FAMILY FIRST PREVENTION SERVICES ACT OF 2016

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Title IV-E Guardianship Assistance Program (GAP) Liliana Hernandez, Childrens Bureau Child Welfare Program Specialist September 2010.
Advertisements

The San Francisco Parent Training Institute Triple P Program December 7, 2011 Stephanie Romney, PhD Danijela Zlatevski, PhD
Supervisor’s Core: Fiscal Essentials Version 2.0 July 2009.
SLOWING THE GROWTH OF MEDICAID SPENDING IN VIRGINIA STRATEGIES DESIGNED TO CONTROL CHILDREN’S MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES EXPENDITURES.
Community Based Care in Florida and the IV-E Waiver.
IE 2, CHARTER, AND STATUS QUO SCHOOL SYSTEMS Flexibility Options Comparison F EBRUARY 26, 2015 Ken Thompson Chief Financial Officer.
 Estimates of the influx of newly-covered individuals in California by 2014: ◦ range from 1.5 to 2 million new Medi-Cal beneficiaries ◦ over 3 million.
CCDF Presentation September 9, CCDF: CCDF Budget Development The CCDF award is based on the federal fiscal year beginning October 1 st and ending.
IMPLEMENTATION OF HOUSE BILL 2782 REFORMING THE GENERAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM This presentation was prepared at member request by staff from the House of.
SILC ORIENTATION. Department of Health & Human Services Administration for Community Living Independent Living Administration Centers for Independent.
2/16/12 Marilyn Bertolucci Coordinator of Special Education Services.
Michigan State Overview Homeless Children and Youth Foster Care Summit November, 2011 Washington, D.C.
October 31, 2008 Charlie Crist, Governor Jim DeBeaugrine, Agency Director LEGISLATIVE BUDGET REQUEST FISCAL YEAR
Mission: Protect the Vulnerable, Promote Strong and Economically Self- Sufficient Families, and Advance Personal and Family Recovery and Resiliency. Charlie.
Child Care and Development Block Grant (CCDBG): Brief Introduction
1 Child Welfare Improvement Overview House Appropriations Subcommittee Kathryne O’Grady, Deputy Director Michigan Department of Human Services September.
1 Long-term Care Vermont’s Approach Individual Supports Unit Division of Disability and Aging Services Department of Disabilities, Aging & Independent.
USE OF TANF FUNDS: OPPORTUNITIES
1 CMHS Block Grant Peer Reviews Ann Arneill-Py, PhD, Executive Officer CA Mental Health Planning Council California Mental Health Planning Council April.
URGENT ISSUES FOR GEORGIA’S CHILDREN IN 2011 Children and Youth Committee Georgia House of Representatives January 25, 2011.
AB 12: California Fostering Connections to Success Act Policy Overview and Implications for THP-Plus Presentation to THP-Plus Institute July 28, 2009.
Introduction to the Tribal Child Support Enforcement Program.
Child In Need of Care (CINC) Code Guardians ad litem Nuts and Bolts October 2015.
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare FY County Child Welfare Presentation to PCCYFS February 21, 2008.
1. Lori Fuller, Bureau Chief CFSD Fernando Sandoval, Manager II CCLD 2.
 Legislative mandate*: ◦ Reform Group Homes & FFAs with robust & diverse stakeholder input ◦ Legislative report with recommendations  Continuum of Care.
California’s Child Welfare Continuum of Care Reform (CCR) Overview California Department of Social Services January 2016.
Health and Safety Information Session
Federal Updates on Kinship Care
Completing the circle: concurrent planning and the use of Family Finding, Blended perspective meetings, and family group decision making processes.
California’s Child Welfare Continuum of Care Reform (CCR) Overview California Department of Social Services January 2016.
Board of Early Education and Care Planning and Evaluation Committee
Association of Indiana Counties Annual Conference September 27th, 2017
The Current State of Foster Care in Virginia
Stakeholder Webinar September 20, 2018
2018 National IV-E Roundtable for Child Welfare Training & Education
Family First Prevention Services Act
FAMILY FIRST PREVENTION SERVICES ACT OF 2016
January 2018 County Human Services Legislative Breakfast
Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act: New Opportunities for Federal Funding for Child Welfare Key Questions and Considerations.
Fostering Connections To Success Act And What It Means For Texas Partners In CPS Reform Meeting, Jan. 14, 2009 Liz Kromrei, Department of Family and Protective.
SB-11 Implementation All residential contracts will be updated to comply with SB-11 effective September 1st, A grace period will exist where DFPS.
Stakeholder Webinar September 20, 2018
Continuum of Care Reform (CCR) Update March 2, 2018
Child Care and Development Fund Overview March 8, 2018 Delaware Early Childhood Council Presented by: Belvie S. Herbert Senior Administrator Delaware Health.
The Family First Prevention Services Act (FFPSA)
Fiscal Considerations and Family First
DIVISION E—HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES EXTENDERS
IV-E Prevention Family First Implementation & Policy Work Group
Presentation to the Senate Finance Committee
Looking Ahead and the Texas Need…
Psychotropic Medication Use by Children in Texas Foster Care:
DOJ Listening sessions/consultation
What does prevention services act mean for Iowa juvenile court judges?
Supporting Families Together Association
FFTA Conversations on Family First Prevention Services Act
Foster Care to 21 Carl E. Ayers, MSW
Family First Prevention Services Act (FFPSA)
The Preventing Sex Trafficking & Strengthening Families Act
WHSFMA Conference May 8, 2019 John Tuohy, DCF Regional Operations
Presentation to the Senate Finance Article II Workgroup
FFTA Conversations on Family First Prevention Services Act
Title IV-E.
Florida’s New Guardianship Assistance Program
Debbie Henderson, Program Administrator
Family First Protection Service Act (FFPSA)
Copyright © 2019, The University of Pittsburgh
Review of Title IV-E Waiver Opportunity
Family First Prevention Services Act (FFPSA)
Children Services Committee Meeting
Presentation transcript:

FAMILY FIRST PREVENTION SERVICES ACT OF 2016 Briefing for Child Welfare Stakeholders and County Government Officials

The Family First Prevention Services Act The Family First Prevention Services Act (H.R. 5456) was formally introduced in the US House of Representatives in June and quickly passed the House The bill’s stated intention is to increase prevention services and move children in foster care out of residential settings like group homes and congregate care The bill is expected to be taken up again when the Senate reconvenes on September 6th

$248 Million Cost to NYS and Counties What is FFPSA? The proposed bill allows for Title IV-E funds to pay for preventive services (that come with significant limitations and MOE impacts) The bill would all but eliminate Title IV-E foster care payments for children in congregate foster care except in limited federally allowable programs The proposed legislation would require validation of each placement in an allowable congregate care program for which there is no federal funding The proposed bill adds additional unfunded costs to support provisions of the bill $248 Million Cost to NYS and Counties

What is FFPSA? The FFPSA, like the Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act and the Child Care Development Block Grant (CCDBG) enacted in 2014 are well intended but largely unfunded NYS and local governments simply cannot afford to implement such sweeping legislation without accompanying federal support

Foster Care Children in Congregate Care New York State’s Story Foster Care Children in Congregate Care Preventive Services Foster Care 1995 54,000 children 17.5 % (2015) Fewer than 18,000 children 2015 62/38 reimbursement: among the most robust in the U.S. Nearly 53,000 families and children served in preventive services cases Reduced the number of children in care by 66% Reduced licensed bed capacity by 2,500

Bill Provisions: Title I Title I allows states to claim Title IV-E funding for certain preventive services This is optional Effective Dates: October 1, 2016 and October 1, 2019 Federal Title IV-E reimbursement is allowed for some preventive services, limited to 12 months per child Services available only for children at imminent risk of foster care and pregnant or parenting foster children; allowable services for children limited to mental health and substance abuse services Preventive services must have rigorous evaluations and be promising, supported or well-supported with at least 50% being well-supported Funding must be provided for and reported on an individual child basis Additional case management reporting requirements are mandated

Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Establishes a new State/Local MOE – spending shall be no less on “foster care prevention services and activities” than what was expended for foster care prevention in FFY 2014 under: TANF Title IV-B child welfare services programs SSBG State/local expenditures for any other state foster care prevention services and activities The MOE impact on NYS is estimated at $300 million *Section 111 FFPSA

