ACADEMY OF PACESETTING STATES Orientation to Cohort #2 - 2011 Seeing Change Through to the Classroom.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Five -Year Strategic Title I School Plan. Session Objectives Review the five year components utilizing the rubric Organize actions steps to meet the requirements.
Advertisements

The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
What Did We Learn About Our Future? Getting Ready for Strategic Planning Spring 2012.
Parents as Partners in Education
Supporting the Art & Science of Teaching Supporting the Art & Science of Teaching Robert J. Marzano.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
Santa Clara Day School Principal’s Leadership Academy David C. Nez Principal.
Rubrics-Based Evaluation of a Statewide System of Support A Tool to Enhance Statewide Systems of Support.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Principal Leadership Academy Basic Leadership Training November 2012.
Studies of high-performing school districts highlight the key to raising student achievement: Improvement must begin in the classroom. By working to get.
Two Generations of Success Family Engagement in Full Service Community Schools Coalition for Community Schools April, 2010.
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
Leadership within SW-PBS: Following the Blueprints for Success Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Intervention.
1 Professional Development Planning and Needs Assessment Regional Trainings Spring 2006.
New York State Professional Development Standards S/CDN 2010.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Virginia Foundation for Educational Leadership Virginia Department of Education Webinar Series 2012 Welcome to Webinar 7.
Linking Systems: State, District, School, Classroom: The Virginia Project Chairs: Nancy Protheroe, Center on Innovation & Improvement Kathleen Smith, Virginia.
Listening, Learning, and Leading Emmanuel Caulk August 24, 2015.
Virginia Foundation for Educational Leadership Virginia Department of Education Webinar Series 2012 Welcome to Webinar 2.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Marietta Rives, DE Consultant, Co-Chair of Instruction & Assessment Team Jan Norgaard, AEA 13 Associate Director, Network Team Member Deb Johnsen, AEA.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
The Academy of Pacesetting Districts Introducing...
SMHC Talent Development around Instruction To Increase Student Learning Carl Cohn.
Indistar® Information about the Indistar® Online Tool.
Participating States and Regional Centers Alaska, Alaska Comprehensive Center Arkansas, Mid-Continent Comprehensive Center Idaho, Northwest Comprehensive.
University of Virginia School Turnaround Program.
Parma City School District Professional Learning Model Committing to the Core Rethinking Mathematics & Literacy for the 21 st Century LITERACY COACHES.
OVERVIEW 1. WHAT IS FIP YOUR SCHOOL? 2 What is a FIP School? Our goal is to make every school in Ohio a FIP School – a school committed to embracing.
Overview – Indistar® SSOS Online Web Tool in comparison to the publication “ Evaluating the Statewide System of Support” Assessment Process Planning Process.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
RAPID DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT Academy of Pacesetting States July 20, 2009 Brett Lane Technical Advisor to the Center on Innovation & Improvement.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
Academy of Pacesetting States Indicators of Effective Instruction Larry Kugler July 20, 2009.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
Presentation to North Carolina State Board of Education Global Education Task Force March 14, 2012  Adam Hartzell, Executive Director  Matt Friedrick,
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM BOB ALGOZZINE AND STEVE GOODMAN National PBIS Leadership Forum Hyatt Regency O’Hare Rosemont, Illinois October 14, 2010.
WELCOME WASHINGTON STATE FELLOWS! September 22, 2015 Jessica Vavrus, Assistant Superintendent of Teaching and Learning, OSPI Cindy Duncan, Assistant Superintendent.
©2014 Center for Creative Leadership. All rights reserved.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk.
Vermont Early Childhood MTSS
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
The Value of School Librarians, School Libraries, and School Library Systems Barbara Stripling
Evaluation Planning & Reporting for School Climate Transformation Grant (SCTG) Sites Bob Algozzine University of North Carolina at Charlotte Steve GoodmanMichigan's.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
Florida Charter School Conference Orlando, Florida November, 2009 Clark Dorman Project Leader Florida Statewide Problem-Solving/RtI Project University.
KEEPING THE FOCUS ON STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT Stephanie Benedict Academic Development Institute & Center on Innovations in Learning.
Stephanie Benedict Academic Development Institute & Center on Innovations in Learning PLANNING FOR SUCCESS.
Moving Toward Self-Sufficiency ________________________________________________________________ Preparing Mississippi’s Workforce Presentation for Reaching.
ELI Educational Leadership Initiative Learning and Leading Together for a Brighter Future.
Instructional Partners Westlawn Middle School Lacey Lupo.
1 A Multi Level Approach to Implementation of the National CLAS Standards: Theme 1 Governance, Leadership & Workforce P. Qasimah Boston, Dr.Ph Florida.
Meeting the LEAPS Act May 5, PEI: Building Rigorous and Robust PreK-3 Family Engagement 1.
New Jersey Tiered System of Supports (NJTSS)
Home Base Partnership Team
Professional Development: Imagine Difference Shapes and Sizes
Coaching for Impact Susan Barrett
Nonprofit Capacity Building
What We Know About Effective Professional Development for Teachers
Framework for an Effective Statewide System of Support
Michigan School Improvement Grant
Differentiation in the Statewide System of Support
Nested State System of School Support
Academy of Pacesetting States
Project Outcomes (separate handout)
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Human capital development
Presentation transcript:

ACADEMY OF PACESETTING STATES Orientation to Cohort # Seeing Change Through to the Classroom

Participating States and Regional Centers Nevada, Southwest Comprehensive Center New Hampshire, New England Comprehensive Center North Dakota, North Central Comprehensive Center Vermont, New England Comprehensive Center West Virginia, Appalachia Regional Comprehensive Center Wisconisn, Great Lakes West Comprehensive Center Bureau of Indian Education, CII

Objectives of the Academy of Pacesetting States The objectives of CII for the Academy of Pacesetting States are to provide: 1.A learning community for teams from states and the Bureau intent upon leading the way to rapid improvement of districts and schools. 2.Training, consultation, and support to enable partners to reach their goals for high quality Statewide Systems of Support that build local capacity to initiate and sustain rapid improvement that brings all classrooms to an optimal level of performance. 3.Training, consultation, and support for state teams to develop skilled experts

Objectives of the Academy of Pacesetting States The objectives of the members of the Academy of Pacesetting States are to: 1.Take full advantage of the opportunities to share talents and experiences with other states, the Academy faculty and partners. 2.Develop and achieve bold plans of action to: Elevate the effectiveness of the Statewide System of Support; Build local capacity to initiate and sustain rapid improvement that brings all classrooms to an optimal level of performance;

Measures of Success 1.Improvement of Statewide System of Support as indicated by rubrics-based evaluation; 2.Achievement of Plan of Action; 3.Evidence of impact on classroom instruction, local capacity to initiate and sustain rapid improvement.

Central Themes

Spheres of Influence on the Instructional Core

Building Local Capacity Culture of Candor Leadership Effective Teams Collegial Coaching/Learning Open scrutiny of data from both sides of equation What students learn What adults do that affects what students learn Indicators of Effective Practice Guideposts for effective practice Plain language, behavioral indicators Aligned with research base Drivers of planning and improvement Necessary in a Culture of Candor

Catalytic Teams A Catalytic Team in a well-coordinated system of support to rapidly improve districts and schools in ways that show substantial effects in classroom instruction and student learning.

The ultimate goal in school improvement is for the people attached to the school to drive its continuous improvement for the sake of their own children and students.

We have important work to do.