Status of PEP-X Lattice Design Study

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ultimate Storage Rings PEP-X and SPring-8 II R. Hettel for the PEP-X design team and T. Watanabe et al., SPring-8 FLS 2012 JNAL March 7, 2012.
Advertisements

Dr. Zafer Nergiz Nigde University THE STATUS OF TURKISH LIGHT SOURCE.
SuperB Damping Rings M. Biagini, LNF-INFN P. Raimondi, SLAC/INFN A. Wolski, Cockroft Institute, UK SuperB III Workshop, SLAC, June 2006.
SuperB and the ILC Damping Rings Andy Wolski University of Liverpool/Cockcroft Institute 27 April, 2006.
Yichao Jing 11/11/2010. Outline Introduction Linear lattice design and basic parameters Combined function magnets study and feasibility Nonlinear dynamics.
June 14th 2005 Accelerator Division Overview of ALBA D. Einfeld Vacuum Workshop Barcelona, 12 th -13 th September 2005 General 10 th September 2005.
CLIC Pre-damping rings overview F. Antoniou, Y. Papaphilippou CLIC Workshop 2009.
Update of 3.2 km ILC DR design (DMC3) Dou Wang, Jie Gao, Gang Xu, Yiwei Wang (IHEP) IWLC2010 Monday 18 October - Friday 22 October 2010 Geneva, Switzerland.
E. Karantzoulis - BESSY, June Elettra2.0-The next generation Emanuel Karantzoulis Circumference m 12 fold symmetry Energy 2 (& 2.4 GeV.
SuperB Lattice Studies M. Biagini LNF-INFN ILCDR07 Workshop, LNF-Frascati Mar. 5-7, 2007.
ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design ( Modified FODO ) ** Yi-Peng Sun *,1,2, Jie Gao 1, Zhi-Yu Guo 2 Wei-Shi Wan 3 1 Institute of High Energy Physics,
PEP-X Ultra Low Emittance Storage Ring Design at SLAC Lattice Design and Optimization Min-Huey Wang SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory With contributions.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Emittance reduction by a SC wiggler in the ATF-DR September 16 th, 2009 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU and Rogelio TOMAS ATF2 weekly meeting.
Lattice design for FCC-ee Bastian Haerer (CERN BE-ABP-LAT, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)) 1 8 th Gentner Day, 28 October 2015.
Workshop on Accelerator R&D for Ultimate Storage Rings – Oct Nov.1 – Huairou, Beijing, China A compact low emittance lattice with superbends for.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES 1 NSLS-II Lattice Design 1.TBA-24 Lattice Design - Advantages and shortcomings Low emittance -> high chromaticity -> small.
Parameter scan for the CLIC damping rings July 23rd, 2008 Y. Papaphilippou Thanks to H. Braun, M. Korostelev and D. Schulte.
Optics with Large Momentum Acceptance for Higgs Factory Yunhai Cai SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Future Circular Collider Kick-off Meeting, February.
HF2014 Workshop, Beijing, China 9-12 October 2014 Challenges and Status of the FCC-ee lattice design Bastian Haerer Challenges.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz IDS- NF Acceleration Meeting, Jefferson Lab,
ESLS Workshop Nov 2015 MAX IV 3 GeV Ring Commissioning Pedro F. Tavares & Åke Andersson, on behalf of the whole MAX IV team.
Off-axis injection lattice design studies of HEPS storage ring
ILC DR Lower Horizontal Emittance, preliminary study
J-PARC main ring lattice An overview
MDI and head-on collision option for electron-positron Higgs factories
LOW EMITTANCE CELL WITH LARGE DYNAMIC APERTURE
NSLS-II Lattice Design Strategies Weiming Guo 07/10/08
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Non-linear Beam Dynamics Studies for JLEIC Electron Collider Ring
Coupling Correction at the Australian Synchrotron
Recent Studies of Injection System at
Non linear optimization of the CLIC pre-damping rings
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Optics Development for HE-LHC
Electron collider ring Chromaticity Compensation and dynamic aperture
PETRA IV Lattice Studies
Introduction to Design Issues and Optimization of Low Emittance Rings
Analysis of Nonlinear Dynamics
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
The new 7BA design of BAPS
R. Bartolini Diamond Light Source Ltd
Status of SuperKEKB Design: Lattice and IR
DA study for CEPC Main Ring
DA Study for the CEPC Partial Double Ring Scheme
SuperB ARC Lattice Studies
XII SuperB Project Workshop LAPP, Annecy, France, March 16-19, 2010
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
SuperB CDR Machine P. Raimondi for the SuperB Team Paris, May 9, 2007.
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
SPEAR3 Lower Emittance & Nonlinear Dynamics
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
PEPX-type BAPS Lattice Design and Beam Dynamics Optimization
Overall Considerations, Main Challenges and Goals
M. E. Biagini, LNF-INFN SuperB IRC Meeting Frascati, Nov , 2007
PS2 meeting NMC lattice for PS2 Y. Papaphilippou September 28th, 2007.
Towards an NMC Ring: Dispersion suppressor & long straight section
Optics considerations for PS2
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Progress on Non-linear Beam Dynamic Study
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
Fanglei Lin, Yuri Nosochkov Vasiliy Morozov, Yuhong Zhang, Guohui Wei
Status of IR / Nonlinear Dynamics Studies
JLEIC Electron Ring Nonlinear Dynamics Work Plan
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
A TME-like Lattice for DA Studies
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
Presentation transcript:

