2013 Dairy Economist Workshop

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Milk Marketing AS 472, AVS 472 Fall 2008 John Swain Lecture 2 Dec 8, 2010.
Advertisements

Federal Milk Marketing Order Reform By Richard P. Stillman USDA-ERS August 26, 1999.
Dairy Marketing Dr. Roger Ginder Econ 338a Fall 2007 Lecture # 2.
Developing Agricultural Commodity Markets Through a Better Trading Platform 13 th Annual Farmer Cooperatives Conference Cooperatives: Looking Forward December.
April 2014 Dairy Commodity Market Situation & Outlook.
Cayuga Milk Ingredients Using Advanced Technology to Produce High Quality Milk Ingredients for the World.
Dairy Market Outlook and Policy Update
Econ 339X, Spring 2010 ECON 339X: Agricultural Marketing Chad Hart Assistant Professor/Grain Markets Specialist
Retail Distribution of Dairy Products Bob Cropp Dairy Marketing and Policy Specialist University of Wisconsin-Madison April 2001.
History, Function & Future of Federal Milk Marketing Orders Bob Cropp Dairy Marketing & Policy Specialist University of Wisconsin-Madison April 2001.
Ag Policy, Lecture 11 Knutson, Penn, & Flinchbaugh, Chapter 7 & 5 Dairy Programs Livestock Impact Supply & Demand for Trade.
Free Trade? Despite policy reforms enacted as a result of the Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture, global dairy markets remain among the most protected.
Copyright © 2002 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 9-1.
The University of Georgia College of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences Dr. Tommie L. Shepherd Dr. Tommie L. Shepherd Center for Agribusiness and Economic.
Dairy Marketing Dr. Roger Ginder Econ 338 Fall 2009 Lecture #21.
CME Group and Informa Economics May 16, 2013 Pan American Grain and Oilseed Conference.
Dairy Marketing Dr. Roger Ginder Econ 338 Fall 2009 Lecture #22.
ECON 337: Agricultural Marketing Chad Hart Associate Professor Lee Schulz Assistant Professor
Potential Impacts From the Growth of New Mexico Dairies By Terry L. Crawford USDA-ERS at “Dairy Fair” At ENMU-Roswell, New Mexico August 7, 2000.
Dairy Marketing Dr. Roger Ginder Econ 338a Fall 2007 Lecture # 15a.
Milk, Components and Processing
Econ 339X, Spring 2010 ECON 339X: Agricultural Marketing Chad Hart Assistant Professor/Grain Markets Specialist
Producer Price Differentials: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly Brian W. Gould Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics and Wisconsin Center for Dairy.
1 Farm and Risk Management Team Cooperative Extension – Ag and Natural Resources Dairy Price Risk Management: Session 3 – Milk Pricing Fundamentals Last.
The Dairy Situation and Policy Responses in the United States Presented at an Agricultural Economics Workshop Brussels, September 29, 2009 Daniel A. Sumner,
Steve Watrin Cell: Minneapolis, Minnesota Nov. 3,4, 2011.
Dairy Marketing Dr. Roger Ginder Econ 338 Fall 2009 Lecture #23.
Cheese Price Discovery Structures, Reasons, & Consequences Mike Brown Dairy Economist Glanbia Foods, Inc.
An Overview of Milk Pricing Under Federal Orders (Milk Pricing 101) July 8, 2003 Brian W. Gould Senior Research Scientist Wisconsin Center for Dairy Research.
MILK PROCESSING By Mr. Weaver Agriculture 1-4. OBJECTIVES 1.Explain and define the scientific method. 2.Work in teams using the scientific method and.
Econ 337, Spring 2013 ECON 337: Agricultural Marketing Chad Hart Associate Professor Lee Schulz Assistant Professor
Price determination  is the broad forces of supply and demand establishing a market clearing price for a commodity.
Outlook for Wisconsin and U.S. Dairy Markets FARM Team Agricultural Prices Conference Brian W. Gould Associate Professor Department of Agricultural and.
1 Farm and Risk Management Team Cooperative Extension – Ag and Natural Resources Dairy Price Risk Management: Session 5 – Hedging With Futures Last Update.
Dairy Marketing Dr. Roger Ginder Econ 338 Fall 2007 Lecture #23.
Joe Collins – MD Ornua Dairy Trading & Ingredients
Dairy Marketing Dr. Roger Ginder Econ 338 Fall 2009 Lecture #10.
Situation and Outlook for the U.S. Dairy Industry Uthra Raghunathan Agricultural Economist USDA Agricultural Marketing Service Dairy Programs February.
 stuff that is traded on the market without a difference of quality  supplies from different suppliers are mutually substitutable  products of uniform.
Options. Semester Grade Options Grade Option Cost Today Only A$10 B$9 C$8 D$7 FFree.
Dairy Market—Situation & Outlook Northeast Agribusiness & Feed Alliance Mark Stephenson, Ph.D. Director of Dairy Policy Analysis Mark Stephenson, Ph.D.
EXCHANGE RATES UNIT 26. DISCUSSION  You probably have at least one banknote in your pocket, wallet or purse. How much is it worth in other currencies?
CONNECTICUT FARM MILK PRICES: Determined by Regional, National and International Markets Presentation by Robert D. Wellington Agri-Mark Dairy Cooperative.
EXCHANGE RATES UNIT 26.
P.Krishnaveni/Financial Derivatives/MBA/SNSCT
Daily Focus Thursday 4/30 Agenda Objectives: Question of the day:
Hidden Benefits of Healthy Eating
FINANCIAL FUTURES MARKETS
Trading Instruments There are a variety of basic types of instruments traded in commodity marketplaces “Spot” contracts “Cash market” contracts Forward.
CME Cash (Spot) Market Cheese, NDM, & Butter Session—
Agricultural Marketing
Agricultural Marketing
Solutions!.
Ron Knutson, Professor Emeritus
Agricultural Marketing
Agricultural Marketing
Dairy Outlook: Indiana Perspectives
Agricultural Marketing
Agricultural Marketing
Agricultural Marketing
Options Contracts Slide Show Courtesy of:
Agricultural Marketing
Agricultural Marketing
Agricultural Marketing
Agricultural Marketing
Agricultural Marketing
Dairy Marketing Dr. Roger Ginder Econ 338a Fall 2007 Lecture # 13.
Agricultural Marketing
Agricultural Marketing
Today’s Dairy Market and Financial Situation
Presentation transcript:

2013 Dairy Economist Workshop Some Issues For Nonfat Dry Milk Price Discovery Craig Alexander 2013 Dairy Economist Workshop Boston Innovative Dairy Solutions

O-AT-KA - Then & Now ...1959 Today…

Value-Added Products Bottled Flavored Drinks Bottled RTD Coffee &Tea Bottled Cream Liquor Cocktails Canned Coffee & Energy Drinks Canned Ethnic Beverages Bottled Flavored Drinks Canned Nutritional Beverages Canned Evaporated Milk Canned Pet Milk Replacers Milk Protein Concentrate Drinks & Shakes

Packaging Options Alumi-Tek Bottles Aluminum Cans Steel Cans Glass Bottles

Nonfat Dry Milk Confusion What is the Price – this past week: CME: $1.70 Friday close (weekly avg - $1.715) Price Survey Reports (previous week): DMN: Central States – $1.75 avg “Mostly” $1.72 DMN: Western – $1.69 mostly NDPSR - $1.6049 California CWAP – $1.55 NFDM Futures – May close on Friday - $1.6470 International (bi-weekly): DMN – Oceania $2.13 EU $1.86 gDT Auction - $1.94

The Nonfat Price Loop Nonfat pricing is key to the issue Past/Present industry practice: DMN – prior to NASS - widespread use but in era of less volatility Not well documented and backwards looking Use of NASS/CWOP The “loop” - Last week’s price reported this week, sets next weeks price which feeds the following weeks price survey which sets the next weeks price that all feeds into the Class IV price at month end…….. Movement is even slower –

Does it Matter? For the U.S. as a whole: More difficult pricing for exporting – almost half of US powder exported now Alignment with export markets more difficult Increasing value at risk for buyers and sellers a little futures activity to hedge Price volatility exacerbated – the more the lag the slower the correction Resources misallocated Class II lags excerbated and creates additional issues

Does it Matter? For us at O-AT-KA: Difficult to plan and hedge for our products like evaporated milk based on Class IV Difficult for customers of our Class II products – can’t forward price the ingredients – and they have alternatives Difficult for our farmers – increasing amount of basis risk using Class III

Nonfat Causes Problems with Class IV and Class II: Class IV is made up of butterfat and nonfat solids values driven by Butter and Nonfat dry milk pricing Nonfat pricing creates some Class IV Pricing problems: Nonfat dry milk prices are confused (butter is better) A major Class IV supply area is on a different price formula using CWAP – California Farmers do not see Class IV valuation directly – creates additional confusion and lack of interest from producers Survey lags and lack of timely price discovery leads to less ability to manage risk – futures liquidity

Futures Open Interest for Nonfat is weak but..

Class IV Open Interest is really bad

Breaking the Loop Ideas for change: Industry practice – use CME? What’s old is new again? Butter seems to work “better” Last week’s average or date of order of CME sets this week’s selling price Correlation between CME spot butter and NASS is .97 With NASS ndm vs. Central States : .87 and vs. CME: .62

NASS nonfat lags both CME and Central States prices (Jan 2011-April 2013 NASS Butter tracks CME much more closely and quicker

Breaking the Loop Ideas for changing nonfat: Industry practice – use CME? What’s old is new again? No regulation will enforce use Industry needs to find credibility between buyers and sellers Need to build liquidity – trades on CME are few (but getting better) Use electronic – anonymous Get rid of extra grade Others ways to facilitate?

What if ? Other ideas? Dairy Innovation Center Study U.S. Style gDT? Interesting auction set up – takes time to administer … every day… every week? Just go back to DMN but improve? ADPI working on suggestions for improvements to reports Use futures – Use as is? Use a physical contract – try to peg contracts to that price? Dairy Innovation Center Study Mike McCully