Title II This is mandatory Title II of the bill severely limits federal funding for children and youth in congregate care placements This is mandatory Effective Date: October 1, 2019 Federal reimbursement for congregate care is restricted to the first 14 days of placement unless certain criteria are met in federally-defined placements

Title II The only congregate care settings that will receive federal financial support after 14 days are: Newly federally-defined Qualified Residential Treatment Programs (QRTPs) Independent living arrangements for youth 18 years and older Homes for pregnant/parenting teens

QRTP Requirements - Accreditation Accreditation and licensing of QRTPs can only be done by specified accreditation entities: The Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities (CARF) The Joint Commission on Accreditation of HealthCare Organizations (JCAHO) The Council on Accreditation (COA) Any other independent, not-for-profit accrediting organization approved by the Secretary of HHS No new federal funding to support this provision

QRTP Requirements Assessments: Each child must be assessed within 30 days of placement by an independent federally-defined qualified individual in conjunction with a federally-defined team of individuals; any changes in placement must be made within 30 days The courts must make an additional assessment within 60 days of placement and determine the placement is “appropriate” Failure to complete a timely 30-day assessment will result in the loss of federal financial support for the duration of the placement QRTPs Must: Provide a trauma-informed treatment model designed to meet clinical needs identified in assessment Have licensed nursing and clinical staff on site during business hours and on call during non-business hours Provide at least six months of post-placement family support services

Loss of Federal Funding Any placements in non-eligible facilities and any delays in making required assessments for placements in federally eligible facilities within the prescribed timeframes will result in a loss of federal financial participation, in some cases, for the duration of the entire placement Under the current Foster Care Block Grant, the County must then financially support the entire placement

Financial Impact Conservative estimates indicate that the fiscal impact of the bill to New York State from additional costs and lost federal funding is $248 million annually just to compensate for the drastic changes to the standards for federal funding of congregate care placements The state does not anticipate being in a position to increase its already significant investment in child welfare to offset this cost impact. Therefore, the cost of complying with this federal mandate will likely fall to counties and NYC Coupled with the large unfunded mandates provided for in the Child Care Development Block Grant, the negative financial impact would balloon to more than $500 million for New York State and localities

$248 Million Impact If the FFPSA is implemented as currently written, the following costs would impact NYS and its counties: ($195M) Increased service costs for youth shifted to QRTPs and lost federal financial support for youth remaining in current congregate care facilities ($20M) to support administrative costs including hiring costs associated with providing oversight for licensing and technical assistance to and training for not-for-profits, and compliance with system changes ($3M) to comply with placement assessments, assuming all youth in congregate care settings require assessment to determine who transitions into QRTPs, as this is not currently performed

$248 Million Impact ($2M) for Adoption Incentive Delinking annual loss of federal funding due to delayed delinking of adoption incentive eligibility criteria in the years prior to the effective date ($28M) to comply with six-month post-placement mandates Fiscal impact for the New York State Unified Court System to comply with the 60-day requirement for a court assessment after a youth is placed in a congregate care placement is not yet final; however, this mandate would drive approximately 5,500 additional hearings in the first year

$248 Million Impact, cont’d.

The Senate reconvenes on September 6th and will be in session briefly What’s Next The Senate reconvenes on September 6th and will be in session briefly New York State will continue efforts to slow the progress of the bill so that carefully crafted, equitable legislation can be substituted

What can you do? Contact New York’s two U.S. Senators and ask them to hold the bill until meaningful and fruitful debate can occur on how to best serve ALL of the most vulnerable children in our care.

Senator Kirsten E. Gillibrand Senator Charles E. Schumer Washington DC Office 478 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Tel. (202) 224-4451 Fax (202) 228-0282 Senator Charles E. Schumer Washington DC Office 322 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510 Phone: (202) 224-6542 Fax:  (202) 228-3027 TDD:  (202) 224-0420

OCFS Contact Information Dee Alexander Federal Liaison | General Counsel’s Office NYS Office of Children & Family Services 52 Washington Street Rensselaer, New York 12144 Office: 518-473-1682 | Dee.Alexander@ocfs.ny.gov