Cognitive Linguistics Croft & Cruse 8 (through 8.3.5)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© Michael Lacewing Expression Michael Lacewing
Advertisements

AS Sociology Exam Technique.
AP Calculus Notes Section 1.2 9/5/07.
Idioms and exceptionality Nik Gisborne and Dick Hudson LAGB Leeds September 2010.
Communication Theory Lecture 1: Introduction to Communication Theory and Novel Technology Dr. Danaë Stanton Fraser.
Ron Chrisley COGS Department of Informatics University of Sussex
Conceptual change. Description of conceptual change The conceptual change process The representation of internal conceptual models Theories of conceptual.
UTILITY MAXIMIZATION AND CHOICE
Category Mistakes and Figurative Language Ofra Magidor University of Oxford.
Metaphor Comprehension Presenter : Quamrul Islam Khan Natural Language and Speech Processing.
Ambiguous contents? Arvid Båve, Higher seminar in Theoretical Philosophy, FLoV, Gothenburg University, 8 May 2013.
Cognitive Linguistics Croft & Cruse 9
Interpreting Empirical Research Results A Tutorial.
Cognitive Linguistics Croft & Cruse 6 A dynamic construal approach to sense relations I: hyponymy and meronymy.
DR PARASKEVI THOMOU UNIVERSITY OF CRETE Metonymy within metaphor: evidence from the Modern Greek Language.
Chapter 4 Number Theory.
LEARNING FROM OBSERVATIONS Yılmaz KILIÇASLAN. Definition Learning takes place as the agent observes its interactions with the world and its own decision-making.
Cognitive Linguistics Croft & Cruse 10 An overview of construction grammars (part 2, through end)
Cognitive Linguistics
LOCKE ON SUBSTANCE (Part 2 of 2) Text source: Essay Concerning Human Understanding, bk. 2 ch. 23.
Cognitive Linguistics Croft & Cruse 10 An overview of construction grammars (part 1, through )
Chapter 4 Number Theory. Terms Factors Divides, divisible, divisibility Multiple.
Philosophy 4610 Philosophy of Mind Week 5: Functionalism.
Cognitive level of Analysis
An investigation of Conservativity Tim Hunter Anastasia Conroy.
Human Language.
Linguistics 104 Language and conceptualization Instructor: Anne Sumnicht Jan 5, 2004.
Cognitive Linguistics Croft&Cruse
Chapter 6. Semantics is the study of the meaning of words, phrases and sentences. In semantic analysis, there is always an attempt to focus on what the.
Essay Reminders.
Functions and Graphs Chapter 1.2. Functions 2 Example 1: The Circle-Area Function 3.
LOGIC AND ONTOLOGY Both logic and ontology are important areas of philosophy covering large, diverse, and active research projects. These two areas overlap.
Ertner Daria Tyumen State University, Russia. Our research aims at analyzing the role of metaphor in poetry with the purpose of interpreting the metaphoric.
Aim: How do we recognize the comparisons being made by visual metaphors?
CAHSEE ELA Prep Lesson 3 Figurative Language Denotation and Connotation.
Worldwide Transport Educational Products For a Child.
COGNITIVE SEMANTICS: INTRODUCTION DANA RETOVÁ CSCTR2010 – Session 1.
Dr. Francisco Perlas Dumanig
Do these make any sense?. Navigation Moving the viewpoint as a cost of knowledge.
Just what conceptualizations are students forming? Hamide Dogan-Dunlap UTEP
Introduction to Film and Television Studies Formal analysis.
Idiomaticity and Translation in the Context of Contemporary Applied Linguistics. Zinaida Camenev, doctor conferenţiar, ULIM, Chişinău,Moldova Olga Pascari,
CSSE501 Object-Oriented Development. Chapter 10: Subclasses and Subtypes  In this chapter we will explore the relationships between the two concepts.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Sequences and Series.
PHILOSOPHY OF LANGUAGE Some topics and historical issues of the 20 th century.
Process of mapping between two different conceptual domains.
History and Core Concepts of Cognitive Linguistics Laura A. Janda
Cosmological arguments from contingency
Documenting Requirements
DnDAF security views.
Entry Task #1 – Date Self-concept is a collection of facts and ideas about yourself. Describe yourself in your journal in a least three sentences. What.
Computers and English Matt Barton
ILAUGH Model.
Structural relations Carnie 2013, chapter 4 Kofi K. Saah.
Theories of Altruism Contrast two theories of altruism.
The Law of Conservation of Matter/Mass
Sensation and Perception
Cognitive metaphor theory
What is good / bad about this answer?
Unit #1 Transformations
CULTURE AND CONCEPTUAL METAPHOR THEORY
EPM: Chs X & XI Pete Mandik Chairman, Department of Philosophy
Conceptual metaphor theory
Modern stylistics Analysis
Metaphor and emotion, again
Objectives Identify functions.
Semantics A presentation by Jaafar Nabeel
Some recent issues in conceptual metaphor theory
Data, Information, Knowledge, and Processing
Presentation transcript:

Cognitive Linguistics Croft & Cruse 8 (through 8.3.5) Metaphor

8.2 The conceptual theory of metaphor “…metaphorical meaning is not…a special kind of meaning: it is rather the case that metaphor is the result of a special process for arriving at, or construing, a meaning.” A metaphor is a mapping between conceptual domains Source domain: “the domain supporting the literal meaning of the expression” Target domain: “the domain the sentence is actually about”

8.2 The conceptual theory of metaphor, cont’d. TARGET DOMAIN IS SOURCE DOMAIN – this is the basic formula for metaphor Not everything from the source domain is relevant Some truly opaque idiomatic expressions might not be interpreted in terms of mapping (fly off the handle)

8.2 The conceptual theory of metaphor, cont’d. Invariance Hypothesis: Metaphorical mappings preserve the cognitive topology (that is, image-schematic structure) of the source domain. (Lakoff 1990, in CogLx 1)[Logic of heated fluid carries over to target of anger] Target domain overrides: we are constrained not to violate the image-schematic structure possessed by the non-image components of the target (Turner 1990, in CogLx 1) [target domain can prevent some ideas from holding, so give a kick doesn’t mean that you get to keep the kick]

8.3 Novel Metaphor The life history of a metaphor: Lakoff concentrates on conventionalized metaphors, but those have lost some of their interpretive properties – perhaps one should look at newly coined examples? How do we recognize metaphor – Lakoff insists that metaphor is so widespread and natural that it cannot be described as deviant. But Cruse points out that “it is not obvious how a metaphor can function if there is nothing perceptibly odd whatsoever about its literal construal”

8.3 Novel Metaphor, cont’d. Blending Theory and novel metaphors: Blending is when structures from two domains are combined to create new structure. Metaphor is actually a special type of blending. Notice that blending (& metaphor) create something new: This surgeon is a butcher implies incompetence, though that is not something inherited from either domain.

8.3 Novel Metaphor, cont’d. Context sensitivity: Novel metaphors involve domains that are construed in context Asymmetry of vehicle (aka source) and target: this remains to be satisfactorily explained