Assessment of the correlation between GAGs and T2 relaxation time using an MR imager Melissa Haehn, Can Pi, Benjamin Sprague, Andrea Zelisko – UW-Madison.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New imaging strategies in Degenerative Disease of the Intervertebral Disks Functional Spine Imaging.
Advertisements

MRI- Magnetic resonance imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
MRI Phillip W Patton, Ph.D..
PHYSICS OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE
MR Airway Pressure Device Group Members Laura Sheehan Kevin Johnson Jon Cappel Noelle Simatic Client Dr. Victor Haughton Advisor Prof. Mitch Tyler.
The Effect of Unpaired Electrons of Metal Ions on the Relaxivity of Hydrogen Atoms INTRODUCTION This experiment was performed to determine the effect of.
The importance of MRI, a few numbers  MRI units worldwide in 2003  75 millions scans per year performed  Constant need for over 1000 MRI technologists.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Restricted © Siemens AG 2013 All rights reserved.siemens.co.uk/education Topic 15: A peep inside Siemens Education.
Equipment Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan requires the use of a very strong magnetic field. Unlike other devices used in radiology, MR imaging.
ELEG 479 Lecture #9 Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Basic principles of MRI This lecture was taken from “Simply Physics” Click here to link to this site.
MAGENETIC RESONANCE IMAGINING T2, T5, T7.
MRI: an Introduction By Mohammad Ali Ahmadi Pajouh Amirkabir University of Technology Biomedical Eng. Dep.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) By Isabelle! and sofia and ronaldo.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Astounding. The MRI magnet and patient table The operator’s console.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging 4
Principles of Magnetic Resonance
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Prof. Dr. Moustafa. M. Mohamed Dr. Eng. Safa Ahmed El-Askary
Magnetic Material Engineering. Chapter 6: Applications in Medical and Biology Magnetic Material Engineering.
Medical Imaging Systems: MRI Image Formation
September, 2003BME 1450 Introduction to NMR 1 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) is a phenomenon discovered about 60 years ago.
Applications of Quantum Physics
How Science Affects People’s Lives  Health  Medical Imaging  X-Rays  C(A)T [Computerized (Axial) Tomography] Scanning  PET [Positron Emission Tomography]
Laser Treated Metallic Probes for Cancer Treatment in MRI Systems July 08, Advance Materials Processing and Analysis Center (AMPAC) Department of.
MRI Physics Dr Mohamed El Safwany, MD.. MRI Magnetic Resonance Imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Missy Haehn, Can Pi, Ben Sprague, Andrea Zelisko Advisor: Professor Kristyn Masters Client: Dr. Victor Haughton In order to meet a client’s needs for research.
BME1450 Intro to MRI February 2002 The Basics The Details – Physics The Details – Imaging.
V.G.Wimalasena Principal School of Radiography
Introducing cross- sectional imaging Dr.Ahmed S. Tawfeek FIBMS(Rad.)
A Phantom for use in an MR Imager BME 400 October 14, 2005.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Glenn Pierce, King’s College London, Department of Physics Introduction Edward Purcell and Felix Bloch were both awarded the.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) by Alex Kiss. Introduction 1946: MRI science was developed independently by Felix Bloch and Edward Purcell 1952: both.
MRI Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Definition A non-ionizing technique with full three dimensional capabilities, excellent soft-tissue contrast, and high.
Brain Imaging Techniques
 This depends on a property of nuclei called spin.  Gyroscope: Principle: As long as its disc remains spinning rapidly the direction of the spin axis.
Abstract Motivation Background Experimental Methods/Results Future Work References Acknowledgements Neal Haas Peter Kleinschmidt Anne Loevinger Luisa Meyer.
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING by PRADEEP V.EPAKAYAL. Mem.no L.
Medical Resonance Imaging MRI. First medical images: X-rays Discovered in 1895 Images of bones What part of the body is this?
Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy Photographer: Dr R Campbell.
