Slides have been adapted from:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DNS – Domain Name system Converting domain names to IP addresses since 1983.
Advertisements

 This Class  Chapter 9  Next Class  Wrap up this semester  Demo/discuss programming assignments  Review what we have learned  Questionnaire/Feedback.
Domain Name System (or Service) (DNS) Computer Networks Computer Networks Term B10.
1 EEC-484/584 Computer Networks Lecture 5 Wenbing Zhao (Part of the slides are based on Drs. Kurose & Ross ’ s slides for their Computer.
EEC-484/584 Computer Networks Lecture 5 Wenbing Zhao (Part of the slides are based on Drs. Kurose & Ross ’ s slides for their Computer.
Domain Name System (or Service) (DNS) Computer Networks Computer Networks Spring 2012 Spring 2012.
EEC-484/584 Computer Networks Lecture 5 Wenbing Zhao (Part of the slides are based on Drs. Kurose & Ross ’ s slides for their Computer.
2: Application Layer1 FTP, SMTP and DNS. 2: Application Layer2 FTP: separate control, data connections r FTP client contacts FTP server at port 21, specifying.
1 Domain Name System (DNS). 2 DNS: Domain Name System Internet hosts, routers: –IP address (32 bit) - used for addressing datagrams –“name”, e.g., gaia.cs.umass.edu.
2: Application Layer1 Chapter 2 Application Layer Computer Networking: A Top Down Approach, 4 th edition. Jim Kurose, Keith Ross Addison-Wesley, July 2007.
Application Layer session 1 TELE3118: Network Technologies Week 12: DNS Some slides have been taken from: r Computer Networking: A Top Down Approach.
CPSC 441: DNS1 Instructor: Anirban Mahanti Office: ICT Class Location: ICT 121 Lectures: MWF 12:00 – 12:50 Notes derived.
Application Layer 2-1 Chapter 2 Application Layer Computer Networking: A Top Down Approach 6 th edition Jim Kurose, Keith Ross Addison-Wesley March 2012.
Name Resolution and DNS. Domain names and IP addresses r People prefer to use easy-to-remember names instead of IP addresses r Domain names are alphanumeric.
Chapter 2 Application Layer
2: Application Layer1 Chapter 2 Application Layer Computer Networking: A Top Down Approach 6 th edition Jim Kurose, Keith Ross Addison-Wesley March 2012.
NET0183 Networks and Communications Lecture 25 DNS Domain Name System 8/25/20091 NET0183 Networks and Communications by Dr Andy Brooks.
CS 4396 Computer Networks Lab
1 Domain Name System (DNS). 2 DNS: Domain Name System Internet hosts: – IP address (32 bit) - used for addressing datagrams – “name”, e.g.,
DNS & P2P A PPLICATIONS د. عـــادل يوسف أبو القاسم.
Domain Name System (DNS)
Data Communications and Computer Networks Chapter 2 CS 3830 Lecture 10 Omar Meqdadi Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering University.
2: Application Layer 1 Chapter 2: Application layer r 2.1 Principles of network applications r 2.2 Web and HTTP r 2.3 FTP r 2.4 Electronic Mail  SMTP,
CS 471/571 Domain Name Server Slides from Kurose and Ross.
IT 424 Networks2 IT 424 Networks2 Ack.: Slides are adapted from the slides of the book: “Computer Networking” – J. Kurose, K. Ross Chapter 2: Application.
DNS: Domain Name System
Review: –Which protocol is used to move messages around in the Internet? –Describe how a message is moved from the sender’s UA to the receiver’s.
1 DNS: Domain Name System People: many identifiers: m SSN, name, Passport # Internet hosts, routers: m IP address (32 bit) - used for addressing datagrams.
Chapter 2 Application Layer Computer Networking: A Top Down Approach, 5 th edition. Jim Kurose, Keith Ross Addison-Wesley, April A note on the use.
1 Application Layer Lecture 6 Imran Ahmed University of Management & Technology.
DNS: Domain Name System People: many identifiers: – SSN, name, Passport # Internet hosts, routers: – IP address (32 bit) - used for addressing datagrams.
Lecture 6: Video Streaming 2-1. Outline  Network basics:  HTTP protocols  Studies on HTTP performance from different views:  Browser types [NSDI 2014]
25.1 Chapter 25 Domain Name System Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
CDN: Content Distribution Networks  References:  CS613 textbook, “Computer Networking – A Top-Down Approach”, 6 th edition. Chapter  The text.
2: Application Layer1 DNS: Domain Name System People have many identifiers: SSN, name, passport number Internet hosts, routers have identifiers, too: IP.
CPSC 441: DNS 1. DNS: Domain Name System Internet hosts: m IP address (32 bit) - used for addressing datagrams m “name”, e.g., - used by.
CS 3830 Day 10 Introduction 1-1. Announcements r Quiz #2 this Friday r Program 2 posted yesterday 2: Application Layer 2.
EE 122: Lecture 20 (Domain Name Server - DNS) Ion Stoica Nov 15, 2001 (* based on the some on-line slides of J. Kurose & K. Rose and of Raj Jain)
Lecture 5: Web Continued 2-1. Outline  Network basics:  HTTP protocols  Studies on HTTP performance from different views:  Browser types [NSDI 2014]
Chapter 2 Application Layer Computer Networking: A Top Down Approach, 4 th edition. Jim Kurose, Keith Ross Addison-Wesley, July 2007.
2: Application Layer 1 Chapter 2: Application layer r 2.1 Principles of network applications r 2.2 Web and HTTP r 2.3 FTP r 2.4 Electronic Mail  SMTP,
Application Layer 2-1 Chapter 2 Application Layer Computer Networking: A Top Down Approach 6 th edition Jim Kurose, Keith Ross Addison-Wesley March 2012.
1. Internet hosts:  IP address (32 bit) - used for addressing datagrams  “name”, e.g., ww.yahoo.com - used by humans DNS: provides translation between.
Application Layer, 2.5 DNS 2-1 Chapter 2 Application Layer Computer Networking: A Top Down Approach 6 th edition Jim Kurose, Keith Ross Addison-Wesley.
Important r On Friday, could you ask students to please me their groups (one per group) for Project 2 so we can assign IP addresses. I’ll send.
CSEN 404 Application Layer II Amr El Mougy Lamia Al Badrawy.
Spring 2006 CPE : Application Layer_DNS 1 Special Topics in Computer Engineering Application layer: Domain Name System Some of these Slides are.
@Yuan Xue A special acknowledge goes to J.F Kurose and K.W. Ross Some of the slides used in this lecture are adapted from their.
@Yuan Xue A special acknowledge goes to J.F Kurose and K.W. Ross Some of the slides used in this lecture are adapted from their.
Last time Finish HTTP FTP.
2: Application Layer 1 Some network apps r r Web r Instant messaging r Remote login r P2P file sharing r Multi-user network games r Streaming stored.
Internet Applications
CS590B/690B Measuring network interference (Fall 2016)
Introduction to Networks
Session 6 INST 346 Technologies, Infrastructure and Architecture
Chapter 9: Domain Name Servers
Introduction to Communication Networks
2017 session 1 TELE3118: Network Technologies Week 12: DNS and CDNs
Chapter 2 Application Layer
Chapter 7: Application layer
Cookies, Web Cache & DNS Dr. Adil Yousif.
ECE 671 – Lecture 16 Content Distribution Networks
Chapter 2: Application layer
EEC-484/584 Computer Networks
CSE 4213: Computer Networks II
DNS: Domain Name System
FTP, SMTP and DNS 2: Application Layer.
Chapter 2 Application Layer
Lecture 3 – Chapter 2 CIS 5617, Fall 2019 Anduo Wang
Presentation transcript:

2017 session 1 TELE3118: Network Technologies Week 12: DNS and Streaming Slides have been adapted from: Computer Networking: A Top Down Approach, 7th (global) edition. Jim Kurose, Keith Ross. Pearson, April 2016. All material copyright 1996-2016. J.F Kurose and K.W. Ross, All Rights Reserved. Computer Networks, 5th edition. Andrew S. Tanenbaum, David J. Wetherall, Pearson, 2010. Application Layer

DNS: domain name system people: many identifiers: SSN, name, passport # Internet hosts, routers: IP address (32 bit) - used for addressing datagrams “name”, e.g., www.yahoo.com - used by humans Q: how to map between IP address and name, and vice versa ? Domain Name System: distributed database implemented in hierarchy of many name servers application-layer protocol: hosts, name servers communicate to resolve names (address/name translation) note: core Internet function, implemented as application-layer protocol complexity at network’s “edge” Application Layer

DNS: services, structure hostname to IP address translation host aliasing canonical, alias names mail server aliasing load distribution replicated Web servers: many IP addresses correspond to one name why not centralize DNS? single point of failure traffic volume distant centralized database maintenance A: doesn‘t scale! Application Layer

DNS: a distributed, hierarchical database Root DNS Servers com DNS servers org DNS servers edu DNS servers poly.edu DNS servers umass.edu yahoo.com amazon.com pbs.org … … client wants IP for www.amazon.com; 1st approximation: client queries root server to find com DNS server client queries .com DNS server to get amazon.com DNS server client queries amazon.com DNS server to get IP address for www.amazon.com Application Layer

