Reduce the Burden on Limited Administrative Dollars

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BASICALLY CDBG Kathleen M. Bialas OGC/HHQ/HUD Pages in Book: None 1.
Advertisements

1 | Weatherization Assistance Program: Use of Training &Technical Assistance and Administrative Fundseere.energy.gov 2011 Orientation for State WAP Directors.
Section 3 Steed Robinson – Office of Community Development  9/4/2014.
1 Session Purpose Clarify Section 3 responsibilities to: 1)Ensure compliance with the annual reporting requirements; and 2)Increase overall compliance.
Section 3: Economic Opportunities U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity Economic Opportunity Division.
CDBG FUNDABILITY For Local Officials. 2 CDBG Program Fundability Overview Fundability refers to key thresholds that determine the ability of projects.
CDBG Disaster Recovery Overview U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
Chapter 56 Workgroup Orientation Session The Road to Chapter 60 June 30, 2007.
Harris County Community Services Department Homeless Prevention and Rapid Re-housing Program Financial Guidelines Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs.
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requires states to have a system in place for reviewing approved CDBG projects Each state’s.
W-2 Program – Procurement for 2013 Scope of Work, Required Systems and Monitoring Janice Peters, Director Bureau of Working Families.
In Berkshire County Sarah C. Hoecker. Economic Development Districts What is an Economic Development District? An EDD is a geographic location created.
ICF Consulting Page 1 CDBG WEBCAST HUD, OFFICE OF BLOCK GRANT ASSISTANCE.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION ARRA GREEN JOB AND HEALTH CARE / EMERGING INDUSTRIES NEW GRANTEE POST AWARD FORUM JUNE.
1 South Dakota Department of Education – Grants Management Rob Huffman – Administrator Mark Gageby – Special Education Fiscal Kim Fischer – Fiscal Monitoring.
CDBG Overview. History of CDBG  Created in 1974-as part of the Housing & Community Development Act  Consolidation of seven different community development.
Section 3 Compliance Facilitated by the Florida Housing Coalition.
2014 CDBG Applicants' Workshop Section 3 Overview (see also DCA Policy– Appendix R)
Effective Management and Compliance 1 ANA GRANTEE MEETING  FEBRUARY 5, 2015.
2011 CDBG Applicants’ Workshop Fair Housing/ Equal Opportunity and Section 3.
Presented by Raaj Kurapati and Charlene Hart. Introduction  The Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 was enacted to streamline and improve the effectiveness.
The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards The OMB SuperCircular Information for FTA Grantees.
TOOLS To successfully implement Section 3 requirements on construction projects Tom Crabson, CDBG Contract Compliance Officer Community Development Commission,
2011 CDBG Recipients’ Workshop Section 3. Page CDBG Recipients’ WorkshopSeptember What is Section 3? Provision of the Housing and Urban.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION ARRA GREEN JOB AND HEALTH CARE / EMERGING INDUSTRIES NEW GRANTEE POST AWARD FORUM JUNE.
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Public Services Funding March 2012 Community Development Block Grant Program.
1 1 Non-Discrimination and Fair Housing Requirements For Grant Administrators.
Impact Assessment Indicators for Administration of Public Transportation Grants NCHRP Task 49 Viktor Zhong Scott Baker Dec 3, 2015.
Andy Papen Community Development Block Grant Program.
Module 6: Program Administration. 2 Module 6 Content Administrative Options Timeliness of Use Defining Expenditures Subrecipients and Developers Homeowners.
JEOPARDY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT EDITION Documentation Procurement Mystery Cost Principles Administrative Requirements Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500.
1 The Basics - Grant Management 101  Basics of Financial Reporting Requirements  Administrative Requirements (record keeping)  On Site Monitoring.
Jaimie Lewis Omnitrans San Bernardino, California SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING.
1.882 million total persons Most of Northeast States combined would fit in Nebraska geographically 0ver 600,000 persons live in 2 nd District (Omaha area)
CDBG Disaster Recovery Overview U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
USING FEDERAL FUNDS FOR CITY PROJECTS. INTRODUCTION PHB’s federal funds come primarily from the U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD).
Wyoming Community Development Authority Financing Affordable Housing in Wyoming Wyoming Community Development Authority National Housing Trust Fund (NHTF)
BONDING & ACCESS TO CAPITAL SMALL CONTRACTORS INITIATIVE.
CDBG PROGRAM INCOME NCDA Winter Legislative, Policy and Professional Development Meeting Holiday Inn Capitol Hill Washington, DC February 16, 2017.
Section 3 Economic Opportunities for Low and Very Low-Income Persons
Subrecipient Monitoring
Section 3 Overview, Section 3 Business Registry, and Reporting System
Essential Requirements of the Uniform Act for Local Public Agencies
The Administration of Subrecipient Agreements
RLF-ED Program Webinar
NCJA’s National Forum on Financial Management Training
MENTAL HEALTH MEDI-CAL ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIVITIES
CDBG Reporting and Monitoring Requirements For Local Officials
Housing Department Update
Implementing 2 CFR 200 Carrie Kronberg Housing Programs Manager
Housing Committee June 5, 2017 Cynthia Rogers-Ellickson,
ENJOY Good Day Section 503 This is your 30-Second Business Training:
Overview of Section 3 Requirements
The Importance of Subrecipient Monitoring
Designers’ Manual Overview and Chapter Contents
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT: TIMELINESS
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973
Title VI Information for THSO Grantees
CoC Subrecipient Management
CDBG and HOME Program Efficiencies
CDBG Program Efficiencies
Hurricane Harvey Affordable Rental Housing Program
Management Verifications & Sampling Methods
Developing the power sector in Federal Nepal Main lessons from international experience Kathmandu, November 06, 2018.
Housing Department FY 2013 Sources: By Fund FY 2013 Sources and Uses
SPR-B Research Coordination Webinar
Procurement After Rental Assistance Demonstration (RAD)
Brave New World: Using PBRA with LIHTC (HUD 811 & RAD PBRA)
2019 CDBG and HOME Applications
Presentation transcript:

Reduce the Burden on Limited Administrative Dollars 2017 NCDA Conference 48th Annual Training Conference June 2017

Are Administrative Costs Wearing You Down? Here are some suggestions to help with that!

Direct Charge Costs to Specific Projects When Possible For example, ensure that staff working on project-related environmental reviews are able to charge their time as a project cost and not charge general administration. Allocate staff costs to activity delivery and project implementation e.g. procuring architects, bidding construction contracts, managing contractors, labor compliance monitoring. Offset some of the costs of managing subrecipients by creating and charging to technical assistance/capacity building projects.

570. 201(p) Technical assistance 570.201(p) Technical assistance. Provision of technical assistance to public or nonprofit entities to increase the capacity of such entities to carry out eligible neighborhood revitalization or economic development activities. (The recipient must determine, prior to the provision of the assistance, that the activity for which it is attempting to build capacity would be eligible for assistance under this subpart C, and that the national objective claimed by the grantee for this assistance can reasonably be expected to be met once the entity has received the technical assistance and undertakes the activity.) Capacity building for private or public entities (including grantees) for other purposes may be eligible under §570.205. This provision makes eligible the use of CDBG funds to increase the capacity of public or nonprofit entities to carry out eligible neighborhood revitalization or economic development activities. Note: While building capacity of an entity under this authority provides an alternative to using the authority under the category of Planning and Administration (and thus can help avoid a problem with exceeding the 20% cap), the program does not provide a presumption concerning national objective compliance - important that this be considered before charging costs under this category. Prior to providing the assistance, the eligibility of the activity for which capacity is to be built and that there is a reasonable expectation that a national objective can be met once the entity has received the technical assistance and undertakes the activity.

Factors to consider to meet the national objective: Nature of the organization receiving the assistance Type and eligibility of the activity to be carried out Location of the activity Entity’s expected (or traditional) clientele Based on a review of these factors, the grantee should have a reasonable expectation that the activity to be undertaken by the entity would comply with a national objective before funding capacity building.

Sample Technical Assistance Project Structure Project No. Description CBLMA0 Capacity building for projects serving low-mod  areas CBLMC0 Capacity building for projects serving low-mod  clientele CBLMH0 Capacity building for projects serving low-mod  housing CBLMJ0 Capacity building for projects providing jobs in low-mod  areas CBSBA0 Capacity building for projects serving slum/blight areas

These costs are not subject to the 20% cap. 570.202(a)(9) Rehabilitation services, such as rehabilitation counseling, energy auditing, preparation of work specifications, loan processing, inspections, and other services related to assisting owners, tenants, contractors, and other entities, participating or seeking to participate in rehabilitation activities authorized under this section, under section 312 of the Housing Act of 1964, as amended, under section 810 of the Act, or under section 17 of the United States Housing Act of 1937. Costs of performing the assessment and related public notices as required under 24 CFR part 58 are considered to be “activity delivery costs.” Alternately, it should be noted, that the regulations allow charging these costs under §570.205. Generally not desirable for a grantee if it is at or near its 20% cap to elect this alternative. Thus part of the costs of carrying out the activity under the same basic eligibility category applicable to that activity. Costs charged as “project delivery” must be reasonable relative to project cost/accomplishments – 20% These costs are not subject to the 20% cap.

Factors to consider for residential rehabilitation: Where environmental assessment costs incurred with respect to an activity would create a problem for that activity, it may be preferable to charge that cost to the category of Planning and Admin. A grantee may prefer to charge all of its environmental assessment costs to §570.205 for administrative convenience, so as to avoid the need to share the costs of one or more staff persons performing the assessments.

How About Some Tools To Help With those Admin Costs!

Tool No. 1

Tool No. 2

Some other ideas…. Always look for ways to improve efficiency in operations and process…an admin dollar saved is an admin dollar earned Eliminate redundancy and overlapping functions Automate processes from paper to electronic e.g. contracting, correspondence, payment processing. Where staff are working on non-federal projects, make sure costs are properly allocated to those projects as well. Assess core functions and eliminate mission creep and non-essential activities. Trade the Cadillac for the VW budget…focus on minimum needs for meeting mandates.

QUESTIONS Scott Stevenson Director County of Los Angeles Community Development Commission – Community Development Division