2005 Environmental Conference June 29, 2005

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What you can’t defend, doesn’t belong to you..  To ensure that Singapore enjoys peace and stability, and that Singapore’s sovereignty and territorial.
Advertisements

Current Conservation Issues in DoD L. Peter Boice OSD Conservation Team Leader Presented to NMFWA, Dallas TX March 2002.
Kinetic Opportunities At PuebloPlex Can LRAs Benefit from Energy Development? September 26, 2013.
Department of Defense Facilities Unit Hazardous Waste Management Program of the EPD Land Protection Branch.
Case Study/History Ft Hood, Texas. Ft. Hood, Texas III Corps (-) 1st Cavalry Division 4th Infantry Division (-) Corps Support Command Other Corps Units.
United States Marine Corps
UPDATE Base Realignment and Closure Authorization Review of December 2001 Congressional Action Prepared by Gary Bushell & Don Rodman - August 2002.
California Integrated Waste Management Board Agreement with Air Resources Board for Surveillance Assistance Special Waste Committee Meeting May 10, 2006.
Foreign Affairs Security Training Center
Fort Bragg Cantonment Area Cape Fear River Basin LIDAR data have been used to create digital contours and topographic maps. 1.A Digital Elevation Model.
U.S. Marine Corps By: Nicolas.
Army Doctrine Publication (ADP) 3-37; and Army
EVOLUTION OF AIR FORCE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Thomas Russell, P.E. U.S. Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence Partnership for Peace Conference,
TopicHouseSenate AH-64 TransferDuring FY15 the SECDEF and SECARMY may not: Transfer AH-64s from the ARNG to the Active Army None of the funds authorized.
United States Army Combined Arms Center
Mayor Sheila Dixon’s BRACTION Plan for Baltimore City.
Keep Fort Rucker “Above The Best.”
Installation Management Update Association of Defense Communities Mr. Jonathan Hunter Deputy Chief of Staff Installation Management Command 14 January.
Our mission ead and execute environmental programs and provide expertise that enables Army training, operations, acquisition and sustainable military communities.
Revenues by Service Area We sell what you buy Facilities Management and Environmental Compliance $6.7M (9.6%) Facilities Management and Environmental Compliance.
Export Controls Marci Copeland Office of Research Export Control Administrator.
ROA Department of Minnesota Congressional Breakfast LtCol Doug Kveene, President LTC Karl Rasmussen, Director, Legislative Affairs.
Secretary of Defense Environmental Awards by Award Category FY 2004 – EPA Region 4 – Winners in Bold Type Honorable Mention – All Others.
Architects of Transformation 1 U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command Soldier as a System (SaaS) Overview Prepared for The National Defense Industry Association.
Building Healthcare for the Iraqi Military & Police Presentation to the 2006 Tri-Service Symposium 14 July 2006.
Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona ANDREA L. KINCAID DLA Energy Track 5 Project FinanceSession 6 Renewables Through Private Financing.
DoD Region 4 Pollution Prevention Project Task 8: Database Development and EMS Integration Phil Barnes University of South Carolina.
STRATEGIC PLAN DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF FOR PERSONNEL, INFRASTRUCTURE AND LOGISTICS U.S. ARMY TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND OCTOBER 2005.
Joint Base Charleston COLONEL RICHARD D. MCCOMB
Branch Orientation Benjamin Brownlee MS-I W&J ROTC.
Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army Installations and Environment Our Installations Supporting the War: Relevant and Ready “Installation Transformation.
Project Update August 2008 Richard Rife Deputy Project Manager.
CPL James W. DeRico Montgomery County Sheriff’s Office 120 Commerce Street Clarksville, TN ext
Navy EMS Implementation Status September Title/Group/Section,etc. Navy EMS Requirements  Fully conforming EMS by Sept 2009  U.S. (by EO) and.
Environmental Officer Course Introduction Fort Wainwright, Alaska Environmental Officer Course 2011 Name//office/phone/ address UNCLASSIFIED 12/24/2015.
Installation Sustainability Program (ISP) - a model for ARNG Training Centers LTC Jeffrey G. Phillips US Army War College Fellow US Army Environmental.
Integrating Your Environmental Management System With Community Stakeholders Mr. Jimmy Parrish Defense Supply Center Richmond April 7, 2004 Presented To.
Adem.alabama.gov Alabama Tier II Update Jimbo Carlson Chief, Facilities Engineering Section Governmental Hazardous Waste Branch Land Division.
Office for Domestic Preparedness Overview Briefing Bob Johns Branch Chief State and Local Program Management Division June 4, 2003 Department of Homeland.
Sustain Noblesville Committee September 19, 2011 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., DEE, QEP Commissioner, Indiana Department of Environmental Management.
Safer, healthier King County: The work of Public Health.
UNCLASSIFIED Florida Air National Guard Col Brian Simpler Commander, 125 th Fighter Wing.
U.S. Public Health Service Service Access Teams U.S. Public Health Service (USPHS) SAT Role in ESF #8 and HHS activities CAPT Veronica Gordon, SAT-4 Team.
LESSONS LEARNED: A CALIFORNIA PERSPECTIVE Robert L. Elliott, Staff Counsel California Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Toxic Substances Control.
DSHS Deployable Teams. Deployable Teams 2011 Medical Incident Support Team - M-IST Ambulance Staging Manager - ASM Ambulance Strike Team Leader - ASTL.
UNCLASSIFIED #1 Priority: Protect community, workforce and environment A Team-of-Teams: Pueblo Chemical Depot staff, Assembled Chemical Weapons Alternatives.
Brownfields 2004 September 2004 NTC Orlando Using All the Tools.
1 Directorate of Logistics and Directorate of Engineering and Housing MAJ Karson Snyder Room FEB 00 INTRODUCTION.
EMS and Mortars: Environmental Management at the Army’s Chemical Weapons Destruction Facilities June 5, 2007.
US ARMY CHEMICAL MATERIALS AGENCY CMA Overview and Requirements 10 October 2008 Presented by: J. Richard Ward US Army Chemical Materials Agency.
2016 ADC TRANSITION POLICY DOCUMENT FORUM. Key Policy Issues.
Remediation and Redevelopment at the Former Fort Devens, Massachusetts.
Utah’s Military installations
Pueblo Chemical Depot Update
Current Event Brief!.
Bob Ross Executive Director Connecticut Office of Military Affairs
US Marine Corps
Strategic Planning Update
Construction Management & Inspection
Georgia Update Jeff Cown Land Protection Branch
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
Branches of the Military
Resourcing the Army A Campaign Quality Army with Joint and Expeditionary Capabilities Our Army at War… Relevant and Ready MG Edgar E. Stanton III Director.
Successfully Integrating NEPA and Environmental Permitting into a DoD Hazardous Waste Treatment Facility Construction Project to Meet Budget and Schedule.
Al Buxton– Department of Ohio National Security Chair
Preparing for a Terrorist Attack Indian Point Energy Center
Georgia Environmental Protection Division
Case Study/History Ft Hood, Texas.
National and Military Policy: 1930s
Small Business Opportunities
Presentation transcript:

2005 Environmental Conference June 29, 2005 Successes in Partnering Kentucky Department for Environmental Protection 2005 Environmental Conference June 29, 2005

UNBRIDLED SPIRIT

BLUEGRASS STATE

Department of Defense Installations in Kentucky Fort Campbell Fort Knox Bluegrass Army Depot BRAC Sites Naval Ordnance Station – Louisville Lexington Bluegrass Army Depot

Fort Campbell Fort Campbell is the home of the 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault), known as the Screaming Eagles. Their primary weapons systems are infantry, aviation, field artillery, and air defense artillery. Ft. Campbell occupies ~105,000 acres on the Kentucky-Tennessee border. The cantonment occupies approximately 12,000 acres in Kentucky in the northeast part of the Post. The remaining portion of the Post is dedicated to training and firing ranges. With more than 4,100 housing units, Ft. Campbell supports the 3rd largest military population in the Army and the 7th largest in the Department of Defense. Additionally, the installation provides support services to family members, National Guard and Reserve units, and retirees. FOUNDATION Major accomplishments, past five years: Establishment of a regulator approved watershed management plan allows integration of INRMP projects and measure project success in coordination with mission readiness and training goals. Establishment of an industry-leading P2 Operation Center. Major accomplishments/projects planned for next five years: Completion of installation-wide unit environmental internal assessments and update of the IAP. Replace current dry cleaning machines w/ silicone based dry cleaning systems. - Awards/recognition: See separate listing. Modularity status: Conducting LBP and asbestos surveys in housing units. Environmental training/awareness program: 40 hour EQO course for all unit environmental poc’s. Compliance training done as separate classes, in combination with other training, or sometimes as on-the-spot opportunities. NEPA: Modularity EA, RPTS EIS, Force Protection EA.

