Student Evaluation Case Competition

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Student Survey Results and Analysis May Overview HEB ISD Students in grades 6 through 12 were invited to respond the Student Survey during May 2010.
Advertisements

QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT Coach as Facilitator The purpose of this module is to present key concepts of facilitation and provide an opportunity for participants.
San Luis Obispo Community College District SENSE 2012 Findings for Cuesta College.
Once in a lifetime opportunity International business competition for undergraduates compete against 23 other countries worldwide Three great reasons.
'Learner Autonomy through the production of a public history resource' Emma Robertson.
Autism Team Training in South Dakota Presented by Brittany Schmidt, MA-CCC/SLP Center for Disabilities Autism Spectrum Disorders Program
Taking the Chair A National Development Programme for Chairs, Vice- Chairs and Chairs of Committees Module Two Activity 2.1 OHT 1.
Aboriginal Business Mentorship Program. ₀Provide a mentor experience for Aboriginal business persons. ₀Help identify and pursue their business goals.
Team Members: * Hana Mehmedovic * Mariola Koplejewska * Ciera Sumner * Trinh Tran Mentors: * The Wonderful Jade Curry & The Magnificent Duaa Saleh.
Ratio of reviews written by respondents to every 100 companies they have done business with Most respondents had written between 5 and 10 reviews out of.
Students as Change Agents Exploring issues of Student Engagement among On- Campus MSc Students Denise Ryder, Jonathan Doney, Nii Tackie-Yaoboi With Nadine.
Forming Performing Use this worksheet while delivering the Moving Teams to High Performance workshop. Ask participants to fill in each of the quadrants.
What Women have said helps them to succeed An evaluation of the women’s programs.
Service Learning Artavius Morgan. Definition of Service Learning n. the incorporation of community service within an educational system, esp. as a graduation.
Accountability Pillar: Continuous Improvement – School Improvement Detail.
Personal Development Plan Name:______________________________ Date:________________ Completion of this plan will follow a 4 step process. Each step will.
Undergraduate Research Opportunity Program
GÉANT 4 Managing People & Performance in Virtual Teams - MPiViT
Development of Self-Determination and Social Skills of College-Bound Students with Visual Impairments Report on an Intervention Program Designed to Improve.
Our aim is to end inequality in careers education.
International Students Mentoring Programme
Curriculum in Neurodevelopmental Disabilities
THM 243 Mid-Semester Evaluation
Continuous Improvement Project (A Guideline For Sponsors)
Views and experiences of Aston undergraduate students in connection with student finance, debt, and employment. Sushmita Jha.
Improving Collaborative Teaching Through utilization of teacher feedback and direct observation Denise Hall, PEDU 504.
Student Peer Moderated Reflection for Changing
Woodland Public Schools Staff Survey Results
Hillingdon CCG CCG 360o stakeholder survey 2014 Summary report.
Librarian Led Technology Sessions Participation in EBM Conference
Woodland Public Schools Parent Survey Results
The Greater Manchester Choices show offers a great range of resources and opportunities for teachers and education professionals to improve their knowledge.
Our aim is to end inequality in careers education.
Evaluating performance management
International Students Mentoring Programme
Encouraging Collaboration
Findings from Cardinal Ambrozic Grade Nine Math Survey
Objectives Identifying how to apply your past experiences to help you be a courageous leader Gaining insight on how to listen from another person’s view.
WHERE DO WE STAND? DISAGREE AGREE Activity 2A Continuum
2016 DTSDE Surveys: Warring Elementary School
Building Relationships with your Team/Zone
KNOCKING OPPORTUNITIES
Montana University System Staff Association (MUSSA) Board of Regents meeting May 25, 2017 John.
Pakitang-turo Dr. Lakangiting Garcia.
Essential Question: How can I give back to my school and community over the course of the year?
School Climate Survey 2008.
Patient Family Survey Lean Six Sigma: Resident Work Rounds Project
Sinless Splurge PROJECT EVALUATION
THM 243 Mid-Semester Evaluation
Nursing Survey Lean Six Sigma: Resident Work Rounds Project
2016 DTSDE Surveys: Clinton Elementary School
THM 415 Mid-Semester Evaluation
Skills competitions Experiences of past competitors
Personal Development Plan
Resident Survey Lean Six Sigma: Resident Work Rounds Project
Mercedes Smart Car 8 feet long (3.5 feet shorter than Mini), 60 MPG, recyclable …but is it electric?
EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES CLICK TO GO BACK TO KIOSK MENU
Harrow CCG CCG 360o stakeholder survey 2014 Summary report.
Student Survey Results
3rd Year PTM Survey Feedback 45 responses
Undergraduate Survey Data
Although U.S. adults generally believe that scientific research is beneficial, other indicators of the perceived impact of science are less conclusive.
To RCT, or not RCT: that is the question
STRESS MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS
Survey Taker Name: Question Survey Taker Name:
Managing the New Generation
Optional Module 7—Mindset
Woodland Public Schools Parent Survey Results
Utilising Module Evaluation data to explore outcomes from the Teaching Excellence and Student Outcomes Framework (TEF) Subject Level Pilot. Natalie Holland.
CIHE Annual Conference
Presentation transcript:

Student Evaluation Case Competition Survey of Past Participants: 1996 - 2015 The Student Evaluation Case Competition celebrates its 20th anniversary in 2016! The competition, sponsored by CES and CESEF, is an event for students to learn evaluation and evaluative thinking. As part of the celebration, a e-survey was conducted with past participants to explore their experiences. This handout highlights the main findings.1 E-survey developed and piloted Survey sent to 768/1132 participants Survey posted on CES webpage 112 (14%) surveys completed Methods: Participants: LOCATION 83% Participated only once in the competition Territories: 2% 56% 59% 16% 8% 12% 15% 7% 4% 1% 3% 2% 3% currently live outside Canada Legend Location when competing Current location 40% Of survey respondents were finalists Of survey respondents were CES Members 48% 39% currently spend 50% or more of work time on evaluation 1Data was available from only 10% of all case competition participants. CES members were overrepresented and data was weighted to account for this.

Impacts of the Case Competition Participants were asked to rate their Case Competition experiences (out of 5)2, and answer an open-ended question. Of the 112 respondents, 49 provided a narrative. The competition was a positive experience 83% Agreed or strongly agreed that they enjoyed participating in the competition “The competition was a very positive experience, although I am not one who enjoys competitions for the most part. I was blessed with wonderful team mates.” Participants gained practical evaluation experience 81% Agreed or strongly agreed that participating increased their understanding of evaluation “…it supplemented the program evaluation experience I received via my academic program. There is no better way to get that than from a hands-on experience with a "real-world" case.” Many since engaged in evaluation activities 66% 60% 53% Used the results of a program evaluation Worked as a program evaluator Pursued further education in evaluation “The Case Competition allowed me to learn more about myself, specifically learning to [work] with a team with different ideas and directions of a project. It also enhanced my decision to pursue employment as an evaluator. The Case Competition provided me with the skills and experience to do some level of evaluation in my current position. It definitely was one of my best experiences during my graduate studies and prepared me for employment post-graduation. I encourage students to participate in the Case Competition as it was an invaluable experience for me.” Conclusions: The survey results indicate that the Case Competition had a positive impact on the majority of participants. Feedback indicated that the competition had many benefits for participants and strong effects on their understanding of evaluation. Acknowledgements: The survey team included Ashley Baker, Christine Sheppard, Petra Lolic and Shilpa Soni. Bea Courtney and Michael Obrecht provided external advice and support. 2The scale used by respondents was as follows: 1 strongly disagree; 2 disagree; 3 neutral opinion; 4 agree; and 5 strongly agree.