Current Status of the T2K Experiment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Expected Sensitivity of the NO A  Disappearance Analysis Kirk Bays (Caltech) for the NO A Collaboration April 14, 2013 APS DPF Denver Kirk Bays, APS DPF.
Advertisements

Current* Neutrino Oscillation Experiments
1 Proton Upgrades at Fermilab Robert Zwaska Fermilab March 12, 2007 Midwest Accelerator Physics Collaboration Meeting Indiana University Cyclotron Facility.
J-PARC PAC ‘07 Imperial College/RAL Dave Wark Status of the T2K Experiment Dave Wark Imperial/RAL J-PARC PAC KEK July 6, 2007.
ECFA-EPS Joint Session Imperial College/RAL Dave Wark Neutrino Physics – Accomplishments and Future Challenges Dave Wark Imperial/RAL (but speaking only.
T2K – Canada Accelerator & Detector Status D. Karlen University of Victoria & TRIUMF ACOT meeting, May 12, 2007.
Neutrino-CH 19 October 2006 Alain Blondel HARP and K2K 1. The K2K experiments 2. beam related uncertainties 3. HARP and results 4. K2K and results 5. conclusions.
Beamline Takashi Kobayashi 1 Global Analysis Meeting Nov. 29, 2007.
F Future of Neutrino Program at FNAL NuMI Off-Axis Meeting Hugh Montgomery January 12, 2004.
T2K experiment at J-PARC Epiphany 2010D. Kiełczewska1 For T2K Collaboration Danuta Kiełczewska Warsaw University & Sołtan Institute for Nuclear Studies.
July 19, 2003 HEP03, Aachen P. Shanahan MINOS Collaboration 1 STATUS of the MINOS Experiment Argonne Athens Brookhaven Caltech Cambridge Campinas Dubna.
J-PARC upgrade T. Nakadaira (KEK / J-PARC). Outline J-PARC overview & on-going program Motivation of future experiment in J-PARC Overview of future experiment.
1 T2K Beam Operation Summary (earthquake recovery and beamline survey) NBI 2012 T. Ishii (KEK) for the T2K beam group.
Expected Sensitivity of the NO A  Disappearance Analysis Kirk Bays (Caltech) for the NO A Collaboration April 14, 2013 APS DPF Denver Kirk Bays, APS DPF.
Proton Plans at Fermilab Robert Zwaska - Fermilab Science and Engineering at Henderson- DUSEL Capstone Workshop Stony Brook University May 5, 2006 Outline.
F MI High Power Operation and Future Plans Ioanis Kourbanis (presented by Bruce Brown) HB2008 August 25, 2008.
2 1/March/2015 日本物理学会大70回年次大会@早稲田大学 東大ICEPP 内山雄祐 他 MEG II collaboration.
Caren Hagner CSTS Saclay Present And Near Future of θ 13 & CPV in Neutrino Experiments Caren Hagner Universität Hamburg Neutrino Mixing and.
1 Status and Plans at J-PARC Linac Kazuo Hasegawa J-PARC Center/Japan Atomic Energy Agency Collaboration meeting between CERN and J-PARC December 18, 2013,
F Project X Overview Dave McGinnis October 12, 2007.
11 Status of Neutrino Beamline Construction T.Kobayashi IPNS, KEK Jan.8, 2008 J-PARC PAC.
KEK Plans for J-PARC Particle Physics at J-PARC CERN-KEK Committee March 29, 2010 at KEK Koichiro Nishikawa Institute for Particle and Nuclear Studies,
Fermilab Neutrino Program Jim Strait Neutrino Discussion at CERN 26 November 2013.
The NOvA Experiment Ji Liu On behalf of the NOvA collaboration College of William and Mary APS April Meeting April 1, 2012.
1 DISCOVERY OF ATMOSPHERIC MUON NEUTRINO OSCILLATIONS Prologue First Hint in Kamiokande Second Hint in Kamiokande Evidence found in Super-Kamiokande Nov-12.
Preliminary Results from the MINER A Experiment Deborah Harris Fermilab on behalf of the MINERvA Collaboration.
F Proton Plan Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division.
1 Future Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments Workshop – March 21, 2012 Workshop on Future Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments March 21, 2012 Fermilab David.
A new underground laboratory at Frejus Jacques Bouchez CEA-SACLAY NNN05-Aussois April 7, 2005 Historical overview Latest developments Outlook.
MICE TARGET OPERATION C. Booth, P. Hodgson, P. J. Smith, Dept. of Physics & Astronomy University of Sheffield, England. 1 – The MICE Experiment2 - The.
June 17, 2004 / Collab Meeting Strategy to reduce uncertainty on a  to < 0.25 ppm David Hertzog University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign n Present data.
