SPICECUBE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
W. A. Horowitz Quark Matter 2005 A Promising Solution to the Elliptic Quench Puzzle at RHIC William A. Horowitz Columbia University August 4-5, 2005.
Advertisements

SPICE Mie [mi:] Dmitry Chirkin, UW Madison. Updates to ppc and spice PPC: Randomized the simulation based on system time (with us resolution) Added the.
AMANDA Lessons Antarctic Muon And Neutrino Detector Array.
Sean Grullon For the IceCube Collaboration Searching for High Energy Diffuse Astrophysical Neutrinos with IceCube TeV Particle Astrophysics 2009 Stanford.
1 Inclusive B Decays - Spectra, Moments and CKM Matrix Elements Presented by Daniel Cronin-Hennessy University of Rochester (CLEO Collaboration) ICHEP.
Calibration of the 10inch PMT for IceCube Experiment 03UM1106 Kazuhiro Fujimoto A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree.
The line that most closely approximates the data in a scatter plot.
Phun with Photonics Phun with Photonics Berkeley IceCube Collaboration Meeting Michelangelo D’Agostino UC Berkeley March 20, 2005.
PD Kobe Univ. 06/29/2007 General performance of the IceCube detector and the calibration results I am Mina Inaba from Chiba university. I will.
CDF Joint Physics Group June 27, 2003 Rick FieldPage 1 PYTHIA Tune A versus Run 2 Data  Compare PYTHIA Tune A with Run 2 data on the “underlying event”.
IceCube: String 21 reconstruction Dmitry Chirkin, LBNL Presented by Spencer Klein LLH reconstruction algorithm Reconstruction of digital waveforms Muon.
Status of gravitational lens paper Internal note: Results of the optical properties of sea water in the ANTARES site with the OB system.
Study of the decay   f 0 (980)    +  -  C.Bini, S.Ventura, KLOE Memo /2004 (upd. 06/2005) C.Bini, KLOE Memo /2005 (upd. 06/2005)
Photon propagation and ice properties Bootcamp UW Madison Dmitry Chirkin, UW Madison r air bubble photon.
March 02, Shahid Hussain for the ICECUBE collaboration University of Delaware, USA.
IceCube simulation with PPC Dmitry Chirkin, UW Madison photon propagation code.
Photon propagation and ice properties Bootcamp UW Madison Dmitry Chirkin, UW Madison r air bubble photon.
Standard Candle, Flasher, and Cascade Simulations in IceCube Michelangelo D’Agostino UC Berkeley PSU Analysis Meeting June 21-24, 2006.
Ice Investigation with PPC Dmitry Chirkin, UW (photon propagation code)
Calibrating the first four IceCube strings Kurt Woschnagg, UCB L3 Detector Characterization IceCube Collaboration Meeting, Bartol, March 2004.
5.7 Predicting with Linear Models Objective : Deciding when to use a linear model Objective : Use a linear model to make a real life prediction. 1 2 A.
IceCube simulation with PPC Dmitry Chirkin, UW Madison, 2010.
South Pole Ice (SPICE) model Dmitry Chirkin, UW Madison.
Ciro Bigongiari, Salvatore Mangano Results of the optical properties of sea water with the OB system.
Ice model update Dmitry Chirkin, UW Madison IceCube Collaboration meeting, Calibration session, March 2014.
Total photoabsorption on quasi free nucleons at 600 – 1500 MeV N.Rudnev, A.Ignatov, A.Lapik, A.Mushkarenkov, V.Nedorezov, A.Turinge for the GRAAL collaboratiion.
MCMC reconstruction of the 2 HE cascade events Dmitry Chirkin, UW Madison.
IceCube simulation with PPC Photonics: 2000 – up to now Photon propagation code PPC: now.
IceCube Calibration Overview Kurt Woschnagg University of California, Berkeley MANTS 2009 Berlin, 25 September identical sensors in ultraclean,
Review of Ice Models What is an “ice model”? PTD vs. photonics What models are out there? Which one(s) should/n’t we use? Kurt Woschnagg, UCB AMANDA Collaboration.
GPU Photon Transport Simulation Studies Mary Murphy Undergraduate, UW-Madison Dmitry Chirkin IceCube at UW-Madison Tareq AbuZayyad IceCube at UW-River.
1 Ciro Bigongiari, Salvatore Mangano Results of the optical properties of sea water with the OB system.
Ciro Bigongiari, Salvatore Mangano, Results of the optical properties of sea water with the OB system.
IceCube simulation with PPC Dmitry Chirkin, UW Madison, 2010 effective scattering coefficient (from Ryan Bay)
DirectFit reconstruction of the Aya’s two HE cascade events Dmitry Chirkin, UW Madison Method of the fit: exhaustive search simulate cascade events with.
Scatter Plots & Lines of Best Fit To graph and interpret pts on a scatter plot To draw & write equations of best fit lines.
Status of Detector Characterization a.k.a. Calibration & Monitoring Project Year 2 objectives ( → Mar ‘04) 1. Calibration plan (first draft in March.
Muon Energy reconstruction in IceCube and neutrino flux measurement Dmitry Chirkin, University of Wisconsin at Madison, U.S.A., MANTS meeting, fall 2009.
Search for Ultra-High Energy Tau Neutrinos in IceCube Dawn Williams University of Alabama For the IceCube Collaboration The 12 th International Workshop.
Date of download: 7/5/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. A graph of the structure factor at volume fractions fv=0.001, 0.2, and 0.5 as a.
2 pion photoproduction from G11A E. Golovach MSU Analysis Status for.
Ring Spectroscopy and Photometry Todd Bradley January 9, 2014.
Photon propagation and ice properties Bootcamp UW Madison Dmitry Chirkin, UW Madison r air bubble photon.
I have 6 events (Nch>=100) on a background of ?
Light Propagation in the South Pole Ice
Date of download: 10/9/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
South Pole Ice model Dmitry Chirkin, UW, Madison.
IceCube Collaboration Meeting Ghent, October 9, 2007
Energy Dependence of the UE
Two Interpretations of What it Means to Normalize the Low Energy Monte Carlo Events to the Low Energy Data Atms MC Atms MC Data Data Signal Signal Apply.
Status of the "direct" photon reconstruction
Calibrations What’s new in Kurt Woschnagg, UCB
South Pole Ice (SPICE) model
Ian Marius Peters, Haohui Liu, Thomas Reindl, Tonio Buonassisi  Joule 
Ian Marius Peters, Haohui Liu, Thomas Reindl, Tonio Buonassisi  Joule 
Freeze-In and Hole Ice Studies with Flashers
Erik Strahler UW-Madison 4/27/2008
Sensitivity of RNA‐seq.
Ice Investigation with PPC
Notes Over 2.5 Positive Correlation Determining Correlation x
Status of Compton Analysis
Experimental setup (SPICE)
Preliminary Comparison of Monte Carlo and 9-string IceCube Data
Lesson 5.7 Predict with Linear Models The Zeros of a Function
Unfolding performance Data - Monte Carlo comparison
Hongbo Yu, Brandon J. Farley, Dezhe Z. Jin, Mriganka Sur  Neuron 
“Min-Bias” and the “Underlying Event” in Run 2 at CDF and the LHC
Summary of yet another Photonics Workshop AMANDA/IceCube Collaboration Meeting Berkeley, March 19, 2005.
Photonics Workshop AMANDA/IceCube Collaboration Meeting Berkeley, March 19, 2005 Going the last mile…
Time-Dependent Searches for Neutrino Point Sources with IceCube
Presentation transcript:

SPICECUBE

absorption vs. scattering Legend: Scaled log Final fit

Minimizer steps 1x -rde -unf 10x -rde -unf new: 193.1 202.4 208.9 289.3 344.2 391.9 lea: ? 205.0 211.2 ? 357.9 408.8 Ratio to initial approximation (SL)

fit region (inside detector) black line: 7-string fit to flasher data absorption gray band: scaled merged dust log (m-1) extrapolation region fit region (inside detector) (outside detector)

fit region (inside detector) black line: 7-string fit to flasher data scattering gray band: scaled merged dust log dotted line: with air bubbles (m-1) extrapolation region fit region (inside detector) (outside detector)

flasher photon yield New: 3.26 Lea: 3.63 2.50 2.78 new convention, off by 1/(0.85*0.9) 2.50 2.78 (old convention)

Ratio New/Lea

Dust logger vs. EDML

Merged dust log

Ratio new model/merged log

Correlation to new model

Fit to relative DOM efficiencies

Correlation to cathode sensitivity

Selected model parameters

Selected model parameters 10x simulation

Selected model parameters

Selected model parameters 10x simulation

From SPICE Lea ICRC report: Red: charge-only Blue: time-binned

f/py inhomogeneity

f/py inhomogeneity 10x simulation

k1/py inhomogeneity 10x simulation

Map of fitted DOM efficiencies Average per string

Model error and linearity: NEW (1x) > 0, 1, 10, 100, 400 p.e./event

Model error and linearity: NEW > 0, 1, 10, 100, 400 p.e./event

Model error and linearity: NEW > 0, 1, 10, 100, 400 p.e./event k1=-0.09 f=131

Model error and linearity: NEW > 0, 1, 10, 100, 400 p.e./event No RDE fit

Model error and linearity: NEW > 0, 1, 10, 100, 400 p.e./event also no azimuthal unfolding

Model error and linearity: LEA > 0, 1, 10, 100, 400 p.e./event No RDE fit

Model error and linearity: LEA > 0, 1, 10, 100, 400 p.e./event also no azimuthal unfolding

Linearity: NEW (1x) log10(data/simulation) at sim=100 p.e.

Linearity: NEW (10x) log10(data/simulation) at sim=100 p.e.

Linearity: NEW (10x) log10(data/simulation) at sim=100 p.e. k1=-0.09 f=131

Linearity: NEW (10x) No RDE fit also no azimuthal unfolding

Linearity: LEA (10x) No RDE fit also no azimuthal unfolding

Status Model error (precision in charge prediction): 10-11% Extrapolation uncertainty: 13% (sca) / 15% (abs) Linearity: < 2% in range 0.1 … 500 p.e.

Timeline AMANDA ice models: bulk, f125, mam, mamint, stdkurt, sudkurt, kgm, … millennium (published 2006)  AHA (2007) 55% IceCube ice models: cont.  WHAM (2011) 42% SPICE 1 (2009) 29% SPICE 2, 2+, 2x, 2y (2010) added ice layer tilt SPICE Mie (2010) fit to scattering function 29% SPICE Lea (2012) fit to scattering anisotropy 20% SPICE Next (2013) 7-string, LED unfolding 17% SPICE Last (2014) llh fixes, DOM sensitivity fits 11%