Markets, Efficiency and

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PART 10 Market Failures Markets may fail to generate efficient results due to Monopoly Externalities Public Goods Open Access Markets may also have informational.
Advertisements

Market Failure.
The assumption of maximizing behavior lies at the heart of economic analysis. Firms are assumed to maximize economic profit. Economic profit is the difference.
Government Goals & Policy
Market Failure And Government Policy Market Failure And Government Policy A’lam Asadov
Modeling the Market Process: A Review of the Basics
3.1. Problems of Market Failures (1)  In reality, no market such a perfectly competitive market. Market tends to be imperfect  Hence, Pareto Efficiency.
1 Externalities and Public Goods Chapter Chapter Seventeen Overview 1.Motivation 2.Inefficiency of Competition with Externalities 3.Allocation Property.
Chapter 7 General Equilibrium and Market Efficiency
Copyright © 2008 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Managerial Economics, 9e Managerial Economics Thomas Maurice.
Ch. 5: EFFICIENCY AND EQUITY
MBA Economics Copenhagen 21 – 24 May Associate Professor Ivar Bredesen Copenhagen 21 – 24 May Associate Professor Ivar Bredesen.
Environmental Economics Market & Policy Failures Harvard Summer School June 29, 2011.
Ch. 5: EFFICIENCY AND EQUITY
MARKET FAILURES Externalities - markets will not lead to efficiency if actions of producers or consumers affect people other than themselves - when these.
Market Failure.
Market Failure and Resource Allocation 2012
Chapter 16: Government Regulation of Business McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 15 Government’s Role in Economic Efficiency ECONOMICS: Principles and Applications, 4e HALL & LIEBERMAN, © 2008 Thomson South-Western.
Monopoly & Efficiency Deadweight Loss Analysis. Efficiency Analysis Allocative Efficiency is when P = MC –No DWL, socially optimal –Monopolies fail as.
Principles of Microeconomics : Ch.10 Second Canadian Edition Externalities Chapter 10 © 2002 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited.
The workings of the Market. Objectives Understand the way in which markets and function and how this helps us to allocate scarce resources Understand.
Monopoly CHAPTER 12. After studying this chapter you will be able to Explain how monopoly arises and distinguish between single-price monopoly and price-discriminating.
M03EFA: Economic Environment of Business Government, Market Failure & Market Regulation: Aims: a)Evaluate the causes of government intervention b)Focus.
Chapter 14 Economic Efficiency and the Competitive Ideal ECONOMICS: Principles and Applications, 4e HALL & LIEBERMAN, © 2008 Thomson South-Western.
Externalities Chapter 10. EXTERNALITIES An externality is the uncompensated impact of one person’s actions on another person –Both positive & negative.
Market Failure Where resources are inefficiently allocated due to imperfections in the working of the market mechanism When markets do not provide us with.
Market Failure. Imperfect competition Restrict output in order to push up prices and maximize profits (i.e. monopoly & other imperfect markets) Restrict.
Unit 10 MARKET POWER: Monopoly and Monopsony. Outcomes Define monopoly market power Identify sources of monopoly power Determine the social cost of monopoly.
Market Failure. Occurs when free market forces, using the price mechanism, fail to produce the products that people want, in the quantities they desire.
Modeling the Market Process: A Review of the Basics Chapter 2 © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
Markets, Maximizers and Efficiency
Monopoly & Efficiency Deadweight Loss Analysis. Allocative Efficiency Total Welfare is maximized only when MC = MB for society –Since MB = Price => only.
Modeling the Market Process: A Review of the Basics Chapter 2 © 2007 Thomson Learning/South-WesternCallan and Thomas, Environmental Economics and Management,
Market Failure. Occurs when free market forces, using the price mechanism, fail to produce the products that people want, in the quantities they desire.
Monopoly.
Lectures in By Prof. Dr. Younis El Batrik. THE FIELD OF PUBLIC FINANCE Fundamental Economic Facts  The Scarcity of Resources  The necessity of economizing.
The Government and the Market Chapter 13 LIPSEY & CHRYSTAL ECONOMICS 12e.
AP MICRO ECONOMICS EXAM REVIEW
What you will learn in this chapter:
AP MICROECONOMICS UNIT #6 MARKET FAILURE/ ROLE OF GOVERNMENT
3. KEGAGALAN PASAR DAN INTERVENSI PEMERINTAH
Chapter 16: Government Regulation of Business
Warm-Up Draw a correctly-labeled graph showing a:
Efficiency and Equity in a Competitive Market
Problem Set #6 Points Distribution
Government Regulation of Business
Monopoly.
EFFICIENCY, MARKETS, AND GOVERNMENTS
Microeconomics Graphs
Chapter 16 Government Regulation of Business
Market Failures and Government Policy
Main Topics for Free Responses Since 1995
Perfect Competition Chapter 11.
Supply curves Originate with individual firm’s marginal cost curve
ENV 536: Environmental Economics and Policy (Lecture 3) Modeling the Market Process: A Review of the Basics Asst.Prof. Dr. Sasitorn Suwannathep School.
8 Government, the Firm and the Market.
8/9b - ARE BUSINESSES EFFICIENT? Pure Competition in the Long Run
Ch. 5: EFFICIENCY AND EQUITY
Perfect Competition and Monopoly
THE FIRM AND ITS CUSTOMERS: PART 2
The Role of Government Chapter 14
Problem Set #6 Points Distribution
Unit 4: Imperfect Competition
Monopoly (Part 2) Chapter 21.
NATURAL RESOURCES Classification Economic characteristics
Pure Competition Chapter 9.
Chapter 16: Government Regulation of Business
Are Monopolies Desirable?
Deadweight Loss Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Markets, Efficiency and the Public Interest

