Cost and Design and Medical Device, oh my!

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is Engineering?.
Advertisements

Engineering Design Process ETP 2005 – Brian Vance This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No
Engineering Design Process
Instant Design Challenge Using the Design Process and Engineering Notebook.
Engineering Design Process
1/19/151 1 TURNING IDEAS INTO REALITY: ENGINEERING A BETTER WORLD Assistive Device
1/21/151 1 Save Max! TURNING IDEAS INTO REALITY: ENGINEERING A BETTER WORLD.
Basics of Research and Development and Design STEM Education HON4013 ENGR1020 Learning and Action Cycles.
Global Relevance Millions of people live in villages located in or nearby mountains. Many of the dwellings are poorly constructed from flimsy materials.
The Engineering Design Process Bridge Activity: Day 1-4 vs. The Scientific Method.
1/20/151 1 Smooth Operator TURNING IDEAS INTO REALITY: ENGINEERING A BETTER WORLD.
STEM: Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math What is Engineering? Mrs. Hulsey and Mrs. Gwinn June 5, 2012.
Preproduction: Engineering Design
Technological Design VS Engineering Design. Technological design and Engineering design are very similar and sometimes the terms are often confused with.
What is Engineering?.
Application of Endothermic & Exothermic Reactions Logan Buck, COFSP Fellow Gray Middle School, 7th Grade Science, Ms. Ashley Gregory RET is funded by.
K-12 Learning Outcomes and Funding What are the learning outcomes for grades K-12, by states? What is the level of funding for K-12 schools, by states?
Choose Ohio First Scholarship Program (COFSP) Professional Development
Choose Ohio First Scholarship Program (COFSP) Professional Development
Choose Ohio First Scholarship Program (COFSP) Professional Development
Click to play video.
Chirau J. Patel Aerospace Engineering 2017 University of Cincinnati
Emma Stumpf-- Biomedical Engineering
RET is funded by the National Science Foundation, grant # EEC
Choose Ohio First Scholarship Program (COFSP) Professional Development
CEEMS is funded by the National Science Foundation, grant #
The Chemistry of Hot and Cold
Engineering Design Process
Choose Ohio First Scholarship Program (COFSP) Professional Development
RET is funded by the National Science Foundation, grant # EEC
Save Barbie Lydia Smoot
National Engineering Design Challenge (NEDC)
Engineering Design Process
TURNING IDEAS INTO REALITY: ENGINEERING A BETTER WORLD
RET is funded by the National Science Foundation, grant # EEC
Welcome to the Math SBAC Parent Information Session
Energy, What is it Good For? Mike Day Reading HS, Mathematics
Engineering Design Process
Cell Membrane Engineering Project COFSP Culmination Event
Teams are judged on these categories:
Is that technology?.
Minimally Invasive Surgery
TURNING IDEAS INTO REALITY: ENGINEERING A BETTER WORLD
Instant Design Challenge
Foundation Concepts for Teaching Problem Solving
NSF Research Experiences for Teachers (RET) Professional Development
Clean Water and Solar Stills Neah Gray, Environmental Engineering Finneytown High School, Environmental Science RET is funded by the National Science.
Here, There, Everywhere! Transportation of Goods Barbara Kenney Glen Este Middle School, 7th grade Math CEEMS is funded by the National.
Air Quality Kat Roedig Sickinger The Summit Country Day School 11-12th Grade AP Environmental Science RET is funded by the National Science Foundation,
Energy Planning using Mathematics COFSP Fellow Fairfield H. S
Water Filtration in the Wild
Moon Expedition STEM Challenge.
Battery Blues Tiara Anderson Purcell Marian High School, Integrated Math I, 9th Grade Panel 3:
RET is funded by the National Science Foundation, grant # EEC
TURNING IDEAS INTO REALITY: ENGINEERING A BETTER WORLD
Engineering Design Process
AI and Computational Thinking:
Ken Okoye COFSP Recipient Senior, Biomedical Engineering
Engineering Design Process
Instant Design Challenge
Trent Amstutz 5th Year Chemical Engineering University of Cincinnati
RET is funded by the National Science Foundation, grant # EEC
Engineering Design Process
Engineering Design Process
Engineering Design Process
TURNING IDEAS INTO REALITY: ENGINEERING A BETTER WORLD
Engineering Design Process
TURNING IDEAS INTO REALITY: ENGINEERING A BETTER WORLD
Burwood Goes Ballistic!
STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics)
Presentation transcript:

Cost and Design and Medical Device, oh my! RET is funded by the National Science Foundation, grant # EEC-1404766 Cost and Design and Medical Device, oh my! April 1st, Culmination Event for COFSP Fellows

Alyssa George Biomedical engineering, UC ’16 COFSP Fellow Amanda Sopko Indian Hill Middle School 6th Grade RET Math Teacher

Engineering Design Process: Cost and Design Standards: Asking questions (for science) and defining problems (for engineering) Constructing explanations (for science) and designing solutions (for engineering) Designing Technological/Engineering Solutions using science concepts

Activity Title: Cost and Design Comparison Activity Outline Students made a device that mimicked the function of a laparoscopic closure device Constraints: Cost, time Were tasked to “make it better” and create a device with better value Guiding Questions: What is the relation between cost and design? What is the relation between constraints and design? What is the engineering design process? Objectives: Compare the costs of alternate designs medical device design to the engineering design process   the different effects of constraints on alternate designs

Careers: Biomedical engineers Mechanical engineers Cost analysts Applications: Medical device design Careers: Biomedical engineers Mechanical engineers Cost analysts Regulatory analysts Society: Gold standard medical devices Relation between cost and function

Student Test Data

Activity in Action Students were taught about medical device design Students worked in teams to brainstorm ideas considering constraints, particularly cost Teams built multiple prototypes and then improved on them to make them more competitive

Reflections Successes Improvements Every student involved Had the opportunity to solve a “real world” problem Creative solutions Emphasis on “make it better” Interesting discussion Improvements Pre and Post test could have been more challenging Could have been more constraints Activity may have been better suited for older students