Determination of Eligibility 5/4/16

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Eligibility and Standards James Garrison Arizona State Historic Preservation Officer.
Advertisements

Historic Preservation Tax Credits The Process and Avoiding Common Problems National Park Service, Technical Preservation Services.
NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT of 1966 as amended Garry J. Cantley Regional Archeologist Bureau of Indian Affairs.
INTERNATIONAL CHARTER FOR THE CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION OF MONUMENTS AND SITES THE VENICE CHARTER.
The National Register of Historic Places. NOT THE: National Historic Registry National Historic Registry Historical List Historical List Historical Registry.
IDENTIFYING & EVALUATING HISTORIC PROPERTIES NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES –CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION HISTORIC.
SAN JUAN BAUTISTA THIRD STREET HISTORIC DISTRICT PROPERTY OWNERS INFORMATIONAL MEETING October 7, 2008.
Woodland-Larchmere Commercial Historic District Cleveland, Shaker Heights, Cuyahoga County, Ohio National Register Public Hearing May 21, 2015 Barbara.
URBAN CHARACTER ANALYSIS. Identifies key things that make up the qualities of an urban area Identifies key things that make up the qualities of an urban.
The Preservation Principles of the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Historic Preservation Projects David W. Look, FAIA, FAPT National Park Service.
Federal Preservation Activities: Part 1. What did With Heritage So Rich (1965) and the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 provide to administer.
Historic Tax Credit Basics : BRAC National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior.
Ohio Historic Preservation Office
Land Use Study for the Community of Winchester May 21, 2012.
Historic Rehabilitation Tax Credits Federal Incentives for Preservation.
Chapter 9 Exterior Design Factors. 2 Links for Chapter 9 Site Considerations Design Basics The Design Process.
City Council 2642 Second Street Appeal of Landmarks Commission Approval of Certificate of Appropriateness 07CA-009 February 12, 2008.
HRB Meeting June 9, 2015 City Council Remand of AP 14-02/ZC
Establishing and Managing Historic Districts
Shireen Abdelrahman Lecture 5. Individual development projects - new construction, expansion, or renovation - can affect the surrounding environment in.
Mr. Green ANALYZING ART.  Responding to, interpreting meaning, and making critical judgments about specific works of art  Art critics help viewers perceive,
Procedures and Processes Phase II: Evaluation CRM Phases I-III This presentation uses materials taken from Ricardo Elia’s Cultural Resources Archaeology.
An architectural evaluation method for conservation of traditional dwellings Basak Ipekoglu.
Nadine Peterson Preservation Planner NH Division of Historical Resources Lynne E. Monroe Preservation Company Christopher W. Closs Christopher W. Closs.
#oldhousefair Old v/s Historic What is historic anyway? Melissa Wyllie.
Planning and Community Development Department Grove Manor Apartments S. Orange Grove Boulevard Application for Landmark Designation City Council.
The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Historic Preservation.
National Historic Districts And Why Taylor Should Be Among Them.
Planning Department 897 Summit Avenue Application for Designation as a Historic Landmark City Council October 15, 2012.
Historic Preservation in Washington, DC. Purposes of the D.C. Historic Preservation Law Protect, enhance and perpetuate the distinctive elements of the.
Historical Resources SURVEY SAVVY Marie Nelson State Historian II OHP-Survey/CLG Coordinator Sep 07 – Chico.
West Linn Historic Resources and Architectural Styles Overview March 17, 2015.
Historic Review Board Continued Public Hearing: DR – th St. October 20, 2015.
Restoration is defined as the act or process of accurately depicting the form, features, and character of a property as it appeared at a particular period.
The Preservation Process. Sequence of Preservation actions 1. Setting standards or criteria that define what is worth preserving. 2. Undertaking a survey.
Cultural Resources office — St. Louis Planning & Urban Design Agency an introduction.
1 City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Historic Landmarks Commission Type II Appeal of Denial LU HDZ – 2327.
Suzanne Derrick Technical Director – Cultural Resources FCC Section 106 Process and the Archeology of Tower Siting Panelist Presentation May 4, 2016.
CITY PLANNING ACADEMY HISTORIC PRESERVATION CITY OF SACRAMENTO PRESERVATION OFFICE Community Development Department March 23, 2016.
1 City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Historic Landmarks Commission Type II Appeal of Approval LU HDZ –
The National Register. The National Register of Historic Places The National Register of Historic Places is authorized by Section 101 (a)(1)(A)of the.
Architectural Survey and National Register Nominations City of Hampton Project Update January 23, 2008.
Planning & Community Development Department 180 South Euclid Avenue Demolition of Existing Structure Consolidated Design Review (Appeal) City Council June.
Historic Districts Chapter 8 ARCH A Historic District is: – A geographically definable area—urban or rural, large or small—possessing a significant.
National Treasures: Brownfields and the National Historic Preservation Act Brownfields 2006 Boston, MA.
Analyzing Art Mr. Green.
Proposed Thorndike-Madrillo Landmark District Public Hearing
Proposed Rose Villa-Oakdale Landmark District Public Hearing
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project FERC Project No February 26, 2008.
Appeal of Technical Denial of Landmark Designation
Application for Landmark Designation S
760 South Arroyo Boulevard Lansing Beach House
CONSERVATION IMPORTANCE AND TYPES.
1211 Wellington Avenue Application for Landmark Designation
Proposed Magnolia Landmark District Public Hearing
Application for Designation as a Historic Landmark
Proposed South Grand-Covington Place Landmark District Public Hearing
Constructed c.1932 Designated as a Master Plan Historic Site in 1979 Significant for commercial and social history related to the Depression A unique.
1600 San Pasqual Street Application for Landmark Designation
2480 Oswego Street Application for Landmark Designation
Determination of Eligibility 6/21/17
Determination of Eligibility 2/20/19
Determination of Eligibility 3/21/18
Browne’s Addition Local Historic District Plan Commission Workshop #1
National Historic Preservation Act
Determination of Eligibility 2/20/19
Historic Tax Credit Basics : BRAC
The Statement of Significance: Format and Content
SALVATION ARMY BUILDING
Browne’s Addition Local Historic District Overlay Zone Spokane Historic Landmarks Commission Final Public Hearing August 28, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Determination of Eligibility 5/4/16 Mayfair Café Building - 202 S. Washington Street