Markets, Efficiency and the Public Interest Efficiency under Perfect Competition

EFFICIENCY UNDER PERFECT COMPETITION Defining social efficiency Pareto improvements Pareto optimality Private efficiency ‘rational’ economic behaviour equating marginal benefits and marginal costs 2

EFFICIENCY UNDER PERFECT COMPETITION Achieving social efficiency under perfect competition efficiency in consumption: MU = P efficiency in production: P = MC 3

Maximum total surplus under perfect competition £ MC D = MU Pe Qe O Q

Maximum total surplus under perfect competition £ MC A Pe B D = MU C O Qe Q

EFFICIENCY UNDER PERFECT COMPETITION Achieving social efficiency under perfect competition efficiency in consumption: MU = P efficiency in production: P = MC assumption of no externalities 3

EFFICIENCY UNDER PERFECT COMPETITION Achieving social efficiency under perfect competition efficiency in consumption: MU = P efficiency in production: P = MC assumption of no externalities social efficiency in goods markets: MSB = MSC 3

Maximum total surplus under perfect competition £ MC A Pe B D = MU C O Qe Q

EFFICIENCY UNDER PERFECT COMPETITION Achieving social efficiency under perfect competition efficiency in consumption: MU = P efficiency in production: P = MC assumption of no externalities social efficiency in goods markets: MSB = MSC social efficiency in factor markets: MSBf = MSCf 3

EFFICIENCY UNDER PERFECT COMPETITION Achieving social efficiency under perfect competition efficiency in consumption: MU = P efficiency in production: P = MC assumption of no externalities social efficiency in goods markets: MSB = MSC social efficiency in factor markets: MSBf = MSCf Interdependence, efficiency and the invisible hand 3

The interdependence of goods and factor markets FIRMS (suppliers of goods and services, demanders of factor services) HOUSEHOLDS (demanders of goods and services, suppliers of factor services)

The interdependence of goods and factor markets £ P Q O D1 = MU1 = MSBG1 £ (1) Consumer demand

The interdependence of goods and factor markets (2) Producer supply £ Goods P S = MC = MSCG D1 = MU1 = MSBG1 Goods O Q £ (1) Consumer demand

The interdependence of goods and factor markets (2) Producer supply £ Goods P S P1 Q1 D1 O Q Goods £ (1) Consumer demand

The interdependence of goods and factor markets demand (2) Producer supply £ £ Goods P Q O P S D1 = MRPF1 = MSBF1 P1 D1 O Q1 Q £ Goods £ (1) Consumer demand

The interdependence of goods and factor markets demand (2) Producer supply £ £ Factor services Goods P P S = MDUF = MSCF S P1 D1 = MRPF1 = MSBF1 D1 O Q O Q1 Q Factor services Goods £ £ (4) Factor supply (1) Consumer demand

