Gorgon Stare Unclear Requirements and Lack of Traceability

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Everett A. Hinkley National Remote Sensing Program Manager Arlington, Virginia UAS Mini Workshop Silver Spring, Maryland February 4, 2011 Forest Service.
Advertisements

Airmanship Knowledge Learning Outcome 3 Part 3 No2 Group Combat Support Part1 Uncontrolled copy not subject to amendment Revision 1.00.
Heavy Lift and Long Duration Co-axial Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
Drone (Pilotless) aircraft Daley Brathwaite. INTRODUCTION Drones or Unmanned Air Vehicles (UAV’s) are essentially aircraft that operate without the physical.
C/3C Lucas Carlson UAV Systems. Development Mission Specifications EmploymentOverview 2.
INNOCON Innovative solutions to the modern real time Arial surveillance challenges.
RPA / UAS support to Environmental Monitoring
Global Security. OVERVIEW Discoverii represents day/night vision technology platform that combines an innovative, near infra-red, continuous-wave laser.
ElectroOptic Sensors Matt McKeever Jonathan Baker UAV Design Team 10/26/2006
1 MILITARY UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY. 2 FACULTY OF ELECTRONICS FACULTY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND GEODESY FACULTY OF MECHATRONICS FACULTY OF MILITARY TECHNOLOGY.
Project Progress Presentation Coffee delivery mission Dec, 10, 2007 NSH 3211 Hyun Soo Park, Iacopo Gentilini 1.
AT 209 Introduction to Civil Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS)
Automatic Control & Systems Engineering Autonomous Systems Research Mini-UAV for Urban Environments Autonomous Control of Multi-UAV Platforms Future uninhabited.
USMC Precision Strike BGen “Wiley” Post Assistant Deputy Commandant for Aviation.
Introduction to Remotely Operated Vehicles ROVs
Aurora Flight Sciences proprietary Aurora Overview James D. Paduano Presented to the ACGSC October Aurora Flight Sciences Corporation 9950 Wakeman.
A New Method for the Tele-operation of Aircraft Dr. Paul Oh James Hing.
Serving society Stimulating innovation Supporting legislation Joint Research Centre The European Commission’s in-house science service.
Military use of Drones! by, Scott Amack.
Application of Drone Technology towards Economic Benefit of Southwest Georgia Atin Sinha Albany State University Albany, GA.
SMUCSE 8394 BTS – Devices II Sensors Detection, Surveillance, Protection.
October 2006 NASA Dryden Status Aerospace Control & Guidance Sub-committee Williamsburg, VA October 2006 John Bosworth (661)
Interdepartmental Hurricane Conference Charleston, SC Tuesday, March 4, 2008 Hurricane and Severe Storm Sentinel (HS 3 ) Scott Braun (GSFC) Paul Newman.
Requirements and Operations Team Industry Day Briefing 17 January, 2002.
AEM 5333 UAV Search and Surveillance. Mission Description Overhead surveillance and tracking – Humans on foot – Moving vehicles Onboard GPS transceiver.
The Altair Unmanned Aircraft System UAS By Hayley Stommel UAS By Hayley Stommel.
UAV LANDING SYSTEM Submitted by: SHAKTI SINGH SHEKHAWAT SHRISH KUMAR SHUKLA RISHI KUMAR YADAV VINEET AGRAWAL.
Iraq & Air Power The Commentator’s View Sir Timothy Garden Centre for Defence Studies King’s College London.
1 Civil Air Patrol United States Air Force Auxiliary …performing Missions for America.
USDA Forest Service, Remote Sensing Applications Center, FSWeb: WWW: USFS Citation Aircraft.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 1 GPS Operations Past, Present, Future Colonel John E. Hyten Commander, 50th Space Wing 29 Mar.
Advantage Through Technology Michael D. Moskal II & William C. Hughes.
C3C Matthew Jordan.  What is an Unmanned Aerial System? ◦ Difference between Unmanned Aerial Systems and Remotely Piloted Aircraft ◦ How this applies.
Doris Hamill UAV Business Development Lead NASA Langley Research Center and Hampton Roads First Responders.
History VIA Group Company is established in March 2012, Ankara-Turkey Mainly focus on defense industry sector Group Companies Providenzia Investment A.Ş.
Elliott Ashworth ARGUS I.S. SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM: THE FUTURE OF MILITARY RECONNAISSANCE.
1 Andreas Keil, 10 Nov 05 NEON Trial Sorties Mircromix/CEASAR Goal: Fly infra-red camera (IIR) for NEON validation Measure the Infra-red signature/contrast.
EU military crisis management capabilities
UNCLASSIFIED BMDO-0101 First Alert & Cueing Space Sensor Demonstration Dr. Robert Erlandson The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory Johns.
Logan Simon & Jackson Smith S&S Aeronautics. Problem Statement Drones are extremely useful in many applications including Aerial photography, Search and.
IMAGERY.
ASA(ALT)/AAE Perspective The Honorable Claude M. Bolton, Jr. Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology) and Army Acquisition.
7 조 강창호 강애량 김창규 오혜영 최재영 이홍일 MQ-9B. 1. Goal of Project 2. Project members 3. Schedule 4. Analysis of UAS 4.1 Requirement analysis 4.2 Air vehicle.
UAS for Remote Sensing Myths and Realities 33rd International Symposium of Remote Sensing of the Environment Steve Wegener Bay Area Environmental Research.
Light-Portable Synthetic Aperture RADAR
AXIS Panorama PTZ Network Camera Pan, Tilt and Zoom in a live panorama over your network.
International Symposium on Remote Sensing of the Environment The NASA IKHANA UAS Platform Introduction to UAV Content provided by: V. Ambrosia, G. Buoni,
Brookhaven College Our 1st Flight Operation July 2016
Outdoor IR Bullet Camera Introduction Ver.2.0
Friends and Partners of Aviation Weather
Full Motion Video in ArcGIS
United States Air Force Unit 3 Notes
02/24/2004.
Unmanned Surveillance To combat Rhino Poaching
Uncontrolled copy not subject to amendment
R09560 – Open Architecture, Open Source Aerial Imaging Systems
UAV Vision Landing Motivation Data Gathered Research Plan Background
Military Aircraft Systems
Gorgon Stare Unclear Requirements and Lack of Traceability
Air Defence Anti Tank System
How(UAVs) are used in Disaster Management
11/15/2018 Qube Jacob Travis.
SCHULICH UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES
Lockheed Martin Challenge
E D U C A T E A D V O C A T E S U P P O R T.
Team 3 Ashwin Shankar Upsham Dawra Samit Sura Joe Katz
CAP Photography Overview FL-051 (JUL 2016)
Artificial Intelligence in Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV)
sUAS-EOTACS Payloads Capability Collaboration Event
Published By: Accurize Market Research Copyright © 2019 Accurize Market Research
Presentation transcript:

Gorgon Stare Unclear Requirements and Lack of Traceability Dylan Brandt June 22, 2013 SYSM 6309 9/23/2018

Outline Program History Program Objectives Gorgon Stare Sensor Operational Capabilities System Level Testing Lack of Traceability 9/23/2018

Program History Air Force quick reaction capability program to address urgent operational need for wide area airborne surveillance. Funding allocated FY09-FY13 for delivery in two increments with expanding capabilities. Managed through the 645th Aeronautical Systems Group (BIG SAFARI program office). Built by Sierra Nevada Corporation. Cost of $17.5 million per set of pods. Pentagon spent $400 million from 2009-2010. Advertised as a revolutionary airborne surveillance system. 9/23/2018

Developed with no clear requirements. Program Objectives Image a larger area than Constant Hawk or Angel Fire (legacy WAAS systems). Enable night operations. Provide real-time support to ground forces. Provide a forensic capability. Support many simultaneous targeting and surveillance missions. Cue and hand off targets to full-motion video platforms for prosecution. Developed with no clear requirements. 9/23/2018

Gorgon Stare Sensor - WAAS Wide-Area Airborne Surveillance sensor mounted under MQ-9 Reaper UAV. Consists of 2 pods: one for cameras, the other for communication. Contains array of 5 electro-optical and 4 infrared cameras. Provides continuous aerial surveillance of “city-sized” 4 km2 area. Can follow as many as 64 separate targets. Video can be chipped out and simultaneously broadcasted from 12 different angles to ground station or ground troops. Quilt images into mosaic for single wide-are view. 9/23/2018

Operational Capabilities 9/23/2018

Operational Capabilities 9/23/2018

DO NOT FIELD RECOMMENDATION System Level Testing Conducted by the 53rd Air Wing Air Combat Command Dec 2010 - 20 sorties totaling 234 hours of flight time. DO NOT FIELD RECOMMENDATION Not Operationally Effective and Not Operationally Suitable Faulty coordinate grid, rendering location information inaccurate and inconsistent. Inferior image stitching resulting in large black triangle. Inferior image quality compared to older systems. Problematic night vision system. Inability to track people on the ground. 55 to 65 percent reliable. 9/23/2018

No requirements, No traceability Lack of Traceability Big Safari disputed the test results. Claimed that the tests were unfair as they probed performance areas that were beyond the specifications for the system. No requirements, No traceability 9/23/2018

References http://www.globalsecurity.org/intell/systems/gorgon-stare.htm http://ukarmedforcescommentary.blogspot.com/2012/07/towards-scavenger.html http://www.defence.pk/forums/pakistan-defence-industry/92072-new-us-drone-spy-cameras-gorgon-stare-fail-air-force-test.html http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htecm/articles/20130524.aspx http://www.darkgovernment.com/news/reaper-sensors-called-gorgon-stare/ http://images.dodbuzz.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/53D-Tests-and-Recommendation.pdf 9/23/2018