District of Innovation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Roles and Responsibilities. Collaborative Efforts to Improve Student Achievement Guidelines for developing integrated planning and decision making processes.
Advertisements

Contracts (Charter School/Sponsor and Charter School/EMO) Dana C. Reed, Director of Compliance, South Carolina Public Charter School District.
1 704 KAR 19:002 Revised October KRS (1)(a) - ”Alternative Education” a program that exists to meet the needs of students that cannot be.
Campus Improvement Plans
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) Program SSVF Grantee Uniform Monitoring.
An Overview of the Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP) January 25, 2014 FREMONT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Educate Challenge Inspire.
EDUCATOR CERTIFICATION UPDATE Michigan Association of School Personnel Administrators Conference December 3, 2010 Flora L. Jenkins, Director Office of.
Scenario – Practical Applications of School Law JESSAMY GUERRERO.
Charter, Contract, Laws, Policies, Regulations, and Statutes.
Los Angeles County Office of Education Division for School Improvement School Site Council (SSC) Training September 9 th 2008 Anna Carrasco From presentation.
Karen Seay PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 101 – Writing a compliant policy and compact We’re all in this together:  State Department of Education 
Title I Schoolwide Ray Draghi and Rasha Hetata October 2014.
AWMLP BOARD MEETING JANUARY 26, 2014 MIKE HUBERT.
What is the cost associated with testing in South Carolina? By Emily Madison 4/13/2011.
EARLY LEARNING COUNCIL AND SICC COLLABORATION: Addendum to September 30, 2012 Report on EI/ECSE Unique Complexities and Recommendations to Improve Service.
Oregon Public Charter Schools Oregon Department of Education August 2007.
Monitoring and Evaluating SES Provider Programs
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Academic Senate for California Community Colleges ­– Leadership Institute 2008 Basics for Effective Senates Shaaron Vogel Wheeler North Academic Senate.
The Facts About Schoolsite Councils The Roles and Responsibilities of a Schoolsite Council.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Quality Education Investment Act of 2006 (QEIA) February.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Charter Schools in Florida Friday, February 13, 2015 Mid-Year Transportation.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT TESTS District Level: Maintenance of Effort School Level: Comparability of Services Child Level: Educational.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
RICHMOND COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM COMMUNITY MEETING GLENN HILLS MIDDLE SCHOOL JANUARY 7, 2015 School System Flexibility Options.
A Principal’s Guide to Title I, Part A and LAP Requirements
Rules Waived - Part I Pupil Accounting Practices – Part II
Review, Revise and Amend from Procedures for State Board Policy 74
North Carolina Council on Developmental Disabilities
Utah Charter School Code & Rules
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015: Highlights and
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: June 2012.
School Community Council Roles and Responsibilities
District of innovation
Self-Study Instrument for Early Childhood Centers EDITION
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Accountability Overview Measures and Results
Rockingham County Public Schools Teacher Evaluation Process
The Federal programs department September 26, 2017
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Alternative Education Programs
Add your school name and the date and time of the meeting
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
SMSD….A District of Innovation
Navigating the Charter Renewal Process: Start to Finish
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Cobb County School District Charter Petition Training
SCHOOL TRAINING District Contact Information Dr. Peter Straker: ext Rachelle Fougere:
Navigating the Charter Renewal Process: Start to Finish
Parent Involvement and No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Studio School Title I Annual Meeting Title I Program Overview for Schoolwide Program (SWP) Schools Federal and State Education Programs Branch.
2019 Local School District Charter Application Process
Roles and Responsibilities
North Carolina Council on Developmental Disabilities
What is does it mean to be a Title I School?
Roles and Responsibilities
ESEA Flexibility: An overview
Title I Annual Meeting Pinewood Elementary, August 30, 2018.
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Developing and Revising Schoolwide Plans
2019 Spring & Fall Timeline May 10, 2019
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

District of Innovation Application and Information Webinar October 13, 2017 Jean Massey Executive Director Office of Secondary Education

What is a District of Innovation? A district that has developed a Plan of Innovation in compliance with Section 1 of SB2191 has been approved by the State Board of Education

SB 2191 Objectives Reducing achievement gaps among groups of students by expanding learning experiences for students identified as academically low-achieving Increasing pupil learning through the implementation of high, rigorous standards for student performance Increasing participation of all students or subgroups in various curriculum and instructional components to enhance student achievement Increasing the number of students who are college and career ready and reduce the number of students that exit high school in need of remediation Motivating students by expanding curriculum choices and learning opportunities for students

Do I need to apply for DoI status? There are many programs that are innovative that do not require significant waivers and can be approved by the MDE in other ways. An MDE representative will work with you to determine if an application is necessary.

