Hadronic recoil analysis:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sabino Meola Charged kaon group meeting 12 October 2005 Status of analysis.
Advertisements

New results from the CHORUS Neutrino Oscillation Experiment Pasquale Migliozzi CERN XXIX International Conference on High Energy Physics UBC, Vancouver,
14 Sept 2004 D.Dedovich Tau041 Measurement of Tau hadronic branching ratios in DELPHI experiment at LEP Dima Dedovich (Dubna) DELPHI Collaboration E.Phys.J.
MC Study of B°  S Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 06/27/01.
University of Gaziantep Department of Engineering Physics August 2006 Page 1/18 A.Beddall, A.Beddall and A. Bingül Department of Engineering Physics University.
Update on Tools FTK Meeting 06/06/06 Erik Brubaker U of Chicago.
Status report B  D 0 K  0 decay G.Calderini M.Carpinelli N.Neri BaBar Italia Capri 11 Apr 2003 INFN Pisa.
Search for B     with SemiExclusive reconstruction C.Cartaro, G. De Nardo, F. Fabozzi, L. Lista Università & INFN - Sezione di Napoli.
Takeo Higuchi Institute of Particle and Nuclear Studies, KEK Jan 21, 2004 Hawaii, USA Super B Factory Workshop Charged Higgs Search with B  D   
CC/NC SEPARATION STUDY Andy Blake Cambridge University Friday February 23 rd 2007.
Radiative and Rare B-Decays at BaBar All results are preliminary unless journal ref. is given limit values are 90% CL unless otherwise specified Carsten.
Preliminary Measurement of the BF(   → K -  0  ) using the B A B AR Detector Fabrizio Salvatore Royal Holloway University of London for the B A B AR.
A Method to measure  + /   detection efficiency asymmetry at LHCb Liming Zhang 08/15/07.
Identification of neutrino oscillations in the MINOS detector Daniel Cole
Measurement of the Branching fraction B( B  D* l ) C. Borean, G. Della Ricca G. De Nardo, D. Monorchio M. Rotondo Riunione Gruppo I – Napoli 19 Dicembre.
E. Devetak - LCWS t-tbar analysis at SiD Erik Devetak Oxford University LCWS /11/2008 Flavour tagging for ttbar Hadronic ttbar events ID.
Charmonium Production at BaBar Jamie Boyd University of Bristol Photon 2003, Frascati 7 th -11 th April 2003 On behalf of the Collaboration.
LCWS 2004, ParisSonja Hillert, University of Oxfordp. 1 Flavour tagging performance analysis for vertex detectors LCWS 2004, Paris Sonja Hillert (Oxford)
Rare B  baryon decays Jana Thayer University of Rochester CLEO Collaboration EPS 2003 July 19, 2003 Motivation Baryon production in B decays Semileptonic.
N  for 2012 Zhiyong Wang May, 12,2015 Charmonium group meeting 1.
Commissioning Studies Top Physics Group M. Cobal – University of Udine ATLAS Week, Prague, Sep 2003.
Mapping separation power Klaus Götzen GSI Darmstadt PID TAG Meeting 15. Feb
W JamboreeEric Lançon - ALEPH Week - January Jetset vs Herwig … Once more III Jetset vs Herwig on same selected events.
Kalanand Mishra April 27, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,
5/9/111 Update on TMVA J. Bouchet. 5/9/112 What changed background and signal have increased statistic to recall, signal are (Kpi) pairs taken from single.
1 What I did last year Nick Barlow Manchester Christmas meeting January 2005.
By Henry Brown Henry Brown, LHCb, IOP 10/04/13 1.
Mike HildrethEPS/Aachen, July B Physics Results from DØ Mike Hildreth Université de Notre Dame du Lac DØ Collaboration for the DØ Collaboration.
QCD Background Estimation From Data Rob Duxfield, Dan Tovey University of Sheffield.
Σ Eγ comparison using Woochun Park Univ of South Carolina Feb 26,
Kalanand Mishra June 29, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,
Kalanand Mishra February 23, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 decay Giampiero.
Elliptic flow of D mesons Francesco Prino for the D2H physics analysis group PWG3, April 12 th 2010.
Study of B s         Supreet Pal Singh Prof. Kajari Mazumdar Prof. J.B.Singh 1India-CMS Meeting 27th-28th.
Search for the decay with the BaBar detector at SLAC Hella Snoek Nikhef Monday Dec Part I One way of measuring γ Part II Analysis.
Mitchell Naisbit Manchester Jan2004 spectral function → a μ, α 1. Motivation Dominant uncertainty comes from experimentally determined hadronic loops:
Elisa manoni FastSim meeting January 21st, FastSim meeting, FastSim meeting, January 21st, 2010 Had Breco code: status report Elisa Manoni INFN.
Charm Form Factors from from B -Factories A. Oyanguren BaBar Collaboration (IFIC –U. Valencia)
Progress on Simulation Software Hai-Ping Peng(USTC) Xiao-Shuai Qin(IHEP) Xiao-Rong Zhou(USTC) Yu Hu(IHEP) 2014 STC Workshop (ITP) Hai-Ping Peng.
Elisa manoni SuperB meeting June 17, SuperB meeting, Physics + Computing session July 17, 2009 B reco studies in FastSim: status report Elisa Manoni.
Susanna Costanza - Pavia Group PANDA C.M., Stockholm – June 14, 2010
Feb. 4,2009 Jongseok Lee (Sungkyunkwan University)
Full Sim Status Estel Perez 27 July 2017.
Full Simulation Session SuperB General Meeting
Charmless Hadronic B Decays at BaBar
Erik Devetak Oxford University 18/09/2008
Inclusive Tag-Side Vertex Reconstruction in Partially Reconstructed B decays -A Progress Report - 11/09/2011 TDBC-BRECO.
EMC session, Annecy General Meeting
Matteo Negrini Frascati, Jan 19, 2006
fully reconstructed B’s in B-factory experiments
bwd EMC and fwd PID material
Global PID MICE CM43 29/10/15 Celeste Pidcott University of Warwick
Time-dependent analyses at D0-D0 threshold
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
Quarkonium production in ALICE
Lc+ Status Report Heavy Flavor Working Group
Analysis of BK(*) against
tt+jets simulation comparisons
DGWG session, Caltech general Meeting,
Reconstruction of short-lived resonances in pp collisions
Direct CP Violation in Observation of and search for
B  at B-factories Guglielmo De Nardo Universita’ and INFN Napoli
Data/ Monte Carlo comparisons for the EMC
Hadronic recoil analysis:
Samples and MC Selection
Geant4 in the BaBar Simulation
Analysis of BK(*) against
Search for Lepton Flavour Violation in the decay  → BaBar
Problems in π0 Reconstruction
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
Presentation transcript:

Hadronic recoil analysis: code status Elisa Manoni INFN Sez. Perugia FastSim session, Annecy general meeting March 18, 2010

PacHadRecoilUser code status code in V0.2.1 used for the February production limit the number of reconstructed Breco channels according to their purity (>50%) Breco mode classification: neat : purity > 80% clean : 50% < purity < 80% dirty : 8%<purity<50%clean + neat Available Bsig modes K* K , Ks()  , with e, , , (0), a1()

From Nov. to Febr. production: to do list To do list for the Nov. production: - bugs to be fixed: bad assignment of kaon lund for kaon coming from B  bug in PacPid now fixed multiple and identical Breco candidates fill R2 variable - add UsrVariable to separate infos from bwd and barrel+fwd emc - implement code for validation - documentation for wiki page

multiple Breco candidates events with ‘semi-identical’ breco candidates, i.e. same mES, DE, decayMode but different E*Breco only for modes with p0, i.e. BD*pp0, BDkp0ks related warning msg UsrWriteBSemiExcl::UsrWriteBRecoBase.hh(63):Cannot put mES = 5.25414 for candidate 0x12d1cff0 in the UsrCandBlock from BaBar-hn: two candidates considered as clones and candBlock.put( cand, mES ) fails ‘semi-identical’ candidates are not clones:  use different gammas to reconstruct the p0 (mES and DE should be different between the two); at ntuple level: the ith cand owns the UsrVariables (mES, DE,…) of the first no chance to fix this for the February production

February production two SuperB Detector Geometry used + BaBar geometry (and beams) to compare Fast Sim with BaBar Full Sim Generic samples (B+B-_generics, B0B0bar_generics, uds, ccbar) DG_BaBar: w background, 50million evts DG_3: w background (25M evts) + w/o background on (530M evts) D_4: w background on (28million evts) + background on (830M evts) Signal Samples: in this talk: - signal MC samples w bkg - generic MC samples w/o bkg

Fast Sim DG_BaBar vs BaBar Full Sim (I) SuperB FastSim: B+B-, B0B0bar, ccbar, uds MC samples B+K+nn, B+K*+nn, B0K*0nn signal MC samples BaBar beams and detector geometry BaBar FullSim (same code and same “skim” as in FastSim): B+B- : 49,766x103 gen. evts B0B0bar : 50,556x103 gen. evts ccbar : 83,974x103 gen. evts uds : 66,892x103 gen evts B+K+nn/B+K*+nn/B0K*0nn: 7,845/7,8510/6,282 x 103 gen evts Selection applied: at least one reconstructed Breco; if #Breco > 1, best candidate  |DE|min -0.09<∆E<0.05 GeV 5.270<mES<5.288 GeV/c2 Run3

Breco efficiencies, generic samples (I) = nsel/nbreco(purity >0.5, abs(charge)==0/1, pid requirements) (see back up for stat errors on efficiencies) neutral Breco B0B0bar BpBm ccbar uds FullSim FastSim mES cut 0.254 0.209 0.116 0.111 0.125 0.101 0.121 deltaE cut 0.223 0.184 0.093 0.091 0.088 0.081 0.087 Fast/Full 0.85 0.98 0.92 0.99 charged Breco B0B0bar BpBm ccbar FullSim FastSim mES cut 0.152 0.140 0.336 0.289 0.126 0.128 0.139 0.137 deltaE cut 0.118 0.110 0.309 0.241 0.089 0.090 0.096 0.094 Fast/Full 0.93 0.78 1.01 0.98 loosing efficiency in the “signal sample”: B0B0bar for neutral Breco and B+B- for charged Breco

Breco shapes, generic samples * FullSim _ FastSim mES and DE before the selection charged breco neutral breco

Mode by mode study; charged Breco (I) * FullSim _ FastSim

D kinematics plots for charged Breco samples slightly better agreement in the neutral * FullSim _ FastSim

B and D Daughters (I) charegd Breco * FullSim _ FastSim

B and D Daughters (II) charegd Breco * FullSim _ FastSim

Bsig efficiencies, signal samples B+K*+(Kp0) B+K*+(Ksp)

Bsig shapes: signal MC samples (I)

Bsig shapes: signal MC samples (II) B+K*0

Conclusion and Outlook Hadronic Breco code in quite good shape background and signal MC samples produced during Feb. Production ntuples analyzed for DG and physics studies quite good agreement between Fast Sim and Full Sim both for signal and generic samples: some investigation on D kinematics and neutral reconstruction needed still some work to do to fix bugs, add Bsig channels (BK(*)ll, BK(*)g?), add validation tools and documentation Higher statistics generic and signal samples (w bkg mixing) needed for physiscs studies (i.e. background impact on neutral energy reconstruction)

Back-up slides