STRUCTURE

What is good structure? Forest grown vs. open grown tree Codominant stems Good branch attachment Structurally sound tree This slide is an outline of what will be covered in this presentation. The goal is to show how trees develop if left to themselves. To demonstrate elements of poor structure vs. good structure – and to show how to recognize them. Finally, to briefly discuss a structurally sound tree.

Trees in the forest grow with one trunk, and codominant stems toward the top of the tree Trees in the forest have to compete with their neighbors for light. As the forest trees grow, lower branches get shaded out, die, and are eventually shed from the tree leaving a clear trunk (no branches).

Codominant stems form far up into the canopy on most forest trees Notice on these tuliptrees (Liriodendron sp) how the lower trunks are clear while further up in the tree, there are a number of large branches competing for the light. Branches on these trees start at about 80 feet and the trees are about 120 feet tall.

Open grown trees Canopy develops low on the trunk Canopy spreads wide Tree is often wider than tall In contrast, this tree, placed in a buffer strip, without any competition, has large branches developing at about 6 feet because light is abundant everywhere. Pruning to encourage strong structure makes open grown trees better able to remain strong.

It’s all about the sunlight This Honeylocust (Gleditsia sp) in Fall demonstrates the typical development of an open grown, decurrent tree. A decurrent tree grown in an open landscape has a spreading canopy with no main trunk as opposed to an excurrent tree which has a conically developing canopy and dominant, centrally located trunk even in an open landscape (e.g. Baldcypress (Taxodium), Sweetgum (Liquidambar), Pines (Pinus), etc).

This slide shows the development of an open grown decurrent tree and the pruning that it typically receives. Notice how the canopy develops low on the trunk and is limbed up. Also notice that the canopy is usually wider or as wide as it is tall. The tree shown at the far right is a sad, and all too common end, for what could have been a beautiful, long lived, large shade tree. Now it has three huge trunk wounds eight feet from the ground. This can begin a downward health spiral due to lost energy reserves and storage space, cracks and decay.

Appears to be a nice tree So what is the problem with large branches developing low on the trunk. This is the first of three slides showing structural problems resulting from large, low branches.

Here you can see the canopy of that tree starts almost right at the ground. The tree has multiple trunks and many large limbs that originate low on those trunks - the negative effect of “party time”. The close up shows the crack where the stems have not been able to grow together. This is because the bark from the adjacent stems is trapped between them. Trees can’t move that bark or break it down so it will be there indefinitely. We’ll see the results of this type of structural flaw shortly.

Same tree five years later Huge crack Same tree five years later Here we can see that the crack has not righted itself. As the stems continue to grow radially (in girth), there is no room for growth between them. As a result, they push against each other compounding the problem.

Keep an eye on this side of the tree The result of such structure can be a “Fall down go boom tree”. Fortunately in this first slide it looks like the failure didn’t cause any significant economic damage.

The next time the tree failed (two years after the right hand stem broke), the owner was not so lucky. So what leads to failures like these and how can they be avoided? We first need to look at stems and branches and how everything is put together.

What is good structure? Forest grown vs. open grown tree Codominant stems Good branch attachment Structurally sound tree This slide is an outline of what will be covered in this presentation. The goal is to show how trees develop if left to themselves. To demonstrate elements of poor structure vs. good structure – and to show how to recognize them. Finally, to briefly discuss a structurally sound tree.

Codominant stems Stems nearly same diameter We define large branches that have an upright growth habit as codominant stems. They are easy to recognize because they are usually about the same diameter. Remember, in forest grown trees, codominant stems develop well up into the canopy. In contrast, open grown trees have codominant stems developing very low in the canopy. The difference is the availability of sunlight.

Not all codominant stems have the same structural weakness Not all codominant stems have the same structural weakness. The strength of a trees structure is evaluated by how the stems and branches are attached to the rest of the tree. This slide shows two different codominant stems with vastly different structure. Which do you think is typical of the forest grown tree? The open grown tree?

Severely acute angle This slide shows probably the two biggest indicators of poor structure in codominant stems – a severely acute angle formed by the two stems, and “elephant ears”. Elephant ears or “hips”, as some call them, are outgrowths from where the two stems are pushing against each other.

Why are they a problem? Included bark beginning to form Here is the problem that we referred to earlier. Bark, that developed when the stems were smaller and had space between them, is now trapped inside the union between the stems. This doesn’t happen when the angle between stems is large enough to allow the stems to develop independent of each other. Included bark beginning to form

Bark inclusion Decay and discoloration from self wounding This slide shows the effect of included bark. Notice the branch angle. The top of the elephant ears can be seen as well. Also, notice that the two stems did not connect with each other as they grew together. The decay and discoloration are results of the stems pressing and rubbing against each other as well as microorganisms breaking down the wood. The narrow branch angle is a perfect environment for microorganisms because it is an area that stays moist, warm, and dark.

Bark inclusion Closed crack indicating inclusion Near-normal wood formation Here is an example of two codominant stems that grew together forming some connective wood between the two stems. Many trees could never accomplish this. Despite the fact that this tree was able to breach the bark between stems and grow together, there is still bark included in the union. The tree could grow enough that the bark inclusion would become inconsequential, but it would take many years to do so. There is still a weakness at this point on the tree.

Closure crack indicating inclusion Bark inclusion Here is that same codominant union. The effect of the narrow branch angle is clearly seen in the development of the stem on the right. It is shaped like a kidney bean! The closure crack seen down the side of the stem is another indicator of included bark.

Bark inclusion (Not a codominant stem!) Here is another example of included bark but it isn’t with a codominant stem! None the less, the two prominent indicators of weak structure are still evident. Notice the branch angle and the early development of elephant ears seen near the closure crack. The next slide is a close up.