Status of PEP-X Lattice Design Study Yuri Nosochkov Beam Physics Department On behalf of BPD Optics Group ARD Status Meeting April 7, 2011

Motivation SLAC-PUB-13999, April 2010 2.2 km PEP-II tunnel

Evolution of PEP-X lattice design Studied lattice configurations ex0, nm-rad at 4.5 GeV, without / with damping wiggler, no IBS Year Minimal PEP-2 HER modification: 6 existing FODO arcs with higher 90 cell phase 4 existing FODO arcs and 2 new DBA arcs 5.0 / 0.41 1.7 / 0.32 2008 Pre-baseline: 4 TME arcs and 2 DBA arcs 0.30 / 0.067 2008 - 2009 Baseline: 4 TME arcs and 2 DBA supercell arcs with low ID beta 0.38 / 0.086 2009 - 2010 White Paper Ultimate: 6 arcs with Multi-Bend Achromat (MBA) cells for lowest emittance 0.029 / ~0.01-0.015 2010 - 2011 under study

Baseline design report Baseline design report SLAC-PUB-13999 (2010) + 10 conference papers Lattice Transverse dynamics IBS & Touschek lifetime RF system Impedance Collective effects Partial lasing

Baseline ring configuration The same 2.2 km ring geometry as in PEP-II with six 243 m arcs and six 123 m straights in order to fit into the existing tunnel . Two new DBA arcs providing 30 straights for ~3.5 m IDs. Four new TME arcs for low emittance. 90 m damping wiggler with B=1.5T, lp=10cm to lower emittance to 86 pm-rad. FODO optics in long straights. PEP-II based injection system. 4.5 GeV beam energy.

Schematic of photon beamlines in PEP-X

Baseline arc cells: DBA and TME high b ID low b ID DBA supercell DBA supercell = two standard DBA cells with a low-b and high-b ID straights: bx,y = 3.00, 6.07 m and 16.04, 6.27 m. Supercell length = 30.42 m. 30 dispersion free straights in 2 arcs for Insertion Devices. Natural emittance = 0.54 nm at 4.5 GeV. TME Compact 7.3 m TME cells in 4 arcs for low emittance. Do not provide ID straights. Low natural emittance = 0.1 nm. Combined DBA & TME arcs emittance = 0.38 nm.

Baseline parameters with wiggler on and off Wiggler off Energy, E0 [GeV] 4.5 Circumference, C [m] 2199.32 Emittance, ex [pm-rad, 0 current] 86 380 Beam current, I [A] 1.5 Harmonic number, h 3492 Number of bunches, nb 3154 Bunch length, sz [mm] 3.0 Energy spread, sd 1.14 x 10-3 0.55 x 10-3 Momentum compaction, ap 5.81 x 10-5 Tunes, nx/ny/ns 87.23 / 36.14 / 0.0077 87.23 / 36.14 / 0.0037 Damping times, tx/ty/ts [ms] 20.3 / 21.2 / 10.8 101 / 127 / 73 Energy loss, U0 [MeV/turn] 3.12 0.52 RF voltage, VRF [MV] 8.9 2.0 bx/by at ID center, [m] (low/high b) [ 3.00 / 6.07 ], [ 16.04 / 6.27 ] With IBS at 1.5 A: e = 164 / 8 pm-rad; Touschek lifetime ~30 min.

