Atmos Energy Corporation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Adapting to a Changing Energy Environment Russ Girling, President and CEO, TransCanada Corporation May 15, 2012 STRIKING A BALANCE IN THE MIDST OF CHANGE.
Advertisements

1 FIRST QUARTER 2009 INVESTOR CONFERENCE CALL. 2 Today ’ s Hosts Steve Romano Chairman & Chief Executive Officer Jim Baumgardner President & Chief Operating.
© 2013 Sri U-Thong Limited. All rights reserved. This presentation has been prepared by Sri U-Thong Limited and its holding company (collectively, “Sri.
Hedge fund flows on pace to nearly double 2012
 Derivatives are products whose values are derived from one or more, basic underlying variables.  Types of derivatives are many- 1. Forwards 2. Futures.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Energy Information Administration Markets, Hubs, Trading Places, and Capacity Release Markets by John H. Herbert.
R Southwest Gas Corporation February 16, 2001 Southwest Gas Corporation Update on Factors Affecting Gas Prices n Storage u Storage levels continue below.
Corporate Overview September Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. (the "Company") makes forward-looking statements in this.
Swing Options Structure & Pricing October 2004 Return to Risk Limited website:
Next steps on capacity Doug Wood NW-GRI SG, Paris, 9 June 2009.
W Geneva December, 2007 World Meteorological Organization Simple Heating Degree Day Program.
MAY 17, 2001 ENERGY MARKETS IN TURMOIL PRESENTED TO THE INSTITUTE FOR REGULATORY POLICY STUDIES
E x p e r i e n c e C o m m i t m e n t SM ERCOT Nodal – Fuel Cost Analysis Verifiable Cost Working Group October 6, 2008.
W Geneva December, 2007 World Meteorological Organization Basics of Weather Risk Management.
Copyright IndexCo, LLC April 1999 Using The GCCI Bruce B. Thomas Chief Executive Officer IndexCo, LLC.
WINTER PREPAREDNESS ARIZONA WINTER PREPAREDNESS ARIZONA.
June 17, 2015 (Regina) June 18, 2015 (Saskatoon) SaskEnergy 2015 Rate Application.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. Chapter 10 Derivatives: Risk Management with Speculation, Hedging, and Risk Transfer.
THIRD QUARTER 2012 RESULTS.  Year-over-year revenue growth of 5.5% to $32.0 million, at the high end range of guidance  Adjusted fully diluted EPS of.
Prospects For Recovery: An Economic Update Karr Ingham Petroleum Economist Texas Alliance of Energy Producers Webinar, May 24, 2016
California Independent System Operator 1 Department of Market Analysis California Independent System Operator California ISO Creation Time: July,
Rates for PKR/US$ are quoted as follows: Rates for PKR/US$ are quoted as follows: Spot – Spot – month –
Interim Fuel Factor Adjustment and Surcharge for Under-Recoveries
Casualty Actuarial Society – Chicago, IL November 2007
BP Global Environmental Products
The Black- Scholes Formula
Fuel Cost Components in the Fuel Adder
California Product Offerings
Fuel Cost Components in the Fuel Adder
Interim Fuel Factor Adjustment and Surcharge for Under-Recoveries
OGK-2 Group 9M 2016 IFRS Results
3 Adjusting the Accounts Learning Objectives
OGK-2 Group 3M 2017 IFRS Results
OGK-2 Group FY2016 IFRS Results
Privileged and Confidential
Fuel Cost Components in the Fuel Adder
Payments in the Digital age
NYMEX Diesel & Gasoline Metropolitan Nashville Board of Education
FINANCIAL DERIVATIVES/SNSCT/MBA
1 The roles of actuaries & general operating environment
Measuring Exposure To Exchange Rate Fluctuations
Summary of financial results for the period 1-12/2016
Foreign Exchange Market and Risk
LNG: Reliable Gas Supply for the Northeast U.S.
OGK-2 Group 9M 2017 IFRS Results
Forecasting Exchange Rates
The interconnected North American gas market: Where do we go from here? Orlando Alvarez, President & CEO, BP Energy Company.
October 9, 2014 Kenneth W. Yagelski Managing Director Gas Supply
First Quarter Fiscal Year 2016
Resource Adequacy Demand Forecast Coincidence Adjustments
WOW12 – Basic Options Strategies (Capstone) – Ask any question options
Market linked debentures
Alexandros Dimitriadis
TSC Modifications Panel Meeting
Liberty Interactive Corporation Q3-11 Earnings Call November 8, 2011
OGK-2 Group 2018FY IFRS Results
Fiscal 3Q’13 Earnings Presentation
TGC-1 9М 2018 IFRS Results 9 November, 2018.
OGK-2 Group 6M 2017 IFRS Results
Planning Reserve Margin
OGK-2 Group 9 months 2018 IFRS Results
Derivatives and Risk Management
Derivatives and Risk Management
Wholesale Electricity Costs
System Operational Update and Review December 4, 2018
© 2013 Sri U-Thong Limited. All rights reserved
Manager, Supply Resource Planning
OGK-2 Group 2017FY IFRS Results
Manager, Resource Planning
Presentation transcript:

Atmos Energy Corporation Preparing for Winter Atmos Energy Corporation

Disclaimer Contents of this presentation do not necessarily reflect Atmos Energy Corporation’s views. This presentation and its contents have been provided to you for informational purposes only. This information is not advice on or a recommendation of any of the matters described herein or any related commercial transactions. Atmos Energy is not responsible for any inaccuracies in the information contained herein. Atmos Energy makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, adequacy, reasonableness or completeness of the information, assumptions or analysis contained herein or in any supplemental materials, and Atmos Energy accepts no liability in connection therewith. Atmos Energy deals and trades in natural gas and may have positions consistent with or different from those implied or suggested by this presentation. This presentation may contain forward-looking statements. Any statements that are not historical facts, including statements about Atmos Energy’s beliefs or expectations, are forward-looking statements. These statements are based mostly on publically available information, estimates and projections and you should not place undue reliance on them. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual future results and trends may differ materially from what is forecast, suggested or implied in any forward-looking statements in this presentation due to a variety of factors. Factors which could cause actual results to differ from these forward-looking statements may include, without limitation, general economic conditions; conditions in the markets; behavior of customers, suppliers, and competitors; technological developments; the implementation and execution of new processes; and changes to legal, tax, and regulatory rules. The foregoing list of factors should not be construed as exhaustive. Atmos Energy disclaims any intention or obligation to publicly or privately update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. Participants should seek their own advice and guidance from appropriate legal, tax, financial and trading professionals when making decisions as to positions to take in the market.

Atmos Energy Corporation One of the Nation’s Largest Pure-Gas Distribution Companies Provides natural gas service in eight states serving three million customers 288 Bcf in annual requirements Over 4 Bcf in peak day requirements Over 67 Bcf of storage capacity Financially or physically hedge up to 58 Bcf per year Over 2.3 Bcf of daily transportation capacity on 18 interstate pipelines Atmos owns one of the largest intrastate pipelines in Texas Connects the Waha, Katy and Carthage hubs Dedicated to Atmos’ needs of 2.4 Bcf per day

Overview Atmos takes a very proactive approach to managing its gas supply. Serving eight states across a wide geographic area allows us to take what we learn from one area and apply it throughout the enterprise. Planning Design Day Instruments Hedging Shifted Volume Simulations Daily Management Tariff Changes

Planning Atmos Planning Overview Forecast the volumetric natural gas requirements Design day Normal purchases Short term daily usage forecast Recommend the appropriate upstream pipeline transportation and storage capacity Annual review with statistical expert to improve forecast methodology Validate current processes and results Recommend improvements in methodology

Planning Changes to Design Day Problem: During the 2010-11 winter usage approached and exceeded Atmos’ calculated design day; however, HDDs did not. (844) (9,054) (17,851) Load studies done in 2010-11 winter Design Day HDD Actual HDD 67 63 Design Day HDD Actual HDD 89 76 Design Day HDD Actual HDD 56 47 Forecast models are run each year incorporating most recent usage If an anomaly is witnessed in one area, we review the data to see where we can use this information in other areas Forecasted (Dth) Actual (Dth)

Planning Changes to Design Day Solution: Incorporate the wind into our design day variables Forecasted Actual Forecast with Wind Incorporating Wind into our models increased accuracy Utilizing the same methodology across all of Atmos’ territories required additional transport capacity, all of which was used during the 2013-14 winter a Reserve margin is enough to make up for shortfall after incorporating wind b Forecasted for Design Day (HDDs for Actual volume were 9° warmer), growing area

Hedging Atmos Hedging Overview Hedge normal winter usage net of expected storage withdrawals Depending on area, able to hedge using fixed physical contract, swaps, call options and deferred premium call options Call option Premium is due within two business days of the trade If I bought a May-15 call option today, payment for the premium would be due on October 13th Deferred premium call option Premium is due after the underlying has settled If I bought a May-015 call option but the premium was deferred, payment for the premium would be due the first part of May 2015 (after the contract settled)

Hedging Call Options As prices of options have decreased as a result of lower volatility and price of the underlying security, Atmos began seeking regulatory approval to use them Regulators comfortable having a known, maximum cost, view call options akin to an insurance policy At the money call options taken first trading day Apr-Oct of each month for the following January contract

Hedging Shifting Volume Typically storage levels and supply are robust at the end of October through November (which is when the Nov-Dec contracts expire) Atmos’ customers use the majority of their gas during the Jan-Mar period, which is also when one could see storage constraints and production freeze-offs Atmos has shifted some of its hedging volume from the months that may not be as high of a risk from price increases due to weather and overall usage and increased the hedging volume for the months that would be at risk.

Daily Management Scenario Planning Atmos’ gas supply portfolio contains several components. In order to meet their customers demand, Atmos runs through a simulated “winter” with its Gas Reps. Variables Include: Forecasted Weather/Demand Current Storage Levels Try to meet incremental demand in the most economic way Daily/Monthly Market Price In some areas, it has been a few years since a design day has occurred. Having Atmos’ Gas Reps. look through supply/transport agreements during these scenarios will help the decision process if/when adverse conditions occur.

Daily Management Tariff Language Problem: Transport customers do not always purchase gas in the spot market to match their expected usage. Background: Transport customers either balance their imbalance monthly or pay a fixed amount per MMBtu ($0.50 above FOM for example) for their overage which may not reflect the market price of gas.

Physical Gas Prices February 2014 ICE Daily Averages Marketers/Transporters do not want to purchase gas in the spot market and pay these prices... …but would much rather work off their imbalance during this part of the month. $5.28

Daily Management Tariff Language Problem: Transport customers do not always purchase gas in the spot market to match their expected usage. Background: Transport customers either balance their imbalance monthly or pay a fixed amount per MMBtu ($0.50 above FOM for example) for their overage which may not reflect the market price of gas. Solution: Move from monthly balancing to daily Change tariff language so that the cashout price is a multiple of the prevailing gas daily price index