San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 5-9, 2017

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee
Advertisements

CALGB 9741 A Randomized Trial of Dose-Dense vs Conventionally Scheduled and Sequential vs Concurrent Combination Chemotherapy as Postoperative Adjuvant.
Obesity at Diagnosis Is Associated with Inferior Outcomes in Hormone Receptor Positive Breast Cancer 1 The Impact of Body Mass Index (BMI) on the Efficacy.
SABCS 2012 Guy Jerusalem, MD, PhD. SABCS 2012: Clinical studies in HER2 negative disease Hunderds of oral and poster presentations to be covered (endocrine.
Robertson JFR et al. J Clin Oncol 2009;27(27):
Herceptin® (trastuzumab) in combination with chemotherapy: pivotal metastatic breast cancer survival data 1.
Clinical Relevance of HER2 Overexpression/Amplification in Patients with Small Tumor Size and Node-Negative Breast Cancer Curigliano G et al. J Clin Oncol.
Prevention of Early Menopause Study (POEMS)-S0230 Phase III trial of LHRH analog during chemotherapy to reduce ovarian failure in early stage, hormone.
The Effect of Zoledronic Acid (ZOL) on Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Bone Loss in Postmenopausal Women with Early Breast Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Letrozole:
Oral Bisphosphonate and Breast Cancer: Prospective Results from the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) Chlebowski RT et al. SABCS 2009; Abstract 21.
Taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer (MBC): investigational agents TTP = median time to disease progression OS = median overall survival.
Session Fertility and Pregnancy FL-BBM Specific questions Risk of premature ovarian failure Ability to become pregnant Safety of pregnancy.
Antiplatelet Therapy Use and the Risk of Venous Thromboembolic Events in the Double-Blind Raloxifene Use for the Heart (RUTH) Trial C. Duvernoy 1, A. Yeo.
Matteo Lambertini, Marcello Ceppi, Francesca Poggio, Fedro A. Peccatori, Hatem A. Azim Jr., Donatella Ugolini, Paolo Pronzato, Sibylle Loibl, Halle C.
The Use of Trastuzumab in the Elderly in the Adjuvant Setting and After Disease Progression in Patients with HER2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Dall.
Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro Genoa – Italy
NHL13: A Multicenter, Randomized Phase III Study of Rituximab as Maintenance Treatment versus Observation Alone in Patients with Aggressive B ‐ Cell Lymphoma.
Final Analysis of Overall Survival for the Phase III CONFIRM Trial: Fulvestrant 500 mg versus 250 mg Di Leo A et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract S1-4.
Cetuximab plus FOLFIRI in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: the influence of KRAS and BRAF biomarkers on outcome: updated data from the CRYSTAL.
High risk premenopausal Luminal A breast cancer patients derive no benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy: results from DBCG77B randomized trial 1 San Antonio.
1 CONFIDENTIAL – DO NOT DISTRIBUTE ARIES mCRC: Effectiveness and Safety of 1st- and 2nd-line Bevacizumab Treatment in Elderly Patients Mark Kozloff, MD.
San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 8-12, 2015
S1207: Phase III Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating the Use of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy +/- One Year of Everolimus in Patients.
HERA TRIAL: 2 Years versus 1 Year of Trastuzumab After Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Women with HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer at 8 Years of Median Follow-Up.
Trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer Slideset on: Piccart-Gebhart M, Procter M, Leyland- Jones B, et al. Trastuzumab.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage*: The 2015 Annual Meeting of the CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 8-12, 2015 San Antonio, Texas.
Neuropathy Is Not Associated With Clinical Outcomes in Patients Receiving Adjuvant Taxane-Containing Therapy for Operable Breast Cancer Bryan P. Schneider,
PHARE Trial Results of Subset Analysis Comparing 6 to 12 Months of Trastuzumab in Adjuvant Early Breast Cancer Pivot X et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract.
MA.17R: Reduced Risk of Recurrence With Extending Adjuvant Letrozole Beyond 5 Yrs in Postmenopausal Women With Early-Stage Breast Cancer CCO Independent.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage*: The 2015 Annual Meeting of the CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 8-12, 2015 San Antonio, Texas.
Angelo Di Leo “Sandro Pitigliani” Medical Oncology Department Hospital of Prato Istituto Toscano Tumori, Prato, Italy Adjuvant hormone therapy in pre-menopausal.
Breast Journal Club – L’Importanza della Ricerca in Oncologia
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
Mamounas EP et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract S1-10.
San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium – December 6-10, 2016
San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 6-10, 2016
Slamon D et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 62.
Neoadjuvant Palbociclib + Anastrozole in ER+/HER2- Breast Cancer
Alessandra Gennari, MD PhD
San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium. December
L’importanza della ricerca in oncologia
Perez EA et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 80.
Prognostic and Predictive Value of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay in Postmenopausal Women with Node-Positive, Estrogen- Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.
CREATE-X: Adjuvant Capecitabine in HER2-Negative Breast Cancer
Phase III Trial (MPACT) of Weekly nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Influence of Prognostic Factors of Survival J Tabernero,
ASCO 2002 Advances in the Adjuvant Chemotherapy of Breast Cancer
Vahdat L et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract P
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
Circulating Tumor Cells and Late Recurrence of Breast Cancer
CCO Independent Conference Coverage
San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 5-9, 2017
Weight Loss and Breast Cancer Incidence in Postmenopausal Women
Results: Patient details Results: QoL
Early Breast Cancer Clinical Trialists’ Collaborative Group
Lo sviluppo clinico di nab-paclitaxel Discussant: Fabio Puglisi
San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 6-10, 2016
Benefits of switching postmenopausal women with hormone-sensitive early breast cancer to anastrozole after 2 years adjuvant tamoxifen: Combined results.
Barrios C et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 46.
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow chart summarising the process for the identification of eligible studies.
Bergh J et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 23.
Short or long adjuvant treatment: can we use new trials to decide it?
Untch M et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
Reviewer: Dr. Sunil Verma Date posted: December 12th, 2011
ONCOLOGYEDUCATION.COM ARTICLE SUMMARIES
LV5FU2-cisplatin followed by gemcitabine or the reverse sequence in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Preliminary results of a randomized phase III trial (FFCD.
Badwe RA et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 72.
Cetuximab with chemotherapy as 1st-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of the CRYSTAL and OPUS studies according to KRAS.
Adjuvant chemotherapy after potentially curative resection of metastases from colorectal cancer. A meta-analysis of two randomized trials E Mitry, A Fields,
Published online Feb 7, 2019 Increasing the dose intensity of chemotherapy by more frequent administration or sequential scheduling:
Fertility Preservation in Breast Cancer
Presentation transcript:

San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 5-9, 2017 Pooled analysis of five randomized trials investigating temporary ovarian suppression with gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs during chemotherapy as a strategy to preserve ovarian function and fertility in premenopausal early breast cancer patients Matteo Lambertini1, Halle C.F. Moore2, Robert C.F. Leonard3, Sibylle Loibl4, Pamela Munster5, Marco Bruzzone6, Luca Boni7, Joseph M. Unger8, Richard A. Anderson9, Keyur Mehta4, Susan Minton10, Francesca Poggio6, Kathy S. Albain11, Douglas J.A. Adamson12, Bernd Gerber13, Amy Cripps14, Gianfilippo Bertelli15, Sabine Seiler4, Marcello Ceppi6, Ann H. Partridge16, and Lucia Del Mastro6 1Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium. 2Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH. 3Imperial College, London, UK. 4GBG - German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany. 5UCSF - University of California, San Francisco, CA. 6Ospedale Policlinico San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy. 7AOU Careggi and Istituto Toscano Tumori, Firenze, Italy. 8SWOG Statistical Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA. 9MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. 10Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL. 11Loyola University Medical Center, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Maywood, IL. 12Tayside Cancer Centre, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK. 13University Hospital Rostock, Rostock, Germany. 14Nexgen Oncology, Dallas, TX. 15Singleton Hospital, Swansea, UK. 16Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA. This presentation is the intellectual property of the author/presenter. Contact them at matteo.lambertini@bordet.be for permission to reprint and/or distribute