Gary Feldman MINOS in Cambridge 24 March NO A Update MINOS Collaboration Meeting Cambridge, England 24 March 2009 Gary Feldman.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Overview Satoshi Ozaki Director, Accelerator Systems Division NSLS-II Project March 27, 2007.
D0 Status: 04/01-04/08 u Week integrated luminosity –1.7pb -1 delivered –1.5pb -1 utilized (88%) –1.1pb -1 global runs u Data collection s global data.
Road Map of Neutrino Physics in Japan Largely my personal view Don’t take too seriously K. Nakamura KEK NuFact04 July 30, 2004.
Neutrino Oscillations at Super-Kamiokande Soo-Bong Kim (Seoul National University)
Θ 13 and CP-Violation in the Lepton Sector SEESAW25 Institut Henri Poincaré, Paris Caren Hagner Universität Hamburg SEESAW25 Institut Henri Poincaré, Paris.
News Y2K June 25, Summary of June 12 Face-to-Face Meeting.
1 Status of the T2K long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment Atsuko K. Ichikawa (Kyoto univeristy) For the T2K Collaboration.
T2K Status Report. The Accelerator Complex a Beamline Performance 3 First T2K run completed January to June x protons accumulated.
F A Fermilab Roadmap Dave McGinnis May 28, f Fermilab Roadmap - McGinnis Timelines  Divide the road map into three parallel paths  ILC - Energy.
Protons for Neutrinos: Mid-Term and Project-X Bob Zwaska Fermilab Intensity Frontier Neutrino Working Group Meeting October 24, 2011.
T2K IFOP 11/7 Imperial College/RAL Dave Wark Status of the 280m Detectors and Current Issues Dave Wark Imperial/RAL J-PARC IFOP Videocon Nov. 16, 2007.
XLVth Rencontres de Moriond Status of the T2K experiment K. Matsuoka (Kyoto Univ.) for the T2K collaboration Contents Physics motivations (neutrino oscillation)
Proposal Preparation. Documents for June PAC  Full Proposal  Starting point is LOI + updates in EOI  Project Definition Report  Cost estimate  Excel-based.
PPAP Review 09 Imperial College/RAL Dave Wark Future Neutrino Oscillation Experiments Dave Wark Imperial/RAL PPAP Birmingham July 15 th, 2009.
Complementarity of Terrestrial Neutrino Experiments in Searching for  13 Pasquale Migliozzi INFN - Napoli P.M., F. Terranova Phys. Lett. B 563 (2003)
 CC QE results from the NOvA prototype detector Jarek Nowak and Minerba Betancourt.
T2K Experiment Results & Prospects Alfons Weber University of Oxford & STFC/RAL For the T2K Collaboration.
Current Status of the T2K Experiment Ryan Terri (for the T2K Collaboration) 31 May – 4 June 2010 Planck 2010, CERN.
Minerva Test Beam 2 Status Geoff Savage for the Test Beam 2 Team March 23, /23/2015AEM - Minerva Test Beam 2 Status1.
J-PARC Site Visit Summary – 03/09 S. Childress (Accelerator, T2K Primary) J. Hylen (T2K Target Hall, Decay, Absorber & Near Detector)
Precision Measurement of Muon Neutrino Disappearance with T2K Alex Himmel Duke University for the The T2K Collaboration 37 th International Conference.
Welcome! Robert Zwaska 23 November 2015 Workshop on Booster Performance and Enhancements.
T2K Oscillation Strategies Kevin McFarland (University of Rochester) on behalf of the T2K Collaboration Neutrino Factories 2010 October 24 th 2010.
The XXII International Conference on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics in Santa Fe, New Mexico, June 13-19, 2006 The T2K 2KM Water Cherenkov Detector M.
DOE review slide 1 MINOS Software and Data Analysis Peter Litchfield, U. of Minnesota DOE Review, 28 th August 2003  Progress on Offline Software  Detector.
STATUS OF KLOE F. Bossi KLOE GM, ROMA Nov. 13/14.
T2K : New physics results
Status of MEG-I physics analysis
J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting
NA61 news and plans Progress in 2010 Revised data taking
Oxford University/RAL
Results from T2K and Prospects for Hyper Kamiokande
András László (for the NA61/SHINE Collaboration)
on behalf of the T2K Collaboration
Title : SciBooNE -- Experimental study of neutrino cross-sections for a long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment and the development of the detectors.
Gary Feldman P5 Meeting 21 February
Present Status of Orbit Stabilization at SPring-8
FNAL-E954: SciBooNE Decay region 50 m MiniBooNE Detector SciBar
Presentation transcript:

Current Status of the T2K Experiment JPARC PAC Jan. 14th, 2011 Dave Wark Imperial/RAL

n beam JPARC Accelerators Super Kamiokande Neutrino Beamline Goals of the T2K Experiment: Build the world’s most intense n beam. Perform the world’s most accurate measurement of nm disappearance. Perform the world’s most sensitive search for ne appearance – measure q13! Near n detectors

Super Kamiokande is running extremely well. 2010b

Beam Delivery during 2010a Period (Jan-June 2010) 3.3 x 1019 (~15.5 kW x 107 s) Total delivered p.o.t. ~ 1/6 planned, but enough to begin n measurements.

280m Calibration Taken from the TPC NIM.

2010a data inputs to Oscillation Analyses CCQE m CCQE m CCQE e Beam Prediction Tuned to NA61

(2010a)

SK events Super Kamiokande Beam Events Two-ring event Single-ring m-like event Two-ring event

2010a oscillation results soon... Two groups doing Preliminary each N1Rm NSK for 2010a 2010a oscillation results soon... ne appearance nm disappearance Two groups doing each analysis – they agree! Preliminary

280m Completion Summer 2010 (I) Monte Carlo Data !

Full ECAL Installed! 280m Completion Summer 2010 (II) 22301/22336 channels live Magnet Electricity Supply upgraded, now capable of running at (above) nominal 0.2T field

On to 2010b...

Machine Time History Days Scheduled downtime n allocation

Preliminary INGRID Results for 2010b

280m OA 2010b data.

(2010a)

Delivered POT v.s. goal If we continue running at 115 kW it is Removing beam tuning / study, Calibration of CT “Good spill” = 4.061019 POT SK DAQ efficiency=99.9% (Run29~34 Delivered= 3.351019, “Good spill”=3.261019) If we continue running at 115 kW it is clear we will not achieve 150 kW x 107 s Assuming * Apr for HD * May 1st~ for NU

1000[kWx1E7s] Mid term goal By summer 2014 (4 seasons) 0.0137 Now 1000[kWx1E7s] 0.0137 1900kW.1E7s LINAC 1 2 3 4

Conclusions (I) Construction is finished! The neutrino beamline has worked beautifully with ~95% reliability. All near detectors are now working and ready for more data. Super Kamiokande continues to run stably with extremely high efficiency. Much effort has gone into tools which now allow for rapid reduction and analysis of the data. We will be announcing our first physics results and publishing our first physics papers in a few months.

Conclusions (II) The accelerator group and the high-power task force have worked extremely hard to increase our available protons on target and have made many improvements, for which we are very grateful. We will need continuing improvements to keep ahead of our international competition: if q13 is large we face near-term competition from MINOS, OPERA, and Double-Chooz; and if it is small we face mid-term competition from NOvA and Daya Bay. Continued running at 115 kW will not achieve 150 kW x 107 seconds before the run ends in June. We therefore need the problem with the injection kicker solved as quickly as possible (see Koseki-san’s talk). After that, we would like to quickly see further high-power tests to see where the next problem lies. As the situation with the accelerators develops, and we see what results come from the experiment, we hope that the accelerator development programme can be optimized to keep us in the world lead (could one consider delaying the Linac upgrade?). We hope that every effort will be expended to maximize our integrated p.o.t during each calendar year!