Medical Resonance Imaging
Medical physics AMMAR ALHASAN University of Central Florida
Lesson 17 Atomic Number and Mass
Lesson Plan MRI Scan Experience
Sunday Case of the Day Physics
How MRI Works Connor Schentag.
3Texas Back Institute Research Foundation, Plano, TX, USA
5-3 Logarithmic Functions
MRI Gradient Coils Peter Kleinschmidt, Luisa Meyer, Anne Loevinger, Neal Haas Client: Orhan Unal, Ph.D. Dept. of Medical Physics, Krishna Kurpad, Ph.D.
A Phantom for use in an MR Imager
5-3 Logarithmic Functions
MRI Pulse Sequences: IR, EPI, PC, 2D and 3D
Radiation Health Physics
Basic MRI I Chapter 3 Notes.
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Lesson Plan MRI Scan Experience
Lesson Plan MRI Scan Experience
MRI: From Protons to Pixels
Magnetic Resonance Imaging [MRI]
How MRI Works By Wesley Eastridge, adapted from and with illustrations from The Basics of MRI by Joseph P. Hornak, Ph.D.
Lesson Plan MRI Scan Experience
The Cognitive Science Approach
Functional Neuroimaging: a window on the working human brain
MECH 373 Instrumentation and Measurement
(4)ELECTRONIC SUPPORT SYSTEM
Arati Sridharan, Chetan Patel, Jit Muthuswamy 
Presentation transcript:

Assessment of the correlation between GAGs and T2 relaxation time using an MR imager Melissa Haehn, Can Pi, Benjamin Sprague, Andrea Zelisko – UW-Madison BME 402 Advisor: Kristyn Masters, PhD; Client: Victor Haughton, MD – UW-Madison Hospital – Dept. Neuroradiology Abstract To determine a correlation between glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) and T2 relaxation time by using magnetic resonance imaging. Gelatin hydrogels, of varying gelatin content, were created to study the affect of GAGs on T2 relaxation time. Chondroitin sulfate was added in increasing amounts to the gelatin samples between 9% and 23% to determine the T2 of different levels of GAGs. The gels were tested in a GE Signa Excite 1.5 T MR scanner using a QID sequence developed at the University of Wisconsin. Analyzing the data revealed a negative correlation between the amounts of GAGs in the sample to T2 relaxation time. Figure 5: GAG concentration vs T2 measurement – During the 2nd Scan of Test Round 2, 24 samples were scanned in the MR scanner and a strong relationship was revealed. This graph shows the inclusion of the 0.5g GAG data, which did not greatly alter the linear fit or R2 value. Motivation Our client, Dr. Victor Haughton, is a neuroradiologist at the UW-Hospital with research interests in dynamic spine MR imaging. Figure 4: The 3-dimensional computer modeling of the phantom – The phantom was designed considering distance between the sample and the MR coil, amount of water loading, and maximal elimination of artifact. Figure 3: Scan image of phantom containing Gd samples of same concentration Figure 6: Change in T2 measurement due to change in chondroitin sulfate – The comparison of T2 values belonging to samples containing differing amounts of chondroitin sulfate (weight per weight percentage) showed the trend of increasing T2 with decreasing chondroitin sulfate percent. Figure 1: The goals of this project involve disk research and assessment of the MR scanner’s accuracy. Verification Experiments Due to much variation in gel testing, it was important to verify the accuracy of the MR scanner and a set of uniform gadolinium doped water samples were created for testing in the MR. Gadolinium doped water solutions of T2 = 38ms created Scanned in MR using the head coil Very little intra-phantom variation found, T2 values ranging from 32 to 44 ms Discussion of Results Conclusions from correlations: Strong linear correlation between chondroitin sulfate concentration and T2 hints that GAGs are interacting with water in way to minimize spin. Decrease in slope of GAG-T2 relationship with increase of gelatin weight/weight percent shows that gelatin also interacts with water in way to minimize spin. Hypothesize that a decrease in gelatin percentage leaves more water suspended in matrix to be affected by the GAG concentration. Possible causes of variability: Absence of difference in Test Round 3 between 5% GAG