How the circle and the squares get along AP UNIT 1 PART 2: FEDERALISM How the circle and the squares get along

Terms you need to know after this presentation… Dual Federalism Cooperative Federalism Grants-in-aid Categorical grant Block grant Mandate Devolution Pros and cons of federalism Federalism Federalist #51 Delegated powers Reserved powers Concurrent powers Prohibited powers Elastic clause McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) Commerce clause Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)

Disaster Relief Who’s job was it to clean up New Orleans and the rest of the coast after Katrina?

No Child Left Behind Should the national gov’t step in to regulate school performance?

What is Federalism? Federalism – Two or more governments exercise power and authority over the same people in the same territory OR… the relationship between the federal government (circle) and the state governments (squares)

Federalist #51 Defends the Constitution Explains why a strong gov’t is necessary “If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary.” Defends separation of powers between state and national gov’t

Powers Delegated Powers (enumerated powers) – powers given to Fed gov’t by Constitution Reserved Powers – state power alone Concurrent Powers – shared Prohibited Powers – denied from both Ex. Neither gov’t can tax exports

Powers Delegated to the National Government Powers Reserved to States Federalism Powers Delegated to the National Government Powers Reserved to States declare war establish local governments create and maintain armed forces raise taxes establish and maintain schools establish foreign policy provide for the public welfare regulate trade within states criminal justice regulate interstate and foreign trade borrow money conduct elections make copyright and patent laws charter banks build roads provide for public safety establish postal offices coin money

Elastic Clause Aka – “Necessary and Proper Clause” Art. I, Sec. 8, Cl. 18 - "The Congress shall have Power - To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.“ Impossible to predict all powers Congress will need to function, sometimes we might have to allow Congress extra powers to fulfill their delegated powers Elastic Clause

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) Background Bank of the US operated in Maryland. Maryland did not want BoUS to operate in state, competition unwanted, unfair. Maryland taxed the bank to put it out of business. McCulloch, BoUS employee, refused to pay the state tax.

YES McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) Is a Bank of the US Constitutional? The national gov’t has certain implied powers that go beyond delegated powers. US needs a national bank for borrowing, lending, holding minted money, etc. All of which are delegated powers.

NO McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) Can a state tax the federal gov’t? John Marshall reaffirmed Supremacy Clause and Elastic Clause -National (Federal) Gov gets STRONGER The federal gov’t is supreme. Since the BoUS is constitutional, only the feds may tax it.

Commerce clause Art. I, Sec. 8, Cl. 3 – ‘The Congress shall have power - To regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes.” What is commerce? Buying and selling of goods and services. Congress has used the elastic clause to stretch this power. Congress given the power to regulate commerce between foreign countries and US as well as state to state… they control business law

Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) 1824 – aka “The Steamboat Case” Ogden received a state licensed monopoly to run a ferry across the Hudson River. Gibbons also saw the potential of the traffic between NJ and NY and obtained a federal license. Ogden sued saying he had the valid state license, even though Gibbons had US license.

Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) Result – Gibbons wins Expanded national power in all areas of commerce law because nation overruled state in interstate trade issues. Fed Gov’t gets STRONGER All trade today is primarily controlled by national law

Commerce Clause Who cares? Why is this case important? Gibbons v. Ogden ruling makes a loop hole giving Congress power to take control over any issue involving the movement of people, or things. Fed gov’t power increased.

United States v. Lopez (1995) 1995 – “Gun Free School Zone” law banned possession of a firearm within 1000 feet of a school. 12 year old Lopez carried a gun on to the property. Gets arrested and goes to SC. SC declared law unconstitutional – “nothing to do with commerce” – carrying a weapon through a school zone is too much of a stretch for “commerce” LIMITED National government power

Gonzalez v. Raich (2005) Controlled Substance Act (1970) – US gov regulates the manufacture, importation, possession, and distribution of certain drugs Medicinal marijuana was legalized in California, but illegal to US government. Raich argued commerce clause should not take effect because 1) there was no business transactions and 2) there were no state border issues. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 against Raich saying that the federal government could trump state laws that permitted medicinal marijuana.

Two Federalisms? Two Metaphors OLD SCHOOL – Dual Federalism Federal and state governments remain dominant in their separate spheres of influence. Gibbons v. Ogden proved life is not that simple. COOPERATIVE FEDERALISM DUEL FEDERALISM LAYER CAKE Two Federalisms? MARBLE CAKE Two Metaphors NEW SCHOOL – Cooperative Federalism State and Federal governments work together to solve complex problems.

Fiscal Federalism Fiscal means $$$ Q – How do you get the states to do things they normally wouldn’t do? A – Money Q – What is the answer to any question ever asked? A – Money

EXAMPLE 1: Categorical Grants - target specific purposes and “strings attached.” (Ex: States receive funds if state raised age to 21 and lowered BAC to .08) Money paid from one level of government to another to be spent for a specific purpose and meets specific criteria. 2 Types Project Grants - based on competitive applications by states and individuals. Formula Grants – based on specific formulas developed by Congress Both impact things like families with dependent children and nutrition programs

EXAMPLE 2: Block Grants Block Grants – given for broad, general purposes and allow more discretion on how the money is spent (ex. Welfare reform & road construction) Vastly reduced under Reagan and George H.W. Bush

EXAMPLE 3: Mandates Most apply to Civil Rights and the Environment. A requirement that a state undertake an activity or provide a service. Most apply to Civil Rights and the Environment. Often times the states or local gov’ts have to pay the bill of the mandate set by Congress.

Ocean Dumping Ban Act Handicapped Children’s Protection Act 1986 EX – Public schools have to use Internet filtering or schools lose e-rate subsidies 1986 Asbestos Emergency Response Act Ocean Dumping Ban Act Explosion of ACTS 1988 1990 EX – Columbus, OH spends 23% of the city budget trying to meet environmental mandates (including testing for pesticides used on rice and pineapple) 1988 Drug-free Workplace Act

Change in Spending 17% 23% 60% 47% 30% 64% 19% 66% 15% 1929 1939 1960 A shift began in the early 20th Century towards more and more Federal Government spending. The Great Depression is a good example. Federal State Local (City) 1929 17% 23% 60% 1939 47% 30% 1960 64% 19% 1997 66% 15%

to the state governments. The return of power from the Federal government to the state governments. This idea is fueled by the distrust of the federal government and the desire to save money by reducing the size of the “bloated federal government”

Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity EXAMPLE Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 Eliminated welfare and transferred the money to states as block grants States received wide latitude on how to administer “workfare” but with the knowledge that Congress was counting on anti-poverty spending” Strings attached: head of family must work or lose benefit; lifetime benefits limited to 5 years; unmarried mother < 18 only receive $ if stay in school and live with adult; immigrants ineligible for 5 years.

Federalism is good Living under 2 governments is great… Built on compromise, promotes unity. Gov’t duties can be split up. Brings gov’t closer to people. Allows for state gov’t to address issues in unique regions of the country. Allows states to experiment with policy before enacting it at the federal level. – Ex. Vermont’s free health care for children or Massachusetts Universal Healthcare law (written by Gov Mitt Romney) and used by President Obama as a blueprint for the national program.

Federalism is bad Living under 2 governments is bad… States can impede progress of Nation. States are unequal. States have different policy. Easier for states to be dominated by interest groups.