Margaret Koulikova1, William Colocho+

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Bates XFEL Linac and Bunch Compressor Dynamics 1. Linac Layout and General Beam Parameter 2. Bunch Compressor –System Details (RF, Magnet Chicane) –Linear.
Advertisements

UCLA The X-ray Free-electron Laser: Exploring Matter at the angstrom- femtosecond Space and Time Scales C. Pellegrini UCLA/SLAC 2C. Pellegrini, August.
P. Skopintsev1,2,3, A. Singer1, J. Bach4, L. Müller1, B. Beyersdorff2, S. Schleitzer1, O. Gorobtsov1, A. Shabalin1, R.P. Kurta1, D. Dzhigaev1,5, O.M. Yefanov1,
Transverse Profiling of an Intense FEL X-Ray Beam Using a Probe Electron Beam Patrick Krejcik SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
The Next Generation Light Source Test Facility at Daresbury Jim Clarke ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory Ultra Bright Electron Sources Workshop, Daresbury,
Status of ECLOUD Simulations for the Shielded Button Measurements
MESH Crystal Injectors
The Electromagnetic Spectrum High Harmonic Generation
Mathematical Derivation of Probability
Jonathan Donkers1, Lin Zhang1+
Measuring the Thickness of Cryosheet Jets
Madhu Karra1, Jason Koglin1,2
Sentiment Analysis and Data visualization Techniques of Experiments
Complications and Troubleshooting
Image Processing For Soft X-Ray Self-Seeding
Structure and Function: Ubiquitination of NEMO and Optineurin
Welcome! To the ETS – Create Client Account & Maintenance
Characterizing Optics with White-Light Interferometry
Matter in Extreme Conditions at LCLS:
Kevin Shimbo1, Matt Hayes+
X-Ray Shielding Introduction Application Research Conclusions
Crystallography images
Hutch 4 (XCS) Laser System
Anomaly Detection LCLS data: Introduction Research Conclusion
MAKING WAY FOR LCLS II HERRIOTT CELL IGNIS THE NEED FOR LCLS-II
A remote EPICS monitoring tool
EASE: Alert Management
Designing and Prototyping Optics Table and Shelves
Managing Diffraction Beam
Integration of Blu-Ice into
Effects of Wrapping Vacuum
Scintillation Material Encapsulation Fixture
LCLS CXI Sample Chambers and Engineering Solutions
Values to Normalize Data
Designing a molecular probe for detection
LAMP Vacuum System Documentation
G6PD Complex Structural Study Crystallization Setup
Your Name, Elias Catalano, Robert Sublett, Robin Curtis
Determining a Detector’s Saturation Threshold
HXRSD Helium Enclosure
Crystallography Labeling Using Machine Learning
IT Inventory and Optimization
Structural study of soluble ammonia monooxygenase
Creation and development of a PRP database
IT Inventory and Optimization
Electro Optic Sampling of Ultrashort Mid-IR/THz Pulses
LCLS Instrument Development
LCLS-II-HE FEL Facility Overview
Analytical Solutions for Heat Distribution in KB Mirror Systems
Repeatability Test of Attocube Piezo Stages
Analytical Solutions for Temperature
Barron Montgomery1,2, Christopher O’Grady2, Chuck Yoon2, Mark Hunter2+
Elizabeth Van Campen, Barrack Obama2, Stephen Curry1,2, Steve Kerr2+
Advanced Methods of Klystron Phasing
Ryan Dudschus, Alex Wallace, Zachary Lentz
Jennifer Hoover1, William Colocho2
LCLS Commissioning Parameters
LCLS-II-HE FEL Facility Overview
X-Ray Spectrometry Using Cauchois Geometry For Temperature Diagnostics
Non-user time 2/7 of total
Redesigning of The SED Calendars
Automatic compression control for the LCLS injector laser
Russell Edmonds1, Matt Hayes2+ 1LCLS Summer Research Intern
Prototype and Design of High-Speed X-Ray Chopper
Title of Your Poster Introduction Research Conclusions Acknowledgments
Reconstruction algorithms Challenges & Future work
LCLS Commissioning Parameters
Z. Huang LCLS Lehman Review May 14, 2009
Two-bunch self-seeding for narrow-bandwidth hard x-ray FELs
Presentation transcript:

Margaret Koulikova1, William Colocho+ FEL Performance Plots Margaret Koulikova1, William Colocho+ 1LCLS Intern 2Linac Coherent Light Source, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, 2575 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA. +Contact: colocho@slac.stanford.edu Introduction The second part of this project incorporates google charts to create plots with range sliders that the user can interact with. Users are able to select the ranges of parameters that interest them. It is of great importance for LCLS users to be aware and informed of the free electron laser’s performance when altering various parameters since these changes can affect their own runs. LCLS pulse intensity will vary week to week and can be affected by other beam parameters such as election energy, electron bunch length, and electron beam charge. Knowing the restrictions and bounds that are necessary for their own experiment, a user may ask for the expected pulse intensity given these three predetermined parameters. It would be useful to estimate the expected pulse intensity based on the other three parameters. Keywords: free electron laser, performance, pulse intensity Figure 2: An example of data plotted from the current run, Run 15. Data is binned into four separate bins by charge (0.165 nC to 0.210 nC in this particular graph). The color of each point reflects the electron bunch length (fs) at a specific energy (eV) and intensity (mJ). Research Background Figure 4: In the following plot, users are able to choose the range of energy, pulse intensity, charge, and year of the data they want to see plotted. Conclusions Figure 1: A screenshot of the control room LCLS summary display. Here, one can see how the FEL performs when certain parameters are varied. Figure 3: In the following plot, data is first binned by charge then energy (bin length is 200 eV). Users are shown the mean and maximum pulse intensity for each energy bunch. One standard deviation from the mean is also shown. It is important for users to have access to information about the free electron laser’s performance. This information may strongly affect how they choose to run their own experiments. The plots presented here are fairly specific and can certainly be altered. For instance the size of energy and charge bins can be changed. Furthermore, as there are multiple parameters to consider, different graphs can be created that present more (or less) parameters but give a better presentation of data depending on what users find most important to know. In the future, it would be helpful if a similar analysis is done for experiments run on LCLS II when it begins operating. The FEL can operate within the energy ranges of 280 eV and 11.2 keV. Resulting pulse intensities vary accordingly between 1 - 3 mJ. Further details and technical capabilities of proposed experiments depend on the available LCSL instruments. Each instrument is unique in creating the necessary environment for a particular experiment. While LCLS is in operation, data about the energy, peak current, electron bunch length, pulse intensity and electron beam charge at different time intervals is recorded. Goal: Show FEL performance that is dependent on four parameters including time. LCLS operates in “run” periods. In between runs it undergoes maintenance and upgrades, so it is reasonable to allow users to access data when it is grouped by runs. Furthermore, users request a certain electron beam charge during their laser beam time so data is then binned by this parameter. Figure 2 and Figure 3 allow users to observe the trend in pulse intensity when altering other parameters. Users are now able to access this information and go through all the data up to the very first run. Acknowledgments Use of the Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS), SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, is supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-76SF00515. Special thanks to William Colocho for being a wonderful mentor. Figure 4: Screen shot of the web page presenting all plots, organized by successive run periods. Date: 08/28/2017