San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 5-9, 2017 Disclosures Lambertini Matteo: Consultant or advisor: Teva Travel grant: Astellas This presentation is the intellectual property of the author/presenter. Contact them at matteo.lambertini@bordet.be for permission to reprint and/or distribute

for young women with breast cancer” San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 5-9, 2017 Background “Fertility preservation and pregnancy-related issues are high priority areas of concern for young women with breast cancer” Paluch-Shimon S et al, Breast 2017;35:203-17 This presentation is the intellectual property of the author/presenter. Contact them at matteo.lambertini@bordet.be for permission to reprint and/or distribute

San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 5-9, 2017 Background Premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) is a common side effect of chemotherapy in premenopausal patients with substantial negative impact on their quality of life Oocyte/embryo cryopreservation are standard strategies for fertility preservation but they do not prevent the risk of chemotherapy-induced POI Temporary ovarian suppression with GnRHa during chemotherapy has been studied in several RCTs as a strategy to preserve ovarian function and potential fertility However, data are mixed and its role remains controversial Paluch-Shimon S et al, Breast 2017;35:203-17. Loren AW et al, J Clin Oncol 2013;31:2500-10. Peccatori F et al, Ann Oncol 2013;24 Suppl 6;vi160-70. Lambertini M et al, Ann Oncol 2015;26:2408-19. Lambertini M et al, Eur J Cancer 2017;71:25-33. This presentation is the intellectual property of the author/presenter. Contact them at matteo.lambertini@bordet.be for permission to reprint and/or distribute

Study Objectives and Endpoints San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 5-9, 2017 Study Objectives and Endpoints Systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from RCTs to evaluate the efficacy (ovarian function and fertility preservation) and the safety (survival outcomes) of GnRHa use during chemotherapy Primary endpoints POI rate (according to the definition used as primary endpoint in each trial) Post-treatment pregnancy rate Secondary endpoints Amenorrhea rates one year and two years after the end of chemotherapy Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) This presentation is the intellectual property of the author/presenter. Contact them at matteo.lambertini@bordet.be for permission to reprint and/or distribute

Study Characteristics Anglo Celtic Group OPTION6 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 5-9, 2017 Study Characteristics PROMISE-GIM61,2 POEMS/SWOG S02303 Moffitt-led trial4 GBG-37 ZORO5 Anglo Celtic Group OPTION6 Definition of POI No resumption of menstrual activity and postmenopausal levels of FSH and E2 Amenorrhea for the prior 6 months and postmenopausal levels of FSH No maintenance of menses and no resumption of menses No re-appearance of two consecutive menstrual periods within 21 to 35 days Amenorrhea with elevated FSH Timing of POI after chemotherapy 12 months 24 months 6 months Between 12 and 24 months Sample size 281 257 48 60 227 ER status for eligibility ER-positive and ER-negative ER-negative only Upper age limit for eligibility ≤ 45 years ≤ 49 years ≤ 44 years None Type of GnRHa Triptorelin Goserelin 1. Del Mastro L et al, JAMA 2011;306:269-76. 2. Lambertini M et al, JAMA 2015;314:2632-40. 3. Moore HCF et al, N Engl J Med 2015;372:923-32. 4. Munster P et al, J Clin Oncol 2012;30:533-38. 5. Gerber B et al, J Clin Oncol 2011;29:2334-41. 6. Leonard RCF et al, Ann Oncol 2017;28:1811-16. This presentation is the intellectual property of the author/presenter. Contact them at matteo.lambertini@bordet.be for permission to reprint and/or distribute

Baseline Characteristics San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 5-9, 2017 Baseline Characteristics GnRHa group (n=436) No. (%) Control group (n=437) p value*   Age, median (interquartile range), years 38 (34-42) 39 (35-42) 0.258 Age distribution, years ≤ 40 ≥ 41 297 (68.1) 139 (31.9) 283 (64.8) 154 (35.2) 0.316 Estrogen receptor status Positive Negative Missing 177 (40.6) 257 (58.9) 2 (0.5) 173 (39.6) 262 (59.9) 0.782 Type of chemotherapy Anthracycline only-based Anthracycline- and taxane-based Non anthracycline-based 194 (44.5) 227 (52.1) 6 (1.4) 9 (2.1) 198 (45.3) 210 (48.0) 13 (3.0) 16 (3.7) 0.196 Cumulative cyclophosphamide dose, median (interquartile range), mg/m2 4000 (3420-5185) 3960 (3082-5400) 0.585 *Calculated by excluding missing data This presentation is the intellectual property of the author/presenter. Contact them at matteo.lambertini@bordet.be for permission to reprint and/or distribute

