LUSI Diagnostics & Common Optics WBS 1.5

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tom Fornek LUSI June 17, LUSI UPDATE – June, 2008.
Advertisements

Richard M. Bionta XTOD July 19-21, 2005 UCRL-PRES-xxxxxx X Ray Diagnostics LCLS FAC Meeting Oct. 27, 2005.
James Welch October 30, FEL Commissioning Plans J. Welch, et. al. FEL Commissioning Plans J. Welch, et. al. Accelerator.
Richard M. Bionta XTOD October 12, 2004 UCRL-PRES-XXXXX X Ray Transport, Optics, and Diagnostics, Overview Facility Advisory Committee.
Bingxin Yang High resolution effective K September 22-23, 2004 High-Resolution Effective K Measurements Using Spontaneous.
J. B. Hastings LUSI Overview LCLS FAC March 20, 2007 LUSI Overview J. B. Hastings January 2007 Lehman Review Response to Lehman Review.
David Fritz LCLS FAC Meeting Oct. 30, X-ray Pump-Probe Instrument David Fritz Instrument Overview Instrument Layout System.
Aymeric Robert XCS 11/12/2008 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory 1 X -ray C orrelation S pectroscopy Instrument Aymeric.
John Arthur Photon Systems April 16, LCLS Photon Systems Status Technical status and accomplishments Response to.
1 Eliazar Ortiz 1 XCS Final Instrument Design Review – DCO June 18, 2009 Diagnostics & Common Optics LUSI WBS 1.5 Yiping Feng.
Diagnostics & Common Optics LUSI WBS 1.5
John Arthur Photon April 20, 2006 Photon Systems Update John Arthur SLAC Photon Systems Manager.
Eliazar Ortiz LUSI Diagnostics & Common November 11-13, 2008 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory 1 Diagnostics/Common Optics:
Sébastien Boutet LCLS FAC June Coherent X-Ray Imaging 1 LUSI Coherent X-ray Imaging Instrument Sébastien Boutet – CXI.
1 Eliazar Ortiz 1 Diagnostics/Common Optics: Priorities, Engineering June 9, 2009 Diagnostics/Common Optics: Priorities, Engineering.
Sébastien Boutet LCLS FAC Meeting Oct 30, 2007 Coherent X-ray Imaging1 Coherent X-ray Imaging Instrument Sébastien Boutet Coherent.
David Fritz XPP June 17, The X-ray Pump-Probe Instrument Instrument Scientist: David Fritz Second Scientist:
1 T. Fornek 1 LUSI CXI FIDR June 3, 2009 Thomas Fornek Project Manager June 3, 2009 LUSI Coherent X-Ray Imaging Instrument Final.
1 T. Fornek 1 LUSI XCS FIDR June 17, 2009 Thomas Fornek Project Manager June 17, 2009 LUSI X-Ray Correlation Spectroscopy Instrument.
1 Sébastien Boutet 1 Coherent X-ray Imaging Instrument FAC Meeting, June Coherent X-ray Imaging Instrument Sébastien Boutet.
J. B. Hastings LUSI DOE Review July 23, 2007 X-ray Optics 1 X-ray Optics J. B. Hastings Beam definition Attenuators Slits Pulse picker.
XCS Aymeric ROBERT 1 LUSI X-ray Correlation Spectroscopy Instrument Advanced Procurement Review : Large Offset Monochromator.
NOvA meeting PIP Update W. Pellico. PIP Goals and Scope (Provided in 2011 – Directorate S. H. / DOE Talk ) Goals: Specific to the issues surrounding the.
Beam Diagnostics Collaboration Meeting March 18 th 2015 at Australian Synchrotron Mario Ferianis – Elettra.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES BIW ’ 06 Lepton Beam Emittance Instrumentation Igor Pinayev National Synchrotron Light Source BNL, Upton, NY.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Project Baseline Jim Yeck NSLS-II Deputy Project Director NSLS-II PAC Meeting November 20, 2007.
Optimization of Compact X-ray Free-electron Lasers Sven Reiche May 27 th 2011.
DOE Stanford Site Office Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 1 U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science Office of Science Review of the LCLS.
An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron radiation. I.Meshkov, T. Mamedov, E. Syresin, An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron.
The Next Generation Light Source Test Facility at Daresbury Jim Clarke ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory Ultra Bright Electron Sources Workshop, Daresbury,
Yiping Feng LUSI DOE Review July 23, 2007 Diagnostics (WBS 1.5)1 Diagnostics (WBS 1.5) Yiping Feng Motivations System Specifications.
Sébastien Boutet LUSI DOE Review July 23, 2007 CXI (WBS 1.3) 1 Coherent X-ray Imaging (WBS 1.3) Sébastien Boutet System Specifications.
Nadine Kurita - LUSI Chief Engineer
Coherent X-ray Imaging Instrument
X-ray Correlation Spectroscopy (WBS 1.4) Aymeric Robert
Experimental Facilities Planning
X-ray Pump-Probe (WBS 1.2) David Fritz
LCLS Instrument Development
LUSI X-ray Correlation Spectroscopy WBS 1.4
FRED Stray Light FRED: A software tool for modern engineering.
Multiplexing of LCLS II SXR beamlines using a canted undulator concept
LUSI X-ray Pump-Probe Instrument WBS 1.2
WBS 5.0 LCLS Strategic Projects Division
Development of LCLS Far Experimental Hall Hutches
John N. Galayda – Director of LCLS Construction March 30, 2009
Coherent X-ray Imaging WBS 1.3
X-ray Pump-Probe Instrument
Electron Beam Systems ETC and Methodology
Thomas Fornek Project Manager July 15, 2009
X-Ray Transport, Optics, and Diagnostics WBS Alan J
X-ray Pump-Probe Instrument
LUSI Controls and Data Systems W.B.S. 1.6
AMO Early Science Capability
LUSI MANAGEMENT OVERVIEW
Project Management Issues John N. Galayda, SLAC April 24, 2002
LUSI WBS 1.2 X-ray Pump Probe Status Review
Transverse size and distribution of FEL x-ray radiation of the LCLS
Optics John Arthur, SLAC & William W. Craig, LLNL April 24, 2002
Experimental Program and Endstations System (WBS ) J
NEH - Status Stefan Moeller.
PIXEL Project Status John Arthur Photon Instrumentation for
Coherent X-ray Imaging Instrument WBS 1.3
X-ray Correlation Spectroscopy Instrument
Linac Coherent Light Source Transition to Operations 11 July 2007
Test Beamline System Requirements and Charge to PDR Committee
LUSI Status and Early Science
X-Ray Endstation Systems (XES) 2006 Schedule
LUSI Controls and Data Systems W.B.S. 1.6
LCLS Lehman Review February 7-9, 2005
Presentation transcript:

