Coordinator: Name Mentor: Name

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Vs. Attending a Different Training as a Site Team.
Advertisements

Vs. Attending a Different Training as a Site Team.
Welcome to Site Management Amy Thompson. Agenda I.Foundation Introductions Setting the Session Agenda II.Site Management Principles III.Site Management.
Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)
What is Assessment? The university, with the support and encouragement of President Hitt and the Vice President team, engages in the institutional effectiveness.
MD Online IEP Instructional Series – PD Activity #1 Introduction: What is New in July 1, 2014 Version?
Albany Unified School District Strategic Plan Board Study Session June 21, 2011.
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
Action Research / Intervention Project Module II Notre Dame of Maryland University.
Model for Improvement Improvement Facilitator Training Session 1 Day 2.
The Department of Educational Administration Assessment Report School of Education and Human Services Carol Godsave, Chair, Assessment Coordinator.
Indiana Student Achievement Institute InSAI STEERING TEAM TRAINING Selecting the Areas of Concern Document
Strategies for Implementing Program-Level Assessment through Outcomes Jeremy Anderson Manager, Academic Computing Dr. Kaitlin Walsh Instructional Designer/Technologist.
Engaging Student Affairs Professionals in Division-Wide Assessment Lisa Garcia-Hanson,University of Washington Tacoma Charlotte Tullos, Central Washington.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
Background Management Council (MC) was briefed on approach in early Feb 2003 and approved it Agreed that every Service Group (SG) will participate in.
Florida Tech’s University Assessment Committee For A Continuing Culture of Assessment.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
By Monica Y. Peters, Ph.D. Coordinator of Institutional Effectiveness/QEP Office of Quality Enhancement.
Using Student Assessment Data in Your Teacher Observation and Feedback Process Renee Ringold & Eileen Weber Minnesota Assessment Conference August 5, 2015.
WestEd.org HELP GUIDE: Classrooms and Quality Improvement Plans (QIPs) in the Toby Database.
High School State of the Schools. Foley High School Staff Development Goals for Goal #190% of FHS teachers will participate in a building in-service.
Continuous Quality Improvement Basics Created by Michigan’s Campaign to End Homelessness Statewide Training Workgroup 2010.
Cal Poly Pomona University Strategic Plan 2011 ‐ 2015 Partial Assessment of Progress Presented to the University Strategic Planning Committee (USPC) 12/4/2014.
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
Quality Online Preparation: Qualities of Faculty, Courses, and Preparation Programs By Dr. Erin O’Brien Valencia College League of Innovation Conference,
Promoting Effective Assessment Practices Through Peer Review Claudia J. Stanny Director, Center for University Teaching, Learning, & Assessment Amy Mitchell-Cook.
CIAS Program Level Assessment Office of Educational Effectiveness Assessment September 6, 2016.
Establish and Identify Processes  Identify and establish current state:  Roles and responsibilities  Processes and procedures  Operational performance.
KELAIAH HARRIS, ANDREW LAMANQUE, ANGEL TZENG SEW, SPRING 2015 Update on Student Equity Plan Activities.
“Live” CI-PLN Healthy Start Convention November 16, 2015.
The Performance and Staff Development Program
Student Equity Plan Review
Shelter Employee Engagement & Development Survey
Strategic Planning Forum Number Three
Instructional Leadership for a Professional Learning Culture:
Polices, procedures & protocols
WG Chairs Forum Wednesday 29 March 2017.
Year-at-a Glance Monthly Coaching Meeting
HUB Program Update FY Strategy
WIRED Performance Reporting
September 19, 2017 Hub ballroom
D Adapted from: Kaplan & Norton The YCCD District Mission, Vision, Values & Goals are Foundational to College Planning. All College EMP work aligns.
Exceptional Children Division Special Programs and Data Section
Strategic Planning Summary.
A Guide for Academic Staff
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
Division Liaison Update
Assessment Day 2017 New Student Experience Presented by Jenny Lee
School Improvement Plans and School Data Teams
ABA Management Council Meeting
[Region name] Region Conference 2016
Sam Houston State University
Organizational Consulting
Chicago Public Schools
Strategic Planning Summary.
[Organization Name]: Sepsis Collaborative
Completing your Program Review
Sam Houston State University
A Guide for Academic Staff
Strategic Enhancement
Assessment Day 2017 New Student Experience Presented by Jenny Lee
ABC Unified School District
Assessment Day Strategy
Fort Valley State University
2017 Cycle Department Report to DRC Name of Department
An Introduction to Evaluating Federal Title Funding
Background This slide should be removed from the deck once the template is updated. During the 2019 Legislative Session, the Legislature updated a the.
Central New York HEALTH EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS COALITION
Presentation transcript:

Coordinator: Name Mentor: Name 2017 Cycle Department Report to DRC Name of Department Assessment Cycle 2017 Coordinator: Name Mentor: Name

Departmental Assessment Process Did you alter your process this year? What went well? What will you change in the next cycle to make the process better for your department?

Departmental Assessment Process How does your department use assessment data?

Feedback and Suggestions Rubrics: Online System:

Proactivity Benchmarks 1. Dates of Mentor-Coordinator Meetings: June (planning): ___ /___ /___ July/Aug: ___ /___ /___, ___ /___ /___ Other: 2. Dates of Mentor and/or Coordinator meetings with DRC Chair: 3. Date(s) of OEAS Consultation(s): 4. Attended Training:  Assessment I: Results Reports  Assessment II: Plans 5. Department Director involvement:  Review  Suggested Improvements  Attended Meetings

Ratings Progress 2017 CYCLE (PROJECTED) 2017-18 Plan 2016-17 Results Enter rating To update the ratings chart, click on the chart and select on “edit data” in the ribbon. Exemplary Accomplished Maturing Emerging Beginning

2017 Cycle Department Report to DRC Closing the Loop Assessing the impact of implemented changes Outcome ___ Measure ___ Required for Accomplished and Exemplary Ratings

Closing the Loop Assessing the impact of implemented changes and DOCUMENTING IMPROVED OUTCOMES Outcome ___ Measure ___ Required for Exemplary Ratings

UCF Collective Impact Strategic Plan Promise # ____: Subheading: Metric / Strategy: Outcome _____ Measure _____ supports the above metric or strategy of the UCF Collective Impact Strategic Plan by:

Success Story See example slide

Changes to Operations, Services, or Business Practices based on data in 2016-17 Results Report Changes to 2017-18 Plan Enter changes Enter changes

Instructions Cycle 2017 includes 2016-17 Results Report 2017-18 Plan Instruction/sample slides and bubbles (text with purple background) should be removed. All slides are required for all departments, except for the Closing the Loop slides which do not apply to departments with ratings of Maturing and below.

Outcome 1 Success Story – Sample Slide Your closing the loop slides specifically focus on this reporting period. Your success story traces one story/theme over multiple assessment cycles. You may use multiple slides. 13-14–identified the need to train staff regarding Purchasing processes and procedures. Implemented training, impact of 35 employees. 14-15–implemented training and outreach strategies to address training gap STRATEGY: targeted four departments based on data-identified areas of concern. DOCUMENTED IMPROVEMENT: Training of 117 employees resulted in reduction in unauthorized purchases, as evidenced by one department reduction from 41 to only one in the reporting period. 15-16 –continue our training sessions for departments in an effort to enhance their STRATEGY: Training focus change to understanding the procurement processes/procedures. This will facilitate time-effective and cost-effective buying. RESULTS: Hosted three trainings (45 attendees) and documented departments of attendance (2 colleges, three centers/institutes, and one admin unit). DOCUMENTED IMPROVEMENT: Trainings increased competitive solicitations in the departments trained from 4 to 9, with a documented savings increase of $185,600.64 over the previous year. 16-17 – increase attendance by 5%, review data for attending departments to determine specific impacts of trainings.