Premature-Ovarian Insufficiency Rate San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 5-9, 2017 Premature-Ovarian Insufficiency Rate OR* 0.38 (95% CI 0.26-0.57) p<0.001 Subgroup analysis 14.1% 30.9% GnRHa group n=363 Control group n=359 *Odds ratio (OR) adjusted for age, estrogen receptor status, type and duration of chemotherapy administered This presentation is the intellectual property of the author/presenter. Contact them at matteo.lambertini@bordet.be for permission to reprint and/or distribute

San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 5-9, 2017 Amenorrhea Rates One-Year Amenorrhea Two-Year Amenorrhea OR* 0.92 (95% CI 0.66-1.28); p=0.623 OR* 0.51 (95% CI 0.31-0.85); p=0.009 36.8% 40.4% 18.2% 30.0% GnRHa group n=386 Control group n=374 GnRHa group n=214 Control group n=210 *Odds ratio (OR) adjusted for age, estrogen receptor status, type and duration of chemotherapy administered This presentation is the intellectual property of the author/presenter. Contact them at matteo.lambertini@bordet.be for permission to reprint and/or distribute

Post-Treatment Pregnancy Rate San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 5-9, 2017 Post-Treatment Pregnancy Rate GnRHa group (n = 37) No. (%) Control group (n = 20) Age distribution, years ≤ 40 ≥ 41   37 (100) 0 (0.0) 20 (100) Estrogen receptor status Positive Negative 6 (16.2) 31 (83.8) 2 (10.0) 18 (90.0) GnRHa Group: 37/359 (10.3%) vs. Control Group: 20/367 (5.5%) IRR* 1.83 (95% CI 1.06-3.15) p=0.030 *Incidence rate ratio (IRR) This presentation is the intellectual property of the author/presenter. Contact them at matteo.lambertini@bordet.be for permission to reprint and/or distribute

Disease-free survival San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 5-9, 2017 Survival Outcomes Disease-free survival Overall survival HR* 1.01 (95% CI 0.72-1.42) p=0.999 HR* 0.67 (95% CI 0.42-1.06) p=0.083 *Hazard ratio (HR) adjusted for age, estrogen receptor status, type and duration of chemotherapy administered and tumor stage This presentation is the intellectual property of the author/presenter. Contact them at matteo.lambertini@bordet.be for permission to reprint and/or distribute

San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 5-9, 2017 Conclusions Administration of GnRHa during chemotherapy was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of chemotherapy-induced POI A greater number of women in the GnRHa group had a post-treatment pregnancy Similar DFS and OS were observed between groups irrespective of the estrogen receptor status of the disease This strategy should be considered as an option to reduce the likelihood of chemotherapy-induced POI and potentially improve future fertility in premenopausal early breast cancer patients undergoing (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy This presentation is the intellectual property of the author/presenter. Contact them at matteo.lambertini@bordet.be for permission to reprint and/or distribute

San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 5-9, 2017 Acknowledgments All the patients enrolled in the trials and their families All the investigators and research teams The Gruppo Italiano Mammella (GIM) study group, the SWOG, the Anglo Celtic Group and the German Breast Group Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC) for supplemental funding This presentation is the intellectual property of the author/presenter. Contact them at matteo.lambertini@bordet.be for permission to reprint and/or distribute

San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 5-9, 2017 Acknowledgments European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) for a Translational Research Fellowship at Institut Jules Bordet (Brussels, Belgium) San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS) Scientific Committee for a SABCS Clinical Scholar Award This presentation is the intellectual property of the author/presenter. Contact them at matteo.lambertini@bordet.be for permission to reprint and/or distribute