PEP-X baseline brightness PEP-X, 1.5A, 3.5m ID

PEP-X in ERL options PEP-X baseline ring design is also compatible with the two studied ERL configurations, where: ERL SC linac is in the SLAC linac tunnel, and the PEP-II injection line and tunnel are reused. SC linac is inside of the PEP-X ring for potential cost saving. Simulations of bunches with E=5 GeV, sz=2 ps, Q=77 pC, ge=0.3 mm-rad indicate acceptable (~10%) emittance growth in both options. Loop SC Linac Injection PEP-X Ring Extraction Bypass

Toward “ultimate” design There is a growing interest in the so-called “ultimate” ring design for a synchrotron light source. It aims at achieving a near maximum brightness by reducing the electron emittance in both planes toward and beyond the diffraction limited photon emittance. where F(l) = photon flux, Electron & photon size and divergence: Photon emittance: (small) e- g x x' Matched be- = br for max B Matched b for ID length L: “… To approach diffraction-limited performance: (1) the electron beam emittance, sxysx'y' must be comparable to or less than the intrinsic photon beam emittance, l/4p and (2) the phase space of the electron and photon beam sizes must be matched (i.e., sr/sr' ≈ sx/sx' ≈ sy/sy'). For hard X-ray radiation at l = 0.1 nm, l/4p = 8 pm-rad while for soft X-rays at l = 1 nm the diffraction limit is 80 pm-rad ...” “The potential of an ultimate storage ring for future light sources.” M. Bei et al., Nucl.Instrum.Meth.A622:518-535,2010.

Scaling for low emittance where For N = number of cells in the ring arcs, L = cell length and NL = const: Need: 1) short cells, 2) low emittance type optics, 3) dipoles with negative gradient for larger Jx. Consequences: Smaller b, h and beam size: Larger ring chromaticity: Stronger quads and sextupoles: Smaller dynamic aperture (affects injection)

Multi-bend achromat cell TME DBA ½ID The new cell should provide both the dispersion free ID straights (DBA type) and the low emittance (TME type). This is achieved using multi-bend achromat cell as in MAX-IV below. The latter contains five TME style units in the middle and half-DBA units at each end. For shorter cell, the QD quads in the TME units are removed and replaced by negative gradient in the dipoles. ½DBA 5 × TME ½DBA MAX-IV

PEP-X 7-bend achromat cell Cell length = 30.4 m, TME unit = 3.1 m, ID straight = 5 m, ID bx,y = 4.9 m / 0.8 m, 5 bends with gradient: LB = 2 m, BB = 1.49 kG, qB = 19.9 mrad, B' = -0.654 kG/cm, 2 matching bends w/o gradient: LBM = 1.6 m, BBM = 1.48 kG, qBM = 15.7 mrad, Quad triplets near ID allow more tuning flexibility, Max quad gradient = 4.3 kG/cm, Natural emittance = 29 pm-rad at 4.5 GeV. Each arc contains 8 cells. 5 TME units

Sextupoles in the 7BA cell TME unit ½ID SF SD Harmonic sext (or octupoles) Matching unit SF and SD sextupoles at dipole and quad locations where dispersion is not zero. Harmonic sextupoles (or octupoles) at the ID triplets – study in progress. Presently modeled as thin lenses: SF inside quads, SD at dipole ends. Max B''L ≈160 kG/cm -- under study. Realistic design should be based on compact integrated magnet designs – for example, as in MAX-IV where dipole + 2 SD sextupoles are made of one iron block. Similar design is planned for quad + sextupole. MAX-IV dipole + 2 sextupoles in one block

Simplified PEP-X ring with 7BA cells 2.2 km ring with 6 identical arcs and 6 identical long straight sections. Each 243.2 m arc contains eight 7BA cells for up to 9 ID straights per arc. Injection optics and damping wiggler are to be included later.

