AYP and Report Card Last updated: 08/20/09.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School and District Report Cards Validation WebEx Jon Wiens Office of Assessment Oregon Department of Education
Advertisements

Bureau of Indian Education
North Santiam School District State Report Cards
Presented to the State Board of Education August 22, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
No Child Left Behind Act January 2002 Revision of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Education is a state and local responsibility Insure.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Update on Data Reporting April LEAP Changes LEAP software will be released shortly. Final LEAP software will not be available before mid-July. We.
Hickory Ridge Elementary School Annual Title One Parent Meeting
Annual Title I Parent Meeting Martin Luther King Jr. Middle School.
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
Acquiring English Proficiency in the Torrington Public Schools Programs, Process, and Student Progress Cheryl F. Kloczko.
End of Course Assessments School Year English Language Arts, Math, Biology, and Government.
Program Improvement/ Title I Parent Involvement Meeting October 9, :00 p.m. Redwood City School District.
Growth. 10/17/2015Free Template from 2 Objectives Understand the Growth Model Understand how the model can be used to improve student.
Ohio’s New Accountability System Ohio’s Response to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) a.k.a. Elementary & Secondary Education Act a.k.a. ESEA January 8, 2002.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
AYP and Report Card. AYP/RC –Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. –Understand the purpose and role of the Report Card in Oregon.
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.
1 Student Longitudinal Growth Project Jonathan Wiens Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
1 No Child Left Behind: Identification of Program Improvement (PI) Schools and Districts July 2003.
Understanding AMAOs Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives for Title III Districts School Year Results.
Cohort Graduation Rate. 1/8/2016Free Template from 2 Objectives Understand the changes to the graduation rate Understand how the cohort.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
GEORGIA’S CRITERION-REFERENCED COMPETENCY TESTS (CRCT) Questions and Answers for Parents of Georgia Students February 11, 2009 Presented by: MCES.
Preliminary AYP Preliminary Adequate Yearly Progress Data.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Priority School District Capacity Review Process and Results Oklahoma State Department of Education March 29, 2012.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.
Performance Wisconsin Student Assessment System
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) State Plan: Update
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
2012 Accountability Determinations
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010
AYP and Report Card.
What Parents Need to Know
NAEP and PSAT Last updated: 08/20/09.
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
NAEP and PSAT.
STAAR State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness
Adequate Progress Gina LaPlaca Grand Canyon University
Kim Miller Oregon Department of Education
What Parents Need to Know
Cohort Graduation Rate
Anderson Elementary School
What Parents Need to Know
District Test Coordinators Training
E L P A Last updated: 08/31/09.
District Test Coordinators Training
What Parents Need to Know
PHILLIPS PREPARATORY SCHOOL
Growth Last updated: 08/20/09.
E L P A.
AYP and Report Card.
Cohort Graduation Rate
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
What Parents Need to Know
Adequate Yearly Progress: What’s Old, What’s New, What’s Next?
Presentation transcript:

AYP and Report Card Last updated: 08/20/09

Big Picture Objectives AYP/RC Big Picture Objectives Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. Understand the purpose and role of the Report Card in Oregon Assessments. Understand your responsibilities in relation to AYP and Report Card. 9/20/2018 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com

Free Template from www.brainybetty.com AYP/RC Definition AYP AYP (Adequate Yearly Progress) is a federal accountability reporting requirement under the No Child Left Behind Act. (Started 2002-03) Under AYP, ODE reports on whether schools and districts have made adequate progress toward the goal of having all students meet rigorous academic standards. Each year, the performance of all students in the school and district, as well as subgroups of students, is measured against annual performance targets. States must identify for improvement any school or district receiving Title I funds that does not meet adequate yearly progress for two consecutive years in the same content area. 9/20/2018 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com

