RWS 100: the natives are restless

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Unit IV: Lesson 1 Slow Way Home Persuasive Writing Assessment
Advertisements

Unit 7 Listen To Me Extension Activities. Activity 1: Let’s Solve It Together! Activity 2: How to Say Sorry?
Four Good Ways to Persuade  Objective: Learn the strategies for persuasion and “think like your audience.”  Let’s look at the Note taker sheet titled.
The Argumentative Essay
Argument and Persuasion
Language Arts 3, Segment 2 Family Collaboration Learn how to ARGUE with your family and PASS your SEGMENT 2 EXAM!!
Writing a Persuasive Essay
Presentation skills 1 Group work: discussion and presentation on the topic Qualities to Work in a Care Home 1)suppose you are volunteers in a care home.
English 1C: Critical Thinking and Advanced Composition AKA: “The Zombie Class” Melissa Gunby.
Analysis of an Argument and Persuasive Strategies Activity One.
Unit 1 family , friends and colleagues
© 2015 albert-learning.com How to talk to your boss How to talk to your boss!!
Speech Drafting Basics June 1/2 Do Now – 5 Minutes List 5 Promises You would make if elected President Number them Most Important to You 1 Least.
Argument and Persuasion Close Read Questions with Persuasive Devices.
Welcome To This Love Story.
ENGL 131Q – Today’s Goals: Warrants Announcements 11/5
Learn all about anger and healthy ways to cope!
The Argumentative Essay
SAT Notes: Please get out your notebook and turn to the writing section. We are taking notes today.
The Final Exam.
Business Ethics
Business Ethics
RWS 100: Writing Paper #2.
RWS 100: Workshop!.
RWS 100: ch-ch-ch-ch-changes.
Module B- Taking the Lead
The Argumentative Essay
Welcome! January 26th, 2018 Friday
RWS 100: Peer Review Paper #2
RWS 100: Thursday Edition.
Start – Up - Discussion 9/19/17
RWS 100: Rhetorical Strategery
Start – Up - Discussion 9/7/17
The In-Class Critical Essay
Debate.
Visual Analysis 101.
How to Write a Position Argument
RWS 100: Starting Unit #2.
Ethos…Pathos…Logos “Rhetoric may be defined as the faculty of observing in any given case the available means of persuasion” Aristotle.
RWS 100: the final argument
RWS 100:.
Visual Analysis 101 University Writing Center Jaclyn Wells.
RWS 100: Lecture Day!.
RWS 100: Charting Exercise!
Rational Thoughts.
Analyzing the Power of Different Mediums: Little Rock Girl 1957
RWS 100: the natives are restless 2
RWS 100: The Invincible Peer Review Workshop
English 1301 Week 4 – (June 25, 2018) - Monday.
Welcome! January 24th, 2017 Tuesday
RWS 200: Rhetorical Strategies
Start – Up - Discussion 1/26/15
Critical Thinking This one is pure logic. Every good thinker can figure this one out. You’ll have three minutes to finish. No cheating or talking.
RWS 200: Demagoguery.
Rhetorical Strategies
The of and to in is you that it he for was.
Perseverance + procrastination: why is the ability to persevere an essential life skill? STARTER: Jess is predicted excellent results this year in every.
Persuasion Basics Persuasion is the use of words or images to influence the actions and opinions of others. It is trying to convince others that your opinions.
Positive Relationships
RWS 100: The Rhetorical Adventure Continues…
RWS 100: Tangoing with Thompson
Key Ideas: unlock What is it about? How do I know?
Persuasive Messages and Ethics
Jasmine Thornton L. Johnson
Do Now May 19 Sit in your new groups for the week and get out your binder and a textbook book: Brenden/ Angelica Kyara/Kaitlyn Abijah/Emani Sabryna/Elizabeth.
University Writing Center Jaclyn Wells
Rogerian “Argument”
Infinitives.
9th Literature EOC Review
Methods of persuasion The Power of Words!.
Presentation transcript:

RWS 100: the natives are restless

First a little bit about the election. (sorry!) …and the importance of audience.

