Principles and Key Issues

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Which role for economics in the implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive ? Arnaud Courtecuisse Artois-Picardie Water Agency Miedzyzdroje, 23.
Advertisements

German Guidebook on the Implementation of the EC Water Framework Directive Dr. Harald Irmer Germany.
Component 5.2 Harald Marent, Veronika Koller-Kreimel, Austrian Ministry for Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management Edith Hödl-Kreuzbauer,
THE MANAGEMENT PLAN IN PRACTICE Case study. RBMP Detailed publication process in the directive...  art. 13: general rules  annex VII: detailed contents.
WFD Reporting, Copenhagen, 4th Feb 2010 Schema overview WFD reporting training Copenhagen, 4 February 2010 Jorge Rodriguez-Romero DG Env, European Commission.
WFD Characterisation Report Dr Tom Leatherland Environmental Quality Manager 29 October 2003.
1 European Topic Centre on Water Workshop on: Identification of surface water bodies under the Pilot River Basin Initiative Monitoring Water Bodies Steve.
Building WFD into impact assessment Richard Sharp Geomorphology IEMA webinar Thursday 31 March 2016.
Identification on Significant Pressures - Surface Water Bodies
Draft Mandate Johannes Grath Balázs Horvath (DG Env)
Indepth assessment economic analysis progress report SCG meeting May 2008 Maria Brättemark, Unit D.2, DG Environment, European Commission.
Proposal for reporting on Programmes of Measures in 2016
Groundwater legislative framework
Project Objectives, Workplan and Timescales
State of Implementation of CEA in Germany
Type of presentation/visualisation
Restoration target values?
Daughter Groundwater Directive
Directive 2006/118/EC Short overview
Daughter Directive Groundwater - Working Procedure -
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive
Purpose Independent piece of legislation, closely integrated in a larger regulatory framework (complement to WFD): prevent deterioration protect, enhance.
A. Pistocchi, A. Aloe, S. Bizzi, F. Bouraoui, P. Burek, A. de Roo, B
WG C – Groundwater Activity WGC-3 Integrated Risk Assessment and Management Wouter GEVAERTS Thomas TRACK Dietmar MÜLLER.
CIS-Workshop on River Basin Management Plans
WGGW Amersfoort – 11 April 2016 Threshold Values: Report and Next Steps Tony Marsland (Amec Foster Wheeler) Tim Besien (Environment Agency – England)
SSG on WFD and agriculture
Directive 2006/118/EC Short overview
1. Implementation of the Water Framework Directive: notifications & infringements, RBMP assessments for the agricultural sector Expert Group on WFD & agriculture.
Philippe QUEVAUVILLER
Groundwater monitoring within the WFD
Update on RBMP&FRMP adoption and reporting Assessment of RBMP&FRMP
Review of Annexes I and II of the Groundwater Directive 2006/118/EC
Preparing a River Basin Management Plan WFD Characterisation Manager
WG C Groundwater Draft Mandate
Revision guidance and schemas WFD Reporting
Background document: How to build the Inventory of Emissions, Discharges and Losses: main elements and compilation of existing datasets (2007) DG on inventory.
Assessment of the Implementation of the Programmes of Measures
Project 2.7 Guidance on Monitoring
Mandate of the EEA To provide the Community and Member States with:
European Commission, DG Environment Air & Industrial Emissions Unit
GROUNDWATER CHARACTERISATION in England & Wales
1st Implementation Report of the Water Framework Directive
WG C – Groundwater Activity WGC-3 Risk Assessment (RA) and
Legal issues in WFD implementation WD meeting 16 June 2008 Jorge Rodríguez Romero, Unit D.2, DG Environment, European Commission.
Strong needs for coordination at EU level
EU Water Framework Directive
Environmental objective document –
WG 2.3 REFCOND Progress report for the SCG meeting 30 Sep-1 Oct 2002
NIVA - Norwegian Institute for Water Research
Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive
Update WG Eflows activity and link with EcoStat
Preparation of the second RBMP in Romania
IMPRESS Guidance and Policy Summary Water Directors Copenhagen, 21-22nd November 2002 Working Group leaders: Volker Mohaupt, Umwelt Bundes Amt Isobel.
Assessment of WFD River Basin Management Plans State of Play
WG C-1 activity Berlin – 3 May 2007
Philippe Quevauviller
WGC-2 Status Compliance and Trends
WFD & Agriculture – Article 5
Concept paper on the assessment of WFD River Basin Management Plans
WISE – Freshwater WFD visualization tool
WG A ECOSTAT Draft Mandate
Article 13 RBMP Schema.
Brussels – 20 April 2007 European Commission - DG Environment
Item 7. Paving the way for WFD in Cross Compliance
Results of the screening of the draft second RBMPs
Water Director's Meeting May 2013, Dublin DG Environment
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive
Henriette Faergemann DG Environment, 04/09/2013
Assessment of Member States‘ 2nd River Basin Management Plans
Presentation transcript:

Principles and Key Issues Identification of Significant Human Pressures and Impacts, According to Annex II of the WFD. Principles and Key Issues Dave Foster, WFD Manager, Environment Agency for England & Wales

Main Elements of Discussion Paper Developed as a result of Belfast Workshop UK / Germany, plus 6 other MS Not intended as substantive guidance on the subject This is the role of CIS project on “Pressures & Impacts” Set out Requirements of the WFD Principles Relating to Identification of Significant Human Pressures and Impacts Further breakdown of categories of Pressures Sources of information on Pressures & Impacts Determining what is “Significant” Making an assessment of impact Level of detail of information on Pressures & Impacts Availability of appropriate tools Links to other elements of the WFD

WFD Requirements Set out in Article 5 and Annex II Analysis to be completed within 4 years

Further Breakdown of Categories Principles Relating to Identification of “Significant” Human Pressures & Impacts Further Breakdown of Categories WFD provides little further breakdown e.g. urban, agricultural, industrial Additional sub-division of categories is important Paper to be discussed this afternoon gives further breakdown (along with broad indicators / indices) for determining “significance” Based on work of German strategy paper

Sources of Information Principles Relating to Identification of “Significant” Human Pressures & Impacts Sources of Information Other existing EC legislation, e.g. UWWTD Existing national requirements “State of the Environment” reports National classification schemes Inventories from national legislation Operational information e.g. “pollution incidents”

Determining what is “Significant” Principles Relating to Identification of “Significant” Human Pressures & Impacts Determining what is “Significant” “Significant” can be considered in various ways: Broad indices / indicator approach Absolute size / magnitude, e.g. STW >5,000 p.e. Relative size / magnitude, e.g. STW’s contributing X% of total load to river basin Pressure is subject to specific EC legislation, e.g. GW Directive Significance limits should be chosen so that results provide a practical solution Future trends in pressure should be considered (in broad terms only)

Principles Relating to Identification of “Significant” Human Pressures & Impacts Determining Impact of a Pressure Impact of pressure - likely to cause failure of WFD objective Impact of pressure - contributes to upward trend Impact of pressure - contributes to / causes failure of existing standard (national or EC) Should take account of sensitivity of the water body Should take account of additive / synergistic effects

Principles Relating to Identification of “Significant” Human Pressures Level of Detail Required A variety of existing information will be available How much extra data should be obtained? Possible approach: 1st RBMP - maximum use of existing data, with limited additional data gathering 2nd RBMP - more detailed data will be available from monitoring required by WFD, and review of outcome of first Programme of Measures N.B. Data used most be robust enough to derive appropriate Programme of Measures

Principles Relating to Identification of “Significant” Human Pressures Availability of appropriate tools Not all tools / techniques needed to identify pressures may currently exist, e.g. for GW Three broad categories currently identified: Monitoring data (environmental/discharge/abstraction) Models, especially linking land use to water status Pollution inventories, e.g. under IPPC Directive Also what role for “expert judgement” Members States may have additional examples

Impact assessment framework Common strategy project Significant pressures Available information about ecological status Initial understanding of ‘good status’ Article 5 - Impact Assessment (2004) -->Identify bodies at risk Environmental objectives ---> Derogations?? Optimise operational monitoring programme RBD plan

? Common Strategy project guidelines on initial pressure assessment Available information on Impacts Categories: (e.g. existing classification system, morphology, additional monitoring information) Available information on Pressures Categories: ( e.g. point source, diffuse source, abstraction / regulation) Sources: (e.g. emissions inventories, licence records, incident reports) Current EC Directive compliance reports ? Common Strategy project scope EU Significance Thresholds ? Initial impact review -known impacts -model pressures --> impacts -expert judgement ? Sufficient information available? Member States optional collection of further data on pressures / impacts Final impact assessment

Principles Relating to Identification of “Significant” Human Pressures Links to several other elements of WFD: Design / implementation of monitoring programmes Use of derogations / designation of HMWBs Development of RBMPs and Programmes of Measures Economic analysis of water use The other half of Art 5 characterisation Scale issues Forecasting future trends

Other Issues Issues which need to be address in guidance What is “significant” (relation to environmental risk) Methods for data interpretation Methods of identifying direct and indirect pressures Pressures from past activities, e.g. contaminated land Forecasting future trends in pressures, e.g. population “Other” pressures, e.g. introduced species Combinations of pressures Common data management / reporting