Gorgon Stare Unclear Requirements and Lack of Traceability

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Copyright 2011 Hero Security & Surveillance, Inc. Mesquite Solar Energy Plant Security & Surveillance Plan By Brian Levy.
Advertisements

Airpower: the Industry Vision
Airmanship Knowledge Learning Outcome 3 Part 3 No2 Group Combat Support Part1 Uncontrolled copy not subject to amendment Revision 1.00.
ODS3F –Observation and Detection Systems For Forest Fire Monitoring
Force XXI Battle Command Brigade and Below (FBCB2) Communications System
Rapid Innovation Fund (RIF) Dan Cundiff Deputy Director, Comparative Technology Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Research and Engineering)
MOTOROLA and the Stylized M Logo are registered in the US Patent and Trademark Office. All other product or service names are the property of their respective.
Instrumented Launch Support Retain the Big Crow Aircraft Andy Roberts 4/xx/08.
From design… …development… … CFD analyses…
U.S.C.G. UAV’s Enhancing the Common Operational Picture Through Emerging Technologies LCDR Troy Beshears UAV Platform Manager United States Coast Guard.
INNOCON Innovative solutions to the modern real time Arial surveillance challenges.
M1400 Lighter-Than-Air Aircraft
RPA / UAS support to Environmental Monitoring
ElectroOptic Sensors Matt McKeever Jonathan Baker UAV Design Team 10/26/2006
1 MILITARY UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY. 2 FACULTY OF ELECTRONICS FACULTY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND GEODESY FACULTY OF MECHATRONICS FACULTY OF MILITARY TECHNOLOGY.
AT 209 Introduction to Civil Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS)
December 2005 (2)(2) Elbit Systems Proprietary Information.
Sense & Avoid for UAV Systems
AERIAL RECONNAISSANCE ALABAMA NATIONAL GUARD COUNTERDRUG PROGRAM RICHARD BREWTON, MSGT Alabama National Guard Counterdrug Program Photographic Support.
Introduction to Remotely Operated Vehicles ROVs
Aurora Flight Sciences proprietary Aurora Overview James D. Paduano Presented to the ACGSC October Aurora Flight Sciences Corporation 9950 Wakeman.
EVENLODE Air Equipment EVENLODE Power Supply, Heat Exchange & Power Amplifier EVENLODE Video Encoder, Transceiver & Up Converter.
Serving society Stimulating innovation Supporting legislation Joint Research Centre The European Commission’s in-house science service.
Military use of Drones! by, Scott Amack.
Application of Drone Technology towards Economic Benefit of Southwest Georgia Atin Sinha Albany State University Albany, GA.
SMUCSE 8394 BTS – Devices II Sensors Detection, Surveillance, Protection.
October 2006 NASA Dryden Status Aerospace Control & Guidance Sub-committee Williamsburg, VA October 2006 John Bosworth (661)
MilSOFT UNCLASSIFIED 1/7 MilSOFT Presentation Turkey – UK Defence Industry Day February 11, 2010.
Requirements and Operations Team Industry Day Briefing 17 January, 2002.
Acquiring Aerial Photos Where and how to get aerial photography.
10/31/06 F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N 1 Unmanned Aircraft Systems in Civil Aviation.
1 Civil Air Patrol United States Air Force Auxiliary …performing Missions for America.