Free Template from www.brainybetty.com AYP/RC Definition AYP Aug 21 – Last date for changes to data Aug 31 – Substantive Appeals applied and Pending designations resolved; District Preview & embargoed media file Sep 3 – Public Release (pdfs and media files posted) 9/20/2018 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com

Free Template from www.brainybetty.com AYP/RC Definition Report Card In law, they are actually named “school and district performance reports.” These reports provide educators with an opportunity to communicate directly with parents and community members about how local schools are performing. The form of the Report Cards is used to meet state and federal reporting requirements. Schools designated as In Need of Improvement shall file a school improvement plan with the Superintendent of Public Instruction and with the school district board. 9/20/2018 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com

Free Template from www.brainybetty.com AYP/RC Changes AYP Basically stayed the same in 2009-10 In 2010-11, there will be some logistical changes 3rd period Cumulative ADM will be the basis for participation ODE will also report the data according to students served by the district and not associated with a school ODE will more closely review the Full Academic Year and District Special Education flags AYP will include the new cohort graduation rate 9/20/2018 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com

Free Template from www.brainybetty.com AYP/RC Changes (cont) AYP In order to meet AYP All subgroups in a school must meet the participation and academic performance targets in English/Language Arts and Mathematics The school must meet the target for attendance or graduation for high schools 2 years of data are used or 4 years used for small schools The targets this year are: Participation – 95% Math – 59% English/Language Arts – 60% Attendance 92% or Graduation 68.1% School Year English/ Language Arts Mathematics 2009-10 60% 59% 2010-11 70% 2011-12 80% 2012-13 90% 2013-14 100% 9/20/2018 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com

Free Template from www.brainybetty.com AYP/RC Changes (cont) Report Card Basically, everything changes in 2009-10 Changes include The ratings The data that are included The formula used to derive the ratings 9/20/2018 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com

Free Template from www.brainybetty.com AYP/RC Changes (cont) Report Card (cont) Only three overall rating categories Outstanding Satisfactory In Need of Improvement Achievement based on math and reading scores. Graduation Rates used instead of dropout rates. The growth model will be incorporated into the rating formula. 9/20/2018 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com

Free Template from www.brainybetty.com AYP/RC Changes (cont) Report Card (cont) Points awarded according to: 133 points for Exceeds 100 points for Meets 100 points for Did Not Meet, but Met Growth Use the same students as are used for AYP includes extended assessments includes the 1% rule for extended assessments At high school we will use growth in school performance as the growth measure, and will give partial credit for nearly meets and low. 9/20/2018 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com

Free Template from www.brainybetty.com AYP/RC Changes (cont) Report Card (cont) Subgroups are not rated individually, only a holistic school rating is given. To address the Achievement Gap, a school’s Achievement Index is a weighted average of the achievement of subgroups. Subgroups in the weighting include “All Students” plus subgroups with an historic statewide achievement gap. Low Attendance/Graduation and Participation can lower the school rating. 9/20/2018 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com

Free Template from www.brainybetty.com AYP/RC Dos and Don’ts Dos Include students for participation if they were enrolled on the 1st day of May. Include students for performance if they were enrolled on the 1st day of May for a full academic year. Include Extended Assessments within 1% cap as Met. Monitor data throughout the year. Code Full Academic Year correctly 9/20/2018 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com

Free Template from www.brainybetty.com AYP/RC Dos and Don’ts (cont) Don’ts Don’t Include Extended Assessments over 1% cap as met. Anything over 1% must be recorded as Not Met. Don’t leave a school as “pending”. ODE will default schools to rating of “Not Met” Don’t code students at the district level unless a school is not accountable for their education. Don’t overuse the District Special Education Flag 9/20/2018 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com

Free Template from www.brainybetty.com AYP/RC In a Nutshell AYP Stays basically the same Report Card changes a lot Planning that the Report Card policy manual available by August 31st. 9/20/2018 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com

Free Template from www.brainybetty.com 9/20/2018 Free Template from www.brainybetty.com