LNF Laboratory Report S. Guiducci.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Some Timing Aspects for ILC Heiko Ehrlichmann DESY GDE, Frascati, December 2005.
Advertisements

Muon Coalescing 101 Chuck Ankenbrandt Chandra Bhat Milorad Popovic Fermilab NFMCC IIT March 14, 2006.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II ASAC-2007, April. 23, 2007 Injection System with a Booster in Separate Tunnel T. Shaftan for the NSLS-II team.
Damping ring K. Ohmi LC Layout Single tunnel Circumference 6.7 km Energy 5 GeV 2 km 35 km.
SuperB and the ILC Damping Rings Andy Wolski University of Liverpool/Cockcroft Institute 27 April, 2006.
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
Impedance measurements at SLS E. Koukovini-Platia CERN, EPFL TIARA mid-term meeting, Madrid, 13 th June 2012 Many thanks to M. Dehler, N. Milas, A. Streun.
CTF3 commissioning status R. Corsini - CTF3 committee 17 th September 2009 Update on CTF3 Operations and schedule This time I will try to give a more complete.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Report on the Damping Ring Meeting at CERN, Nov , 2005 J. Gao IHEP, Beijing, China Nov. 24, 2005, ILC-Asia Meeting.
Comparison between NLC, ILC and CLIC Damping Ring parameters May 8 th, 2007 CLIC Parameter working group Y. Papaphilippou.
Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.
1 Simulations of fast-ion instability in ILC damping ring 12 April ECLOUD 07 workshop Eun-San Kim (KNU) Kazuhito Ohmi (KEK)
DR 3.2 km Lattice Requirements Webex meeting 10 January 2011.
Damping Ring Parameters and Interface to Sources S. Guiducci BTR, LNF 7 July 2011.
The SPS as a Damping Ring Test Facility for CLIC March 6 th, 2013 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN CLIC Collaboration Working meeting.
Bunch Separation with RF Deflectors D. Rubin,R.Helms Cornell University.
S. Guiducci WG3b - Damping ring size and layout. DR configuration recommendation Circumference and layout ~ 17 km dogbone 3 km or 6 km ring Single rings.
TESLA DAMPING RING RF DEFLECTORS DESIGN F.Marcellini & D. Alesini.
ILC Damping Rings: Configuration Status and R&D Plans Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory January 19, 2006.
Damping Ring Specifications S. Guiducci ALCPG11, 20 March 2011.
MAX IV linac overview and scope of automation Sara Thorin.
HP-PS beam acceleration and machine circumference A.LachaizeLAGUNA-LBNO General meeting Paris 18/09/13 On behalf of HP-PS design team.
Injection System Update S. Guiducci (LNF) XVII SuperB Workshop La Biodola, Isola d'Elba, May 29 th 5/29/111.
Evaluation of 1GHz vs 2GHz RF frequency in the damping rings April 16 th, 2010 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU and Alexej Grudiev.
ALCW at SLAC, January 7, 2004J. Rogers, Novel Schemes for Damping Rings1 Novel Schemes for Damping Rings J. Rogers Cornell University Improving dynamic.
C. Biscari, D. Alesini, A. Ghigo, F. Marcellini, LNF-INFN, Frascati, Italy B. Jeanneret, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland CLIC DRIVE BEAM FREQUENCY MULTIPLICATION.
CLIC Frequency Multiplication System aka Combiner Rings Piotr Skowronski Caterina Biscari Javier Barranco 21 Oct IWLC 2010.
Beam Manufacture in PS2 M. Benedikt, S. Hancock. LHC Beams in the PS by 2015 Typeh injε l inj [evs] h ejN bunch ej RF ej [MHz] ε l ej [evs] τ ej [ns]
Sara Thorin, MAX IV Laboratory
Design study of CEPC Alternating Magnetic Field Booster
Alternative/complementary Possibilities
Design and Parameters for a linearly colliding Super B-FACTORY
TESLA Damping Ring: Injection/Extraction Schemes with RF Deflectors
CLIC Damping ring beam transfer systems
Linac possibilities for a Super-B
Recent Developments in Damping Rings and their Wigglers
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Status and Plan of GDE Design Work (Including Road Map for RDR)
Discussion on Emittance Evolution through FCC-e+e-
IntraBeam Scattering Calculation
Measurements, ideas, curiosities
Bunch Separation with RF Deflectors
SuperB project. Injection scheme design status
Pol. positron generation scheme for ILC
Overview Multi Bunch Beam Dynamics at XFEL
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
Damping Ring parameters for the new accelerating structure
Design study of CEPC Alternating Magnetic Field Booster
Design study of CEPC Alternating Magnetic Field Booster
Design study of CEPC Alternating Magnetic Field Booster
Super-B Factory in a “4400m” Tunnel
J. Seeman Perugia Super-B Meeting June 2009
Damping Ring parameters for the new accelerating structure
Kicker and RF systems for Damping Rings
Kicker specifications for Damping Rings
Injection design of CEPC
Kicker and RF systems for Damping Rings
Damping Ring parameters with reduced bunch charge
JLEIC 200 GeV ion beam formation options
Technical challenges for forming the double intensity section of JLEIC ion beam Jiquan Guo.
JLEIC CCR Path Length and Gap Formation
MEIC New Baseline: Part 7
Evaluation of 1GHz vs 2GHz RF frequency in the damping rings
Beam-beam simulations
Updated MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme
JLEIC Ion Beam Formation options for 200 GeV
Presentation transcript:

LNF Laboratory Report S. Guiducci

A solution for the present DR design has been worked out at LNF. Damping Ring Kickers An injection extraction scheme for TESLA based on RF deflectors has been suggested by P. Raimondi. A solution for the present DR design has been worked out at LNF. The possibility of obtaining a much shorter bunch distance in the DR is envisaged. This opens the possibility of having an unified DR design for any LC project independent on the Linac technology (warm/SC)

APDG Working Group TESLA Damping Ring: Injection/Extraction Schemes with RF Deflectors D. Alesini, F.Marcellini TESLA Damping Ring: RF Deflectors Design F.Marcellini, D. Alesini

INTRODUCTION: CTF3 INJECTION SCHEME

Two frequencies f2=4f1 F=16 Recombination factor F=16 CTF3 Recombination factor F=5

CTF3-LIKE INJECTION/EXTRACTION SCHEME -Number of bunches in the Linac = NB -Bunch time spacing in the Linac = TL (Bunch spacing LL= TL*c) -Total length of the bunch train = LB -Number of RF deflectors = 2 (1 inj. + 1 extr.) -fRF= n*1/ TL (in the Figs. n=1) -Recombination Factor (F) -Total length of the damping ring (LDR) = LB/F LL/F -Bunch time spacing in the Damp. Ring TDR = TL/F -(Bunch spacing LDR= LL/F) Injection Extraction

(first evaluations made by J.P. Delahaye) If the filling time (F) of the deflectors is less than TDR it is possible to inject or extract the bunches without any gap of the filling pattern in the DR;  should be  * (depending on the ring optics) (considering a single RF frequency  /MAX=1-cos(2/F)) IN THE TESLA CASE (first evaluations made by J.P. Delahaye) -NB = 2820 -TL= 337 ns (LL=101 m) -LB 285 km -fRF 1.3 GHz (= 438*1/ TL) -F=20 -*=0.6 mrad -LDR  14 km -TDR = 16.85 ns TESLA klystrons inj./extr. with more RF frequencies near 1.3 GHz /MAX  5%  MAX  12 mrad!! TW RF Deflectors GAP F  16.85 ns !!

RF Deflectors Recombination factor F=20 Gap to turn on and off the deflectors: 1 empty bucket over 141 Two (or Three) Frequencies near 1.3 GHz (Linac Klystron) Effect of bunch length Error sensitivity Design of the deflectors

3 Km Damping Ring? How critical? F=100 is feasible for a very short bunch length sl ~ 2mm. How critical? An exercise: A parameter list for a 3Km long DR

Space charge tune shift TDR: DQ = .23 Short DR: DQ = .23 · .18 / .33 = .13 C 17Km 3Km .18 sl 6 mm 2 mm .33

Damping time  gC/U0 ; U0 = g2 B2 dl U0 = U0,arc + U0,wig = U0,arc (1 + Fw) To get the same damping time: U0 = 21 · 3/17  3.7 MeV and B2 dl = 605 · 3/17  107 T2m

ex = ea/(1+Fw) + ew Fw/(1+Fw) = 8 10-6 m Emittance ex = ea/(1+Fw) + ew Fw/(1+Fw) = 8 10-6 m TDR: ea/(1+Fw) = 2 10-6m ew Fw/(1+Fw) = 6 10-6 m Bw = 1.6 T Fw = 17.5 Short DR: ea/(1+Fw) = 7 10-6 m ew Fw/(1+Fw) ~ ew  Bwig3 l2<b> ~ 1 10-6 m Bw = .8 T Fw  smaller or ea  larger

e+ Parameters @5GeV TDR Short DR Circumference Km 17 3 Inj. emittance rms (m) .01 Norm. emitt. hor/ver (m) 8/2 10-6 Damping time (ms) 28 Bunch num/space (ns) 2820/ 20 2820/ 3.5 Particles/bunch 2 1010 B2 dl (T2m) 605 107 Wiggler l (m) / B0 (T) .4 / 1.6 .4/ 0.8 Energy loss/turn(MeV) 21 3.7 Rel. Energy spread sp 1.3 10-3 .65 10-3 Bunch length (mm) 6 2 Space charge DQ .23 .13

Conclusions RF deflectors for the Damping Ring with a recombination factor F=20 are proposed. The possibility of a larger recombination (F=100) is interesting in order to shorten the Damping Ring and make it less demanding.

RF DEFLECTORS AND RECOMBINATION 1st turn - 1st bunch train from linac 2nd turn 3rd turn 4th turn

TW RF DEFLECTORS + GAP nB=1 1 bunch over 141  TG=337 ns