The interdependence of goods and factor markets demand (2) Producer supply £ £ Factor services Goods P P S S PF1 P1 QF1 D1 D1 O Q O Q1 Q Factor services Goods £ £ (4) Factor supply (1) Consumer demand

The interdependence of goods and factor markets demand (2) Producer supply £ £ Factor services Goods P P S S P2 PF1 D2 = MU2 = MSBG2 P1 Q2 D1 D1 O QF1 Q O Q1 Q Factor services Goods £ £ (4) Factor supply (1) Consumer demand

The interdependence of goods and factor markets demand (2) Producer supply £ £ Factor services Goods P P S S PF2 P2 QF2 PF1 D2 = MU2 = MSBG2 P1 D2 = MRPF2 = MSBF2 D1 D1 O QF1 Q O Q1 Q2 Q Factor services Goods £ £ (4) Factor supply (1) Consumer demand

Markets, Efficiency and the Public Interest Social Efficiency: Intermediate Analysis

SOCIAL EFFICIENCY: INTERMEDIATE ANALYSIS Private efficiency in goods markets in consumption: MUX / MUY (MRS) = PX / PY in production: MCX / MCY (MRT) = PX / PY Social efficiency in goods markets between consumers: MRSa = MRSb ... = MRSn between producers: MRTg = MRTh ... = MRTn in exchange (assuming no externalities): social MRS = social MRT 4

SOCIAL EFFICIENCY: INTERMEDIATE ANALYSIS Social efficiency in factor markets The achievement of general equilibrium 5

Social efficiency under perfect competition Production possibility curve Good Y Slope = MRT O Good X

Social efficiency under perfect competition indifference curves Good Y Slope = MRS I3 I2 Slope = MRT I1 O Good X

Social efficiency under perfect competition Market price ratio MRS = PX / PY = MRT s Good Y Slope = MRS I3 Slope = PX / PY I2 Slope = MRT I1 O Good X

Markets, Efficiency and the Public Interest The Case for Government Intervention

CASE FOR GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION Externalities External costs of production MSC > MC 6

External costs in production MC = S Costs and benefits D P Q1 O Quantity

External costs in production MSC MC = S Costs and benefits P D Q2 External cost O Q1 Social optimum Quantity

CASE FOR GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION Externalities External costs of production MSC > MC External benefits of production MSC < MC 6

External benefits in production MC = S Costs and benefits P D O Q1 Quantity

External benefits in production MC = S MSC External benefit Costs and benefits P D Q1 Q2 O Social optimum Quantity

External costs and benefits in production MSC MC = S MC = S MSC External benefit Costs and benefits (£) Costs and benefits (£) P D P D External cost O Q Q O Q Q 2 1 1 2 Quantity Quantity (a ) External costs (b) External benefits

CASE FOR GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION Externalities External costs of production MSC > MC External benefits of production MSC < MC External costs of consumption MSB < MB 6

External costs in consumption (MB) MU = D Costs and benefits P D Q1 O Quantity

External costs in consumption (MB) MU = D External cost Costs and benefits P D Q2 MSB O Q1 Social optimum Quantity

CASE FOR GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION Externalities External costs of production MSC > MC External benefits of production MSC < MC External costs of consumption MSB < MB External benefits of consumption MSB > MB 6

External benefits in consumption (MB) MU = D Costs and benefits P D O Q1 Quantity

External benefits in consumption (MB) MU = D External benefit Costs and benefits P D Q2 MSB O Q1 Social optimum Quantity

External costs and benefits in consumption External benefit Costs and benefits (£) External cost Costs and benefits (£) P P P P MSB MB MB MSB O O Q 2 Q 1 Q 1 Q 2 Car miles Rail miles (a ) External costs (b) External benefits

CASE FOR GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION Public goods Non-rivalry Non-excludability: free-rider problem Common resources equilibrium use of a common resource 7

Fishing in open-access fishing grounds £ ARP MRP AC = MC O Number of boats

Fishing in open-access fishing grounds £ Equilibrium: well beyond the optimum The collective optimum for boat owners Beyond this point no more fish can be caught AC = MC B1 ARP O B2 B3 Number of boats MRP