Close-up of closure crack This slide shows a close-up of the closure crack. Notice that two ridges are beginning to form on either side of the crack. Remember that as the branch and stem grow radially, they are pushing against each other. The ridges are formed as the tree tries to spread the pressure from that pushing over a larger area. Those ridges are the initial stages of elephant ears.

What is good structure? Forest grown vs. open grown tree Codominant stems Good branch attachment Structurally sound tree This slide is an outline of what will be covered in this presentation. The goal is to show how trees develop if left to themselves. To demonstrate elements of poor structure vs. good structure – and to show how to recognize them. Finally, to briefly discuss a structurally sound tree.

Good branch attachment How does a BRANCH form? What are the indicators? What can we do to prevent weak unions? We need to understand how strong unions form and how to recognize them.

Branch bark ridge Some branch unions have a prominent branch bark ridge Bark not included Indicates solid branch union One indicator of a good branch attachment is a prominent branch bark ridge. It is formed on the upper side of the branch union. It is the result of new branch wood and new trunk wood pushing up into the union. It is different from the formation of elephant ears because the pushing occurs only at the surface so there is always room to the outside. Unlike a bark inclusion, there is no pressure pushing the branch from the trunk.

Collar No branch bark ridge Some trees never develop a branch bark ridge. Another indicator of a strong branch union is a swollen area at the base of the branch called the collar. The collar is the result of overlapping branch and trunk wood shown in previous slides.

Pine union Collar is visible as a swelling at the base of the branch Trunk growing around base of branch Region of wound healing elements Branch bark ridge (arrows) is visible as a dark, rough bark region on the top and sides of the union Some trees have both a collar and a branch bark ridge that are easy to see.

Wood orientation at union Note how trunk wood grows out onto the base of the branch (dotted line is edge of trunk wood) This slide reemphasizes the wood orientation at the union between a branch and the trunk.

This slide shows the formation of the branch union more clearly This slide shows the formation of the branch union more clearly. In the drawing on the left, the branch wood is brown and forms first each spring growing on top of last years trunk wood. The trunk wood is yellow and forms later in the spring overlapping the recently formed branch wood. The photos on the right show a strong branch union. The trunk has rotted away leaving only branch wood. The ridges are comprised of branch wood and are a result of the alternating growth of branch and trunk wood. The ridges of branch wood act like threads on a screw to secure the branch to the trunk. These ridges only form when the branch is much smaller than the trunk.

Desirable branch size We mentioned that codominant stems do not have the same wood orientation seen between branches and stems. The size of the branch in relation to the trunk has an affect on the formation of a collar. Notice that a visible collar is lost when branch diameter is greater than about half the diameter of the trunk it originates from.

The relationship between the diameter of a branch and the diameter of the trunk it originates from has been called the branch “Aspect ratio”. Branch aspect ratio is found by dividing the diameter of the branch by the diameter of the trunk. The most desirable branch aspect ratio is less than 0.5 as was demonstrated in the previous slide.

Strong union Weak union This slide sums up a number of the elements of good vs. bad structure. Notice the branch angle of the strong union vs. that of the weak union. Notice also the branch bark ridge of the strong union vs. the closure crack of the weak union indicating an bark inclusion. Also notice the aspect ratio of the strong union vs. that of the weak union. Do you think there is included bark in one of these two unions? Can you guess which one?

What is good structure? Forest grown vs. open grown tree Codominant stems Good branch attachment Structurally sound tree This slide is an outline of what will be covered in this presentation. The goal is to show how trees develop if left to themselves. To demonstrate elements of poor structure vs. good structure – and to show how to recognize them. Finally, to briefly discuss a structurally sound tree.

Structurally sound tree Scaffold branches spaced vertically Rule of thumb: about 5% of tree’s ultimate height Now that we’ve covered branch and stem attachment, we need to briefly mention whole tree structure. Branch spacing, both vertically and radially, is very important to good structure. Live Crown Ratio (L.C.R.) is also important, not only for structure but for the overall health of the tree. We can’t forget that good structure is only one piece of a very complex puzzle that, when solved, provides for large, healthy, and failure resistant trees in our urban environments.

Structurally sound tree Scaffold branches spaced radially None directly above another Now that we’ve covered branch and stem attachment, we need to briefly mention whole tree structure. Branch spacing, both vertically and radially, is very important to good structure. Live Crown Ratio (L.C.R.) is also important, not only for structure but for the overall health of the tree. We can’t forget that good structure is only one piece of a very complex puzzle that, when solved, provides for large, healthy, and failure resistant trees in our urban environments.

Structurally sound tree Consistently maintain 60% LCR Live Crown Ratio Now that we’ve covered branch and stem attachment, we need to briefly mention whole tree structure. Branch spacing, both vertically and radially, is very important to good structure. Live Crown Ratio (L.C.R.) is also important, not only for structure but for the overall health of the tree. We can’t forget that good structure is only one piece of a very complex puzzle that, when solved, provides for large, healthy, and failure resistant trees in our urban environments.

Live Crown Ratio (LCR) Total photosynthetic potential of a tree Ratio of the height of the crown to the total height of the tree The crown starts at where the first main branch(s) attach to the trunk Goes to the top of the tree.

Good structure

Stems too close together Trees with major branches or stems too close together can fail. The wood in the region of the union can not develop its normal strong connection when many stems are close together.

Water Sprouts Axillary buds that failed to produce a shoot within a year Remain in the bark tissue Also referred to as latent buds Held on by a thin layer of xylem wood

Water Sprouts Form during stress or severe reduction in foliage Rapid response to replace foliage Random pruning cuts

Suckers Root sprouts or sucker from certain species root systems No known control of suckers