshire  We also provide funding.
Implications of Part 3 of the Children and Families Act for children, young people, families and professionals The future of SEND in Hartlepool Philippa.
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING
3-MINUTE READ Draft SEN Code of Practice: for 0 to 25 years.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. 2 Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due.
3-MINUTE READ SEND IN THE CHILDREN AND FAMILIES ACT 2014.
Planning appeals Peter Ford Head of Development Management Planning Committee Training – 30 th July 2015.
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due to.
Nottingham and Nottinghamshire Parent Partnership Service Exclusions Sept 2012.
Derbyshire County Council PERFORMANCE CAPABILITY PROCEDURE TRAINING FOR MANAGERS PUBLIC.
Attending Meetings at School Louise Mottershead Aspire North West 2015.
HANDLING DISCIPLINARY AND GRIEVANCE CASES – INCLUDING INVESTIGATIONS BY GAIL ESCOLME EMPLOYMENT LAW SOLICITOR.
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
Exclusion from School: Practice and Procedures 9 th March 2015 Dedworth Middle School.
Supporting Governance Governors Sessions 2016/17 April 2016 Gary Peile.
Disability Living Allowance Claiming and challenging decisions.
Exclusions and Reviews. Key Points Permanent exclusion should only be used as last resort Decision to exclude must be lawful reasonable and fair A permanent.
Page 1 CHILDREN’S AND CARERS’ RIGHTS: SOCIAL CARE Caroline Barrett – Solicitor – Irwin Mitchell LLP Family Voice Conference –
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING.
The council’s future role in education June 2016 [Final] Standards First.
SEN, disability and the EYFS
Training for Chairs of Governing Bodies
Advocacy: Can It Be Learnt?
Equality, diversity and inclusion in work with children and young people Unit 306.
Hilary Wilson and Paul Rooney
SEN Support: The Children & Families Act & The Equality Act
Moving up to Secondary School in September 2018
SECONDARY SCHOOL ADMISSION ARRANGEMENTS FOR SEPTEMBER 2017
SECONDARY SCHOOL ADMISSION ARRANGEMENTS FOR SEPTEMBER 2017
PREPARING FOR ADDITIONAL SUPPORT NEEDS TRIBUNALS
SECONDARY SCHOOL ADMISSION ARRANGEMENTS FOR SEPTEMBER 2017
Regional EHC plan Peer Moderation Group
Taken from Irwin Mitchell 2017
Helpful Information to Support Your Secondary School Appeal
Academic representative Committee CHAIR training
Community Support Worker
Consent, throughout the Early Help Journey
Mediation 20/04/2018.
A Question of Equality and Diversity
INDEPENDENT SUPPORT WORKSHOP
Practical tools for conflict resolution
IEP Basics for Parents and Families
Resolving Issues ADR, Due Process and CDE Complaints
Overview of the Children and Families Act 2014
STATEMENTS…….. WHO’S DONE ONE!!??
SCARAB.
Information, Advice and Support Services – Are you Ofsted Ready?
Louise de Menthon and Alison Sutherland
Implications of Part 3 of the Children and Families Act for children, young people, families and professionals Philippa Stobbs, Council for Disabled Children.
BC Council of Administrative Tribunals ADJUDICATOR BOOT CAMP
Ask Us Nottinghamshire
Ask Us NottinghamShire
Masterclass: Managing Sickness Absence – Refresher & Key Learnings
Year 5 pese and kent test Transfer to secondary school 2019/2020
Copyright IPSEA 2018.
Judge Jane McConnell June 2019
The process of secondary school transfer for pupils with an EHC Plan is different to those children who don’t have an EHC Plan. Children who have an EHC.
Admission to Secondary School in Kent September 2020
Presentation transcript:

Catherine Pape, Specialist SLT and lay member of SENTW The Special Educational Needs Tribunal for Wales (SENTW): view from a panel member Catherine Pape, Specialist SLT and lay member of SENTW

Introduction Background to involvement Range of expertise Not selected on basis of case Conflicts of interest

What is the tribunal? Independent; funded by WG Deals with appeals and claims Regulations e.g. on time limits/ areas of jurisdiction / Welsh language/witnesses etc Child has the right to bring their own case Process takes approx 4-5 months from application to decision Panel at hearing consists of 1 chair (legal) plus 2 ‘lay’ (expert) members. Some hearings are paper only http://sentw.gov.wales/?skip=1&lang=en

Appeals Appeals (against LA decision) can be against: refusal to assess; refusal to make or maintain a statement; parts 2,3 4 of statement Depending on the type of appeal an Order may be one or more of the following: to carry out an assessment or re-assessment, to make a statement, to change the statement, to change the school named in line with the parents wishes, to continue a statement, to cancel (cease to maintain) a statement.