Determination of Eligibility mayfair café – 202 S washington At the request of a potential purchaser, the SHLC will: Hearing Purpose: Per 17D.040.230, SHLC Determines Eligibility Standards Used: Per 17D.040.230, National Register – 36 CFR 60 Outcome: Eligible or Ineligible for National Register

Downtown boundary area 17D.040.230 Subject property

To Be Eligible Under 36 CFR 60 a Property Must: Meet basic guidelines for age and resource category Be associated with an important historic context Retain historic integrity of those features necessary to convey its significance. Source: National Register Bulletin 15: How To Apply The National Register Criteria for Evaluation

Age and Resource Category Eligible Resource Category: “A property must be classified as a district, site, building, structure or object” The properties qualify as a “Building” Eligible Age: “Ordinarily…properties that have achieved significance within the past 50 years shall not be considered eligible for the National Register.” Source: National Register Bulletin 15: How To Apply The National Register Criteria for Evaluation

Age Criteria The property at 202 S. Washington was built in 1890 and 1911 and meets the 50 year age criteria.

202 S. Washington street

202 S. Washington street

202 S. Washington street

Eligibility: Criterion A or B A. That are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; or B. That are associated with the lives of significant persons in or past (NPS Bulletin 15). A - The building at 202 S. Washington Street lacks sufficient integrity to be listed under Criterion A for its former association with the saloon and tavern business in Spokane B – The building is not associated with a significant person in Spokane’s history, thus not eligible under B

Eligibility: Criterion C A property important for illustrating a particular architectural style or construction technique must retain most of the physical features that constitute that style or technique. A property that has lost some historic materials or details can be eligible if it retains the majority of the features that illustrate its style in terms of the massing, spatial relationships, proportion, pattern of windows and doors, texture of materials, and ornamentation. The property is not eligible, however, if it retains some basic features conveying massing but has lost the majority of the features that once characterized its style (NPS Bulletin 15). The building at 202 S. Washington Street has lost nearly all of the physical features that were present when constructed. The building has lost two of three stories; its original windows; its original cladding; entries have been moved, etc. This loss of integrity of materials leaves the building ineligible for listing on the National Register under Criterion C for its architecture.

Integrity Location Design Setting Materials Workmanship Feeling Association

Bulletin 15 The evaluation of integrity is sometimes a subjective judgment, but it must always be grounded in an understanding of a property's physical features and how they relate to its significance.

Character Defining Features Loss of two upper stories Covering up of original cladding with fieldstone (later painted) and T111 Main entry relocated All windows replaced – and not in original openings Interior significantly altered Banquettes and booths removed Lighting changed Flooring and wall materials altered “Ultimately, the question of integrity is answered by whether or not the property retains the identity for which it is significant.” (NR Bulletin 15)

NPS Bulletin 15 “Properties eligible under Criteria A, B, and C must not only retain their essential physical features, but the features must be visible enough to convey their significance.” The Mayfair Café no longer retains its essential physical features

NPS Bulletin 15 “A basic integrity test for a property associated with an important event or person is whether a historical contemporary would recognize the property as it exists today.” Doubtful!

Summary Property is an Eligible Resource Category? Yes Property is an Eligible Age? Fit Within a Historic Context? No Integrity?

Staff Recommendation The building at 202 S. Washington is not eligible for listing on the National Register based on the National Register Criteria for Evaluation (36 CFR 60). The property has lost nearly all of its integrity and no longer conveys five of the seven aspects of integrity: design, materials, workmanship, feeling, or association.