Volume 107, Issue 12, Pages (December 2014)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 88, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Advertisements

Mapping of the Interaction Interface of DNA Polymerase β with XRCC1
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages (July 2000)
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 105, Issue 2, Pages (July 2013)
by Nuha Shiltagh, John Kirkpatrick, Lisa D. Cabrita, Tom A. J
Olivier Fisette, Stéphane Gagné, Patrick Lagüe  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 108, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Jing Han, Kristyna Pluhackova, Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Rainer A. Böckmann 
Transmembrane Signaling across the Ligand-Gated FhuA Receptor
Backbone Dynamics of the 18
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
Carlos R. Baiz, Andrei Tokmakoff  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 109, Issue 4, Pages (August 2015)
Intramolecular interactions of the regulatory domains of the Bcr–Abl kinase reveal a novel control mechanism  Hyun-Joo Nam, Wayne G Haser, Thomas M Roberts,
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
The Gemin6-Gemin7 Heterodimer from the Survival of Motor Neurons Complex Has an Sm Protein-like Structure  Yingli Ma, Josée Dostie, Gideon Dreyfuss, Gregory.
Volume 103, Issue 12, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Monika Sharma, Alexander V. Predeus, Nicholas Kovacs, Michael Feig 
Volume 108, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 107, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Leonardus M.I. Koharudin, Angela M. Gronenborn  Structure 
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
A Molecular Dynamics Study of Ca2+-Calmodulin: Evidence of Interdomain Coupling and Structural Collapse on the Nanosecond Timescale  Craig M. Shepherd,
Volume 22, Issue 12, Pages (March 2018)
Volume 113, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
The Arginine-Rich RNA-Binding Motif of HIV-1 Rev Is Intrinsically Disordered and Folds upon RRE Binding  Fabio Casu, Brendan M. Duggan, Mirko Hennig 
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Yuno Lee, Philip A. Pincus, Changbong Hyeon  Biophysical Journal 
Ligand Binding to the Voltage-Gated Kv1
RIα Subunit of PKA Structure
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
The Structure of the Tiam1 PDZ Domain/ Phospho-Syndecan1 Complex Reveals a Ligand Conformation that Modulates Protein Dynamics  Xu Liu, Tyson R. Shepherd,
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 109, Issue 3, Pages (August 2015)
Insights into Oncogenic Mutations of Plexin-B1 Based on the Solution Structure of the Rho GTPase Binding Domain  Yufeng Tong, Prasanta K. Hota, Mehdi.
Volume 103, Issue 5, Pages (September 2012)
Cholesterol Modulates the Dimer Interface of the β2-Adrenergic Receptor via Cholesterol Occupancy Sites  Xavier Prasanna, Amitabha Chattopadhyay, Durba.
Yijin Liu, David M.J. Lilley  Biophysical Journal 
A Self-Sequestered Calmodulin-like Ca2+ Sensor of Mitochondrial SCaMC Carrier and Its Implication to Ca2+-Dependent ATP-Mg/Pi Transport  Qin Yang, Sven.
Dynamics of the BH3-Only Protein Binding Interface of Bcl-xL
Min Wang, Mary Prorok, Francis J. Castellino  Biophysical Journal 
Alice Qinhua Zhou, Diego Caballero, Corey S. O’Hern, Lynne Regan 
Open-State Models of a Potassium Channel
Volume 114, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Kalyan S. Chakrabarti, Jess Li, Ranabir Das, R. Andrew Byrd  Structure 
Christina Bergonzo, Thomas E. Cheatham  Biophysical Journal 
Crystal Structure of a Trapped Catalytic Intermediate Suggests that Forced Atomic Proximity Drives the Catalysis of mIPS  Kelly Neelon, Mary F. Roberts,
OmpT: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of an Outer Membrane Enzyme
Anisotropic Membrane Curvature Sensing by Amphipathic Peptides
Backbone Dynamics of the 18
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Pingwei Li, Gerry McDermott, Roland K. Strong  Immunity 
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages e5 (July 2019)
Characterization of Structure, Dynamics, and Detergent Interactions of the Anti-HIV Chemokine Variant 5P12-RANTES  Maciej Wiktor, Oliver Hartley, Stephan.
