University at Albany (State University of New York)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Upgrading the Oracle Applications: Going Beyond the Technical Upgrade Atlanta OAUG March 19, 1999 Robert Cooney.
Advertisements

TITLE OF PROJECT PROPOSAL NUMBER Principal Investigator PI’s Organization ESTCP Selection Meeting DATE.
Global Business Blueprint Summary Presenters: Laurie Dempsey, CBP Lois McCluskey, eCP January 28, 2004.
Import Controls Phase 2 Workgroup 1.
CCTC Background Process coordinated by NASDCTEc 42 states, DC, and one territory involved in development Modeled the process and outcomes of Common Core.
Knowledge Translation Curriculum Module 3: Priority Setting Lesson 2 - Interpretive Priority Setting Processes.
Moving from Analysis to Design
Planning and Managing Information Security Randall Sutton, President Elytra Enterprises Inc. April 4, 2006.
1 Samples The following slides are provided as samples and references for the Quarterly Reviews Additional slides will be added.
IT Planning.
Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0214/Audit Sistem Informasi Tahun: 2007.
1 Performance Auditing  In IT Environment  Evidence Gathering & Analysis Techniques  Computer Assisted Techniques  Use of IDEA.
Change Advisory Board COIN v1.ppt Change Advisory Board ITIL COIN June 20, 2007.
Financial Advisory & Litigation Consulting Services Risk Management 2006 September 14-15, 2006 The Metropolitan Club, New York, NY Workshop B: Information.
Summary Device protocols tied intimately to applications. A need to significantly reduce critical data update times. Current network bandwidth consumption.
Police Communication Protocol SACRAMENTO STATE. Problem Statement The Sacramento State Police Department recognizes that a communication protocol is essential.
Presented to President’s Cabinet. INTERNAL CONTROLS are the integration of the activities, plans, attitudes, policies and efforts of the people of an.
Organize to improve Data Quality Data Quality?. © 2012 GS1 To fully exploit and utilize the data available, a strategic approach to data governance at.
Next Doc Project Team: xxxxx Spring TitlePage Scope Statement Mission Statement3 Business Need4 Project Description5-6 Project Lifecycle Approach7.
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service February William C. Smith Assistant Administrator Office of Program.
Joel Predd and Henry Willis February 26, 2009 Toward Adaptive, Risk-Informed Allocation of Border Security Assets.
MD Digital Government Summit, June 26, Maryland Project Management Oversight & System Development Life Cycle (SDLC) Robert Krauss MD Digital Government.
© Mahindra Satyam 2009 Decision Analysis and Resolution QMS Training.
HIGH INTENSITY DRUG TRAFFICKING AREA FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT DATABASE PROJECT.
The Minnesota State Colleges and Universities system is an Equal Opportunity employer and educator. Information Technology Enterprise Strategic Investment.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2006 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 8 Moving from Analysis to Design.
P1516.4: VV&A Overlay to the FEDEP 20 September 2007 Briefing for the VV&A Summit Simone Youngblood Simone Youngblood M&S CO VV&A Proponency Leader
Project Management Methodology Development Stage.
Warren Township Study To Examine Enrollment Project (STEEP) Project Plan & Criteria High Level Timeline Sub-Committee Goals & Deliverables Revised October.
SOLUTION What kind of plan do we need? How will we know if the work is on track to be done? How quickly can we get this done? How long will this work take.
Peer Review of E-Government in Arab countries by Marco Daglio, Administrator, Public Governance and Territorial Development Directorate.
4.5 Perform Integrated Change Control
Directions for this Template  Use the Slide Master to make universal changes to the presentation, including inserting your organization’s logo –“View”
Information Sharing for Integrated Care A 5 Step Blueprint.
Import Safety Phase 2 Workgroup 1.
David Cooper Industry Engagement Manager - Highway June 2016.
IW:LEARN TDA/SAP Training Course Module 3: Developing the SAP.