Fort Knox Fort Knox is a U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command installation with the primary mission of training soldiers for the Armor Force. The Armor School is the rock on which the Armor Center mission is built. Its staff sections, directorates, and units provide the personnel, equipment, and guidance needed to train in the development of its doctrine. The bestl-known landmark at Fort Knox is the U.S. Bullion Depository, better known as the Gold Vault. Fort Knox is a certified Kentucky city, covering 109,054 acres or about 170.4 square miles. It is the seventh largest urban community in the Commonwealth, with a day-time population of about 33,000. There are 18 training areas just inside the perimeter of Fort Knox where the Army conducts both vehicle-based and on-foot training. Half of the reservation, about 21,332 ha, is an impact area for ordnance where only Army personnel are permitted. Almost all of the floodplains surrounding the Salt River and Rolling Fork lie within this central impact area. FOUNDATION: Major accomplishments, past five years: MPDTRC EIS prepared and completed in-house at considerable savings INRMP, ICRMP, and IPMP all completed and signed Partnering (Tier 1 Team) successful for over five years Major accomplishments/projects planned for next five years: Fill upcoming vacancies and adjust/balence grade structure of staff Complete Urban Forestry Plan and proactively manage for a healthy urban forest Fully support RCI and other utility privatization efforts EMS (ESMS) Program On-Track

Bluegrass Army Depot Located within the heart of Blue Grass country (think race horses, tobacco) in Kentucky, just minutes south of Lexington, lies the town of Richmond, Home of Eastern Kentucky University. Richmond is also home to the Blue Grass Army Depot. The depot, consisting of 15,000 acres of conventional ammunition storage for the Armed Forces, is also home to the Blue Grass Chemical Activity. BGAD's mission is to provide munitions, chemical defense equipment and special operations support to the Department of Defense. The depot's main mission is to provide munitions, chemical material surveillance, and Special Operations support to the Department of Defense. Many Reserve and National Guard units train at the depot requirements.

Bluegrass Army Depot The conventional ammunition area consists of 852 igloos filled with ammunition with several tons additionally stored outside. The Depot's mission of conventional munitions has remained very active since World War II. Located within the heart of this highly secure area is the chemical limited area (CLA), with even more security.

Chemical Demilitarization Chemical neutralization of nerve agents Benefits of partnering - Permitting on track - Ongoing dialogue with Army, Contractors, other Federal and State Agencies, Public - Allows for more effective regulatory oversight Chemical weapons have been stored at Blue Grass since 1944, with shipment of more modern chemical agent and weapons arriving until the mid-sixties. Blue Grass stores 523 tons, approximately 1.7 percent, of the original US stockpile of chemical weapons. The stockpile consists of projectiles and rockets containing nerve agents GB (Sarin) and VX, and mustard or blister agent. Projectiles come in two sizes and can contain one of three different agents. There are about 30,000 projectiles in the BGCA stockpile. M55, 115mm, rockets have either GB or VX nerve agent. There are about 70,000 of these highly explosive, assembled chemical weapons stored at Blue Grass Chemical Activity. These rockets present the greatest risk associated with the storage of chemical weapons. The U.S. Army had planned to construct a state-of-the-art incinerator at Blue Grass Chemical Activity to eliminate the stockpile. In an ongoing effort to ensure the Army is using the best disposal technology available, a congressional mandate in December 1996, established the Assembled Chemical Weapons Assessment program to examine the destruction of assembled chemical weapons, such as bombs and missiles, currently stored at stockpile sites across the United States.

Naval Ordnance Station Louisville

Lexington Bluegrass Army Depot In 1964, the Blue Grass Ordnance Depot (located in Richmond, Kentucky) merged with the Lexington Signal Depot (located in Lexington, Kentucky) to form Lexington-Blue Grass Army Depot. Lexington-Blue Grass Army Depot operated until 1992, providing ammunition and general supply support and maintaining communications and electronics equipment. In response to a Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Commission decision in 1988, the federal government directed that the Lexington facility close by 1995. In 1992, the general supply and maintenance mission that the Lexington facility had undertaken ended. The Richmond Facility has since been renamed the Bluegrass Army Depot. The Lexington Facility has effectively transitioned to an operational success with leasing buildings and installation management support provided by the Commonwealth of Kentucky Department of Military Affairs.

Successes with BRAC Sites NOSL went from base closure listing to final transfer (2004) in less than 9 years – extremely fast in comparison to other base closure sites LBAD put on BRAC list in 1988; final transfer by end of 2005

Conclusions Partnering requires buy in to team approach Partnering requires effort of everyone Partnering requires patience Partnering requires new ways of thinking about established processes PARTNERING DOES WORK