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 109, Issue 7, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 109, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 107, Issue 12, Pages 2972-2981 (December 2014) Ligand Binding Modulates the Structural Dynamics and Compactness of the Major Birch Pollen Allergen  Sarina Grutsch, Julian E. Fuchs, Regina Freier, Stefan Kofler, Marium Bibi, Claudia Asam, Michael Wallner, Fátima Ferreira, Hans Brandstetter, Klaus R. Liedl, Martin Tollinger  Biophysical Journal  Volume 107, Issue 12, Pages 2972-2981 (December 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.10.062 Copyright © 2014 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Complex structure of Bet v 1.0101 with two SDS molecules. (A) Overview of Bet v 1.0101 in complex with the outer (front, left) and inner (right) SDS molecules shown in yellow stick representation. Three putative entrances (ε1–ε3) to the inner hydrophobic cavity are indicated with arrows. (B) Zoom-in view of the outer SDS binding site. The ligand molecule in yellow sticks is superimposed on the experimental 2Fo-Fc electron density contoured at 0.8 σ. Protein residues that are involved in important interactions with SDS are labeled. (C) Zoom-in view of the inner SDS binding site. The ligand molecule in yellow sticks is superimposed on the experimental 2Fo-Fc electron density contoured at 0.8 σ. Protein residues that are involved in important interactions with SDS are labeled. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2014 107, 2972-2981DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.10.062) Copyright © 2014 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Compactness of Bet v 1.0101. Top: PFG-NMR translational diffusion data. Relative translational diffusion coefficients (Dt/Dt,apo) of Bet v 1.0101 (0.2 mM) without ligand (three repeat experiments), and with ligand bound (0.6 mM SDS or STS, 0.4 mM ANS) are shown. Mean values (bars) and SDs (error bars) for 20 backbone amide NH resonances are reported. Control experiments were performed with the CBP KIX domain. Bottom: distribution of the radius of gyration of apo Bet v 1.0101 (red) and DXC-bound Bet v 1.0101 (green) found in MD simulations. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2014 107, 2972-2981DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.10.062) Copyright © 2014 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 NMR chemical shift data. Top: secondary structure of Bet v 1.0101 as defined by Gajhede et al. (14). Middle: TALOS+ secondary structure probabilities (blue, β-sheet; red, α-helix) of Bet v 1.0101 derived from 1HN, 15N, 13C’, 13Cα, and 13Cβ chemical shifts for the apo protein compared with complexes with SDS and STS. For residues that are marked by an asterisk, resonance assignments were not obtained. Bottom: cumulative chemical shift differences, Δωcum, between Bet v 1.0101 in the absence of ligand and Bet v 1.0101 in complex with SDS (blue) and STS (red), respectively, as a function of residue number. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2014 107, 2972-2981DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.10.062) Copyright © 2014 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Picosecond–nanosecond dynamics of Bet v 1. Backbone amide 15N order parameters S2 and error bars of apo (black) and SDS-bound Bet v 1.0101 (blue) are shown as a function of residue number. Averages of S2 (within a sliding window of ±2 residues) are indicated by black and blue lines, respectively. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2014 107, 2972-2981DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.10.062) Copyright © 2014 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Millisecond timescale dynamics in Bet v 1. (A–D) CPMG relaxation dispersion profiles for the 15N backbone amides of eight representative residues, along with best-fit lines, of (A) apo Bet v 1.0101, (B) SDS-bound Bet v 1.0101, (C) STS-bound Bet v 1.0101, and (D) ANS-bound Bet v 1.0101, recorded at 500 MHz (298 K). Biophysical Journal 2014 107, 2972-2981DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.10.062) Copyright © 2014 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Correlation of relaxation dispersion and titration chemical shifts. Left: plot of the fitted relaxation-dispersion-derived chemical shift differences (Δωdisp) versus the measured 15N backbone chemical shift differences between apo Bet v 1.0101 and SDS-bound Bet v 1.0101 (Δωbind). Right: 1H-15N-HSQC titration of Bet v 1.0101 with SDS. Spectra are shown for protein/ligand ratios between 1:0 (orange) and 1:3 (black). To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2014 107, 2972-2981DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.10.062) Copyright © 2014 The Authors Terms and Conditions