Effect of framing of death on health state values obtained from DCEs

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Comparing different treatments How can we decide?.
Advertisements

Measuring outcomes Emma Frew October Measuring outcomes Learning objectives By the end of the session students should be able to – Explain how different.
1 Could there be a single European EQ tariff? Jan J.V. Busschbach, Ph.D. Former address: –iMTA, Erasmus university Present address: –Medical Psychology.
Optimal Drug Development Programs and Efficient Licensing and Reimbursement Regimens Neil Hawkins Karl Claxton CENTRE FOR HEALTH ECONOMICS.
1 A Health Economic View on Borderline Personality Disorder Prof. dr. Jan Busschbach Viersprong Institute for studies on Personality Disorders Medical.
Big Q and Little Q revisited Christopher McCabe PhD Capital Health Endowed Research Chair in Emergency Medicine Research.
Using a discrete choice experiment with duration to estimate values for health states on the QALY scale Nick Bansback Assistant Professor School of Population.
What determines student satisfaction with university subjects? A choice-based approach Twan Huybers, Jordan Louviere and Towhidul Islam Seminar, Institute.
Modelling Cardinal Utilities from Ordinal Utility data: An exploratory analysis Peter Gilks, Chris McCabe, John Brazier, Aki Tsuchiya, Josh Solomon.
Using ranking and DCE data to value health states on the QALY scale using conventional and Bayesian methods Theresa Cain.
Utilising rank and DCE data to value health status on the ‘QALY’ scale using conventional and Bayesian methods John Brazier and Theresa Cain with Aki Tsuchiya.
25 Sept 07 FF8 - Discrete Choice Data Introduction Tony O’Hagan.
1 Dyslexia and Cost Effectiveness Prof. dr. Jan van Busschbach De Viersprong Erasmus MC.
1 EQ-5D, HUI and SF-36 Of the shelf instruments…..
Overview of the EQ-5D Purpose and origins of the descriptive system.
1 CADTH Value Methods Panel Using Best Worst Scaling to elicit Values Carlo Marra.
How can societal concerns for fairness be integrated in economic evaluations of health programs? Erik Nord, PhD, Senior Researcher, Norwegian Institute.
- Interfering factors in the comparison of two sample means using unpaired samples may inflate the pooled estimate of variance of test results. - It is.
Measuring Health Outcomes
Why use the EQ-5D? What are the alternatives?. What are the alternatives for Direct valuation? Other VAS Time Trade-Off Standard Gamble Willingness to.
Patients’ preferences for preventive osteoporosis drug treatment EW de Bekker-Grob ML Essink-Bot WJ Meerding HAP Pols BW Koes EW Steyerberg Dept. Public.
Ranking and Rating Data in Joint RP/SP Estimation by JD Hunt, University of Calgary M Zhong, University of Calgary PROCESSUS Second International Colloquium.
Direct Message Passing for Hybrid Bayesian Networks Wei Sun, PhD Assistant Research Professor SFL, C4I Center, SEOR Dept. George Mason University, 2009.
1 EQ-5D, HUI and SF-36 Of the shelf instruments…..
GECCO Papers Same research group, different lead authors Same conference Paper 1: Embodied Distributed Evolutionary Algorithm (EDEA) for on-line, on-board.
1 Health outcome valuation study in Thailand Sirinart Tongsiri Research degree student Health Services Research Unit, Public Health & Policy Department.
Using a Discrete Choice Experiment to Value the EQ-5D-5L in Canada Nick Bansback Assistant Professor School of Population and Public Health, University.
1 Interactive Introduction Cost Effectiveness and Psychotherapy Jan J. v. Busschbach, Ph.D. Psychotherapeutic Centrum ‘De Viersprong’, Halsteren
HERU is supported by the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Executive Health Department and the University of Aberdeen. The author accepts full responsibility.
“Introduction to Patient Preference Methods used for QALYs” Presented by: Jan Busschbach, PhD, Chair Section Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department.
Effect of framing of death on health state values obtained from DCEs Dr. Esther W. de Bekker-Grob by Jonker, de.
Feng Xie Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics McMaster University.
Quality of Life Lost due to Road Crashes Patricia Cubí-Mollá University of Alicante XXXIII SIMPOSIO DE ANÁLISIS ECONÓMICO ZARAGOZA 2008 Job Market Paper.
1 VAS, SG, TTO and PTO An Interactive Introduction.
Canadian TTO Valuations of the EQ-5D-5L: East versus West Differences
Some Terminology experiment vs. correlational study IV vs. DV descriptive vs. inferential statistics sample vs. population statistic vs. parameter H 0.
Professor Nancy J. Devlin Office of Health Economics Royal Statistical Society June 18 th 2015 Measuring and ‘valuing’ patient reported health.
Lesson 8: Basic Monte Carlo integration
Parameter Estimation.
Chapter 23 Comparing Means.
M. Dakoutrou, V. Gerovasili, G. Sidiras, I. Patsaki, A. Kouvarakos, S
One-Sample Inference for Proportions
Patient Baseline Assessment
Math 4030 – 9b Introduction to Hypothesis Testing
William Greene Stern School of Business New York University
Part III – Gathering Data
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
Prof. Dr. Jan J.V. Busschbach
User preferences for coworking space characteristics
Statistical Data Analysis
Advanced Placement Statistics
SAMPLING (Zikmund, Chapter 12.
The valuation of disease-specific questionnaires for QALY analysis
SAMPLING.
Designing Experiments
User preferences for coworking space characteristics
The Randomized Complete Block Design
SAMPLING (Zikmund, Chapter 12).
Statistical Data Analysis
Measuring benefits Morris et al (2012) Ch
Chapter 7: Sampling Distributions
Chapter 24 Comparing Means Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.
20 times 80 is enough Ben van Hout 10/4/19
CHAPTER 10 Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Measuring outcomes Emma Frew October 2012.
Elicitation methods Health care demands exceed resource supply
Presumptions Subgroups (samples) of data are formed.
How to Measure Quality of Life
Chapter 9 Test for Independent Means Between-Subjects Design
Presentation transcript:

Effect of framing of death on health state values obtained from DCEs Marcel Jonker, de Bekker-Grob, Donkers, Stolk Dr. Esther W. de Bekker-Grob e.debekker@erasmusmc.nl www.eur.nl/ecmc

Introduction Discrete choice experiments (DCE) is considered a promising technique for health state valuation Nevertheless, the method is still in development and obtained results warrant further investigation Notably, compared to TTO, DCE classifies more states as worse than death www.eur.nl/ecmc

Hypothesis Differences between health state values based on TTO and DCE may at least in part be reconciled by harmonizing their framings TTO includes an endowment, whereas DCE involves a neutral choice between option A and option B www.eur.nl/ecmc

Aim To determine how alternative framing of the DCE questions affects EQ-5D-5L health state values www.eur.nl/ecmc

DCE health-state valuations latent utility scale QALY scale 1-1-1-1-1 1-1-1-1-1 = 1 death = 0 5-5-5-5-5 5-5-5-5-5

2 ways to obtain QALY values Including “death” as an alternative-specific health state in the DCE Including “duration” as an additional attribute in the DCE (zero duration of life = death) 1-1-1-1-1 = 1 death = 0 5-5-5-5-5

Methods 9 different study arms: 5 different DCE duration framings 4 different DCE death framings www.eur.nl/ecmc

Methods 9 different study arms: 5 different DCE duration framings 4 different DCE death framings www.eur.nl/ecmc

Base case (A vs B) Which health state do you prefer, A or B? 10 years in this health 10 years in this health state, followed by death state, followed by death no problems in walking about no problems in walking about Mobility no problems washing or dressing no problems washing or dressing Self-care Usual activities moderate problems doing usual activities moderate problems doing usual activities severe pain or discomfort extreme pain or discomfort Pain extremely anxious or depressed slightly anxious or depressed Anxiety

Base case (B vs C) Which health state do you prefer, B or C? 10 years in this health 10 years in this health state, followed by death state, followed by death no problems in walking about no problems in walking about Mobility no problems washing or dressing no problems washing or dressing Self-care Usual activities moderate problems doing usual activities moderate problems doing usual activities severe pain or discomfort extreme pain or discomfort Pain extremely anxious or depressed slightly anxious or depressed Anxiety

Base case (DCE death) Which health state do you prefer, B or C? 10 years in this health 10 years in this health You die immediately state, followed by death state, followed by death no problems in walking about no problems in walking about Mobility no problems washing or dressing no problems washing or dressing Self-care Usual activities moderate problems doing usual activities moderate problems doing usual activities severe pain or discomfort extreme pain or discomfort Pain extremely anxious or depressed slightly anxious or depressed Anxiety