District of Innovation Application Details Districts should apply when they require a significant number of waivers from accreditation policies or state laws that hinder the desired innovation Collaboration between the district and MDE will determine if an application for an Innovative School under SB2191 is required or not A committee from MDE will collaborate with districts and review plans to approve Innovative Status to eligible districts Recommendation for approval will be based on the application fit with SB2191 and the appropriateness of performance measures within the plan The MDE will award Innovative Status to no more than five districts or five joint district applications each year

District of Innovation Approval Terms Plans are approved for five years All districts approved will be monitored by MDE for progress and continued support during the five-year term. The district may request adjustments to their innovation plan during the five-year term if the following scenarios occur: 1. A waiver becomes required due to the nature of the innovative model identified in the innovation plan 2. A waiver becomes required due to new federal or state policies that address the operation of an innovative school

Innovation Application Components Innovative Program Design Accountability/Effectiveness and Performance Targets Students Funding Staffing Stakeholders/Collaboration Governance Waivers and Exemptions Timeline of Activities • Assurances

#1 Innovative Program Design Describe the proposed program and how it differs from a traditional model. Explain what makes the proposed program innovative. Describe the specific innovative model being followed. Explain how the innovation fits within the existing district vision and mission. Describe how the proposed innovation at multiple schools within the district support the larger vision or goal. Describe the vision and broad goals for the school. Explain how it ensures students are college and career ready. Describe what facilities will be used for the innovative model. Identify any extracurricular, exploratory, or experiential activities that are planned and explain how they support the goal of college/career readiness.

#2 Accountability and Performance Identify the annual student performance targets. Identify other measures of school performance. Identify student and school performance targets for year one and revised targets for each of the following years. Describe how the schools will monitor and report interim achievement and progress during the school year to the district and to MDE.

#3 Students Include the description of the target student population. Describe how the innovation will impact student achievement. Explain how the program will address student achievement gaps. Identify the number of students served. Identify the grade level(s) served. If the innovation involves a cohort of students, describe the selection and admission process for students. Describe the student dismissal process from the innovative program.

#4 Funding Explain the funds sources to be used for the innovative program. Address costs and plans for projected costs of the following: Personnel Transportation Meals Instructional Materials Technology Facilities Professional Development Other costs Include a detailed 3-year budget projection. Address sustainability for years four and five.

#5 Staffing Include an organization plan that describes the plan for shared leadership with teachers in the school(s). Describe the qualifications required for individuals employed in the program. Include evidence of staff and stakeholder support for the proposed innovation. Describe the professional development planned for staff that directly relates to the proposed innovation that includes job-embedded support. Include a 3-year staffing plan.

#6 Stakeholders and Collaboration Include evidence of stakeholder support and capacity to create the change desired in the school. Explain the plan for ongoing collaboration and the roles that the following groups of people will play in the school(s): • Parents • Education partners • Business/Industry partners • Community partners Include documentation of the following items necessary for the implementation of the innovative school(s) or district: Partner agreements Memoranda of understanding Other legal agreements

#7 Governance Describe the proposed governance structure planned for the school. Include a description of the advisory board to support the proposed innovation. Describe the district’s role in the following: School oversight Support Professional development Reporting and monitoring

#8 Waivers and Exemptions Include requests for waivers of any state or local policies, requirements, or restrictions. Include the rationale for the waiver connected to the proposed innovation. Districts of Innovation may request exemptions from regulatory areas. Districts may request additional waivers if the waiver is needed to support innovative practices and does not violate any federal regulations. Districts are not allowed to request a waiver from state assessment requirements. Districts must meet the requirements of the current Mississippi Accountability Standards unless specifically described in the innovation plan and approved by the SBE.

