Fixed and Random Effects

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Randomized Complete Block and Repeated Measures (Each Subject Receives Each Treatment) Designs KNNL – Chapters 21,
Advertisements

Multiple Comparisons in Factorial Experiments
The Purpose of an Experiment We usually want to answer certain questions posed by the objectives of the experiment Irrigation experiment (a 2 x 2 factorial)
ANOVA TABLE Factorial Experiment Completely Randomized Design.
STRIP PLOT DESIGN AND MULTILOCATIONS
1 Chapter 4 Experiments with Blocking Factors The Randomized Complete Block Design Nuisance factor: a design factor that probably has an effect.
Experiments with both nested and “crossed” or factorial factors
STT 511-STT411: DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS AND ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE Dr. Cuixian Chen Chapter 14: Nested and Split-Plot Designs Design & Analysis of Experiments.
Introduction to Nested Designs Mark S. Rusco for ASQ – Grand Rapids Section.
Nested Designs Study vs Control Site. Nested Experiments In some two-factor experiments the level of one factor, say B, is not “cross” or “cross classified”
N-way ANOVA. Two-factor ANOVA with equal replications Experimental design: 2  2 (or 2 2 ) factorial with n = 5 replicate Total number of observations:
Analysis of Variance 2-Way ANOVA MARE 250 Dr. Jason Turner.
ANOVA: ANalysis Of VAriance. In the general linear model x = μ + σ 2 (Age) + σ 2 (Genotype) + σ 2 (Measurement) + σ 2 (Condition) + σ 2 (ε) Each of the.
Analysis of Variance: ANOVA. Group 1: control group/ no ind. Var. Group 2: low level of the ind. Var. Group 3: high level of the ind var.
The Statistical Analysis Partitions the total variation in the data into components associated with sources of variation –For a Completely Randomized Design.
Every achievement originates from the seed of determination. 1Random Effect.
Chapter 7 Blocking and Confounding in the 2k Factorial Design
Chapter 14 Conducting & Reading Research Baumgartner et al Chapter 14 Inferential Data Analysis.
Experimental Design Terminology  An Experimental Unit is the entity on which measurement or an observation is made. For example, subjects are experimental.
Lecture 9: One Way ANOVA Between Subjects
Chapter 10 - Part 1 Factorial Experiments.
Analysis of Variance Introduction to Business Statistics, 5e Kvanli/Guynes/Pavur (c)2000 South-Western College Publishing.
Nested and Split Plot Designs. Nested and Split-Plot Designs These are multifactor experiments that address common economic and practical constraints.
Module 13: Gage R&R Analysis – Analysis of Repeatability and Reproducibility This is a technique to measure the precision of gages and other measurement.
Factorial ANOVA 2 or More IVs. Questions (1)  What are main effects in ANOVA?  What are interactions in ANOVA? How do you know you have an interaction?
Fixed vs. Random Effects
1 Design of Engineering Experiments Part 10 – Nested and Split-Plot Designs Text reference, Chapter 14, Pg. 525 These are multifactor experiments that.
Factorial Experiments Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Experimental Design.
Jack’s gone to the dogs in Alaska February 25, 2005.
Psychology 301 Chapters & Differences Between Two Means Introduction to Analysis of Variance Multiple Comparisons.
Multiple Comparisons.  Multiple Range Tests  Tukey’s and Duncan’s  Orthogonal Contrasts.
Comparing Three or More Means ANOVA (One-Way Analysis of Variance)
Latin Square Designs KNNL – Sections Description Experiment with r treatments, and 2 blocking factors: rows (r levels) and columns (r levels)
ETM U 1 Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Suppose we want to compare more than two means? For example, suppose a manufacturer of paper used for grocery.
ANOVAs.  Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)  Difference in two or more average scores in different groups  Simplest is one-way ANOVA (one variable as predictor);
Fixed and Random Effects. Theory of Analysis of Variance Source of variationdfEMS Between treatmentsn-1  e 2 + k  t 2 Within treatmentsnk-n e2e2 Totalnk-1.
IE241: Introduction to Design of Experiments. Last term we talked about testing the difference between two independent means. For means from a normal.
Other experimental designs Randomized Block design Repeated Measures designs.
Tests after a significant F
Genotype x Environment Interactions Analyses of Multiple Location Trials.
ANOVA Overview of Major Designs. Between or Within Subjects Between-subjects (completely randomized) designs –Subjects are nested within treatment conditions.
Analyses of Variance. Simple Situation Genotype AGenotype B
Genotype x Environment Interactions Analyses of Multiple Location Trials.
Chapter 13 Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). ANOVA can be used to test for differences between three or more means. The hypotheses for an ANOVA are always:
Repeated Measures Designs
Nested Designs Ex 1--Compare 4 states’ low-level radioactive hospital waste A: State B: Hospital Rep: Daily waste.
Two way ANOVA with replication
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
Two-way ANOVA problems
i) Two way ANOVA without replication
Two way ANOVA with replication
Nested Designs Study vs Control Site.
Chapter 10: Analysis of Variance: Comparing More Than Two Means
Thought Questions.
Source Sum of Squares (SS) df Mean Square (MS) F p-value
Balanced Incomplete Block Design
Two-Factor Studies with Equal Replication
Analyses of Variance Review
Two-Factor Studies with Equal Replication
Orthogonal Contrasts.
Analyses of Variance.
Latin Square Designs KNNL – Sections
STRIP PLOT /split block DESIGN AND MULTILOCATIONS
Definitional Formulae
Factorial ANOVA 2 or More IVs.
The Analysis of Variance
Balanced Incomplete Block Design
A Bestiary of ANOVA tables
Experimental Statistics - week 8
Two-way ANOVA problems
Presentation transcript:

Fixed and Random Effects

Theory of Analysis of Variance Source of variation df EMS Between treatments n-1 e2 + kt2 Within treatments nk-n e2 Total nk-1 [e2 + kt2]/e2 = 1, if kt2 = 0

Expected Mean Squares Dependant on whether factor effects are Fixed or Random. Necessary to determine which F-tests are appropriate and which are not.

Setting Expected Mean Squares The expected mean square for a source of variation (say X) contains. the error term. a term in 2x. a variance term for other selected interactions involving X.

Coefficient for error mean square is always 1 Coefficients for EMS Coefficient for error mean square is always 1 Coefficient of other expected mean squares is # reps times the product of factors levels that do not appear in the factor name.

Expected Mean Squares Which interactions to include in an EMS? All the factors appear in the interaction. All the other factors in the interaction are Random Effects.

A and B Fixed Effects

A and B Fixed Effects

A and B Fixed Effects

A and B Random Effects

A and B Random Effects

A and B Random Effects

A Fixed and B Random

A Fixed and B Random

A Fixed and B Random

A, B, and C are Fixed

A, B, and C are Random

A, B, and C are Random

A, B, and C are Random

A, B, and C are Random

A Fixed, B and C are Random

A Fixed, B and C are Random

A Fixed, B and C are Random

A Fixed, B and C are Random

Pooling Sums of Squares

Example Ten yellow mustard lines. Five different nitrogen levels (50, 75, 100, 125, 150 units of N). Three replicates. Raw data presented in Table 7 (Page 110 & 111)

Example Source df SS MS ‘F’ Reps Genotypes Nitrogen G x N 2 9 4 32 12875 14881 24705 32809 6438 1666 6176 911 8.94 ** 1.83 ns 6.78 ** 1.26 ns G x R N x R G x N x R 18 8 72 7180 7612 55819 399 951 775 0.51 ns 1.23 ns Total 149 155992 1047

Example Source df SS MS ‘F’ Reps Genotypes Nitrogen G x N 2 9 4 32 12875 14881 24705 32809 6438 1666 6176 911 8.94 ** 1.83 ns 6.78 ** 1.26 ns G x R N x R G x N x R 18 8 72 7180 7612 55819 399 951 775 0.51 ns 1.23 ns Pooled Error 98 70610 720 Total 149 155992 1047

Example ~ Genotype Main-plot Source df SS MS ‘F’ Reps Genotypes Nitrogen G x N 2 9 4 32 12875 14881 24705 32809 6438 1666 6176 911 8.94 ** 1.83 ns 6.78 ** 1.26 ns G x R N x R G x N x R 18 8 72 7180 7612 55819 399 951 775 0.51 ns 1.23 ns Total 149 155992 1047

Example ~ Genotype Main-plot Source df SS MS ‘F’ Reps Genotypes Nitrogen G x N 2 9 4 32 12875 14881 24705 32809 6438 1666 6176 911 8.94 ** 1.83 ns 6.78 ** 1.26 ns G x R N x R G x N x R 18 8 72 7180 7612 55819 399 951 775 0.51 ns 1.23 ns Total 149 155992 1047

