Physics Testing for ACRIN 6678 Protocol version 3.0 QIBA Group 1C

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IMAGE GENERATION IN CT.
Advertisements

CT Scanning: Dosimetry and Artefacts
Image Reconstruction.
Image Quality Bushong Chapter 7.
Section 1 fMRI for Newbies
IMAGE QUALITY.
Computed Tomography Physics, Instrumentation, and Imaging
Key CT Parameters - What Are They Called and What Do They Mean?
Seeram Chapter 13: Single Slice Spiral - Helical CT
NC HPS Meeting 10/18-19/2001 Boone, NC Recent Advances in CT Technology and Issues of CT Dosimetry T. Yoshizumi 1,2, M. Sarder 1, R. Reiman 1,2, E. Paulson.
MULTISLICE CT.
1 Physics Testing for Performance Based Protocol version 3.0 (Now based on ACRIN 6678) QIBA Group 1C.
5 th September 2005 Paul Collins Computed Tomography Dosimetry Assessment of Effective Dose in Computed Tomography using an Anthropomorphic Phantom Paul.
David E. Hintenlang, Ph.D., DABR
American Association of Physicists in Medicine AAPM Working Group on Standardization of CT Nomenclature and Protocols.
IMAGE QUALITY NOISE LINEARITY CROSS-FIELD UNIFORMITY IMAGE ARTIFACTS.
Special Imaging Techniques Chapter 6 Bushong. Dynamic Computed Tomography (DCT) Dynamic scanning implies 15 or more scans in rapid sequence within one.
tomos = slice, graphein = to write
QA in digital mammography: local activities and remote control H. Bosmans et al.
Seeram Chapter 11: Image Quality
CT Quality Control for CT Scanners. Quality Control in CT A good idea? Yes Required for accreditation? Sometimes Improves image quality? Sometimes Depends.
QIBA CT Volumetrics - Cross-Platform Study (Group 1C) May 6, 2009 Interclinic Comparison of CT Volumetry Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance.
QIBA Quantitative CT: Towards routine quantitative CT in obstructive lung disease JP Sieren 1, PF Judy 2, DA Lynch 3, JD Newell 3, HO Coxson 4 and EA Hoffman.
Context: How does Profiling fit in to what we are trying to accomplish overall? 9/3/2015Buckler Biomedical1 Public Data Infrastructure QIBA Define Profiles.
FDG-PET/CT Technical Committee
Dose Survey in Computed Tomography DS /CM Kampala IAEA/RCA Kampala.
QIBA CT Volumetrics - Cross-Platform Study (Group 1C) December 23, 2009 CT Cross-platform Sizing of Phantom Lesions Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance.
Computed Tomography Q & A
Reduction of effective and organ dose to the eye lens in cerebral MDCT scans using iterative image reconstruction Zizka J, Jandura J, Kvasnicka T, Klzo.
Aim Clinical indication Manufacturing scan prosthesis CT scan protocol Double scan registration wizard Double scan.
Factors affecting CT image RAD
S Demehri 1, M.K Kalra 2, M.L Steigner 1, F.J Rybicki 1, M.J. Lang, 3, S.G Silverman 1. 1.Department of Radiology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard.
QIBA CT Volumetrics - Cross-Platform Study (Group 1C) September 2, 2009 Interclinical Comparison of CT Volumetry Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Optimization of Protection in Computed Tomography (CT)-What can radiographers do? IAEA Regional Training Course.
Scanner Validation via the SNM Clinical Trials Network Phantom Program Paul E. Christian Molecular Imaging Program Huntsman Cancer Institute University.
QIBA CT Volumetrics - Cross-Platform Study (Group 1C) March 18, 2009 Interclinic Comparison of CT Volumetry Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance.
N Petrick RSNA QIBA Phantom Group November 13, QIBA Proposed Phase 1A Project V5.0 QIBA Phantom Subgroup.
QIBA Datasets: Comparison of Philips detailed (edge enhanced) & medium (normal) reconstruction Filters Lisa Kinnard, Nick Petrick, FDA 2/2/2009.
Image Quality The capacity to define, measure, and assess image quality is a primarily responsibility of a CT Technologist.
Image Display. But first a review Remember the 3 main steps 1. Data Acquisition 2. Image Reconstruction 3. Image Display.
CT QUALITY MANAGEMENT. SPATIAL RESOLUTION CONTRAST RESOLUTION NOISE IMAGE ARTIFACTS RADIATION DOSE.
Part No...., Module No....Lesson No
Part No...., Module No....Lesson No
Quality Assurance.
All QIBA PHANTOMS C52 Transducer held in ring stand – verasonics system Phantom on turntable – 8 rotation angles 7 transducer locations 3 focal depths.
1 Physics Testing for Performance Based Protocol version 2.1 QIBA Group 1C.
Quality Control Bushong Chapter 10.
History: A 61-year-old man with suspected thoracic aneurysm underwent ECG-gated chest CT angiogram. He was instructed to hold his breath during the exam.
Wednesday Case of the Day History: 32-year-old female (approximately standard-sized female) undergoes CT scan of abdomen and pelvis after motor vehicle.
Computed tomography. Formation of a CT image Data acquisitionImage reconstruction Image display, manipulation Storage, communication And recording.
Sunday Case of the Day How does the presence of the object impact patient dose? A. Increases by 20% - 50% B. Increases by 3% - 5% C. No Change D. Decreases.
Basic Principles of CT Scanning. CT CT - Computed Tomography CAT Scan - Computerized Axial Tomography.
IMAGE QUALITY. SPATIAL RESOLUTION CONTRAST RESOLUTION NOISE IMAGE ARTIFACTS RADIATION DOSE.
CT Scanner Detection system. 2 CT Scanner n Generator s High frequency, kW n X-ray tube s Rotating anode, high thermal capacity: 3-7 MHU s Dual.
Date of download: 9/20/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. (a) Photographs of the anthropomorphic phantom used in this study and (b) the inner.
Medical imaging (CT SCAN, NMR) to study some of the cases are diagnosed radio graphically by physical applications. By Ali Adil Turki Aldalawi (MEDECAL.
-42 Impact of signal non-repeatability on spectral CT images
CT Multi-Slice CT.
Role of Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction (ASIR) in lowering radiation dose for pediatric head CT Electronic Poster-eP 140 Azadeh Tabari, MD.
How we set a DRL An example using CT
Sunday Case of the Day Physics
CT Radiation Dose at Equal Image Contrast-to-noise Ratio using Iodine- and Novel Tantalum-based Contrast Agents: A Large Habitus Phantom Study Paul FitzGerald.
Reducing radiation dose and enhancing imaging quality of 4DCT for radiation therapy using iterative reconstruction algorithms  George Noid, PhD, An Tai,
Computed Tomography (CT) Dose Optimization
Single Photon Emission Tomography
Wednesday Case of the Day
Basic principles Geometry and historical development
The effect of vertical centering and scout direction on automatic tube voltage selection in chest CT: a preliminary phantom study on two different CT.
Brief Multi-Band Explanation Conversion of Raw Data to FSL/AFNI Format
Presentation transcript:

Physics Testing for ACRIN 6678 Protocol version 3.0 QIBA Group 1C

Goal Determine Scanner Performance for Spatial Resolution and Noise under protocol specified by ACRIN 6678. These will be compared with results from Performance Based Protocol Testing

ACRIN 6678 Protocol(hyperlink)

General Outline of Testing Protocol Using protocol specified by ACRIN 6678 Scan ACR phantom spatial resolution section Record visible bar pattern size Scan ACR phantom uniformity section Place ROI in center of phantom and record std. deviation

Testing Protocol (Details) Record required data on accompanying spreadsheet, On accompanying spreadsheet, record: Scanner Manufacturer (e.g GE) Model (e.g. VCT) Site id (e.g Scanner 95) Software version Testing date (12-26-09) All scanners use 120 kVp, record 120 in kVp field. Record Scan Field of View or Patient Size (or equivalent) setting used. Record Slice thickness between 0.75 to 1.25 mm (depending on scanner’s available reconstructed slice thickness) Record nominal beam collimation (NxT such as 16 x 0.5mm, or 128x0.6mm, 320 x 0.5 mm) rotation time and pitch such that scan can cover a 35 cm thorax in 15 seconds or less Values near pitch 1 are preferred. Record reconstruction kernel. Record mAs or effective mAs setting

Specific Instructions for Testing Protocol 2. Using parameters specified in ACRIN 6678, Scan phantom once through section 4 of ACR CT accreditation phantom. Reconstruct images, display with Level =1100, Window=100 Record the name of recon filter Record the size of the line pair object (e.g. 6 lp/cm etc.) observed for that filter Provide image (DICOM AND jpeg) Zoomed in B30 6 lp/cm 7 lp/cm ACR Spatial Resolution Section (Module 4)

Specific Instructions for Testing Protocol 3 Using parameters specified in ACRIN 6678, Scan phantom once through section 3 of ACR CT accreditation phantom. Reconstruct images, display with Level =100, Window=100 From Reconstructed image, measure standard deviation by placing an ROI of approximately 400 mm2 at the center of the image Record standard deviation on spreadsheet Provide image (DICOM AND jpeg)

Example of Testing Protocol Step 3 – Example on Siemens Sensation 64. 100 eff. mAs Tech. Params: 120 kVp 1mm Pitch 1 0.5 sec B30 100 eff. mAs; std dev = 17

RESULTS Of Testing Protocol For Siemens Sensation 64, using ACRIN 6678 parameters: 120 kVp Reconstructed Slice thickness 1.0 mm Nominal beam collimation 64x0.6 (actually 32x0.6 with flying focal spot) Rotation time 0.5 seconds Pitch 1.0 Recon kernel B30 Effective mAs setting 100 CTDIvol = 7.7 mGy PERFORMANCE Spatial Resolution = 6 lp/cm Standard Deviation = 17 HU

Next Scanner?