Base case (DCE duration) Which health state do you prefer, B or C? B C 10 years in this health 10 years in this health 7 years in this health state, followed by death state, followed by death state, followed by death no problems in walking about no problems in walking about no problems in walking about Mobility no problems washing or dressing no problems washing or dressing no problems in walking about Self-care Usual activities moderate problems doing usual activities moderate problems doing usual activities no problems in walking about extreme pain or discomfort no problems in walking about Pain severe pain or discomfort extremely anxious or depressed slightly anxious or depressed no problems in walking about Anxiety

Framing 1: lead time Which health state do you prefer, A or B? You will live 20 years, of which 10 in full health and 10 years in this health below You will live 20 years, of which 10 in full health and 10 years in this health below You will live 10 years in perfect health, followed by death no problems in walking about no problems in walking about no problems in walking about Mobility no problems washing or dressing no problems washing or dressing no problems in walking about Self-care no problems in walking about Usual activities moderate problems doing usual activities moderate problems doing usual activities severe pain or discomfort extreme pain or discomfort no problems in walking about Pain extremely anxious or depressed slightly anxious or depressed no problems in walking about Anxiety

Framing 2: endowment health state Assume you live 10 years in health state A. Which health state do you prefer, health state A or do you want to substitute for health state B? A B C 10 years in this health 10 years in this health state, followed by death state, followed by death no problems in walking about no problems in walking about Mobility no problems washing or dressing no problems washing or dressing Self-care Usual activities moderate problems doing usual activities moderate problems doing usual activities severe pain or discomfort extreme pain or discomfort Pain extremely anxious or depressed slightly anxious or depressed Anxiety

Framing 3: reversed endowment Assume you would die immediately. Which health state do you prefer, health state A or do you want to substitute for health state B? A B C 10 years in this health 10 years in this health You die immediately state, followed by death state, followed by death no problems in walking about no problems in walking about Mobility no problems washing or dressing no problems washing or dressing Self-care Usual activities moderate problems doing usual activities moderate problems doing usual activities extreme pain or discomfort extreme pain or discomfort Pain slightly anxious or depressed slightly anxious or depressed Anxiety

Framing 4: years of life lost Which health state do you prefer, B or C? B C 10 years in this health 10 years in this health You loose 3 out of the remaining 10 years state, followed by death state, followed by death no problems in walking about no problems in walking about no problems in walking about Mobility no problems washing or dressing no problems washing or dressing no problems in walking about Self-care Usual activities moderate problems doing usual activities moderate problems doing usual activities no problems in walking about extreme pain or discomfort no problems in walking about Pain severe pain or discomfort extremely anxious or depressed slightly anxious or depressed no problems in walking about Anxiety

Methods Sample: Online panel (Dutch general population) 2,700 respondents (300 per arm) Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the 9 study arms www.eur.nl/ecmc

Methods Sample: Online panel (Dutch general population) 2,700 respondents (300 per arm) Respondents were randomly assigned to one of the 9 study arms Experimental DCE design: Bayesian D-efficient design with 2*15 choices for each respondent jointly optimized for DCE duration and death Keeping all aspects of the DCE design constant except for the framing (!) www.eur.nl/ecmc

Methods Estimations: Bayesian mixed logit models Comparisons between 9 study arms in terms of QALY tariffs (on a comparable scale) www.eur.nl/ecmc

Results DCE duration www.eur.nl/ecmc

Results DCE death www.eur.nl/ecmc

Results – QALY scale www.eur.nl/ecmc

Results – QALY scale www.eur.nl/ecmc

Results – QALY scale www.eur.nl/ecmc

Conclusion Framing effects were substantial Our harmonizing framings did not reconcile differences between health state values based on TTO and DCE Interestingly, we found something else: our base case values were not that different anymore from TTO values

Further research needed 1) Our design was jointly optimized for ‘DCE duration’ and ‘DCE death’.  QALY-balanced DCE designs (?) 2) The death parameter in DCE death might not be normally distributed.  Mixture of normals, dirichlet process prior (?) 3) Our results showed that the TTO values lay exactly between DCE duration and DCE death results  How desirable is it to “tweak” DCE to reach similar values as TTO?

Previous & current DCE design www.eur.nl/ecmc

Distribution of the death parameter www.eur.nl/ecmc

Acknowledgement www.eur.nl/ecmc