CASE FOR GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION Public goods Non-rivalry Non-excludability: free-rider problem Common resources equilibrium use of a common resource the tragedy of the commons 7

CASE FOR GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION Public goods Non-rivalry Non-excludability: free-rider problem Common resources equilibrium use of a common resource the tragedy of the commons current-day examples 7

CASE FOR GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION Public goods Non-rivalry Non-excludability: free-rider problem Common resources equilibrium use of a common resource the tragedy of the commons current-day examples Market power 7

CASE FOR GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION Public goods Non-rivalry Non-excludability: free-rider problem Common resources equilibrium use of a common resource the tragedy of the commons current-day examples Market power lack of Pareto optimality 7

A monopolist producing less than the social optimum MC £ AR MR P1 Q1 MC1 O Q Monopoly output

A monopolist producing less than the social optimum £ MC = MSC P1 P2 = MSB = MSC MC1 AR = MSB MR O Q1 Q2 Q Monopoly output Perfectly competitive output

CASE FOR GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION Public goods Non-rivalry Non-excludability: free-rider problem Common resources equilibrium use of a common resource the tragedy of the commons current-day examples Market power lack of Pareto optimality deadweight loss under monopoly 7

Deadweight loss under monopoly £ MC (= S under perfect competition) Consumer surplus a Ppc Qpc Producer surplus AR = D O Q (a) Industry equilibrium under perfect competition

Deadweight loss under monopoly £ MC (= S under perfect competition) MR Deadweight welfare loss Consumer surplus b Pm Qpc a Ppc Producer surplus AR = D O Qpc Q (b) Industry equilibrium under monopoly

Deadweight loss under monopoly £ MC (= S under perfect competition) Perfect competition Consumer surplus a Ppc Qpc Producer surplus AR = D O Q (a) Industry equilibrium under perfect competition

Deadweight loss under monopoly £ MC (= S under perfect competition) Monopoly MR Deadweight welfare loss Consumer surplus b Pm Qpc a Ppc Producer surplus AR = D O Qpc Q (b) Industry equilibrium under monopoly

CASE FOR GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION Ignorance and uncertainty Immobility of factors and time lags Protecting people’s interests dependants merit goods Other objectives Possible conflict between objectives Limitations of economics in assisting policy making 7

Markets, Efficiency and the Public Interest Forms of Government Intervention

FORMS OF GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION The problem of the second best the first-best world the second-best solution to market distortions Taxes and subsidies to correct externalities 8

Using taxes to correct a market distortion (“first-best” world) MC = S Costs and benefits D P Q1 O Quantity

Using taxes to correct a market distortion (“first-best” world) MSC MC = S Costs and benefits P D Q2 External cost O Q1 Social optimum Quantity

Using taxes to correct a market distortion (“first-best” world) MSC MC = S Optimum tax = MSC – MC Costs and benefits P D Q2 MC O Q1 Quantity

Using subsidies to correct a market distortion (“first-best” world) MC = S Costs and benefits P D O Q1 Quantity

Using subsidies to correct a market distortion (“first-best” world) MC = S MSC External benefit Costs and benefits P D Q1 Q2 O Social optimum Quantity

Using subsidies to correct a market distortion (“first-best” world) MC = S MSC MC Optimum subsidy = MC – MSC Costs and benefits P D O Q1 Q2 Quantity

FORMS OF GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION The problem of the second best the first-best world the second-best solution to market distortions Taxes and subsidies to correct externalities second-best tax and subsidy policies 8

Using taxes to correct for externalities: firms with monopoly power £ MC Monopoly price and output P1 D = MSB MR O Q1 Q

Using taxes to correct for externalities: firms with monopoly power MSC £ MC P2 Optimum price and output Q2 P1 D = MSB MR O Q1 Q

Using taxes to correct for externalities: firms with monopoly power MC + tax £ MSC MC P2 Optimum tax on the monopoly P1 Optimum tax D = MSB MR O Q2 Q1 Q

Using taxes to correct for externalities: firms with monopoly power £ MSC MC + tax MC P2 P1 Continuing excess profits can be reduced by a further lump-sum tax Optimum tax D = MSB MR O Q2 Q1 Q

FORMS OF GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION The problem of the second best the first-best world the second-best solution to market distortions Taxes and subsidies to correct externalities second-best tax and subsidy policies to correct for monopoly 8