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Title of the Change Project
Carol Levin, PhD Department of Global Health
Business Analysts / Impl Officers
Managing the Project Lifecycle
10 year investment plan ERGEG approach and contribution
Tarrant County Criminal Courts Phase 1 Implementation
Business Case Analysis
Review of proposed outline for handbook
BANKING INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Information Sharing for Integrated care A 5 Step Blueprint
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Enhancing employers’ involvement in Social Protection policy debates
TechStambha PMP Certification Training
Hyper-V Cloud Proof of Concept Kickoff Meeting <Customer Name>
Maintaining Quality Test Optimization with Increasing Software Complexity Ankit Goyal Software Engineer II Adobe Systems.
The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF)
Phase 1 Tollgate Review Discussion Template
Phase 1 Tollgate Review Discussion Template
Strawman Best Practice IIA Change Forum June 2017
The National Network of
Risk Detection, Operations Efficiency & Economic Analysis Eva K Lee
University of California—Irvine
Phase 1 Tollgate Review Discussion Template
CIS12-3 IT Project Management
Considerations in Development of the SBSTA Five Year Programme of Work on Adaptation Thank Mr. Chairman. Canada appreciates this opportunity to share.
Vijay Rachamadugu and David Snyder September 7, 2006
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
The Shortest Path Algorithm
(Project) SIGN OFF PROCESS MONTH DAY, YEAR
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Presentation transcript:

University at Albany (State University of New York) Simulation, Analytics, and Modeling for Border Apprehension and Security (SAMBAS) Brandon Behlendorf University at Albany (State University of New York) Albany, NY Problem Statement and Objective: Key Question: Where should DHS/CBP/OBP position detection / interdiction resources between Ports of Entry (POEs)? Objective: To develop a geospatial toolkit to allow Sector-and Station-level personnel to: Determine likely probable pathways prior to apprehension; Conduct change detection analysis to identify shifts in probable pathways between two time periods; Identify current “GEOINT” areas of low-risk that contain a significant concentration of probable pathways; and, Assess the impact of “fixed” detection infrastructure (IFTs, RVSS, MSCs, MVSS) and interior enforcement operations (checkpoints) on probable pathways to support an alternative analysis of return-on-investment (ROI) for specific deployments. Methodology and Data Requirements Methodology: Across a baseline topological model, simulate probable pathways using weighted shortest-path network algorithms coupled with a multivariate cost-benefit matrix across different decision-making inputs. Validate simulation models against sample of OBP apprehension data Incorporate field perspectives into the design of the toolkit, assumptions underlying the modeling, and outline of the training Use COTS software [ArcGIS] to develop GUI toolkit to address four objectives and ease integration into existing CBP/OBP systems Data Requirements: Three-year sample of apprehension data from E3 system that allows for aggregate results to be released in validation study (no raw data released but study will not be FOUO or LES) Access to HSIP & additional OBP data for toolkit development (no aggregate results released; toolkit will ultimately be LES or FOUO) Impact Statement and Relevance to DHS Roles and Responsibilities The SAMBAS project will primarily support CBP, who can integrate the toolkit into operational protocols at the Station- and Sector-levels within the Office of Border Patrol. The validated toolkit will: Increase situational awareness of potential smuggling routes (not just apprehension points) Provide a third-party transparent standard to identify and justify a “reasonably-located checkpoint” (U.S. v. Martinez-Fuente, 1976) Support location of detection infrastructure relevant to upcoming investments in border technology Provide new methods for Border Patrol to measure the impact of their operations on potential smuggling routes, supporting the National Border Geospatial Intelligence Strategy Timeline and Deliverables Timeline: 9/25/2017-6/30/2019 (21m) 30d – Revised workplan 60d – Final workplan, data use agreements & IRB approved 90d – Design mock-ups for toolkit (with field input) 120d – Final toolkit design & data integration plans approved by OBP 6mo – Draft validation study 9mo - GUI Toolkit v1 & validation study completed Deliverables: Validation of Baseline Methodology GUI-based toolkit implemented in an ArcGIS desktop environment for planning and analysis Sector-specific data warehouse of model parameters Training/operator’s guide