LUSI Diagnostics & Common Optics WBS 1.5 Yiping Feng – DCO Lead Scientist LUSI CD-2 Review August 19, 2008 Lead Engineer: Eliazar Ortiz Mechanical Engineer: Marc Campell Mechanical Engineer: Nadine Kurita Design Engineer: Rick Jackson Designer: Don Arnett Designer: Ben Bigornia Page Page 1

Outline Diagnostics & common optics (DCO) overview DCO scope Components locations Components physics requirements Components descriptions Deliverables Schedule Costs Major risks 6-month look-ahead Summary Page

Overview Common needs recognized for all LUSI instruments in Diagnostics for measuring X-ray FEL properties Transverse beam profile Incident beam intensity Transverse beam positions Wave field at focus Optical components for performing X-ray FEL manipulations Beam size definition and clean-up Attenuation Pulse pattern selection and/or repetition rate reduction Isolation of fundamental from high harmonics Focusing Monochromatization Page

Overview (cont.) Common components identified among all LUSI instruments & categorized, based on functionalities, into diagnostics suite common optics suite To facilitate common design & implementation A single WBS element created – WBS 1.5 Captured all XPP, CXI, and XCS common components The DCO integrated team put in place DCO scientific/technical team DCO engineering team Page

DCO Science Team Responsible for developing specifications and device/component concepts for DCO DCO scientific/technical team Yiping Feng, DCO lead scientist Instrument liaisons & DCO scientists David Fritz, XPP instr., attenuator, harmonic rejection mirrors Marc Messerschmidt, XPP instr. Sébastien Boutet, CXI instr., slits system, pulse picker Aymeric Robert, XCS instr., focusing lens, offset monochromator Niels van Bakel, X-ray detectors support Gunther Haller/Dieter Freytag, EE support Page

Overview (cont.) Physics requirement documents released by DCO team Diagnostics sp39100004-1_XRPopInProfMon-PRD sp39100009-1_XRPopInIntensity-PRD sp39100008-1_XRIntensity-Position-PRD sp39100007-0_XRWavefrontMon-PRD* Common optics sp39100011-1_BeLens-PRD sp39100014-1_Slits-PRD sp39100010-1_Atten-PRD sp39100023-1_Pulse_Picker-PRD sp39100034-1_HarmRejMirror-PRD sp39100016-0_OffsetMono (in work)* * In initial version-0

DCO Scope Work Breakdown Structure Scope/CD-2 Includes: Physics support & engineering integration (WBS. 1.5.1) Diagnostics (WBS 1.5.2) Pop-in Profile/Wavefront Monitor (WBS 1.5.2.1) Pop-in Intensity Monitor (WBS 1.5.2.2) Intensity-Position Monitor (WBS 1.5.2.3) Common Optics (WBS 1.5.3) Offset Monochromator (WBS 1.5.3.1) X-ray Focusing Lenses (WBS 1.5.3.2) Slits System (WBS 1.5.3.3) Attenuators (WBS 1.5.3.4) Pulse Picker (WBS 1.5.3.5) Harmonic Rejection Mirrors (WBS 1.5.3.6) Page