DNS: root name servers contacted by local name server that can not resolve name root name server: contacts authoritative name server if name mapping not known gets mapping returns mapping to local name server c. Cogent, Herndon, VA (5 other sites) d. U Maryland College Park, MD h. ARL Aberdeen, MD j. Verisign, Dulles VA (69 other sites ) k. RIPE London (17 other sites) i. Netnod, Stockholm (37 other sites) e. NASA Mt View, CA f. Internet Software C. Palo Alto, CA (and 48 other sites) m. WIDE Tokyo (5 other sites) 13 logical root name “servers” worldwide each “server” replicated many times a. Verisign, Los Angeles CA (5 other sites) b. USC-ISI Marina del Rey, CA l. ICANN Los Angeles, CA (41 other sites) g. US DoD Columbus, OH (5 other sites) Application Layer

TLD, authoritative servers top-level domain (TLD) servers: responsible for com, org, net, edu, aero, jobs, museums, and all top-level country domains, e.g.: uk, fr, ca, jp Network Solutions maintains servers for .com TLD Educause for .edu TLD authoritative DNS servers: organization’s own DNS server(s), providing authoritative hostname to IP mappings for organization’s named hosts can be maintained by organization or service provider Application Layer

Local DNS name server does not strictly belong to hierarchy each ISP (residential ISP, company, university) has one also called “default name server” when host makes DNS query, query is sent to its local DNS server has local cache of recent name-to-address translation pairs (but may be out of date!) acts as proxy, forwards query into hierarchy Application Layer

DNS name resolution example root DNS server 2 host at cis.poly.edu wants IP address for gaia.cs.umass.edu 3 TLD DNS server 4 5 iterated query: contacted server replies with name of server to contact “I don’t know this name, but ask this server” local DNS server dns.poly.edu 7 6 1 8 authoritative DNS server dns.cs.umass.edu requesting host cis.poly.edu gaia.cs.umass.edu Application Layer

authoritative DNS server DNS name resolution example root DNS server 2 3 recursive query: puts burden of name resolution on contacted name server heavy load at upper levels of hierarchy? 7 6 TLD DNS server local DNS server dns.poly.edu 4 5 1 8 authoritative DNS server dns.cs.umass.edu requesting host cis.poly.edu gaia.cs.umass.edu Application Layer

DNS: caching, updating records once (any) name server learns mapping, it caches mapping cache entries timeout (disappear) after some time (TTL) TLD servers typically cached in local name servers thus root name servers not often visited cached entries may be out-of-date (best effort name-to-address translation!) if name host changes IP address, may not be known Internet-wide until all TTLs expire update/notify mechanisms proposed IETF standard RFC 2136 Application Layer

RR format: (name, value, type, ttl) DNS records DNS: distributed database storing resource records (RR) RR format: (name, value, type, ttl) type=A name is hostname value is IP address type=CNAME name is alias name for some “canonical” (the real) name www.ibm.com is really servereast.backup2.ibm.com value is canonical name type=NS name is domain (e.g., foo.com) value is hostname of authoritative name server for this domain type=MX value is name of mailserver associated with name Application Layer

DNS protocol, messages query and reply messages, both with same message format 2 bytes 2 bytes identification flags # questions questions (variable # of questions) # additional RRs # authority RRs # answer RRs answers (variable # of RRs) authority (variable # of RRs) additional info (variable # of RRs) message header identification: 16 bit # for query, reply to query uses same # flags: query or reply recursion desired recursion available reply is authoritative Application Layer

DNS protocol, messages name, type fields for a query RRs in response 2 bytes 2 bytes identification flags # questions questions (variable # of questions) # additional RRs # authority RRs # answer RRs answers (variable # of RRs) authority (variable # of RRs) additional info (variable # of RRs) name, type fields for a query RRs in response to query records for authoritative servers additional “helpful” info that may be used Application Layer

Inserting records into DNS example: new startup “Network Utopia” register name networkuptopia.com at DNS registrar (e.g., Network Solutions) provide names, IP addresses of authoritative name server (primary and secondary) registrar inserts two RRs into .com TLD server: (networkutopia.com, dns1.networkutopia.com, NS) (dns1.networkutopia.com, 212.212.212.1, A) create authoritative server type A record for www.networkuptopia.com; type MX record for networkutopia.com Application Layer

Attacking DNS DDoS attacks bombard root servers with traffic not successful to date traffic filtering local DNS servers cache IPs of TLD servers, allowing root server bypass bombard TLD servers potentially more dangerous redirect attacks man-in-middle Intercept queries DNS poisoning Send bogus relies to DNS server, which caches exploit DNS for DDoS send queries with spoofed source address: target IP requires amplification Application Layer

