MPO’s School Transportation Working Group

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jordan School District Board of Education Boundary Recommendation for New Middle School in Herriman November 27, 2012 Teri Timpson, Administrator of Schools,
Advertisements

Pinellas by Design: A Blueprint for Updating the Countywide Plan Pinellas Planning Council May 18, 2011.
Infinite Campus: Parent Portal Training Jesse Rice Elementary September 18, 2014.
Rezoning Study -Committee Meeting 2- November 15, 2011.
1 PROPOSED ATTENDANCE BOUNDARIES FOR HERITAGE AND NEEDHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS LODI UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION MEETING APRIL 6, 2010.
Office of Portfolio Management May 16, 2013 District 30 Middle School Rezoning.
UNIT 5 REDISTRICTING COMMUNITY FORUM mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.
Office of Portfolio Management September 22, 2011 Draft of Rezoning presented to CEC D2.
Nina Taylor Research and Analysis Division Texas Education Agency.
1 Middle School Admissions Process Office Of Student Enrollment Fall 2009.
SAN MARCOS SCHOOL DISTRICT RECOMMENDED ATTENDANCE AREA REVISIONS
- 0 - Community Forums OUSD School Admissions and Attendance Boundary Policies Spring 2008.
Space Utilization Project Chandler Unified School District 2010.
Analysis of Salvador and El Centro School Boundaries SEPTEMBER 16, 2015.
Walton County School District 5-Year Facilities Work Plan
Roster Verification RV Presentation to School Administrators Spring 2012.
Coursework Completion System September 9, 2010 Welcome Impact on PI-1215 Who is Reported? District Checklist for CWCS Timeline Training Opportunities Future.
Iredell-Statesville Attendance Line Review Spring Area Advisory Meetings.
2008 Lamar CISD Thomas Elementary Meeting Agenda January 12, 2009  Welcome - Representatives from Campbell Elementary, Wessendorff MS, Dickinson.
11 School Board Monitoring Report: Capacity Update Arlington Public Schools April 29, 2010.
Tuscany Public Participation Meeting St. Basil Elementary and Junior High School Wednesday, March 4, 2009.
DRAFT Inman Middle School Community Conversation February 19, 2015.
Special Board Study Session Attendance Parameters January 14, 2013 Larkspur - Corte Madera School District Special Board Study Session Attendance Parameters.
MAY 10, 2010 Redistricting Proposal. Committee Members Bill Long Beau Barrett Becky Edlin Larry Heydon Robert Hill Susan Mullendore* Jeff Rayner Tonya.
DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION ONLY Student Reassignment Survey Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools October 1 – November 1, 2012.
OCTOBER 15, 2015 SCHOOL CONSOLIDATION & REDISTRICTING Dr. Karen M. Couch, Superintendent Ron Kauffman, RK Educational Planning, LLC.
1 Clayton Elementary Relief for Community Outreach Meeting February 17, :30 p.m.
Opening of Schools Report Opening of Schools Report Fall Housing Counts: Actuals vs. Projections All numbers are as of 9/30/08 6,294 students.
Opening of Schools Report Information Services October 15, 2007.
Planning for Increased Enrollment Community Engagement Meetings May -June /21/20161.
Attendance Zone Realignment Process Fall 2014 Approved by TISD Board of Trustees 12/09/
The Rezoning Process CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG PLANNING.
Student Assignment Analysis for the Lexington Public Schools Public Forum & School Committee Workshop March 16, 2016.
Presentation to Board of Education 1 August 2014 Facilities Capital Plan Board of Education August 4, 2014 Stakeholder Engagement and Communications Services.
BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS AND EDUCATION HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS MPO SCHOOL TRANSPORTATION WORKING GROUP
Clay County School Concurrency Program January 18, 2007.
Hillsborough County Public School Siting MPO SCHOOL TRANSPORTATION WORKING GROUP
Opportunity Scholarship Program (OSP) Section , Florida Statutes.
Data Collections Conference September 2010 Lou Ferretti & Jim Milliman
High School Application Process School Year
Community Development Department April 3, 2017
Dadeschools Mobile App
Programming Assignment #1
Welcome to the Nevada Test Administration Training and Q&A Session
Enrollment Counts Instructions for Designee
Welcome to Back-to-School Night!
2018 School Performance Scores
Parent/Community Meeting March 13, 2018 Presented by:
Community Development Department April 3, 2017
MPO School Transportation Working Group
Community Development Department May 2, 2016
Dublin Unified School District
Hillsborough MPO School Safety Study
Student Assignment Advisory Committee
Ohio Deans Compact Brenda Haas
School Concurrency Requirement that public school facilities necessary to maintain the adopted level of service are in place prior to or concurrent with.
Your session will begin shortly
DRAFT Buffer Zone Policy
Climate Surveys.
Rezoning Proposal Fall 2019
Colorado Department of Education Data Collections / ADE Unit
Starting Community Conversations
Fall 2018 Elementary School Boundary Process: Superintendent’s Recommendation (To take effect September 2019) November 8, 2018.
Preview of Moore County Board of Education
Scheduling Information Night
Non-Resident Tuition Exception
East Windsor – Forest Glade Area
Recommendations for Schools of Choice School Year
Community Development Department May 2, 2016
Community Development Department April 3, 2017
Presentation transcript:

MPO’s School Transportation Working Group 6.28.2017 Hillsborough County Public Schools Process for Attendance Boundary Changes MPO’s School Transportation Working Group 6.28.2017

What Prompts an Attendance Boundary Change? Residential Growth Over Utilization & Underutilization School Closures (MOSI) New School Openings Conversions & Programmatic Note: Petitions and property owner requests are not accommodated on a case by case basis

Data Collection & Scenarios Current Enrollments Assigned vs Enrolled (Popularity) Choice Attractor Programs New Development Tracking School Concurrency Reviews Metro Study CoStar Geography & Access Synergy Can you get there from here? Neighborhoods Continuity Charter School Influence Ethnicity & Economic Factors

Example: University Area 1 Scenario 1: Movement Guide POD Description Assigned Students Dev. Shifts Map Code University Area Elementary   MOSI to Pizzo 567 26 1 MOSI to Shaw 262 2 Hunters Green to Shaw 286 3 Forest Hills to Van Buren 383 4 Shaw to Van Buren 459 5 Witter to Van Buren 223 6 Clark to Witter 239 7 Pizzo to Van Buren 111 8 2 7 3 5 6 8 4

Current and Projected Utilization with No Changes   Elementary Schools Middle Schools Raw Data Points Cahoon Clark Forest Hills Heritage Hunters Green Mort MOSI Pizzo Pride Shaw Witter Adams Greco Sligh Van Buren FISH Capacity 641 975 1069 747 1034 1026 300 810 1018 846 737 1500 1293 1130 981 Assigned Students 942 1425 837 818 1167 863 432 962 901 717 1108 1266 590 802 Enrolled Students 414 884 998 693 822 865 277 754 965 688 600 771 750 510 435 Current FISH Utilization (%) 65% 91% 93% 79% 84% 92% 95% 81% 51% 58% 45% 44% Growth Factor Growth Projections N/A 70 385 26 22 8 6 Enrolled + Development 954 1078 891 987 779 756 Projected FISH Utilization w/Development (%) 98% 144% 87% 97% 52%

Proposed Elementary Data Data Points Clark Forest Hills Heritage Hunter’s Green Mort MOSI Pizzo Pride Shaw Witter FISH Capacity 975 1069 747 1034 1026 300 810 1018 846 737 Net Change in Assigned -69 -295 -202 78 -17 -863 473 -360 123 23 Projected Assigned Students 873 1130 635 896 1150 905 602 1024 740 Projected Enrolled Students (Assigned x Popularity + Choice) 819 802 597 868 842 582 756 604 Projected FISH Utilization (%) 84% 75% 80% 82% 91% 57% 89% Growth Factor   Growth Projections 70 106 22  0 26 279 Enrolled + Development 889 703 890 763 861 Projected FISH Utilization w/Development (%) 94% 86% 85% Sources: 140th day enrollment data, school concurrency projects and development data with adjusted student generation rates

Internal Stakeholders Area Superintendents Choice Department Communications Department Elementary & Middle School Education Exceptional Student Education Department Growth Management Department School Principals Transportation Department The internal stakeholders consist of various school district departments. Each review different issues related to how the changes may impact each specific area. This group has been working on this combination of issues for over a year considering various options for the New Tampa and North Tampa areas.

Community Outreach Community Meetings Parent Link Calls/Emails Website Peach Jar Attendance Boundary email address and phone number

We want your input! Comment sheets are available at this meeting to provide your comments/concerns To submit additional questions specific to the boundaries please send an email to boundaries@sdhc.k12.fl.us or call 813.272.4608 For questions regarding choice options please contact the Choice Information Line at 813.272.4692 Also, located at the tables in the center of the room are comment forms. If you have not commented via email or phone, please complete a form and return it to the comment box.

Implementation Strategies 5th Grade Grandfathering (18-19) Early Admission (17-18) MOSI Students School Class Size Students Grandfathered Pride Elementary Students: Lottery for grandfathering in 2018-19, weighted based on grade levels (higher grade levels allotted more weight) Cahoon Students: All students may enroll at new PK-8 Hunter’s Green & Clark Students located in North Tampa: Special Choice information session in fall 2017 Transportation: Generally, transportation is not provided for grandfathered students, future routes to be determined Siblings: Grandfathering does not apply to siblings New PK-8 Programming: Under Development

Department Manager of Planning & Siting Thank you! Amber K. Dickerson, AICP Department Manager of Planning & Siting 813.272.4896 amber.dickerson@sdhc.k12.fl.us http://www.sdhc.k12.fl.us/