and other GAG samples made at later time shows 5% gel did not change over time. Similarity of two test rounds of phantom and Gadolinium samples shows that MR scanner should be consistent between two scan occurrences. Similarity between consecutive scans show consistency possible between scans Because of testing limitations, speculate difference in temperature of gels at time of scans is source of variability. Conclusions about gel composition: GAG-H2O relationship shown in samples is inverse of relationship seen in intervertebral discs in body. Only chondroitin sulfate used in gels, intervertebral discs have several types of GAGs Further proof evidence that samples not a physiologic model of intervertebral discs Future Work Despite the great deal of work on this project, there is further research which could be conducted to advance this area of disk and MR research. Imaging of cadaver disks – researcher contact formed Additional scans of gadolinium samples to assess effect of coils Further scans of gelatin samples to generate more data, reliability Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Magnetic resonance imaging (MR imaging) is an imaging modality that uses the spin of hydrogen nuclei for visualizing the inside of human bodies. Hydrogen nuclei aligned by powerful magnet -Figures 1 and 2 illustrate this alignment and nuclei spin Radio frequency (RF) pulse is applied perpendicular to magnetic field After RF turned off, hydrogen nuclei realign with magnetic field and emit energy Time to realign is T1 value, exponential decay of signal is T2 value Table 1: Results of gadolinium scans showing little intra-phantom variation within the MR scanner when using the head coil. It was also deemed important to assess the variation in T2 measurement due to the use of different coils. Set of gels scanned in MR using head and spine coils Variation between the two occurred Significant signal lost in samples furthers from the spine coil Head coil led to equal signal distribution throughout the phantom Figures 1 (left) and 2 (right): The alignment and spin, respectively, of hydrogen atoms in a magnetic field. Hydrogel Preparation and Selection From the testing, we chose to use gelatin gels with the lowest T2 Targeted T2 was between 50 and 150 ms and so we made gels between 9 and 23% (wt/wt %) -Sodium Azide added as a preservative GAGs added in increasing amounts -0.2, 0.5 and 0.8 grams chondroitin sulfate -used chondroitin sulfate A from bovine trachea cell Gel Testing Results Scans with plain gelatin and gelatin with GAGs were performed on two days and a MATLAB program was used to analyze the results Magnitude of T2­ values increased between the two days -Maybe due to conditions of scan -Still maintained the same trend Data shows that GAGs had a lowering effect on T2 (R2 values) -See Figure 5 -At the higher gelatin weights, GAGs had less of an effect as indicated by slope -0.5g gel data and inclusion explanation Compared change in T2 with respective change in GAGs -Change in T2 is greater when change in GAG is greater -Positive correlation -See Figure 6 Spinal Anatomy and Imaging Disks act as cushions between vertebrae Disks degenerate with age due to decreased water and blood flow Health problems include back pain, pinched nerves, muscle spasms MR’s high proton sensitivity proves superior image quality to X-ray Phantom A phantom was designed and constructed specifically for the needs of this project. Since the primary goal was to assess how GAGs affect T2 measurement, a phantom that eliminated the differences within the magnetic field was desired. Varying distance from MR coil – 2.75 to 13.75 cm Symmetric design for easy scanning in a single plane Volume of 2.5 L for adequate loading Friction fit tubes to eliminate material artifact Made of acrylic Constructed at UW Mechanical Engineering Lab Acknowledgements UW-Madison Hospital - Dr. Victor Haughton, Dr. P. Anderson, Dr. R. Patel, Kelli Hellenbrand UW-BME Dept. – Prof. K. Masters, Prof. W. Block UW-Engr. Manufacturing Lab – Todd Kile UW-Medical Physics Dept. – Prof. E. Madsen, M. Hobsen, J. Perry