Components Locations Components locations Distributed throughout the XPP, CXI, and XCS instruments, including X-ray transport tunnel HEDS CXI Endstation X-ray Transport Tunnel Near Experimental Hall XCS Endstation XPP Endstation Far Experimental Hall LCLS X-ray FEL SXR AMO Page

Components Locations (cont.) An example in XPP 15 diagnostics/common optics components embedded in XPP

Device/Component Counts Total device/component counts Diagnostics/Optics XPP CXI XCS Total Pop-in Profiler/ Wavefront Monitor 3 4 5 12 1 Pop-in Intensity Monitor 2 9 Intensity-Position Monitor 11 Offset Monochromator X-Ray Focusing Lenses Slits System 6 13 Attenuators/Filters Pulse Picker Harmonic Rejection Mirrors 15 16 26 57 Page

DCO Physics Requirements Goals Build diagnostics and common optics to help XPP, CXI, and XCS instruments achieve their full scientific potentials Common requirements stemmed from characteristics of LCLS X-ray FEL Ultra short @ 100 fs, and repetition rate of 120 Hz High peak power ~ 10 GW Fully coherent in transverse directions ~ TEM00 Intrinsic intensity, temporal, spatial, timing fluctuations on per-pulse basis, i.e., LCLS Expected Fluctuations Pulse intensity fluctuations ~ 30 % (in contrast to synchrotron where fluctuation is Poisson limited) Position & pointing jitter (x, y, a, b) ~ 10 % of beam diameter ~ 10 % of beam divergence Source point jitter (z) ~ 5 m (leads to variations in apparent source size, or focal point location if focused)

DCO Physics Requirements (cont.) Unique challenges identified for LUSI DCO Capable of sustaining the instantaneous LCLS X-ray FEL peak power Exercising deliberate material selection Thermal calculations including melting threshold and onset of thermal fatigue Capable of coherent beam manipulation Minimizing large angle diffractions to the extent possible i.e., utilizing cylindrical blades for slits Minimizing random wavefront distortion to the extent possible Reducing surface roughness and bulk non-uniformities Capable of ultra-fast signal detection Extracting signals in ~ ns to avoid large background i.e., charge-sensitive detection in intensity measurements Capable of per-pulse measurement if required Each pulse is a new experiment Averaging NOT an option, requiring high S/N ratio from single pulse i.e., high-precision intensity measurements to 0.1% based on single pulse

DCO Physics Requirements (cont.) Unique challenges for LUSI DCO (cont.) Capable of maintaining ultra-high mechanical stability in case of large optics-to-sample distance, i.e., XCS offset monochromator To 10% of beam size at 50 mm  0.25 mrad pointing stability Linac-to-Undulator (227m) Undulator Hall (175m) Near Expt. Hall X-ray Transport (230m) Far Expt. Hall Source to Sample distance @ 1.5 Å CXI - 440 m XCS - 419 m XPP - 193 m 54 m Rayleigh Length 60 mm 220 mm 490 mm 1.1 mrad Mono location 200 m

Component Descriptions Diagnostics suite Pop-in profile monitor (WBS 1.5.2.1) Requirements Destructive; Retractable; Variable FOV and resolution At 100 mm resolution, 24x24 mm2 FOV; At 8 mm resolution, 2x2 mm2 FOV; Capable of per-pulse op. @ 120 Hz if required Attenuation used if necessary Pop-in intensity monitor (WBS 1.5.2.2) Requirements Destructive; Retractable; Relative accuracy < 1%; Working dynamic range 100; Sensitive area 20x20 mm2 Capable of per-pulse op. @ 120 Hz Attenuation used if necessary

Component Descriptions (cont.) Diagnostics suite (cont.) Intensity-position monitor (WBS 1.5.2.3) Requirements In-situ, but retractable if desired Highly transmissive (< 5% loss); Relative accuracy < 0.1%; Working dynamic range 1000; Position accuracy in xy < 10 mm; Per-pulse op. at 120 Hz; Wavefront monitor (WBS 1.5.2.1) Requirements In-situ, but retractable if desired Variable FOV and resolution Per-pulse op. @ 120 Hz Attenuation used if necessary Computational algorithms needed for wavefront reconstruction