Example ~ Genotypes Main-plot Source df SS MS ‘F’ Reps Genotypes Error (1) 2 9 18 12875 14881 7180 6438 1666 399 16.26 *** 4.18 ** - Nitrogen G x N Error (2) 4 32 80 24705 32809 63430 6176 911 793 7.78 ** 1.15 ns Total 149 155992 1047

Example ~ Nitrogen Main-plot Source df SS MS ‘F’ Reps Nitrogen Error (1) 2 4 8 12875 24705 7612 6438 6176 951 8.94 ** 6.78 ** - Genotypes G x N Error (2) 9 32 90 14881 32809 70611 1666 911 720 2.31 ns 1.26 ns Total 149 155992 1047

Example ~ Strip-plot Source df SS MS ‘F’ Reps Genotypes Error(Geno) 2 9 18 12875 14881 7180 6438 1666 399 8.94*** 4.18 ** - Nitrogen Error(Nitro) 4 8 24705 7612 6176 951 6.49 *** G x N Error (GxN) 32 72 32809 55819 911 775 1.18 ns Total 149 155992 1047

Another Example Four species of Brassica. Ten lines within each species. Three insecticide treatments (Thiodan, Furidan, none). Three replicates. Raw data in Table 8.

Example Source df SS MS Species x Rep 6 75 12.4 Genotype x Rep 18 217 12.0 Treat x Rep 4 50 12.5 S x G x R 54 698 12.9 S x T x R 12 123 10.3 G x T x R 36 53 14.8 G x T x S x R 108 1577 14.6

Example Source df SS MS ‘F’ Rand Fixed Reps Treat Species Genotype 2 3 9 31 490 1046 225 15.7 244.9 348.7 25.0 1.5 ns 17.95*** 25.47 *** 1.58 ns Spec x Geno Spec x Treat Geno x Treat 27 6 18 1489 587 189 55.1 97.9 10.5 2.06 * 3.65 * 0.39 ns 4.05 *** 7.20 *** 0.77 ns S x G x T 54 1445 26.8 1.96 ns Pooled Error 240 3273 13.6 -

Example Source df SS MS ‘F’ Rand Fixed Reps Treat Species Genotype 2 3 9 31 490 1046 225 15.7 244.9 348.7 25.0 1.15 ns 2.50 ns 3.56 ns 0.45 ns 1.5 ns 17.95*** 25.47 *** 1.58 ns Spec x Geno Spec x Treat Geno x Treat 27 6 18 1489 587 189 55.1 97.9 10.5 2.06 * 3.65 * 0.39 ns 4.05 *** 7.20 *** 0.77 ns S x G x T 54 1445 26.8 1.96 ns Pooled Error 240 3273 13.6 -

Cross-Classified Genotypes Nitrogen 50 units Sunrise Helios Premier

Cross-Classified Genotypes Species B. napus Sunrise Helios Premier S. alba B. juncea B. rapa

Nested Genotypes Species B. napus Sunrise Helios Premier S. alba IdaGold Goldfield Tilney B. juncea P. Gold Kodiak Cutlass B. rapa Raven Reston Goldrush

Example ~ Nesting Source df SS MS ‘F’ Fix Rand Reps 2 31 15.7 1.15 ns Treat 490 244.9 2.50 ns 17.95*** Species 3 1046 348.7 3.56 25.47 *** Genotype 9 225 25.0 0.45 ns 1.58 ns Spec x Geno 27 1489 55.1 2.06 * 4.05 *** Spec x Treat 6 587 97.9 3.65 * 7.20 *** Geno x Treat 18 189 10.5 0.39 ns 0.77 ns S x G x T 54 1445 26.8 1.96 ns

Example ~ Nested Split-plot Source df SS MS ‘F’ Rand Fixed Reps 2 31 15.7 1.15 ns 1.5 ns Treat 490 244.9 2.50 ns 17.95*** Species 3 1046 348.7 3.56 ns 25.47 *** Geno w Spec 36 1940 53.9 1.58 ns Spec x Treat 6 587 97.9 7.17 *** 4.31 *** Geno w S x T 72 16334 22.7 1.66 ns Pooled Error 240 3273 13.6 -

Example ~ Nest Split-plot Source df SS MS ‘F’ Reps 2 31 15.7 1.25 ns Treat 490 244.9 19.57*** Error (1) 4 50 12.5 - Species 3 1046 348.7 3.36 * Geno w Spec 36 1940 53.9 2.37 * Spec x Treat 6 587 97.9 7.17 *** Geno w S x T 72 16334 22.7 1.66 ns Error (2) 236 3223 13.6

Multiple Comparisons