Lattice parameters without wiggler Energy, GeV 4.5 Circumference, m 2199.3167 Betatron tune, x/y 114.23 / 66.14 Synchrotron tune 0.00405 Beam current, A 0.2 Number of bunches 3154 Natural emittance at 0 A, pm 29 (no IBS) Emittance at 0.2 A, x/y, pm 47 / 8 (IBS) RMS bunch length, mm 3.1 RMS momentum spread 7.2e-4 Momentum compaction 5.0e-5 Damping time, x/y/s, ms 75 / 184 / 326 Natural chromaticity, x/y -162.9 / -131.2 Energy loss per turn, MeV 0.36 RF voltage, MV 2.7 Max ID straights per arc 9 Length of ID straight, m 5.0 Beta at ID center, x/y, m 4.9 / 0.8

Cell phase advance Phase advance per cell mx = 21/8 × 2p, my = 11/8 × 2p is chosen based on optimal cell optics properties and maximum dynamic aperture. Each arc (8 cells) has an integer tune advance which provides local cancellation of the sextupole 2nd order geometric and chromatic aberrations in each arc, per K. Brown’s theorem. Local cancellation of 2nd order dispersion in each arc

Cancellation of 3rd and 4th order resonances LEGO tracking confirms local suppression of the 3rd and most of the 4th order resonance terms in each arc due to the chosen cell phase advance. Due to thin lens sextupole model, the effects of finite sextupole length are not yet included. 3rd order driving terms 4th order driving terms

Remaining resonance and tune shift effects 2nx-2ny resonance term is accumulating, and the amplitude dependent tune shifts are quite large. This will affect dynamic aperture. Further optimization may include: 1) sextupoles, 2) minor tuning of cell phase for better 2nx-2ny suppression. From MAD: 2nx-2ny dnx/dex -5.0∙105 dnx/dey -3.0∙104 dny/dey 3.8∙105 (5 times larger than in baseline)

Tune energy dependence Chromatic and harmonic sextupole families have been optimized for minimal tune dependence on energy for larger tune working area.

Dynamic aperture The simplified ring has reasonably large dynamic aperture – about 170sx × 400sy for 47 / 8 pm-rad emittance. This is helped by the 6-fold periodicity, resonance suppression and thin lens sextupole model. Horizontal aperture corresponds to ~15 mm at injection with bx = 200 m which is sufficient. The injection optics and wiggler will break the periodicity which may reduce the aperture (to be studied). At ID: bx = 4.9 m by = 0.8 m

IBS and Touschek lifetime At I = 0.2 A, the IBS results in ~90% higher horizontal emittance. Momentum aperture defined by Touschek scattering is from 1.2% (in arcs) to 2.5% (in straights). Touschek lifetime is ~1 and ~2 hours for diffraction limited and round beam modes. To maintain stable beam intensity, top-up injection may be used. coupling e0 (pm) eIBS (pm) sE (10-4) sz (mm) T (min) 0.17 24.7 / 8.0 46.8 / 8.0 8.4 3.47 58 1 14.5 / 14.5 27.1 / 27.1 8.0 3.30 109 K. Bane

Cell tuning flexibility The cell includes sufficient number of quadrupole families to provide tuning flexibility. The vertical ID beta function can be varied in the range of ~0.5 m to 5 m without changing the cell phase advance. The horizontal ID beta function and emittance are not significantly changed in this range. bx (m) by (m) ex (pm)

Damping wiggler Preliminary estimate shows a reduction of 29 pm emittance to: 15.7 pm for Lw=89m, B=1.0T, lp=10cm 10 pm for Lw=89m, B=1.5T, lp=5cm The wiggler also significantly reduces the damping times to 20-30 msec. A higher wiggler field increases energy spread and requires smaller wiggler gap which reduces vertical acceptance and increases resistive wall impedance. e/e0 vs Lw at 1.5T e/e0 vs B at Lw=89m sE/sE0 vs B

Injection straight section Injection optics will be included in one of the 6 long straight sections. It will have large bx = 200 m for large acceptance area at septum. This lattice is similar to the PEP-X baseline and should be able to reuse the PEP-II injection components.

Summary The PEP-X baseline ring design was completed and documented in SLAC-PUB-13999. Its emittance is 164 / 8 pm at 1.5 A, and the predicted brightness is ~10 times higher than in the NSLS-II. The design is based on existing technology – ready for implementation. The baseline design is also compatible with the recently studied ERL options at SLAC producing satisfactory beam quality. “Ultimate” PEP-X lattice for extremely low emittance approaching diffraction limited photon emittance is currently under study. Simplified 6-fold periodic ring with 29 pm-rad natural emittance (47 / 8 pm at 0.2 A) is designed providing up to nine 5m ID straights per arc. Dynamic aperture for this ring is sufficiently large due to periodicity, compensated sextupole resonance effects and thin lens sextupole approximation. Further work will include the injection and wiggler insertions (almost done), more sextupole optimization for maximum aperture, tolerance and correction studies.