The primaries established that there were real divides among the American population. Sanders exploited the economic divide…and almost won (as a socialist.) Trump exploited identity/cultural divisions and won it all. Look at chart. (see who voted) Hillary’s slogan was “Stronger Together,” and she focused on championing American diversity. (What might people, who feel disenfrenchised have heard?)

Was Clinton’s mistake a rhetorical error or an election strategy error? She chose an effective rhetorical style for an audience that didn’t vote (enough). Her arguments did not work as well on those who were inspired enough to vote in large numbers. The answer might be both: if she knew who was going to vote, she might have worked harder to identify (a rhetorical strategy!) with, and reach out to, those disenfranchised voters. If she wanted to concentrate on those who were persuaded by her inclusive message, she needed to focus on building their enthusiasm for voting for her (which she didn’t).

Whether it was luck or genius, Trump built his rhetoric for a disenfranchised audience (which was not effective on everyone, and in fact turned off a very large group of Americans). The “Rust Belt” strategy. s Very few people thought it would work. Pollsters didn’t. They were very, very wrong. If Clinton’s error was both a rhetorical and election strategy mistake, Trump’s strategy was a winning one: tailor your message (rhetorical argument) to an audience that will vote. Hence, we are where we are today.

The most logically reasoned rhetorical arguments are not always the most effective or persuasive. The effectiveness of a rhetorical argument is always based on how well it persuades its intended audience.

Enough about the election (I promise). Ok, let’s reset. (watch palate-cleansing video)

Let’s meet Danah Boyd and our final text for the class! Rhetorical Teams take 8-10 minutes to quickly coordinate your answers to the questions from the Wiki.

Team #1 John Cossette Audrey Espinosa Josue Jauregui Rigoberto Macedo Bryan Verkler

The Professional Danah Boyd!

Team #2 Jenna Bisla Kaylani Brown Angelica Gamez Jarod Heise Sarah Tucker

The Human Danah Boyd!

Team #3 Stephanie Bradley Jasmine Evans Jessica Khajerian Blake Nuesca Rosario Tornabene

Meet the Text! Introducing Literacy: Are Today’s Youth Digital Natives!

Team #4 Alisha Arco Gianna Cecchini Paul Fuerte Christopher Kamikawa Amber Simes

Introducing the Conversation and “Rhetorical Situation!”

Team #5 Ryan Bennett Brianna Bigornia Chloe Jorgensen Gregory Royse Brianne Sheridan

Introducing the Digital Native!

So, what did you think? This is certainly a more complex and nuanced argument than the ones we have heard from Carr and Thompson.(And features a number of claims!) What did you think her main point is? What do you think her “project” is, what is she advocating for?s

Do you agree with her. Do you disagree Do you agree with her? Do you disagree? What did you like, what did you think was BS? Do you think you are a “digital native?” Do you agree with her point about the term? How do you view this text in relation to Thompson’s techno utopianism and Carr’s techno fearmongering?

“I am resolutely opposed to all innovation, all change, but I am determined to understand what’s happening. Because I don’t choose just to sit and let the juggernaut roll over me. Many people seem to think that if you talk about something recent, you’re in favor of it. The exact opposite is true in my case. Anything I talk about is almost certainly something I’m resolutely against. And it seems to me the best way to oppose it is to understand it. And then you know where to turn off the buttons.”  ― Marshall McLuhan

Your Third…and Final!...Prompt.

Homework: Your Rhetorical Analysis blog post on a movie is due Sunday night. Decide on your team name by Tuesday, best name is +2 Rhetorical Challenge points. (Change your page name to it on the wiki.) No reading over the weekend. We will get back to Boyd on Tuesday, and begin to chart her text, so be prepared for that. Paper grading starts this weekend…