Current and Projected Utilization with No Changes   Elementary Schools Middle Schools Raw Data Points Cahoon Clark Forest Hills Heritage Hunters Green Mort MOSI Pizzo Pride Shaw Witter Adams Greco Sligh Van Buren FISH Capacity 641 975 1069 747 1034 1026 300 810 1018 846 737 1500 1293 1130 981 Assigned Students 942 1425 837 818 1167 863 432 962 901 717 1108 1266 590 802 Enrolled Students 414 884 998 693 822 865 277 754 965 688 600 771 750 510 435 Current FISH Utilization (%) 65% 91% 93% 79% 84% 92% 95% 81% 51% 58% 45% 44% Growth Factor Growth Projections N/A 70 385 26 22 8 6 Enrolled + Development 954 1078 891 987 779 756 Projected FISH Utilization w/Development (%) 98% 144% 87% 97% 52%

Proposed Elementary Data Data Points Clark Forest Hills Heritage Hunter’s Green Mort MOSI Pizzo Pride Shaw Witter FISH Capacity 975 1069 747 1034 1026 300 810 1018 846 737 Net Change in Assigned -69 -295 -202 78 -17 -863 473 -360 123 23 Projected Assigned Students 873 1130 635 896 1150 905 602 1024 740 Projected Enrolled Students (Assigned x Popularity + Choice) 819 802 597 868 842 582 756 604 Projected FISH Utilization (%) 84% 75% 80% 82% 91% 57% 89% Growth Factor   Growth Projections 70 106 22  0 26 279 Enrolled + Development 889 703 890 763 861 Projected FISH Utilization w/Development (%) 94% 86% 85% Sources: 140th day enrollment data, school concurrency projects and development data with adjusted student generation rates

Proposed Middle School Data Proposed PK-8 School Data Adams Greco Sligh FISH Capacity 1500 1293 1130 Net Change in Assigned 373 -46 111 Projected Assigned Students 1481 1220 701 Projected Enrolled Students (Assigned x Popularity + Choice) 986 726 566 Projected FISH Utilization (%) 66% 56% 50% Growth Factor   Growth Projections 8 6 Enrolled + Development 994 732 Projected FISH Utilization w/Development (%) 57% New K-8 FISH Capacity 1236 Projected Assigned Students 1473 Projected Enrolled Students (Assigned x Popularity + Choice) 1117 Projected FISH Utilization (%) 90% Growth Factor   Growth Projections Enrolled + Development Projected FISH Utilization w/Development (%)

Recommendation POD Description Assigned Students New Development University Area Elementary   MOSI to Pizzo 549 26 MOSI to Shaw 296 Hunters Green to Shaw 298 Forest Hills to New PK-8 412 Shaw to New PK-8 354 Witter to New PK-8 232 Clark to Witter 255 Pizzo to New PK-8 111 Shaw to Forest Hills 117 MOSI to Mort 18 Mort to Pizzo 35 New Tampa Elementary Hunters Green to Clark 186 Pride to Hunters Green 562 22 Heritage to Pride 202 279 University Area Middle Van Buren to Adams 373 Van Buren to Sligh Greco to New PK-8 46

Current & Proposed Meal Status of Assigned Students   Current Paid % Proposed Paid % Current Free/Reduced % Proposed Free/Reduced % Clark 49.8% 54.2% 50.2% 45.8% Cahoon 18.1% N/A 81.9% Forest Hills 11.6% 13.2% 88.4% 86.8% Heritage 57.6% 52.8% 42.4% 47.2% Hunter’s Green 29.7% 78.0% 70.3% 22.0% Mort 6.6% 6.7% 93.4% 93.3% MOSI 8.2% 91.8% Pizzo 11.3% 10.7% 88.7% 89.3% Pride 76.1% 66.4% 23.9% 33.6% Shaw 3.8% 2.2% 96.2% 97.8% Witter 7.0% 6.9% 93.0% 93.1% Adams 29.8% 23.6% 70.2% 76.4% Greco 20.9% 21.1% 79.1% 78.9% Sligh 9.7% 9.4% 90.3% 90.6% Van Buren 7.5% 0.0% 92.5% New PK-8 7.3% 92.7% Sources: 140th day assigned student data

Current and Proposed Ethnicities of Assigned Students (Continued on Next Page)   Current African American Proposed African American Current American Indian Proposed American Indian Current Asian Proposed Asian Clark 23.7% 23.0% 0.1% 18.9% 20.5% Cahoon 51.7% N/A 0.7% 1.2% Forest Hills 30.2% 25.0% 0.4% 1.7% 2.0% Heritage 26.8% 0.2% 0.0% 12.2% 8.8% Hunter’s Green 31.3% 11.0% 4.5% 21.7% Mort 23.5% 23.9% 0.3% MOSI 47.3% 1.3% Pizzo 46.1% 42.8% 5.1% 2.7% Pride 12.1% 16.6% 0.8% 27.7% 21.8% Shaw 52.3% 48.7% 0.6% 2.3% Witter 46.2% 48.6% Adams 22.0% 30.0% 2.4% 2.5% Greco 53.2% 53.4% 1.9% 1.8% Sligh 70.3% 69.8% Van Buren 54.5% New PK-8 49.6% 1.1% Sources: 140th day assigned student data