FORMS OF GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION The problem of the second best the first-best world the second-best solution to market distortions Taxes and subsidies to correct externalities second-best tax and subsidy policies to correct for monopoly use of lump-sum taxes plus subsidies 8

Using a lump-sum tax to reduce monopoly profits £ MC P =AR AR = MSB MR O Q1 Q

Using a lump-sum tax to reduce monopoly profits £ MC P =AR AC Profit (no tax) AC AR = MSB MR O Q1 Q

Using a lump-sum tax to reduce monopoly profits £ 1. Acceptable profit 2. Lump sum tax necessary to achieve acceptable profit MC AC + lump-sum tax P1 AC 1 AC + tax 2 AC AR = MSB MR O Q1 Q

FORMS OF GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION The problem of the second best the first-best world the second-best solution to market distortions Taxes and subsidies to correct externalities second-best tax and subsidy policies to correct for monopoly use of lump-sum taxes plus subsidies advantages and disadvantages of taxes and subsidies 8

Deadweight loss from an indirect tax £ Before-tax situation S P1 D O Q1 Q

Deadweight loss from an indirect tax £ Before-tax situation S Consumer surplus P1 D O Q1 Q

Deadweight loss from an indirect tax £ Before-tax situation S Consumer surplus P1 Producer surplus D O Q1 Q

Deadweight loss from an indirect tax £ S + tax S P2 Q2 P1 P2 - tax D O Q1 Q

Deadweight loss from an indirect tax £ S + tax S 1 P2 2 3 P1 4 5 P2 - tax 6 D O Q2 Q1 Q

Deadweight loss from an indirect tax £ S + tax S 1 P2 2 3 P1 4 5 P2 - tax 6 D O Q2 Q1 Q

Deadweight loss from an indirect tax £ S + tax S 1 P2 2 3 P1 4 5 P2 - tax 6 D O Q2 Q1 Q

Deadweight loss from an indirect tax £ S + tax Tax revenue for government S 1 P2 2 3 P1 4 5 P2 - tax 6 D O Q2 Q1 Q

Deadweight loss from an indirect tax £ S + tax Deadweight loss from tax S 1 P2 2 3 P1 4 5 P2 - tax 6 D O Q2 Q1 Q

FORMS OF GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION Changes in property rights the problem of limited property rights extending property rights the Coase theorem limitations of this solution Legal controls laws prohibiting behaviour that imposes external costs laws to regulate monopoly power laws to prevent firms from exploiting people’s ignorance 9

FORMS OF GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION Regulatory bodies Price controls high minimum prices low maximum prices Provision of information The direct provision of goods and services providing public goods other goods making rational decisions Public ownership 10

Markets, Efficiency and the Public Interest Cost–Benefit Analysis

COST–BENEFIT ANALYSIS The procedure Identifying costs and benefits costs direct private monetary external monetary external non-monetary benefits private non-monetary 11

Private non-monetary benefits (consumer surplus) £ 50p D O Q1 Q

Private non-monetary benefits (consumer surplus) £ Private non-monetary benefit Consumer surplus 50p D O Q1 Q

COST–BENEFIT ANALYSIS The procedure Identifying costs and benefits costs direct private monetary external monetary external non-monetary benefits private non-monetary external 11

COST–BENEFIT ANALYSIS Measuring costs and benefits direct private monetary costs and benefits non-monetary private benefits monetary externalities non-monetary externalities Risk and uncertainty sensitivity analysis 12

COST–BENEFIT ANALYSIS Discounting working out the NPV choosing the discount rate The distribution of costs and benefits the strict Pareto criterion the Hicks–Kaldor criterion taking specific account of redistributive consequences 13

Markets, Efficiency and the Public Interest The Case for Laissez-Faire

THE CASE FOR LAISSEZ-FAIRE The growth of libertarian thinking the neo-Austrian school and its influence on radical-right thinking libertarian policies of governments Drawbacks of government intervention shortages and surpluses poor information bureaucracy and inefficiency lack of market incentives shifts in government policy lack of freedom for the individual 14

THE CASE FOR LAISSEZ-FAIRE Advantages of the free market automatic adjustments dynamic advantages of capitalism high degree of competition even under monopoly/oligopoly Judging the arguments 16