USDA Forest Service, Remote Sensing Applications Center, FSWeb: WWW: USFS Citation Aircraft.
Advantage Through Technology Michael D. Moskal II & William C. Hughes.
C3C Matthew Jordan.  What is an Unmanned Aerial System? ◦ Difference between Unmanned Aerial Systems and Remotely Piloted Aircraft ◦ How this applies.
Doris Hamill UAV Business Development Lead NASA Langley Research Center and Hampton Roads First Responders.
HWT X-1 POTOTYPE IN OPERATION Unmanned System - Scalable 6 Years of Development Rigorous Testing Patented WingSail & Controls Autonomous Vehicle Control.
Elliott Ashworth ARGUS I.S. SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM: THE FUTURE OF MILITARY RECONNAISSANCE.
1 Andreas Keil, 10 Nov 05 NEON Trial Sorties Mircromix/CEASAR Goal: Fly infra-red camera (IIR) for NEON validation Measure the Infra-red signature/contrast.
Hybrid-Structure Robot Design From the authors of Chang Gung University and Metal Industries R&D Center, Taiwan.
IMAGERY.
REMOTE CONTROL ROBOT WITH HUMAN ARTICULATION Justin Wells Dept. of Technology, CET.
7 조 강창호 강애량 김창규 오혜영 최재영 이홍일 MQ-9B. 1. Goal of Project 2. Project members 3. Schedule 4. Analysis of UAS 4.1 Requirement analysis 4.2 Air vehicle.
Project Fenix.
PROPRIETARY —Do not distribute Presented to: Date: OPTIMIZING DATA LINK PERFORMANCE FOR UNMANNED SYSTEM PAYLOADS C4 Robot Platforms & Sensors Exposition.
UAS for Remote Sensing Myths and Realities 33rd International Symposium of Remote Sensing of the Environment Steve Wegener Bay Area Environmental Research.
Light-Portable Synthetic Aperture RADAR
Persistent Surveillance – Aerostats for Border Security
USDA Forest Service, Remote Sensing Applications Center, FSWeb: WWW: USFS AMS Operations Spring.
International Symposium on Remote Sensing of the Environment The NASA IKHANA UAS Platform Introduction to UAV Content provided by: V. Ambrosia, G. Buoni,
Critical Situation Management, Inc. Automating Response Processes with 4 command ™
Advancing National Wireless Capability Date: March 22, 2016 Wireless Test Bed & Wireless National User Facility Paul Titus Department Manager, Communications.
I-CMOR Integrated Chemical Mapping Optical Radar
Friends and Partners of Aviation Weather
United States Air Force Unit 3 Notes
02/24/2004.
Spring 2017 Senior Design Project Team32 -May1732
AERIAL RECONNAISSANCE
UAV Vision Landing Motivation Data Gathered Research Plan Background
Gorgon Stare Unclear Requirements and Lack of Traceability
Civil Air Patrol Advanced Communications User Training
How(UAVs) are used in Disaster Management
SCHULICH UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES
Federal Protective Service
Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release; Distribution is unlimited. 1 Customer Advocate Airborne Electronic Warfare Systems 29 MAR 2011 Tim.
2018 Roadmap for the Aerial Industrial Revolution
Drones For Work Food For Thought For the New Customer Considering Drone Services Lee Badman President, Wirednot, LLC.
Artificial Intelligence in Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV)
5G as a Social Infrastructure Chaesub LEE, Director, ITU
sUAS-EOTACS Payloads Capability Collaboration Event
Presentation transcript:

Gorgon Stare Unclear Requirements and Lack of Traceability Dylan Brandt August 3, 2013 SYSM 6309 9/21/2018

Outline Acronyms Problem Statement Program History Program Objectives Gorgon Stare Sensor Operational Capabilities System Level Testing Operational Effectiveness Operational Suitability V-Model 9/21/2018

Acronyms EO - Electro-optical GS - Gorgon Stare GSGS - Gorgon Stare Ground Station IED - Improvised explosive device IR - Infrared NRT - Near real time OUE - Operational Utility Evaluation QRC - Quick Reaction Capability RFI - Request for intelligence RVT - Remote video terminal TO - Technical order 9/21/2018

Problem Statement Gorgon Stare is an advanced intelligence; surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) sensor developed by Sierra Nevada Corp as a quick reaction capability for the Air Force to address the urgent operational need for wide area airborne surveillance. The Gorgon Stare sensor was developed with no formal requirements. System level testing was conducted by the 53rd Air Wing Air Combat Command in December of 2010. The Gorgon Stare system was found to be not operationally effective and not operationally suitable for deployment. 9/21/2018

Advertised as a revolutionary airborne surveillance system. Program History In 2008 the DOD requested funds for the Air Force acquire an enhanced to address urgent operational need for wide area airborne surveillance. Funding allocated FY09-FY13 for delivery in two increments with inc2 expanding the capabilities of inc1. Managed through the 645th Aeronautical Systems Group (BIG SAFARI program office). Prime contractor Sierra Nevada Corporation. EO/IR payload made by ITT Exelis Geospatial Systems. Cost of $17.5 million per set of pods. Total funding allocated for the Gorgon Stare program was 150 million dollars. Advertised as a revolutionary airborne surveillance system. 9/21/2018

Developed with no clear requirements. Program Objectives ID OBJECTIVES 01 Image a larger area than Constant Hawk or Angel Fire (legacy WAAS systems). 02 Enable night operations. 03 Provide real-time support to ground forces. 04 Provide a forensic capability. 05 Support many simultaneous targeting and surveillance missions. 06 Cue and hand off targets to full-motion video platforms for prosecution. 07 Operationally effective / suitable. Developed with no clear requirements. 9/21/2018

Gorgon Stare Sensor - WAAS Wide-Area Airborne Surveillance sensor mounted under MQ-9 Reaper UAV. Consists of 2 pods: one with a sensor ball for cameras, the other for communication. Contains array of 5 electro-optical (EO) and 4 infrared (IR) cameras for nighttime ISR. Provides continuous aerial surveillance of “city-sized” 4 km2 area. Can follow as many as 64 separate targets. Video can be chipped out into 10 different views and simultaneously broadcasted to ground stations or ground troops. Quilt images into mosaic for single wide-are view. 9/21/2018

Operational Capabilities 9/21/2018

Operational Capabilities 9/21/2018

Operational Capabilities 9/21/2018

DO NOT FIELD RECOMMENDATION System Level Testing Conducted by the 53rd Air Wing Air Combat Command. Dec 2010 - 20 sorties totaling 234 hours of flight time. DO NOT FIELD RECOMMENDATION Not Operationally Effective and Not Operationally Suitable 9/21/2018

No requirements, No traceability, Unclear Validation Lack of Traceability Big Safari disputed the test results. Claimed that the tests were unfair as they probed performance areas that were beyond the specifications for the system. No requirements, No traceability, Unclear Validation 9/21/2018

Operational Effectiveness ID OBJECTIVES TEST RESULTS 01 Image a larger area than Constant Hawk or Angel Fire (legacy WAAS systems). Inferior image stitching resulting in large black triangles. Dropped frames during download. 02 Enable night operations. Problematic night vision systems. IR image quality poor. 03 Provide real-time support to ground forces. Two second latency to RVT operators. Unpredictable software error - faulty coordinate grid for chipout imagery. 04 Provide a forensic capability. EO imagery sufficient for detecting ground activity. IR imagery not sufficient. 05 Support many simultaneous targeting and surveillance missions. Unpredictable software error - faulty coordinate grid for chipout imagery. Image quality not sufficient to track dismounts. 06 Cue and hand off targets to full-motion video platforms for prosecution. 12 to 18 second latency to GSGS, limits ability to cross-cue the MTS targeting pod or track a dynamic target. 9/21/2018

Operational Suitability Non-Functional Requirement Test Results Operations Formally developed operator TOs and checklists were not delivered for operating the aircraft sensor pods. Maintenance Formally developed TOs do not exist for the physical changes made to the GS modified MQ-9 aircraft. Availability Pod set availability was problematic during the operational utility evaluation. Parts were not interchangeable between pods. Lack of configuration. Reliability Overall availability of the system was 63.8%. MTBF was 119 minutes, with an average of 3.7 failures per sortie. Training Training program still in development. Mobility Requires semi-permanent collocation of 80 nautical miles. Security Contains “SECRET // NOFORN” restrictions. 9/21/2018

V-Model 9/21/2018

References http://www.globalsecurity.org/intell/systems/gorgon-stare.htm http://ukarmedforcescommentary.blogspot.com/2012/07/towards-scavenger.html http://www.defence.pk/forums/pakistan-defence-industry/92072-new-us-drone-spy-cameras-gorgon-stare-fail-air-force-test.html http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htecm/articles/20130524.aspx http://www.darkgovernment.com/news/reaper-sensors-called-gorgon-stare/ http://images.dodbuzz.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/53D-Tests-and-Recommendation.pdf 9/21/2018