Integrity: Ethical & Responsible Conduct September 15, 2016

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Selected Items from a Report of the Higher Learning Commission Comprehensive Evaluation Visit to OSU Pam Bowers Director, University Assessment & Testing.
Advertisements

The University of Houston Institutional Compliance Program Rev July 2011.
Quality Assurance and Development Unit College of Applied Medical Sciences Females 1.
Session 4: Good Governance: How SAIs influence Good Governance in Public Administration Zahira Ravat 27 & 28 May 2014.
Budget Authority Training Office of Human Resources.
Association for Biblical Higher Education February 13, 2013 Lori Jo Stanfield Evaluator Team Training for Business Officers.
Academic Dishonesty: Fundamentals of Prevention Susan Pocotte, Ph.D. Associate Dean for Academic Affairs College of Graduate Studies.
Michelle Grimes-Hillman, South Representative Cynthia Rico, South Representative FACULTY LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE JUNE 11-13, 2015 SAN JOSE Empowering Local.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. 1 Part Four: Implementing Business Ethics in a Global Economy Chapter 9: Managing and Controlling Ethics.
Student Rights and Responsibilities Student Conduct and The University of Wyoming Regulations.
Accreditation in a Multi-College District Accreditation Institute Academic Senate for California Community Colleges February 11, 2012, 1:00-2:00pm John.
Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) What is RCR? New Requirements for RCR Who Does it Affect? When? Data Management What is the Institutional Plan? What.
Agency Risk Management & Internal Control Standards (ARMICS)
Atlanta Board of Education AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” February 14, 2011.
EMPOWERING LOCAL SENATES Kevin Bontenbal, South Representative Stephanie Dumont, Area D Representative.
Institutional Accreditation: What is it? Higher Learning Commission accredits degree- granting institutions in the North Central region. Assurance to the.
Title IX GRS New Student Orientation August 31, 2015 GRS Deputy Title IX Coordinator Laura Wipf Assistant Director of Graduate Affairs
AU Senate Chair’s Report Dr. Bill Sauser August 21, 2012.
Title IX GRS New Teaching Fellow Orientation August 28, 2015 GRS Deputy Title IX Coordinator Laura Wipf Assistant Director of Graduate Affairs
Accreditation in a Multi-College District Accreditation Institute Academic Senate for California Community Colleges February 9, :15 am Facilitator:
Accreditation: What we learned about ourselves College Forum Talk August 19, 2015 Patricia A. Fleming, Ph.D. Provost/ Senior Vice President for Academic.
DRAFT Proposed Sexual Harassment Policy Office of General Counsel Southern Illinois University September 2008.
2010 Faculty Leadership Institute Local Senates & Curriculum Committees Richard Mahon, Area D Beth Smith, Treasurer.
SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.
Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education CAS Standards and Self- Assessment in Higher Education Tony Ellis, CAE Director of Education,
CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY OPEN SESSION MARCH 25 Higher Learning Commission Re-accreditation.
Hiring and Evaluation Processes Greg Granderson & Pat James Hanz.
Criterion 1 Mission A. The institution's mission is broadly understood within the institution and guides its operations. B. The mission is articulated.
HLC Criterion Five Primer Thursday, Nov. 5, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
HLC Criterion Two Primer Tuesday Sept. 8, Criterion Two. Integrity: Ethical and Responsible Conduct The institution acts with integrity; its conduct.
Higher Learning Commission (HLC) Re-affirmation of accreditation in
In Preparation for HLC Accreditation September 18,
Strategic Resource Planning Council June 26, 2013 Merit Policy.
Principles of Good Governance
Jim White Gonzaga University
Finding balance between academic requirements and accommodations
MGMT 452 Corporate Social Responsibility
SACSCOC Fifth-Year Readiness Audit
GOVERNANCE COUNCILS AND HARTNELL’S GOVERNANCE MODEL
Kate Miller, Anne Alexander
University Career Services Committee
Multi-track Faculty System Changes from Ver to 1.5
How to Survive an External Quality Assessment
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
Student Concerns about Faculty Conduct Faculty and staff together provide support to students that help align the student experience with the mission and.
NICC Self-Study The Road to Excellence
HLC Day February 13, 9:30am - 2:00pm, TUC Great Hall.
All About Resources: Standard III
Title IX GRS New Teaching Fellow Orientation September 2, 2016
The Office of Institutional Equity (OIE)
Foothill College Accreditation Self-Study Update
Pathways 2017: HLC Accreditation Overview
Academic Promotion Information session, 22 March 2018.
10+1 Governance and Union Issues: Similarities and Differences
Title IX GRS New Student Orientation September 2, 2016
Middle States Commission on Higher Education
The Office of Institutional Equity (OIE)
HLC Update: Progress and Preparation for the Visit
10+1 Governance and Union Issues: Similarities and Differences
In Preparation to ACCJC team site visit on 10/8-10/11
Overview of accjc stanard IV
Higher Learning Commission Accreditation
Penn State University Change Initiatives Presented By: Matthew Bell Anjaih Clemons Obie Evans Bruce Kastner.
Navigating the College Culture
The Equity Office April Castañeda
1..
Developing and Evaluating Processes and Practices
The Office of Institutional Equity (OIE)
BOARD OF TRUSTEES April 12, YEAR REACCREDITATION EVALUATION
Presentation transcript:

Integrity: Ethical & Responsible Conduct September 15, 2016 HLC Criterion 2 Update Integrity: Ethical & Responsible Conduct September 15, 2016

Criterion 2: Integrity: Ethical & Responsible Conduct Team Leader: Chiara Hensley, Assistant Vice President of Student Affairs Team Members: Lauren London, Legal Office Melody Werner, Title IX Coordinator Stephanie Robinson, HR Sonia Chawla Wright, Research Compliance Margaret Crouch, Faculty, History and Philosophy Julia Heck, Office of the Ombuds

Overall Progress The team has begun writing the core document with completion of 1st draft anticipated October 2016 Our aim in writing the document is to… Foster a tone of transparency Tell a story about what we are doing well and then show areas of improvement, e.g., Positive Framework Evidence Areas of Improvement

Core Components 2.A. The institution operates with integrity in its financial, academic, personnel, and auxiliary functions; it establishes and follows policies and processes for fair and ethical behavior on the part of its governing board, administration, faculty, and staff. 2.B. The institution presents itself clearly and completely to its students and to the public with regard to its programs, requirements, faculty, and staff, costs to students, control, and accreditation relationships. 2.C. The governing board of the institution is sufficiently autonomous to make decisions in the best interest of the institution and to assure its integrity. 2.D. The institution is committed to freedom of expression and the pursuit of truth in teaching and learning. 2.E. The institution’s policies and procedures call for responsible acquisition, discovery and application of knowledge by its faculty, students, and staff.

Performance Gaps/Areas Requiring Immediate Attention CATE Lab, do students have to sign a statement saying that they understanding academic honesty and integrity when using note takers or testing. Ethical teaching - separating personal opinion from teaching the content Part time lecturers - advancement is dependent on evaluation Gift giving - BoR policy Faculty Senate vote of no confidence - Margaret is following up with Judy BoR Code of Ethics 1.7 Presidential Search Clarity about costs for students (cost breakdown) Review HLC Criterion 2 from last accreditation team Ineffective stay a part of the institution Evaluation of employee & documentation Reporting structures (on paper reports to one place, in reality another) Personal Professional Development (Technological Proficiency) Research compliance Instructor retaliation Poor mentorship Grades being submitted Lack of transparency Lack of not holding individuals responsible for not staying within budgets Don’t bring people to the table who need to be involved Underestimating the revenue and capital outlay Been a feeling of a lack of transparency and holding people accountable, mismanagement No consequences for not staying on budget (exceptions)

Criterion 2 Evidence List Evidence - Regular AP Meetings Evidence - Accreditation Website Evidence - University Budget Website Evidence - Audit and Review Evidence - State Controller's Office (Ask Jim/Todd for EMU/MI specific standards) Evidence - Budget Committee (BoR) Evidence - OoO Charter Evidence - Academic Resolution Protocol Evidence - EMU Handbook Website Evidence - Rec and Reg Website Evidence - Program and College Websites Evidence - Student Code of Conduct Evidence - Fast Track Evidence - AAUP Ethical Statements Evidence - Program Accreditation requirements Evidence - HR Hiring Processes Evidence - On-Boarding Training Evidence - HR Ethical Statement Evidence - BoR Ethical Statement Evidence - Department Ethical Statements Evidence - Compliance Matrix Document Evidence - ODAA Evidence - Non-Discrimination Sexual Misconduct EMU Databook (IRIM) EMU Student Handbook (place where First Year Center is talked about in UW report) Budget Priorities Documents Board Policy - Job of President is outlined as being the CEO of the university 4.05 Faculty Senate Board Policy - First Amendment Policy Set of Resources for any group who wants to protest on campus or hold event, who to call, etc. - Campus Life Website AAUP code of ethics Hate Crimes Policy Grade Grievance FERPA & HIPPA Policies

Questions?