Team Decision Making Karl A. Smith Nanyang Business School

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Introduction to Teamwork
Advertisements

1.05 Characteristics of Effective Teams
1.05 Characteristics of Effective Teams
Agenda Introduction/Syllabus Review Introduction/Syllabus Review Exercise Review Exercise Review Discussion/Comparison of Lists Discussion/Comparison of.
Why is School Health Education Important? 1 in 7 students have been in a fight on school property..(relates to Mental Health) There are 1,000,000 teen.
Population Perspective of Relations Individual Family Community, nation Human population All populations.
High-Performance Teamwork Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of Minnesota Preparing and Supporting.
HANCOCK CENTRAL SCHOOL INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP TEAM SEPTEMBER 14, 2012.
Ten Leading Causes of Death. Name the 10 leading causes of death and rank them in order from greatest to least. Name the 10 leading causes of death and.
National Institutes of Health
© 2010 McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights Reserved. Chapter One.
Building and Managing Successful Teams – Team Decision Making
Managing Conflict in Multidisciplinary Teams Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Technological Leadership Institute/ STEM Education.
New topic. Global Patterns of Disease The aim of this lesson: To describe and explain the global distribution of diseases of poverty. To describe and.
High-Performance Teamwork Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of Minnesota -
Authored by Andrea White, PhD for the C3 Initiative.
Ms. Eberhard HGD – Spring What is teamwork? A joint action by a group of people, in which each person subordinates his or her individual interests.
1 Chapter One © 2012 McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights Reserved.
RankCause of DeathNumberDeath Rate % of Deaths All causes2,543, % 1Diseases of the heart 599, Malignant neoplasms 582,
Carbon monoxide and nitrogen dioxide in the atmosphere: A look at the effects on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Carbon monoxide and nitrogen dioxide.
CHAPTER 1 WELLNESS AND YOUR CHOICES MR. HRUNKA 9 th Grade Health.
Team Decision Making Karl A. Smith University of Minnesota January 2005 Engineers Leadership Institute Minnesota Society.
Team Decision Making Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of Minnesota -
Cooperative Learning and Problem- Based Learning: Working with Teams Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University.
Lifestyle Choices for Wellness Nutrition and Wellness Unit
The Good…. The Bad…. & The Ugly.. What is disease?  How many diseases are there?  Diseases vs Conditions…  Types of diseases.
The Good…. The Bad…. & The Ugly.. What is disease?  How many diseases are there?  Diseases vs Conditions…  Types of diseases.
Structuring Cooperative Learning: Examples from Small group learning in higher education (SGLHE) Karl A. Smith University of Minnesota Cooperative.
Team Decision Making Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Technological Leadership Institute/ STEM Education Center/ Civil Engineering.
The Good…. The Bad…. & The Ugly.. Disease concepts  How many diseases are there?  Health, Function, Disability, Impairment, oh my!  Is it a disease.
Team Decision Making Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of Minnesota Preparing and Supporting Students.
Introduction to Wellness, Fitness, and Lifestyle Management…
UNIT I. What are the causes and nature of adult death locally, nationally and globally and how can these factors be reduced? What are the factors that.
Massachusetts Deaths 2004 Massachusetts Department of Public Health Center for Health Information, Statistics, Research, and Evaluation Division of Research.
The Global Burden of Injuries Thomas Songer, PhD University of Pittsburgh.
Team Decision Making Karl A. Smith Purdue University/ University of Minnesota Engineers Leadership Institute Minnesota Society for Professional.
Environmental Health and Toxicology Introductory Lecture.
Business Operations Ch. 7 Manager As Leader. Goals Discuss the common characteristics of effective leaders. Explain the five human relations skills needed.
HEALTH AND WELLNESS.
National Association of Hispanic Nurses
High Performance Teamwork
Health Education Data Presentation Unit 1
Community Health Needs Assessment
Health Concerns in the United States
1.05 Characteristics of Effective Teams
Three Ways to Structure Cooperative Learning: Formal-Informal-Base
1.05 Characteristics of Effective Teams
Taking Charge of Your Health
Leadership in Teams and Decision Groups
An Introduction to Teamwork
Team Building and Leadership Standards 8.21 and 8.22
Population and Demography
Topic: Health in the Past vs Present
High Performance Teamwork
High Performance Teamwork
Team Decision Making Karl A. Smith Nanyang Business School
Team Decision Making Engineers Leadership Institute
1.05 Characteristics of Effective Teams
1.05 Characteristics of Effective Teams
Objective 7.02 Understand team building.
WHO Statistics, 2000 Dr. Rüdiger Krech
Chapter 1: Understanding Health and Wellness
Introduction to Wellness, Fitness, and Lifestyle Management
Objective 7.02 Understand team building.
Teamwork.
Why people get diseases?
Three Ways to Structure Cooperative Learning: Formal-Informal-Base
Structuring Cooperative Learning:
1.05 Characteristics of Effective Teams
Objective 7.02 Understand team building.
Presentation transcript:

Team Decision Making Karl A. Smith Nanyang Business School Engineering Education – Purdue University Technological Leadership Institute/ STEM Education Center/ Civil Engineering - University of Minnesota ksmith@umn.edu - http://www.ce.umn.edu/~smith Nanyang Business School Nanyang Technological University Teaching Strategies for Cooperative Learning Workshop February – March 2012

Teamwork Skills Communication Listening and Persuading Decision Making Conflict Management Leadership Trust and Loyalty

Decision-Making Approaches Objective Deterministic Stochastic Multiple Ranking AHP SMART MAUT Single B/C LP Optimization Decision Tree (EV) Simulation

Team Decision Making – Ranking Tasks Typically “survival” tasks First was Moon Survival, “Lost on the moon” developed by Jay Hall for NASA in 1967 Many survival tasks available – desert survival, lost at sea, winter survival, … Individual followed by team ranking Different decision-making conditions in each team

Team Member Roles Observer/ Process Recorder (non participant role) Facilitator/Time Keeper Task Recorder Skeptic/Prober 5

6 Action Name 1 Name 2 Name 3 Name 4 Total Contributes Ideas Describes Feelings Encourages Participation Summarizes, Integrates Checks for Understanding Relates New To Old Learning Gives Direction To Work 6

Team Decision Making… World Mortality Causes Below in alphabetical order, are listed the top causes of death in the world in 2003. The data were taken from the World Health Organization (WHO) Report. Your task is to rank them in order. Place the number 1 next to the item that is the most frequent cause of death, the number 2 next to the item that is the second most frequent, and so on. Then, in the last column, write in your estimate of the number of death per year. To Group Members: TASKS 1. Individually determine the ranking. 2. Determine one ranking for the group. 3. Every group member must be able to explain the rationale for the group's ranking. 4. When your group finishes (each member has signed), (a) record your estimated number of fatalities in the World for each, and then (b) compare your ranking with that of another group.

World Mortality Causes Product or Activity Ranking Number of Fatalities Cancer Childhood Diseases Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Cirrhosis of the liver Diarrheal diseases Heart Disease HIV/AIDS Hypertensive heart disease Lower respiratory infections Malaria Measles Nephritis/nephrosis Other unintentional injuries Road traffic accidents Self-inflicted Stroke Tuberculosis

World Mortality Causes - 2003 1 Heart Disease 8,119,000 2 Stroke 5,509,000 3 Lower respiratory infections 3,884,000 4 Cancer 3,333,000 5 HIV/AIDS 2,777,000 6 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 2,748,000 7 Diarrheal diseases 1,798,000 8 Tuberculosis 1,566,000 9 Malaria 1,272,000 10 Road traffic accidents 1,192,000 11 Childhood Diseases 1,124,000 12 Other unintentional injuries - Accidents 923,000 13 Hypertensive heart disease 911,000 14 Self-inflicted 873,000 15 Cirrhosis of the liver 786,000 16 Nephritis/nephrosis 677,000 17 Measles 611,000

http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0779147.html

http://ucatlas.ucsc.edu/cause.php

US Mortality Causes - 2003 1 Heart disease 684462 2 Cancer 554643 3 Stroke 157803 4 Lung disease 126128 5 Accidents 105695 6 Diabetes 73965 7 Influenza and pneumonia 64847 8 Alzheimer's disease 63343 9 Kidney disease (Nephritis/nephrosis) 42536 10 Blood poisoning 34243 11 Suicide 30642 12 Liver disease 27201 13 Hypertension 21841 14 Parkinson’ disease 17898 15 Pneumonitis 17457

Postdecision Questionaire How understood and listened to did you feel in your group? Not at all 1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7 – 8 – 9 Completely 2. How much influence do you feel you had in your group’s decision making? None 1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7 – 8 – 9 A great deal How committed do you feel to the decision your group made? 4. How much responsibility do you feel for making the decision work? 5. How satisfied do you feel with the amount and quality of your participation in your group’s decision making Dissatisfied 1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7 – 8 – 9 Satisfied 6. Write one adjective that describes the atmosphere in your group during the decision making

Team Decision-Making Process How Individual Mathematical Consensus Iterative – H, M, L Both ends toward the middle Assumptions/Biases Family/Friends News Youth Geographic location

Methods of Decision Making (Johnson & Johnson, 1991) Decision by authority without discussion Expert member Average of member’s opinions Decision by authority after discussion Majority control Minority control Consensus See Table Summarizing Characteristics – Smith (2007), p. 46

Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, F.P. 1991. Joining together: Group theory and group skills. Prentice-Hall

Choice of Decision-Making Method Depends On: 1. The type of decision to be made. 2. The amount of time and resources available. The history of the group. The nature of the task being worked on The kind of climate the groups wishes to establish The type of setting in which the group is working Johnson & Johnson, 1991

Characteristics of Effective Decisions: The resources of the group members are well used. Time is well used. The decision is correct, or of high quality. The decision is put into effect fully by all the necessary members' commitment. The problem-solving ability of the group is enhanced. Johnson & Johnson, 1991