College of Public Health and Human Sciences

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Step 3: Strategy Development. Learning Objectives Define strategy/strategic approach Understand strategy development process Engage in informed dialogue.
Advertisements

From Research to Advocacy
Some Practical Steps to Test Construction
Evaluating Decision Support Systems Projects. Who Evaluates Technical Managers  Chief Information Officer,  Corporate IT professionals,  Database administrators,
Knowledge Translation Curriculum Module 3: Priority Setting Lesson 2 - Interpretive Priority Setting Processes.
Public Finance Public Policy Paper Igor Baranov Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg University.
Midterm Review Evaluation & Research Concepts Proposals & Research Design Measurement Sampling Survey methods.
Risk Management and Strategy Prioritisation Intelligence Step 8 - Risk Management and Strategy Prioritisaiton Considering the risks associated with action.
ESPA Comprehensive Aquifer Management Plan Presentation to the Governor’s Water Summit April 17, 2007 Idaho Water Resource Board Jonathan Bartsch and Diane.
ABET 1 SAYS - Your Senior Design Course Should Include Engineering design is the process of devising a system, component, or process to meet desired needs.
PPA 503 – The Public Policy Making Process
61 What is hazard risk management?. 62 Emergency risk management is “a systematic process that produces a range of measures that contribute to the well.
OECD GUIDANCE FOR REGULATORY COMPLIANCE COST ASSESSMENT Antonia Custance Baker Analyst, Regulatory Policy Division OECD 14 April 2014.
Concept Analysis Document Executive Summary Template, (To view template instructions – Save this template to project files, reopen and then select View,
Dealing with Policy Change in Education Common borders. Common Solutions. Grant Contract No , MIS-ETC 2674 MANAGE.EDU: Efficient Education.
Lesson 8: Effectiveness Macerata, 11 December Alessandro Valenza, Director, t33 srl.
A Comparison of 42 Local, National, and International HIA Guidelines Andrew L. Dannenberg, MD, MPH Katherine Hebert, MCRP Arthur M. Wendel, MD, MPH Sarah.
© Mahindra Satyam 2009 Decision Analysis and Resolution QMS Training.
Research & Technology Implementation TxDOT RTI OFFICE.
Guidelines for Impact and Adaptation Assessment Design versus Implementation Issues RICHARD J.T. KLEIN POTSDAM INSTITUTE FOR CLIMATE IMPACT RESEARCH (PIK)
Introduction to the Research Framework Work-in-progress Conceptualizing the Criteria to assess ‘appropriateness’ of actions in given ‘national’ circumstances.
The Health Policy Process
Policy Development Unit 7. 2 Policy Development l Policy: Authoritative guidelines that direct human behavior toward specific goals l Politics: Use of.
Introduction to Public Policy. Outline What is public policy? Why study it? Contexts of public policy Reasons for government intervention Role of policy.
Readings n Text: Riddick & Russell –Ch1 stakeholders – p10 –Ch 2 an evaluation system –Proposal p25-36 – Ch 4 – Lit Review n Coursepack –GAO report Ch.
MAVILLE ALASTRE-DIZON Philippine Normal University
Environmental Planning. Evolution of Planning Planning as Design ( ) Planning as regulation 1925 – Planning as Applied Science 1940 – Planning.
John N. Lavis, MD, PhD Professor and Canada Research Chair in Knowledge Transfer and Exchange McMaster University Program in Policy Decision-Making McMaster.
California Water Plan Old and New Steve Macaulay, Executive Director.
Public Policy Process and Public Administration
Selecting Evaluation Criteria and Evaluating Policy
CLASS ONE – NURSING HISTORY.  Demonstrates expert knowledge, skills, and attitudes in the practice of nursing  Administrative skills are based upon.
Planning Planning is considered the most important element of the administrative process. The higher the level of administration, the more the involvement.
Strategic planning LADA- Assessing the Status, Causes and Impact of Land Degradation.
Guide for Financial Analysis of Economic Development Projects City of Hampton Finance Committee.
Yandell - Econ 216 Chap 1-1 Chapter 1 Introduction and Data Collection.
Logic Models How to Integrate Data Collection into your Everyday Work.
Analysis Manager Training Module
Managing the Information Systems Project
Feasibility.
Module 9 Designing and using EFGR-responsive evaluation indicators
April 21 Francesca Recanatini, WBI
CSU/Riverside Global Water & Climate Initiative
Accountability System
Infrastructure planning and management
CEEN 525 Policy Analysis Framework
Accountability System
Decision Matrices Business Economics.
COMPETITION ASSESSMENT of Laws and Regulations
Air Carrier Continuing Analysis and Surveillance System (CASS)
Multi-Sectoral Nutrition Action Planning Training Module
Project Plan Template (Help text appears in cursive on slides and in the notes field)
College of Public Health and Human Sciences
College of Public Health and Human Sciences
College of Public Health and Human Sciences
College of Public Health and Human Sciences
College of Public Health and Human Sciences
Project Management Process Groups
Chapter 1: Introduction to Engineering Economy
SparkPoint Coordinator
Policy Making In the Public Interest
TITLE Business Case YOUR LOGO BUSINESS CASE PRESENTATION 00/00/0000
Creating an Innovation and Culture Change Plan
Economics 2/3 The Goals of a Nation.
Getting Ready for IPMA Level D® Certification in the USA
Main recommendations & conclusions (1)
Project Manager, EA, the REC
What is Planning? Planning as a Basic Human Activity
Shanar Tabrizi Knowledge Management Specialist
The Context of Public Policy
Presentation transcript:

College of Public Health and Human Sciences Public Health Policy Institute Selecting a Policy Option and Crafting a Policy Statement Presenter: Jeff Luck & Jangho Yoon Date: August 22, 2013

Review possible criteria for selecting among multiple policy options Agenda Review possible criteria for selecting among multiple policy options Outline key elements of draft policy statement September 20, 2018 Public Health Policy Institute

Evaluative criteria for comparing multiple policy options   Definition Limitation Effectiveness How well will a policy work? Likelihood of achieving policy goals and objectives Estimates involve uncertain projection of future events. Efficiency What will we get for our money? Benefits in relation to costs: Least cost for given benefit or largest benefit for given cost. Measuring all costs and benefits is not always possible. Equity Will a policy be fair? Fairness in distribution of the policy’s costs, benefits, & risks across population subgroups. Can be difficult to measure equity. Involves making qualitative judgment. September 20, 2018 Public Health Policy Institute

Evaluative criteria for comparing multiple policy options (cont.)   Definition Limitation Feasibility Political Extent to which elected officials accept and support a policy proposal. Depends on personalities and economic and political conditions. Administrative Likelihood that an agency can implement the policy effectively. Requires estimate of available resources and leadership. Technical Availability or reliability of technology needed for policy implementation. Difficult to anticipate technological change. Social acceptability Extent to which stakeholders will accept and support a proposed policy. Depends on saliency of the issues and level of public awareness. Liberty Extent to which policy extends or restricts individual rights and choices. May involve value judgments September 20, 2018 Public Health Policy Institute

Policy Selection Methods Matrix (scorecard) display method Multiple criteria can be assessed at the same time. Alternatives are listed along one axis of a matrix. The criteria are listed along the other axis. Cells can be filled with numeric scores or qualitative assessments Criteria Option A Option B Option C Effectiveness Efficiency Equity Feasibility Political Administrative Technical Social acceptability Liberty September 20, 2018 Public Health Policy Institute

Policy Selection Methods Weighted checklist example Criteria Score (1 – 10) Weight Option A Option B Option C Effectiveness 5 7 6 1 Efficiency 9 8 3 Equity 4 10 0.5 Feasibility   Political Administrative Technical n/a Social acceptability 1.5 Liberty Sum 61 60 42 September 20, 2018 Public Health Policy Institute

Policy Selection Methods Goeller scorecard example Selected criteria Option A Option B Option C   Effectiveness XXXXX Efficiency Equity Feasibility Political Administrative Social acceptability September 20, 2018 Public Health Policy Institute

Drafting a policy statement A simple 1 page policy statement is very useful for sharing your ideas and moving toward planning Format 1 or 2 paragraph description of you policy problem 1 paragraph description of each policy option Indication of preferred option (at this time) September 20, 2018 Public Health Policy Institute