Examples of Waivers and Exemptions Use of capital outlay for operation costs Use certain exemptions in the hiring process and licensing Develop alternate salary schedules for extra or extended duty Create flexible school schedules and school year calendars Promote programs between districts and educational entities Create nontraditional learning environments Use of blended instructional practices such as online learning to meet graduation requirements Employ creative funding strategies

#9 Timeline of Activities Explain the planning activities that have taken place up to the point of application submission. Explain the key planning activities that still remain from the time of the plan submission to the opening of the school. Explain the continual monitoring practices that will occur throughout the implementation process.

#10 Assurances The application must include statements of assurances that the district is in compliance with the regulatory items identified in the Waivers and Exemption section of the Administrative Rules and Procedures Implementation. The following regulatory areas shall be met: Ensure the same health, safety, civil rights, and disability rights requirements as are applied to all public schools. Ensure students meet compulsory attendance requirements under Sections 37-13-91 and 37-13-92. Ensure that high school course offerings meet or exceed the minimum required under sections 37-16-7 and 37-3-49, for high school graduation or meet early graduation requirements that may be enacted by the Mississippi Legislature. Ensure the student performance standards meet or exceed those adopted by the State Board of Education as required by Sections 37-3-49, 37-16-3, and 37-17-6, including compliance with the statewide assessment system specified in Chapter 16, title 37, Mississippi Code of 1972.

#10 Regulatory Assurances – continued Adhere to the same financial audits, audit procedures, and audit requirements as are applied under Section 7-7-211(e). Require state and criminal background checks for staff and volunteers as required of all public school employees and volunteers within the public schools and specified in Section 39-9-17. Comply with open records and open meeting requirements under Sections 25-41-1 et seq. and 25-61-1 et seq. Comply with purchasing requirements and limitations under Chapter 39, title 37, Mississippi Code of 1972. Provide overall instructional time that is equivalent or greater than that required under Sections 37-1-11 and 37-13-67, but which may include on-site instruction, distance learning, online courses, and work- based learning on nontraditional school days or hours. Provide data to the department as deemed necessary to generate school and district reports.

Sample Process Timeline District MDE Year prior to school implementation Notify the Office of Secondary Education of interest or intent to apply for Innovative District status. Collaborate with local stakeholders Assign a contact for district consultation during plan development October to December Work with MDE contact and stakeholders to develop plan for the innovative school. Provide support to district December 15 Submit application with evidence of school board support for application. If chosen as DoI, the school will be approved for a 5-year period. Verify applications; review applications; score applications January Prepare district leadership. Key stakeholders from districts will participate in MDE interview, if chosen as a finalist. Review of applications; selection for interview, and finalists chosen for recommendation. February Present recommendations to the State Board of Education

Approval Process Applications are reviewed and scored by an MDE committee according to the SB2191 District of Innovation Application Review process. The committee will select districts to participate in an interview. The committee will present recommendations for Districts of Innovation approval to the State Board of Education.

Amendment to the Plan Requests for amendment(s) the District of Innovation plan may be submitted as needed. After review by the MDE committee, a recommendation may be submitted the State Board of Education for approval. The MDE will respond to the amendment requests within 60 days.

Revocation of the Plan If a situation arises where an innovative model is simply not sustainable, not successful, or not meeting the purpose of SB2191, the following procedure will apply: 1. The school and district will be notified by the MDE of deficiencies and concerns related to the success and sustainability of the school. The MDE may require certain actions to take place in this notification. 2. The district will have 30 days to respond with a plan to alleviate the issues. 3. Key district leaders will appear before a MDE committee to explain how they will address the concerns.

Revocation of the Plan The MDE committee may take either of the following actions: Recommend to the SBE that the innovative plan be revoked and the school be returned to “regular” status with a minimum amount of academic disruption. Allow the district to continue in Innovative Status by taking all actions required by the committee. MDE shall monitor the actions as necessary.

Revocation of the Plan If the district disagrees with MDE’s deficiencies and concerns related to the success and sustainability of the school, the district may submit a rebuttal within 30 days for review by the MDE committee. Should a district who has been awarded Innovative Status decide to terminate approved innovations, the district shall submit a plan to the MDE outlining the reason for the decision. Districts may submit termination plans at any time during the school year but will go into effect the following school year.

Renewal of the Plan Requests for renewals must be submitted no later than November 30th in the 5th year of the term. If approved, renewals will be for no more than five years.

Questions?

Jean Massey Executive Director Office of Secondary Education