Auxiliary & Self Supporting Activities (ASSA) – Administrative Assessment Update to HSSAL May 12, 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ORGANIZATION, TERMINOLOGY, AND FUNDS FLOW
Advertisements

Auditor of Public Accounts Update Bill Cole, Deputy Auditor Auditor of Public Accounts May 8, 2006.
Research Administration 101 Beth Ridenour Office of the Comptroller Facilities & Administrative Cost Rate Proposal.
Facilities & Administrative (F&A) Cost Recovery Report April 22, 2009 Carol Hollingsworth, Director, Grants & Contracts Financial Services & Janet Parker,
UW-Platteville Financial Overview October/November 2014 Robert Cramer - Vice Chancellor Financial Services 1.
FY 2011-FY2015 Budget Comparison And 5 Year Projection 1 Office of Finance.
Administration and Finance Joyce Hatch Vice Chancellor Administration and Finance August 2006 Proposed Facility Indicators Presentation to the Board of.
UCSF Budget and the Funding Streams Initiative Academic Senate Leadership Retreat September 26, 2011 Eric Vermillion Vice Chancellor - Finance.
The University Budget Debora Obley Associate Vice President
Oregon State University AN INTRODUCTION TO FACILITIES & ADMINISTRATIVE RATES November 2008.
FY11 Budget Snapshot budget.missouri.edu. MU Funding Sources Fiscal Year 2011 General Operating Funds $488,385, % Designated Fees 63,968, %
Community Leaders Update mubudget.missouri.edu. Community Leaders 1.Questions to Answer a)If state funding is only 12% of your budget, it can’t be that.
AN OVERVIEW OF CSU FUNDS Rodney Rideau Director of the Budget, California State University Franz Lozano, Director/Budget Officer, San Francisco State University.
Establishing and Managing a Recharge Center WHAT IS A RECHARGE CENTER?
1 Budget Model Update #2 Resources Implementation Team.
David Proulx, Assistant Vice President for Financial Planning and Budgeting Budget Office Website:
Facilities & Administrative (F&A) Cost Recovery March 5, 2009.
Overview of Rate Calculation TWO COST GROUPS: DIRECT COSTS INDIRECT COSTS FACILITIES ADMINISTRATION.
Standard costing.
Office of Budget and Financial Planning F&A Meeting Sep 30, 2014.
1 Facilities and Administrative (Indirect) Costs at The Ohio State University Administrative Research Council April 15, 2008 Tom Ewing, Associate University.
The Minnesota State Colleges and Universities System is an Equal Opportunity employer and educator. Audit Committee Meeting May 20, 2009 Auxiliary and.
The Management of Service centers NCURA REGIONS VI and VII CONFERENCE April 7, 2009.
  Institutional Support Expenditures divided by Total Operating Expense - Auxiliary Exp.   According to the Legislative Budget Board: “provides an.
Essentials of Accounting for Governmental and Not-for-Profit Organizations Chapter 6 Proprietary Funds McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill.
Adult Education and Literacy Budget Development and Cost Allocation.
Cost Recovery Model. What is Cost Recovery Cost=Subsidy + Cost recovery Cost –all expenditures associated with a program Subsidy –how much of the cost.
University of Minnesota Internal/External Sales “Annual Requirements and Certification” How to Annually Account for Internal Sales Activity.
Operating Budget Funding Sources State Appropriations - General Revenue Formula Funding, Special Items, Benefit Cost Sharing THECB Transfers TX Grant,
Private Support for Infrastructure and Central Services Growing with a Sustainable Financial Model Private Support for Infrastructure and Central Services.
Budget Forum February Where the State Dollar Comes From (general funds) – FY16 $13.1 Billion.
F UNCTION /NACUBO C ODES – W HAT ARE T HEY AND W HY ARE T HEY I MPORTANT ? May 25, 2016 Sheri Hardison, Asst. VP for Financial Affairs & Controller May.
Funds Flow for Johns Hopkins Department of Surgery October 4, 2015 Joint SSC and AASA Session Presented by: John D. Hundt.
1 Auxiliary & Self Supporting Activities (ASSA) – Administrative Assessment Update to HSSAL May 12, 2016.
1 Federal Cost Recoveries Georgia Fiscal Management Council October 3, :30pm – 3:30pm.
Understanding Facilities and Administration Charges in NIH Grants
HIGHER EDUCATION FINANCE AND BUDGETING May 2017
Student Broad-Based Fee Proposal
Auxiliary Organizations
UW-Platteville Financial Overview November 2016
Fees, Rates and Charges Heather Richards, Administrative Manager
RF Service Centers RF Symposium March 24, 2015.
FY2007 Billing Rate Proposal Preparation (Part I)
A Primer on The University Budget Fiscal Year
FY18 Budget Planning Council Orientation
Understanding Facilities and Administration (F&A) Costs
DEPARTMENT FINANCIAL OPERATIONS
Fiscal Management.
New Facilities and Administrative (F&A) Rates
Financial Report FY18 Plan
UW-Platteville Financial Overview November 2016
UIC 2008 Bringing Administrators Together Conference
Charges, Fees, Assessments and You
FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY
FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY
UW-Platteville Financial Overview November 2017
Sponsored Programs at Penn
UW-Platteville Financial Overview November 2017
FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY
F&A Rate Practices, Concepts and Calculations
UW-Platteville Financial Overview November 2016
Michael McKee | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Office of the Vice Chancellor for Administration and Finance
Florida Atlantic University
FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY
Budgeting and Financial Management
UW-Platteville Financial Overview January 2018
OCGA Presentation - Academic Affairs Fiscal Contacts Meeting
5/28/2019 Understanding the University Budget Joan King Associate Vice President Chief Budget Officer July 26, 2018.
Budget Background and FY 2020 Budget Proposal
Presentation transcript:

