Three Years Follow Up. SORT OUT II

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SORT-OUT III: A Prospective Randomized Comparison of Zotarolimus-Eluting and Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Michael.
Advertisements

SORT-OUT III: A Prospective Randomized Comparison of Zotarolimus-Eluting and Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Jens Flensted.
Eight Months Angiographic Follow-up in Patients Randomized to Crush or Culotte Stenting of Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions The Nordic Bifurcation Stent.
For the Nordic-Baltic PCI Study Group
Creating a Power Point Presentation Open Microsoft Power Point Create a new presentation using a blank presentation. Choose an Auto Layout Select the sample.
DEDICATION Peter Clemmensen, Henning Kelbæk, Anne Kaltoft, Steffen Helqvist, Jens Flensted Lassen, Lene Kløvgaard, Christian J Terkelsen, Hans Henrik Tilsted,
Lisette Okkels Jensen, Per Thayssen, Henrik Steen Hansen, Evald Høj Christiansen, Hans Henrik Tilsted, Lars Romer Krusell, Anton Boel Villadsen, Anders.
Cardioprotective Effects of Postconditioning in Patients Treated with Primary PCI Evaluated with Magnetic Resonance Jacob T Lønborg Niels Vejlstrup, Erik.
Influence of a Pressure Gradient Distal to Implanted Bare-Metal Stent on In-Stent Restenosis After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Lisette Okkels Jensen,
The Third DANish Study of Optimal Acute Treatment of Patients with ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: DEFERred stent implantation in connection.
Lessons from PARTNER I (A & B) CRT, Washington DC, Feb 5, 2012
Disclosure Statement of Financial Interest
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair Hugo Londero Sanatorio Allende Córdoba - Argentina.
De Novo and Restenotic Coronary Lesions
Disclosure Statement of Financial Interest
High Definition (HD) IVUS: A New Approach to Improve Conventional IVUS
Disclosure Statement of Financial Interest
Ajay J. Kirtane, MD I have no real or apparent conflicts of interest to report.
Blood supply of the Heart & Conduction System
Debate: Prophylactic Support Increases Risk With Little Benefit
SORT-OUT VI A Prospective Randomized Trial of a Durable-Polymer Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent Versus a Bioabsorbable-Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients.
How to Build A Successful Clinical Research Program
Advanced CTO Techniques:
Non-Inferiority Exposed: Uses and Abuses
Influence of Diabetes Mellitus on Clinical Outcomes Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial.
BRS Sizing and Vessel Preparation
Novel atherectomy devices for the coronary calcified lesions
On behalf of the PRECOMBAT Investigators
Washington Hospital Center, Division of Cardiology
Columbia University Medical Center Cardiovascular Research Foundation
Next Generation HD IVUS
Atherosclerosis and Erectile Dysfunction: Is PTA with DES the answer?
David J. Cohen, M.D., M.Sc. On behalf of The PARTNER Investigators
Craig A. Thompson, M.D., MMSc.
DKCRUSH V Shao-Liang Chen, MD DKCRUSH V
The DKCRUSH-V Randomized Trial
Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of DES vs
Is it possible to develop universal bleeding definition?
Crossing CTOs via Planned Dissection: LaST (Limited Antegrade Subintimal Tracking): from knuckle wire to Bridgepoint Craig A. Thompson, M.D., MMSc. Director,
Comparison of Outcomes in Patients With Versus Without Diabetes Mellitus After Revascularization With Everolimus- and Sirolimus-Eluting Stents (from the.
Crossing CTOs via Planned Dissection: LaST (Limited Antegrade Subintimal Tracking): from knuckle wire to Bridgepoint Craig A. Thompson, M.D., MMSc. Director,
Collagenase for CTO: An update Bradley H
Thomas Stiermaier, MD; Suzanne de Waha, MD;
(p < for group 1 or 2 vs. group 3)
A Randomized Trial Comparing a Polymer-Free Coronary Drug-Eluting Stent With an Ultra-Thin Strut Bioresorbable Polymer-Based Drug-Eluting Stent in an All-Comers.
Learning PowerPoint Just the basics.
CIT 2018 Template Title 40 pt Bold Arial
CIT 2018 Template Title 40 pt Bold Arial
REALITY: 8 month results
CIT 2017 Template Title 40 pt Bold Arial
Comparison of Everolimus- and Biolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents With Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds: 2-year Outcomes of the EVERBIO.
Five-Year Cumulative Rates of Clinical Events after Cypher™ Stent Implantation: Insights from a Patient-Level Pooled Analysis of Four Randomized Trials.
CIT 2018 Template Title 40 pt Bold Arial
A Randomized Trial Comparing a Polymer-Free Coronary Drug-Eluting Stent With an Ultra-Thin Strut Bioresorbable Polymer-Based Drug-Eluting Stent in an All-Comers.
Large-Scale Registry Examining Safety and Effectiveness of Zotarolimus-Eluting and Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Western.
CIT 2017 Template Title 40 pt Bold Arial
For the Nordic-Baltic PCI Study Group
CIT 2017 Template Title 40 pt Bold Arial
SORT-OUT III: A Prospective Randomized Comparison of Zotarolimus-Eluting and Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Michael.
Long-term safety and efficacy of zotarolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting stents in routine clinical care patients 36-month follow-up in the SORT OUT.
Division of Endovascular Interventions
Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of DES vs
CIT 2017 Template Title 40 pt Bold Arial
Gregg W. Stone, MD Columbia University Medical Center
Federico M. Asch, MD Director, Echocardiographic Core Lab
Updated 3-Year Meta-Analysis of the TAXUS Clinical Trials Safety and Efficacy Demonstrated in 3,445 Randomized Patients Time allocation for this talk.
ISAR-LEFT MAIN: A Randomized Clinical Trial on Drug-Eluting Stents for Unprotected Left Main Lesions J. Mehilli, MD Deutsches Herzzentrum Technische.
Title 40pt Trebuchet MS Bold
DANAMI 3-DEFER Trial design: Patients presenting with STEMI and in whom the operators could establish TIMI 2-3 flow without stenting or those presenting.
CIT 2018 Template Title 40 pt Bold Arial
Presentation transcript:

Three Years Follow Up. SORT OUT II Anders Galløe, Leif Thuesen, Henning Kelbæk, Per Thayssen, Klaus Rasmussen, Peter R. Hansen, Niels Bligaard, Kari Saunamäki, Anders Junker, Jens Aarøe, Ulrik Abildgaard, Jan Ravkilde, Thomas Engstrøm, Jan S. Jensen, Henning R. Andersen, , Hans E. Bøtker, Søren Galatius, Steen D. Kristensen, Jan K. Madsen, Lars R.Krusell, Steen Z. Abildstrøm, Ghita B. Stephansen, Jens F. Lassen, on behalf of the SORT OUT II investigators. Gentofte University Hospital Copenhagen, Denmark.

Disclosure Cordis, Johnson and Johnson and Boston Scientific have contributed with unrestricted grants

SORT OUT II A randomized comparison of the clinical outcome of Cypher® or Taxus® stenting in unselected all-comers in everyday clinical practice assessed by symptom driven clinical end points 1½ year results: Galløe AM et al, JAMA 2008; 299(4): 409-16. This is the Bulleted List slide. To create this particular slide, click the NEW SLIDE button on your toolbar and choose the BULLETED LIST format. (Top row, second from left) The Sub-Heading and footnote will not appear when you insert a new slide. If you need either one, copy and paste it from the sample slide. If you choose not to use a Sub-Heading, let us know when you hand in your presentation for clean-up and we’ll adjust where the bullets begin on your master page. Also, be sure to insert the presentation title onto the BULLETED LIST MASTER as follows: Choose View / Master / Slide Master from your menu. Select the text at the bottom of the slide and type in a short version of your presentation title. Click the SLIDE VIEW button in the lower left hand part of your screen to return to the slide show. (Small white rectangle) 2 2

SORT-OUT participating centers Catchments area: Denmark (5.4 MIO inhabitants) PCI centers: All five Danish University Centers Study population: 2,098 randomized out of 11,749 PCI patients Randomization period: Aug. 2004 – Jan. 2006 (498 days)

Purpose To compare the Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) and Stent Thrombosis (ST) rates during 3 years of observation in patients randomized to either Taxus® or Cypher® stent implantation

MACE rates at 3 years

A difference is a difference if it makes a difference The curves are not superimposed and the apparent difference between the two curves represents a difference of 17 MACE Out of a total of 352 MACE (16.8%) in 2098 patients followed for 3 years

What might we be missing ? The postulated or missed health gain (remember the ”ns”) may be extracted from the area between the two curves and may be utilized to calculate that: If a population were to be treated by Cypher® in preference to Taxus® then that population would reach a MACE rate of 16.8 % 109 days later than a similar population treated by Taxus® stenting. Equal to a gain of approx 3½ months in 3 years

Stent thrombosis rates at 3 years

1½ and 3 year results 1½ y. ST HR 0.90 CI 0.54-1.51 1½ y. MACE HR 0.83 CI 0.63-1.08 3 y. MACE HR 0.87 CI 0.70-1.07 No apparent change from 1½ to 3 year

The Cypher® vs. Taxus® studies Number of patients randomized

Conclusion I The SORT OUT II is an unselected all comers study with symptom driven clinical end points There is no statistically significant difference in MACE rates between Cypher® and Taxus® There is apparently little or no clinically significant difference in MACE rates between Cypher® and Taxus® The MACE rate after 3 years is 16.8 % This is the Bulleted List slide. To create this particular slide, click the NEW SLIDE button on your toolbar and choose the BULLETED LIST format. (Top row, second from left) The Sub-Heading and footnote will not appear when you insert a new slide. If you need either one, copy and paste it from the sample slide. If you choose not to use a Sub-Heading, let us know when you hand in your presentation for clean-up and we’ll adjust where the bullets begin on your master page. Also, be sure to insert the presentation title onto the BULLETED LIST MASTER as follows: Choose View / Master / Slide Master from your menu. Select the text at the bottom of the slide and type in a short version of your presentation title. Click the SLIDE VIEW button in the lower left hand part of your screen to return to the slide show. (Small white rectangle) 11

Conclusion II There is no statistically significant difference in stent thrombosis rate between Cypher® and Taxus® There is apparently no clinically significant difference in stent thrombosis rates between Cypher® and Taxus® Stent thrombosis rate after 3 years is 4.2% This is the Bulleted List slide. To create this particular slide, click the NEW SLIDE button on your toolbar and choose the BULLETED LIST format. (Top row, second from left) The Sub-Heading and footnote will not appear when you insert a new slide. If you need either one, copy and paste it from the sample slide. If you choose not to use a Sub-Heading, let us know when you hand in your presentation for clean-up and we’ll adjust where the bullets begin on your master page. Also, be sure to insert the presentation title onto the BULLETED LIST MASTER as follows: Choose View / Master / Slide Master from your menu. Select the text at the bottom of the slide and type in a short version of your presentation title. Click the SLIDE VIEW button in the lower left hand part of your screen to return to the slide show. (Small white rectangle) 12 12