Component Descriptions (cont.) Common optics suite X-ray focusing lenses (WBS 1.5.3.2) Requirements Produce variable focused spot size For XPP 2-10 mm in focus 40-60 mm out-of-focus Minimize wavefront distortion Withstand FEL full flux Slits system (WBS 1.5.3.3) Requirements 0 – 10 mm gap setting 10-9 in trans. btw 2-8.265 keV 10-8 in trans. at 25 keV Gap precisions in xy 0.5 mm for precise slits 5 mm for coarse slits Minimize diffraction/wavefront distortion Withstand FEL full flux

Component Descriptions (cont.) Common X-ray optics (cont.) Attenuators (WBS 1.5.3.4) Requirements Minimize wavefront distortion Withstand full FEL flux 108 attenuation at 8.3 keV* 104 attenuation at 24.9 keV At least 3 steps per decade Pulse picker (WBS 1.5.3.5) Requirements < 3 ms switching time Reduce rep rate < 10 Hz operation* Not preferred for > 10 Hz continuous operation, FEL rep rate reduction will be used Withstand full LCLS FEL flux Requiring 100 mm Si3N4 to protect the steel blade *DCO key performance parameters

Component Descriptions (cont.) Common optics (cont.) Harmonic rejection mirrors (WBS 1.5.3.6) Requirements Energy range btw 6 - 8.265 keV 104 contrast ratio between fundamental and the 3rd harmonic, 106 overall 80% overall throughput for the fundamental Minimize wavefront distortion Withstand full FEL flux Offset monochromator (WBS 1.5.3.1) Requirements Large 600 mm offset 6-25 keV energy range Continuously tunable 10% positional stability (of beam size) Double-crystal geometry Attenuation used if necessary

DCO Deliverables Phased deliverables CD-4A CD-4B CD-4C XPP CXI XCS Pop-In Profile Monitor Pop-In Intensity Monitor Intensity-Position Monitor Slits System Pulse Picker Attenuators Harmonic Rejection Mirrors X-Ray Focusing Lenses CXI Wavefront Monitor XCS Offset Monochromator

DCO Schedule WBS 1.5 schedule developed to ensure that instruments’ milestones are met on time Preliminary design reviews Pop-In Profile Monitor Q4 FY08 Pop-In Intensity Monitor Q4 FY08 Pulse Picker Q4 FY08 Slits System Q1 FY09 Intensity-Position Monitor Q1 FY09 X-ray Focusing Lens Q2 FY09 Attenuators Q3 FY09 Harmonic Rejection Mirrors Q4 FY09 Wavefront Monitor Q1 FY10 Offset Monochromator Q2 FY10 Final design reviews Pulse Picker Q1 FY09 Intensity-Position Monitor Q2 FY09 Pop-In Profile Monitor Q2 FY09 Pop-In Intensity Monitor Q3 FY09 X-ray Focusing Lens Q3 FY09 Attenuators Q4 FY09 Harmonic Rejection Mirrors Q1 FY10 Wavefront Monitor Q2 FY10 Installation complete CD-4A Installation complete Q1 FY11 CD-4B Installation complete Q3 FY11 CD-4C Installation complete Q3 FY12 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 Page

DCO Cost Baseline Labor & non-labor (M&S, etc.) Page

DCO Cost Baseline (cont.) Level-3/4 cost breakdown 1.5.02 - Diagnostics 1.5.03 – Common optics

DCO Major Risks Offset monochromator Mechanical stability not met Required to maintain position stability to 10% of beam size Mitigation Ensure requirements are clearly stated and agreed prior to award and fabrication Implement a stringent vendor selection process Implement regular visits to vendor Implement frequent and measurable status reports Maintain constant communication with the vendor prior to and during design and fabrication Linac-to-Undulator (227m) Undulator Hall (175m) Near Expt. Hall X-ray Transport (230m) Far Expt. Hall 60 mm 1.1 mrad 220 mm 490 mm Mono location Rayleigh Length 200 m 54 m XPP - 193 m Source to Sample distance @ 1.5 Å XCS - 419 m CXI - 440 m

6-Month Look-ahead Major milestones Preliminary design reviews Q4FY08 – PDR Pop-in profile monitor Q4FY08 – PDR Pop-in intensity monitor Q4FY08 – PDR Pulse picker Q1FY09 – PDR Intensity-position monitor Q1FY09 – PDR Slits system Final design reviews Q1FY09 – FDR Slits system Q1FY09 – FDR Pulse picker

Summary Diagnostics and common optics help support LUSI instruments to fulfill CD-0 mission in a wide variety of cutting edge research capabilities Diagnostic & optical components concepts are based on proven developments made at SPPS, FLASH, and SR sources Safety hazards have been identified in Hazard Analysis Report (HAR) Safety issues are considered at every step of design and fabrication process Scope of DCO components for XPP, CXI, and XCS instruments fully defined Resource loaded schedule developed through end of project Preliminary designs of key components are well advanced DCO and LUSI are ready for CD-2 approval Page