Auxiliary & Self Supporting Activities (ASSA) – Administrative Assessment Update to HSSAL May 12, 2016

Background Sales and services enterprise is a significant and growing component Comprised of auxiliary and self supporting activities: Housing and dining, parking, bookstore, Extension, space rentals, conferences, athletic events, lab service agreements, the medical center, the clinical practice, etc Expected to set market based rates that recover direct and indirect costs to “fully self-support” without institutional subsidy Campus charges an ASSA assessment so that: The institution does not subsidize these activities They contribute back to core mission Assessment includes overhead costs incurred by the campus: Institutional oversight by Chancellor and VC offices, computing services, human resources, business & financial services, payroll, budget, capital planning, facilities, development, diversity, legal council, etc Currently, there are 2 rates based on prior year adjusted expenses (MTDC): 4.1% for auxiliaries and other self supporting activities. Calculated in 2009/10 by dividing applicable institutional support expenses by total campus expenses (has remained unchanged) by dividing. .7% for Medical Center. Calculated annually based on agreed level of administrative services provided by the campus

Issue Current methodology is viewed as too complex and not understood by the units being assessed The assessment is structured as a cost recovery but the perception is that there is not sufficient accounting of services rendered The Federal Facilities and Administrative (F&A) methodology used for calculating research overhead, and used for setting the ASSA rate appears to be insufficient basis for some activities View is that some activities would opt out if given an option which is not a realistic option

Alternative Proposal Shift current methodology from a complex adjusted expenditure base (MTDC) to a simplified assessment rate as a percent of revenues Activities be grouped into three self-supporting categories to better distinguish the nature of the business income: Academic/Educational Auxiliaries Health Care (Medical Center and Clinical Practice) Impact: Rate shifts from 4.1% on MTDC to 3.4% of Academic/Educational and Auxiliaries’ revenues Health Care remains at .7% of revenues Academic/Educational and Health Care activities contribute less Auxiliaries contribute more (generally have higher margins than educational activities and should be able to absorb the increase)

Benefits of Proposed Alternative Simpler to explain and understand Improves units’ ability to plan and project annual assessment Allows for ability to assess in the year revenue is earned versus the current method that assesses on prior year expenses Increases efficiency by allowing automated assessments on revenues Corrects questionable behavior to avoid or lower assessment (misclassifying activities and expenses or seeking exclusions/waivers) Ability to assess differential rates to three self-supporting categories

Next Steps Discuss with the Vice Chancellor unit’s Financial Officers - Done Integrate into 2016/2017 budget discussion – In progress Communicate policy decision to impacted units – In progress Coordinate with ITS on automation – FY 2017/18 roll out

2015/16 ASSA Administrative Overhead Comparison ($000s) Modeling based on 2015/16 Assessment Campus Unit Current Method based on Expense/MTDC1 Med Practice to Med Ctr w/ all others one rate and based on % of Revenues 2 Change to current   Educational/Academics $ 6,312 $ 5,501 $ (810) UCSD Extension 1,280 1,510 230 Clinical Service Agreements 690 782 93 Rady School of Management 356 399 43 Patent Income 300 665 365 Patient Consult/Witness Agreements 218 364 146 Aquarium Museum 177 156 (21) OCME/CFM Dept Course Inc 115 84 (31) Other 3,177 1,543 (1,634) Auxiliaries 4,339 6,684 2,345 Clinical Practice - Integrated with Primary Care - Housing and Dining 3,573 5,057 1,484 Parking 274 734 460 Bookstore 166 615 448 Daycare Center 125 91 (34) 201 188 (13) Primary Care 13,001 11,467 (1,534) Medical Center 9,804 Clinical Practice 3,197 1,663 Total $ 23,652 $ (0) 1. Current assessments based on 2014/15 adjusted expenses/MTDC. 4.1% for Auxiliaries, Educational/Academics, Medical Clinical Practice and approximately .8% for Medical Ctr. 2. Medical Center and Med Practice integrated and held at .7% rate and all others at a single rate of 3.4%. Redistributes differential amount of contribution to Auxiliaries.