Claims Claims relate to disability discrimination (Equality Act 2010 ) and are made against a school in relation to Admissions, Education and access to any benefit, service and facility and Exclusions. This may include: direct discrimination; indirect discrimination; discrimination arising from disability; failure to provide a reasonable adjustment for a disabled child; harassment; or victimisation SENTW can order education providers to take action to help make up for any opportunities that your child has missed and to help prevent discrimination against disabled pupils in the future. SENTW cannot order payment of financial compensation.

The hearing “ The Tribunal’s overriding objective is to deal with cases fairly and justly. It is the Tribunal’s expectation that parents, representatives, Local Authority officers and responsible bodies, will help further the overriding objective by co-operating with each other and the Tribunal for the purposes of progressing the appeal or the claim” ‘Bundle’ (paper evidence) submitted prior to hearing. Includes case statements from both sides plus supporting evidence and usually a working document highlighting outstanding areas of disagreement. Regulations re: late evidence Parents and LA call witnesses to support their paper evidence. Usually parents come with or without their child; sometimes supported by legal rep/ advocate; with their witnesses; and LA rep attends with 1 or 2 witnesses; sometimes legal rep Chair sets agenda; considers late evidence/ adjournment requests etc Hearings start at 10am and finish by 4pm Panel hears from both sides (parents first) and ensures everyone is heard who wants to be Panel get together to make a decision which is sent out within 10 working days Both sides have a right to appeal to the Upper Tribunal against the decision (n.b. Review hearings)

the role of the expert witness at a hearing: what the panel need to know Detailed reports: independent therapists frequently produce reports with 50+ pages for the bundle. While this is not practicable for most NHS/ LA therapists; if you are attending in order to challenge the SLT provision requested by the other party you need to be well prepared to do so (i.e. thorough consideration of other SLT report(s) with evidence to back up any contended areas) Specificity: evidence is needed on what the child needs; who it can and should be delivered by; and dosage. This can be difficult for SLT because we often don’t have the evidence base to be decisive about this. However, you may find that witnesses for the other party are less reticent, and in the absence of evidence to the contrary the panel sometimes have little choice but to go with the dose recommended. If a particular point isn’t challenged by the other party; the panel themselves can’t always challenge it (RCSLT position paper example). What the child needs, not just what the service offers: frequently SLAs are explained in great detail in the bundle; but if the parents have evidence that the child needs something above what the service is offering then this needs to be addressed. If SLCN is detailed in part 2; it must be addressed in part 3. Expertise and professionalism: the panel need to know about your experience and expertise; and the rep for the other party may question you on this. Rarely, there is animosity between parties and this has included SLTs accusing one another of negligent practise. The role of the witness is to help the panel to reach a just and fair decision, not to blindly support the position of the party they are there to speak for. The most satisfactory hearings from my perspective are often the ones where one or both sides are able to compromise.

Challenges Hearings can be challenging for either or both parties (and for the panel) for many reasons; including: Inadequate written evidence (out of date reports/ repetitions/ irrelevant info etc) Poor representation Poor selection of witnesses (NB SLTs) Animosity between parties Emotive topics Lots of time waiting while parties go out to discuss aspects of the case that could have been agreed on prior to the hearing

What to do to make it less scary! Don’t assume that the hearing will be difficult - everyone is there because they want a fair and just outcome for the child. The panel are unbiased and genuinely need your help to reach the right decision. Understand the law – read relevant parts of the CoP before you attend the hearing. Read it anyway even if you don’t have tribunals coming up! The panel can only make decisions based on this law Look at the SENTW website and familiarise yourself with the process if you haven’t been to a hearing before. Watch the ‘Aled’s tribunal’ video Talk to your party’s rep and be clear about why you are being asked to appear and what you are likely to be questioned about. If you don’t agree with aspects of what your party are saying make sure you have discussed this and you know your position clearly Read the case statements and SLT/ other relevant reports thoroughly, and use the working document to structure your thoughts. Don’t feel that you need to know the rest of the bundle off by heart! Don’t be afraid to ask questions during the hearing. You can ask for a break if you need time to think or talk something over.

Questions? Catherine.pape@wales.nhs.uk