Video Streaming and CDNs: context video traffic: major consumer of Internet bandwidth Netflix, YouTube: 37%, 16% of downstream residential ISP traffic ~1B YouTube users, ~75M Netflix users challenge: scale - how to reach ~1B users? single mega-video server won’t work (why?) challenge: heterogeneity different users have different capabilities (e.g., wired versus mobile; bandwidth rich versus bandwidth poor) solution: distributed, application-level infrastructure Application Layer

Multimedia: video video: sequence of images displayed at constant rate …………………….. spatial coding example: instead of sending N values of same color (all purple), send only two values: color value (purple) and number of repeated values (N) ……………….……. frame i frame i+1 temporal coding example: instead of sending complete frame at i+1, send only differences from frame i video: sequence of images displayed at constant rate e.g., 24 images/sec digital image: array of pixels each pixel represented by bits coding: use redundancy within and between images to decrease # bits used to encode image spatial (within image) temporal (from one image to next) Application Layer

Multimedia: video CBR: (constant bit rate): video encoding rate fixed …………………….. spatial coding example: instead of sending N values of same color (all purple), send only two values: color value (purple) and number of repeated values (N) ……………….……. frame i frame i+1 temporal coding example: instead of sending complete frame at i+1, send only differences from frame i CBR: (constant bit rate): video encoding rate fixed VBR: (variable bit rate): video encoding rate changes as amount of spatial, temporal coding changes examples: MPEG 1 (CD-ROM) 1.5 Mbps MPEG2 (DVD) 3-6 Mbps MPEG4 (often used in Internet, < 1 Mbps) Application Layer

Streaming stored video: simple scenario: Internet video server (stored video) client Application Layer

Streaming multimedia: DASH DASH: Dynamic, Adaptive Streaming over HTTP server: divides video file into multiple chunks each chunk stored, encoded at different rates manifest file: provides URLs for different chunks client: periodically measures server-to-client bandwidth consulting manifest, requests one chunk at a time chooses maximum coding rate sustainable given current bandwidth can choose different coding rates at different points in time (depending on available bandwidth at time) Application Layer

Streaming multimedia: DASH DASH: Dynamic, Adaptive Streaming over HTTP “intelligence” at client: client determines when to request chunk (so that buffer starvation, or overflow does not occur) what encoding rate to request (higher quality when more bandwidth available) where to request chunk (can request from URL server that is “close” to client or has high available bandwidth) Application Layer

Content distribution networks challenge: how to stream content (selected from millions of videos) to hundreds of thousands of simultaneous users? option 1: single, large “mega-server” single point of failure point of network congestion long path to distant clients multiple copies of video sent over outgoing link ….quite simply: this solution doesn’t scale Application Layer

Content distribution networks challenge: how to stream content (selected from millions of videos) to hundreds of thousands of simultaneous users? option 2: store/serve multiple copies of videos at multiple geographically distributed sites (CDN) enter deep: push CDN servers deep into many access networks close to users used by Akamai, 1700 locations bring home: smaller number (10’s) of larger clusters in POPs near (but not within) access networks used by Limelight Application Layer

Content Distribution Networks (CDNs) CDN: stores copies of content at CDN nodes e.g. Netflix stores copies of MadMen subscriber requests content from CDN directed to nearby copy, retrieves content may choose different copy if network path congested … Akamai: 100,000+ servers in 1000+ clusters in 1000+ networks in 70+ countries serving trillions of requests a day. How many people use Netflix? manifest file where’s Madmen? Application Layer 24

“over the top” Content Distribution Networks (CDNs) … Internet host-host communication as a service peak load: 7million viewers, 2 Tbytes via OTT challenges: coping with a congested Internet from which CDN node to retrieve content? viewer behavior in presence of congestion? what content to place in which CDN node? 25

CDN content access: a closer look Bob (client) requests video http://netcinema.com/6Y7B23V video stored in CDN at http://KingCDN.com/NetC6y&B23V 1. Bob gets URL for video http://netcinema.com/6Y7B23V from netcinema.com web page 1 2. resolve http://netcinema.com/6Y7B23V via Bob’s local DNS 2 5 6. request video from KINGCDN server, streamed via HTTP Bob’s local DNS server netcinema.com 3. netcinema’s DNS returns URL http://KingCDN.com/NetC6y&B23V 4&5. Resolve http://KingCDN.com/NetC6y&B23 via KingCDN’s authoritative DNS, which returns IP address of KingCDN server with video 4 3 netcinema’s authoratative DNS KingCDN.com KingCDN authoritative DNS Application Layer

Case study: Netflix upload copies of multiple versions of video to CDN servers Amazon cloud CDN server Netflix registration, accounting servers 3. Manifest file returned for requested video CDN server 2. Bob browses Netflix video 2 3 1 CDN server 1. Bob manages Netflix account 4. DASH streaming Application Layer